Symptom Burden

症状负担
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨临床、人口统计学,术后早期肺癌患者的心理社会因素和癌症相关担忧。
    方法:本研究采用描述性横断面设计。问卷调查,包括对癌症相关担忧的评估,症状负担,疾病感知,心理韧性,应对方式,社会支持和参与者特征,分发给手术后早期肺癌患者的302例。数据收集期从2023年1月到10月。分析程序包括描述性统计,独立Wilcoxon秩和检验,Kruskal-Wallis-H-测试,Spearman相关分析,和分层多元回归。
    结果:手术后,89.07%有癌症相关的担忧,具有中位数(四分位数间距,IQR)CRW得分为380.00(130.00,720.00)。最常提到的问题是癌症本身(80.46%),而性问题最不令人担忧(44.37%)。控制人口统计学变量的回归分析显示,较高水平的癌症相关担忧(CRW)与症状负担增加有关。疾病感知,和接受-拒绝应对模式,而他们的心理弹性水平较低,社会支持和对抗应对方式,并且更愿意从互联网或应用程序中获取有关该疾病的信息。在这些因素中,在回归中观察到最大的解释力是症状负担,疾病感知,社会支持,和疾病信息来源(来自互联网或应用程序),这共同解释了52.00%的方差。
    结论:医疗保健提供者应该意识到,对于预后良好的早期肺癌幸存者来说,担忧是一个常见问题。术后恢复期间,医师应通过心理支持和疾病教育来确定患者的担忧并解决未满足的需求,以改善患者的情绪状态和生活质量。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the links between the clinical, demographic, and psychosocial factors and cancer-related worry in patients with early-stage lung cancer after surgery.
    METHODS: The study utilized a descriptive cross-sectional design. Questionnaires, including assessments of cancer-related worry, symptom burden, illness perception, psychological resilience, coping modes, social support and participant characteristics, were distributed to 302 individuals in early-stage lung cancer patients after surgery. The data collection period spanned from January and October 2023. Analytical procedures encompassed descriptive statistics, independent Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, Kruskal-Wallis- H- test, Spearman correlation analysis, and hierarchical multiple regression.
    RESULTS: After surgery, 89.07% had cancer-related worries, with a median (interquartile range, IQR) CRW score of 380.00 (130.00, 720.00). The most frequently cited concern was the cancer itself (80.46%), while sexual issues were the least worrisome (44.37%). Regression analyses controlling for demographic variables showed that higher levels of cancer-related worry (CRW) were associated with increased symptom burden, illness perceptions, and acceptance-rejection coping modes, whereas they had lower levels of psychological resilience, social support and confrontation coping modes, and were more willing to obtain information about the disease from the Internet or applications. Among these factors, the greatest explanatory power in the regression was observed for symptom burden, illness perceptions, social support, and sources of illness information (from the Internet or applications), which collectively explained 52.00% of the variance.
    CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers should be aware that worry is a common issue for early stage lung cancer survivors with a favorable prognosis. During post-operative recovery, physicians should identify patient concerns and address unmet needs to improve patients\' emotional state and quality of life through psychological support and disease education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究比较了疾病负担,经验,克罗恩肛周瘘(CPFs)患者与克罗恩病(CD)无肛周瘘(PFs;non-PFCD)患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。
    这个横截面,观察性研究是在3个年龄在18-89岁的美国患者队列中进行的,自我报告,医生诊断的CD:(1)非PFCD;(2)无PF相关手术的CPF;(3)有PF相关手术的CPF。医疗和外科干预数据,CD特异性症状,HRQoL(使用短期炎症性肠病和5维EuroQol问卷进行评估),和大便失禁(使用修订的大便失禁量表和大便失禁生活质量问卷进行评估)通过启用网络的问卷收集。
    总共,403名CD患者填写了问卷(非PFCD,n=300;未经手术的CPF,n=51;手术后的CPF,n=52)。在队列中观察到较高的症状负担。更多的CPF患者接受了≥1个CD相关手术,并且经历了≥1个CD相关手术失败(79%和20%)与非PFCD(53%和9%;P<0.001)。CPF与非PFCD患者的总体HRQoL结果更差,对于没有PF相关手术的患者,短期炎症性肠病和5维EuroQol问卷评分明显更差(P<0.01)。在所有队列中,58%的患者报告有大便失禁,CPF与非PFCD患者的负面影响更大(修订后的粪便失禁量表评分更高;粪便失禁生活质量评分更低)。
    CPF患者经历了巨大的HRQoL负担,反映症状和医疗/外科干预的影响。这些结果可能有助于提供全面的护理策略,以改善患者的HRQoL。
    UNASSIGNED: This study compared disease burden, experiences, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between patients with Crohn\'s perianal fistulas (CPFs) and those with Crohn\'s disease (CD) without perianal fistulas (PFs; non-PF CD).
    UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in 3 cohorts of US patients aged 18-89 years with self-reported, physician-diagnosed CD: (1) non-PF CD; (2) CPF without PF-related surgery; and (3) CPF with PF-related surgery. Data on medical and surgical interventions, CD-specific symptoms, HRQoL (assessed using the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease and 5-dimension EuroQol questionnaires), and fecal incontinence (assessed using Revised Faecal Incontinence Scale and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaires) were collected via a web-enabled questionnaire.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 403 patients with CD completed the questionnaire (non-PF CD, n = 300; CPF without surgery, n = 51; CPF with surgery, n = 52). A high symptom burden was seen across cohorts. More patients with CPF underwent ≥1 CD-related surgery and experienced ≥1 failure of CD-related surgery (79% and 20%) vs non-PF CD (53% and 9%; P < .001). Overall HRQoL outcomes were worse for patients with CPF vs non-PF CD, with significantly worse Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease and 5-dimension EuroQol questionnaire scores for those without PF-related surgery (P < .01). Across all cohorts, 58% of patients reported experiencing fecal incontinence, which had a greater negative impact (higher Revised Faecal Incontinence Scale scores; lower Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scores) in patients with CPF vs non-PF CD.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with CPF experience substantial HRQoL burden, reflecting the impact of symptoms and medical/surgical interventions. These results may help to inform comprehensive care strategies to improve patient HRQoL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor(ETI)减轻了囊性纤维化(CF)的许多症状。
    我们试图确定ETI对CF成人症状和治疗决定的影响。
    参与者参加了一项横断面研究。调查是通过RedCap链接发送的。半结构化访谈是通过MicrosoftTeams进行远程管理的。访谈是录音和专业转录的。
    我们评估了囊性纤维化问卷修订(CFQ-R)分量表的身体,呼吸,情感,和治疗,并分析了涵盖CF治疗方案和日常生活的半结构化访谈。通过混合方法收敛编码矩阵分别分析了定量和定性结果。
    包括24名服用ETI的CF成年人。CFQ-R子量表得分(平均得分/标准偏差)为物理(82.1/22.8),呼吸(83.7/11.2),情感(65.3/14.2),和治疗(57.5/20.1)。关于非ETI治疗决策的三个主题出现了:(1)我的感受,(2)没有注意到差异,(3)修改治疗方案的长期影响的不确定性,我们发现参与者在他们的治疗决定中权衡了这些因素中的每一个。混合方法分析的主要发现表明,与情绪和治疗相比,在身体和呼吸方面的CFQ-R得分更高的个体中,有声明表明,虽然这些参与者的身体健康状况更好,许多人继续他们繁重的治疗方案。
    关于减少非ETI治疗的影响的长期数据很少,参与者权衡了他们的感受,治疗功效信念,以及在做出治疗决定时的风险承受能力。
    Trikafta对CF健康的影响,与健康相关的生活质量,和治疗依从性囊性纤维化患者服用Trikafta可能会带来许多健康益处,导致一些人减少或停止其他非Trikafta治疗。我们探讨了Trikafta对CF健康的影响,与健康相关的生活质量,以及目前服用Trikafta的CF患者的治疗依从性。我们比较了CF问卷修订后的关注身体症状的健康相关生活质量分量表,呼吸道症状,治疗负担,和情绪健康,以评估CF患者与情绪健康和治疗负担感相比,身体和呼吸健康是否有所改善。我们发现许多人的身体感觉更好,但仍然经历着不良的心理健康和高的治疗负担。然后,我们查看了开放式访谈的结果,看看我们的定性数据是否可以解释与健康相关的生活质量评分的差异。我们发现,虽然人们的身体感觉更好,许多人仍在继续使用Trikafta前期治疗方案,这可以解释为什么身体健康和呼吸健康评分高于情绪健康和治疗负担评分.此时,我们认为需要更多的研究来指导与削减或停止繁重的治疗方案相关的治疗决策.
