Suture Anchors

缝合锚钉
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用有限元建模模拟了倾斜锚与各种密度的松质骨的机械相互作用。模型喜欢骨骼的复杂表示,作为一种具有大变形能力的弹塑性材料。植入阶段锚的