    UNASSIGNED: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has reduced many symptoms of cystic fibrosis (CF).
    UNASSIGNED: We sought to identify the impact of ETI on both symptoms and treatment decisions among adults with CF.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Surveys were sent via a RedCap link. Semistructured interviews were administered remotely via Microsoft Teams. Interviews were audio recorded and professionally transcribed.
    UNASSIGNED: We assessed Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) subscales for physical, respiratory, emotion, and treatment, and analyzed semistructured interviews covering CF treatment regimens and daily living. Quantitative and qualitative results were analyzed separately and via a mixed-methods convergence coding matrix.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-four adults with CF taking ETI were included. CFQ-R subscale scores (mean scores/standard deviation) were physical (82.1/22.8), respiratory (83.7/11.2), emotion (65.3/14.2), and treatment (57.5/20.1). Three themes about decision-making for non-ETI-treatments emerged: (1) How I\'m feeling, (2) Not noticing a difference, and (3) Uncertainty about long-term impact of modifying treatment regimens, and we found participants weighed each of these factors in their treatment decisions. Key findings from mixed-methods analysis show that among individuals experiencing higher CFQ-R scores for physical and respiratory compared to emotion and treatment, there were statements indicating that while those participants were experiencing better physical health, many continued their burdensome treatment regimens.
    UNASSIGNED: With little long-term data on the impact of reducing non-ETI treatments, participants weighed how they were feeling, treatment efficacy beliefs, and risk tolerance when making treatment decisions.
    The impact of Trikafta on CF health, health-related quality of life, and treatment adherence People with cystic fibrosis may be experiencing many health benefits from taking Trikafta, leading some people to cut back on or stop their other non-Trikafta treatments. We explored the impact of Trikafta on CF health, health-related quality of life, and treatment adherence for people with CF currently taking Trikafta. We compared health-related quality of life subscales from the CF Questionnaire-Revised questionnaire focused on physical symptoms, respiratory symptoms, treatment burden, and emotional well-being to assess whether people with CF were experiencing improved physical and respiratory health compared to emotional health and feelings of treatment burden. We found that many people were feeling better physically, but were still experiencing poor mental health and high treatment burden. We then looked at results from open-ended interviews to see if our qualitative data could explain the differences in the health-related quality of life scores. We found that while people were feeling better physically, many people were still continuing with the pre-Trikafta treatment regimens which may explain why physical health and respiratory health scores were higher than emotional well-being and treatment burden scores. At this time, we believe that more research is needed to guide treatment decisions related to cutting back or stopping burdensome treatment regimens.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在描述A/B血友病人群的基线疾病和治疗负担,同时使用(HAwI/HBwI)和不使用(HA/HB)抑制剂。
    方法:前瞻性,非介入性研究6纳入重度HA≥12岁的患者,严重/中度HB或任何严重程度的HAwI/HBwI,根据当地标准治疗(不包括先前/当前暴露于康西珠单抗或emicizumab)。收集基线特征和历史临床数据,并报告患者结果,包括治疗负担,被评估。
    结果:本研究纳入了来自33个国家的231例血友病患者(84例HAwI/HBwI)。在基线,预防性治疗的HA/HB患者的中位年出血率最低(ABRs;2.0),无论血友病类型如何;在这些患者中,27.5%(HA)和31.4%(HB)具有目标关节。接受HAwI/HBwI治疗的患者报告的治疗负担最高。在这些病人中,28.5%(HAwI)和25.1%(HBwI)在筛查前一个月进行体育活动。
    结论:尽管接受了常规的临床护理,在explerr6中登记的患者的历史和基线信息显示,有HA/HB的患者和有HAwI/HBwI的患者有较高的ABR,与预防性治疗的HA/HB患者相比,治疗负担更高,参加运动的人数更少。新兴的治疗方法可能有利于解决这些未满足的医疗需求。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterise baseline disease and treatment burden in a large population with haemophilia A/B, both with (HAwI/HBwI) and without (HA/HB) inhibitors.
    METHODS: The prospective, non-interventional explorer6 study included patients ≥12 years old with severe HA, severe/moderate HB or HAwI/HBwI of any severity, treated according to local standard of care (excluding previous/current exposure to concizumab or emicizumab). Baseline characteristics and historical clinical data were collected and patient-reported outcomes, including treatment burden, were assessed.
    RESULTS: The explorer6 study enrolled 231 patients with haemophilia (84 HAwI/HBwI) from 33 countries. At baseline, patients with HA/HB treated with prophylaxis had the lowest median annualised bleeding rates (ABRs; 2.0), irrespective of haemophilia type; of these patients, 27.5% (HA) and 31.4% (HB) had target joints. Patients with HAwI/HBwI treated episodically reported the highest treatment burden. Of these patients, 28.5% (HAwI) and 25.1% (HBwI) performed sports activities in the month before screening.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite receiving routine clinical care, historical and baseline information from patients enrolled in explorer6 showed that patients with HA/HB treated episodically and patients with HAwI/HBwI had higher ABRs, higher treatment burden and participated in sports less than those with HA/HB treated with prophylaxis. Emerging treatments could be beneficial in addressing these unmet medical needs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对生命末期(EOL)患者的肠胃外液体(PF)治疗存在争议。这项研究的目的是评估PF之间的关联,死亡癌症患者的EOL护理过程质量和症状负担,使用基于人口的方法。
    方法:这是一项针对所有成人癌症死亡的全国性回顾性注册研究,记录了三年期间瑞典姑息治疗注册中心报告的生命最后24小时的PF信息(n=41,709)。在有记录的决定专注于EOL护理的患者中,评估了生命最后一周的患病率和症状缓解以及EOL护理过程质量指标与PF的关系(立即死亡,n=23,112)。计算了赔率比,调整死亡地点(医院与非医院)。
    结果:对30.9%的立即死亡患者在医院进行了PF治疗,而在医院外,这一比例为6.5%。PF与呼吸困难和恶心的可能性更高相关。在使用经过验证的仪器筛查EOL症状的患者中,PF与呼吸困难完全缓解的可能性成反比,呼吸道分泌物,焦虑,恶心和疼痛。几个姑息治疗质量指标与PF呈负相关,包括EOL对话和注射药物的处方。这些关联在医院中更为明显。
    结论:生命最后24小时的肠外液体治疗与EOL护理过程质量低劣以及即将死亡的癌症患者的症状负担增加有关。
    BACKGROUND: Parenteral fluid (PF) therapy of patients in end-of-life (EOL) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess associations between PF, quality of the EOL care process and symptom burden in dying cancer patients, using a population-based approach.
    METHODS: This was a nationwide retrospective register study of all adult cancer deaths with documented information on PF in the last 24 h of life as reported to the Swedish Register of Palliative Care during a three-year period (n = 41,709). Prevalence and relief of symptoms during the last week of life as well as EOL care process quality indicators were assessed in relation to PF in those patients who had a documented decision to focus on EOL care (immediately dying, n = 23,112). Odds ratios were calculated, adjusting for place of death (hospital vs. non-hospital).
    RESULTS: PF was administered to 30.9% of immediately dying patients in hospitals compared to 6.5% outside of hospitals. PF was associated with a higher likelihood for breathlessness and nausea. In patients screened for EOL symptoms with a validated instrument, PF was inversely associated with the likelihood of complete relief of breathlessness, respiratory secretions, anxiety, nausea and pain. Several palliative care quality indicators were inversely associated with PF, including EOL conversations and prescriptions of injectable drugs as needed. These associations were more pronounced in hospitals.
    CONCLUSIONS: Parenteral fluid therapy in the last 24 h of life was associated with inferior quality of the EOL care process and with increased symptom burden in imminently dying cancer patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重症监护病房(ICU)患者出现几种症状,然而,以前尚未研究症状模式及其与人口统计学和临床特征的关系。
    目的:根据7天内同时发生症状的患病率,确定和比较重症ICU患者的亚组(即潜在症状类别)。
    方法:对ICU中7天内的5种症状的成人ICU患者进行前瞻性队列研究。应用潜在类别分析来识别ICU患者的亚组。
    方法:多中心研究来自挪威六个混合ICU的患者。
    方法:患者症状调查用于评估五种症状(即,口渴,疼痛,焦虑,疲倦,呼吸急促)。
    结果:在353名患者中,中位年龄为63岁,60.3%为男性.亚组患者被确定为低等(n=126,35.7%),中产阶级(n=177,50.1%)和高级(n=50,14.2%)基于五种症状的患病率报告。低等患者的所有症状患病率较低。中产阶级患者口渴和疲倦的患病率高,疼痛的患病率低,焦虑和呼吸急促。高级患者所有症状的患病率都很高。随着时间的推移,中低阶层的症状患病率保持稳定,而高阶层的症状患病率随着时间的推移而增加。使用机械通气的症状类别之间存在显着差异(p=0.012),镇痛药(p<0.001),α-2激动剂(p=0.004)和液体限制(p=0.006)。高级患者接受了更多的ICU治疗。
    结论:研究结果表明,有不同症状经历的ICU患者亚组可以识别。高患病率类患者在7天的ICU中,所有症状的水平一直很高,并且接受了更多的ICU相关干预措施。
    一些ICU患者的共同发生症状的患病率一直很高。临床医生应该意识到可能与高症状负担有关的治疗因素。
    BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients experience several symptoms, yet patterns of symptoms and their relationship with demographic and clinical characteristics have not previously been investigated.
    OBJECTIVE: To identify and compare subgroups (i.e. latent symptom classes) of intensive ICU patients based on prevalence of co-occurring symptoms over seven days.
    METHODS: Prospective cohort study of adult ICU patients\' self-reports of five symptoms during seven days in ICU. Latent class analysis was applied to identify subgroups of ICU patients.
    METHODS: Multicenter study with patients from six mixed ICUs in Norway.
    METHODS: Patient Symptom Survey was used to assess five symptoms (i.e., thirst, pain, anxiousness, tiredness, shortness of breath).
    RESULTS: Among 353 included patients, median age was 63 years and 60.3 % were male. Subgroups of patients were identified in a Low class (n = 126, 35.7 %), Middle Class (n = 177, 50.1 %) and High Class (n = 50, 14.2 %) based on reporting of the prevalence of five symptoms. Patients in the Low class had a low prevalence of all symptoms. Middle Class patients had a high prevalence of thirst and tiredness and a low prevalence of pain, anxiousness and shortness of breath. The High class patients had a high prevalence of all symptoms. Symptom prevalence remained stable in the Low and Middle class over time and increased over time in the High class. There were significant differences among symptom classes in use of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.012), analgesics (p < 0.001), alpha-2 agonists (p = 0.004) and fluid restriction (p = 0.006). Patients in the High class received more of these ICU-treatments.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that subgroups of ICU patients with distinct symptom experiences can be identified. The High prevalence class patients had consistently high levels of all symptoms across seven ICU days and received more ICU-related interventions.
    UNASSIGNED: Some ICU patients experience a consistently high prevalence of co-occurring symptoms. Clinicians should be aware of treatment factors that could be linked to a high burden of symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析卵巢癌化疗患者报告结局(PROs)的波动及其与外周血细胞因子的关系。
    方法:在化疗前基线时,通过M.D.Anderson症状量表-卵巢癌(MDASI-OC)前瞻性测量PROs负担,每天在化疗期间和化疗后(PCD)7、14和20天。在基线时收集细胞因子,出院前几天和PCD20。Pearson相关性用于探索外周血中PROs与细胞因子水平之间的关联。
    结果:比较了新辅助化疗(NACT)组(n=20)和术后辅助化疗(PAC)组(n=7)的前8项症状。化疗前,NACT组的疲劳和食欲不振的平均评分高于PAC组.化疗后,疼痛,恶心,呕吐,睡眠不安,缺乏食欲,在PCD2-6期间,便秘增加到峰值;而,在PCD2-13期间,疲劳和麻木或刺痛保持在高水平。到PCD20,睡眠不安和疲劳显示平均得分显着增加,特别是在NACT组中;而,其他症状评分下降并恢复至基线水平.此外,疼痛的纵向波动,疲劳,缺乏食欲与白细胞介素-6和干扰素γ的循环水平呈正相关(p<0.05)。
    结论:MDASI-OC是可行的,并且适用于证明整个化疗过程中症状负担的波动。此外,随着细胞因子水平的变化,症状可能为探索潜在的生化病因机制提供线索。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the fluctuations of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and their relationships with cytokines in the peripheral blood of patients undergoing chemotherapy for ovarian cancer (OC).
    METHODS: PROs burden was prospectively measured by the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Ovarian Cancer (MDASI-OC) at baseline before chemotherapy, on a daily basis during and post-chemotherapy days (PCD) 7, 14, and 20. Cytokines were collected at baseline, days prior to hospital discharge and PCD 20. Pearson correlation was used to explore the associations between PROs and cytokines levels in peripheral blood.
    RESULTS: The top 8 rated symptoms were compared between the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) group (n=20) and the postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC) group (n=7). Before chemotherapy, the mean scores of fatigue and lack of appetite in the NACT group were higher than those in the PAC group. After chemotherapy, pain, nausea, vomiting, disturbed sleep, lack of appetite, and constipation increased to peak during PCD 2-6; while, fatigue and numbness or tingling remained at high levels over PCD 2-13. By PCD 20, disturbed sleep and fatigue showed a significant increase in mean scores, particularly in the NACT group; while, other symptom scores decreased and returned to baseline levels. Additionally, the longitudinal fluctuations in pain, fatigue, and lack of appetite were positively associated with circulating levels of interleukin-6 and interferon gamma (p<0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: MDASI-OC was feasible and adaptable for demonstrating the fluctuations of symptom burden throughout chemotherapy course. Moreover, symptoms changing along with cytokines levels could provide clues for exploring mechanism underlying biochemical etiology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:晚期结直肠癌(CRC)患者同时存在多种生理和心理症状。本研究旨在探讨焦虑之间的关系,抑郁症,和晚期CRC的症状负担。
    方法:在中国地理和经济上不同的10个癌症中心进行了一项多中心横断面研究。共有454例晚期CRC患者完成了医院焦虑和抑郁量表和MDAnderson症状量表。运用多元回归分析探讨焦虑与焦虑、抑郁症和症状负担。
    结果:约三分之一的患者表现出焦虑或抑郁症状。焦虑或抑郁患者的症状负担明显高于无焦虑或抑郁患者(p<0.001)。有焦虑或抑郁症的患者报告的中度至重度(MS)症状数的比例高于没有(p<0.001)的患者。约52%的焦虑或抑郁症患者报告至少有三种MS症状。MS症状的患病率从7.3%(呼吸急促)到22%(睡眠障碍),焦虑或抑郁患者比没有焦虑或抑郁的患者高2-10倍(p<0.001)。疾病阶段(β=-2.55,p=0.003),焦虑(β=15.33,p<0.001),抑郁(β=13.63,p<0.001)与较高的症状负担相关。
    结论:晚期癌症患者的焦虑和抑郁与较高的症状负担相关。研究结果可能会导致肿瘤学专业人员在晚期癌症患者的症状管理中更加关注未识别和未治疗的心理症状。
    OBJECTIVE: Patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) have multiple concurrent physical and psychological symptoms. This study aimed to explore the relationship between anxiety, depression, and symptom burden in advanced CRC.
    METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in 10 cancer centers from geographically and economically diverse sites in China. A total of 454 patients with advanced CRC completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. Multiple regression analysis was applied to explore the relationship between anxiety, depression and symptom burden.
    RESULTS: About one-third of the patients showed symptoms of anxiety or depression. Patients with anxiety or depression reported significantly higher symptom burden than those without (p < 0.001). Patients with anxiety or depression reported a higher proportion of moderate-to-severe (MS) symptom number than those without (p < 0.001). About 52% of the patients with anxiety or depression reported at least three MS symptoms. The prevalence of MS symptoms was ranging from 7.3% (shortness of breath) to 22% (disturbed sleep), and in patients with anxiety or depression was 2-10 times higher than in those without (p < 0.001). Disease stage (β = -2.55, p = 0.003), anxiety (β = 15.33, p < 0.001), and depression (β = 13.63, p < 0.001) were associated with higher symptom burden.
    CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and depression in patients with advanced cancer correlated with higher symptom burden. Findings may lead oncology professionals to pay more attention to unrecognized and untreated psychological symptoms in symptom management for advanced cancer patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:宫颈癌放化疗患者症状负担较高。我们对前瞻性收集的患者报告结果(PRO)进行了分析,以确定预测不良治疗经验的特征。
    方法:在2021-2023年之间,我们前瞻性地收集了接受确定性放化疗的宫颈癌患者的PRO。EORTC-QLQ-C30和EORTC-QLQ-CX24在基线(BL)和治疗结束时(EOT)完成。不良治疗经验定义为EOT不良健康相关生活质量(HRQOL),低身体机能,或显著的总体症状负担。分析的预测因素包括人口统计,临床,疾病特异性因素,和基线财务毒性,抑郁症,社会功能,和情感功能。ROC分析提供了适当的预测性截止值。进行单变量(UVA)和多变量(MVA)线性回归分析。
    结果:49名患者完成了BL和EOT问卷。中位年龄为43岁(范围,18-85).大多数患者(59%)患有III期疾病。根据ROC分析,在EORTC线性变换量表0-100上,基线经济毒性≥66.7,抑郁≥66.7,社会功能≤50和情绪功能≤58是不良治疗经验的显着预测因素(p≤0.04)。在MVA上,不良的BL社会功能与降低的EOTHRQOL相关(β-9.3,_95CI--16.1_至-2.6,_p<0.008),身体机能下降(β-24.4,_95CI_-36.3_至_-12.6,_p<0.001),和高症状负担_(β26.9,_95CI_17.5_至_36.3,_p<0.001)。早期疾病阶段预测症状负担降低_(β-6.7,_95CI_-13.1_至_-0.3,_p=0.039)。BL财务毒性是UVA的显着预测指标(p=0.001-0.044),并且对于所有三个治疗经验不足的领域,MVA均显示出显着的相互作用项(p=0.024-0.041)。人口统计学和治疗相关因素不能预测。
    结论:基线社会功能差或经济毒性高的宫颈癌患者存在症状负担增加和HRQOL差的风险。筛查这些因素为早期干预提供了机会,以改善治疗经验。
    OBJECTIVE: Patients with cervical cancer undergoing chemoradiation have high symptom burden. We performed an analysis of prospectively collected data on patient-reported outcomes to determine characteristics predictive of poor treatment experience.
    METHODS: Between 2021 and 2023, we prospectively collected data on patient-reported outcomes from patients with cervical cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Quality of Life Question-Core 30 and the EORTC-Quality of Life Question-Cervical Cancer module were completed at baseline (BL) and at the end of treatment (EOT). Poor treatment experience was defined as EOT poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL), low physical function, or significant overall symptom burden. Predictive factors analyzed included demographic, clinical, and disease-specific factors and BL financial toxicity, depression, social function, and emotional function. Receiver operating characteristic analysis provided appropriate predictive cutoff values. Univariable and multivariable (MVA) linear regression analyses were performed.
    RESULTS: Forty-nine patients completed BL and EOT questionnaires. Median age was 43 years (range, 18-85 years). Most patients (59%) had stage III disease. BL financial toxicity ≥66.7, depression ≥66.7, social function ≤50, and emotional function ≤58 on the EORTC linear transformed scale of 0 to 100 were significant predictors for poor treatment experience (p ≤ .04) based on receiver operating characteristic analysis. On MVA, poor BL social function was associated with reduced EOT HRQOL (β, -9.3; 95% CI, -16.1 to -2.6; p < .008), decreased physical function (β, -24.4; 95% CI, -36.3 to -12.6; p < .001), and high symptom burden (β, 26.9; 95% CI, 17.5-36.3; p < .001). Earlier disease stage predicted decreased symptom burden (β, -6.7; 95% CI, -13.1 to -0.3; p = .039). BL financial toxicity was a significant predictor in univariable analysis (p = .001-.044) and showed a significant interaction term on MVA (p = .024-.041) for all 3 domains of poor treatment experience. Demographic and treatment-related factors were not predictive.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cervical cancer with poor BL social function or high financial toxicity were at risk for increased symptom burden and poor HRQOL. Screening for these factors provides an opportunity for early intervention to improve treatment experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:胰腺癌和胃食管癌(PGE)患者的症状负担很高,但患者在多模式治疗过程中的体验仍不清楚.我们旨在描述患者在整个围手术期的经历和症状负担。
    方法:对17例PGE癌症手术患者进行了定性访谈。分析访谈记录,并按频率对症状进行排名。专家小组评估了这些症状清单项目的相关性。
    结果:在包括的17例患者中,35%(n=6)接受了胃切除术,30%(n=5)接受了食管切除术,35%(n=6)接受了胰腺切除术;76%(n=13)接受了新辅助全身化疗和/或放化疗.总的来说,报告了32个症状,超过20%的患者报告了19例。专家小组评估了9种症状与PGE手术患者相关或非常相关。这些症状(吞咽困难,胃灼热/反流,腹泻,便秘,冲洗/出汗,肚子感觉很饱,萎靡不振,头晕,或感觉寒冷)如果通常报告或达到阈值相关性得分,则将其添加到核心MDAnderson症状清单(MDASI)中。
    结论:在这项定性研究中,我们为接受PGE癌症手术的患者制定了临时症状清单。将对MDASI的PGE手术患者的症状清单模块进行心理测量的有效性和可靠性测试。
    OBJECTIVE: Patients with pancreatic and gastroesophageal (PGE) cancers experience high symptom burden, but patient experience throughout multimodality treatment remains unclear. We aimed to delineate the experience and symptom burden of patients throughout their perioperative course.
    METHODS: Qualitative interviews were performed with 17 surgical patients with PGE cancer. Interview transcripts were analyzed and symptoms were ranked by frequency. An expert panel assessed the relevance of these symptom inventory items.
    RESULTS: Of the 17 patients included, 35% (n = 6) underwent gastrectomy, 30% (n = 5) underwent esophagectomy, and 35% (n = 6) underwent pancreatectomy; 76% (n = 13) received neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation. Overall, 32 symptoms were reported, and 19 were reported by over 20% of patients. An expert panel rated nine symptoms to be relevant or very relevant to PGE surgical patients. These symptoms (difficulty swallowing, heartburn/reflux, diarrhea, constipation, flushing/sweating, stomach feeling full, malaise, dizziness, or feeling cold) were added to the core MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) if they were commonly reported or reached a threshold relevancy score.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this qualitative study, we developed a provisional symptom inventory for patients undergoing surgery for PGE cancer. This symptom inventory module of the MDASI for PGE surgical patients will be psychometrically tested for validity and reliability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号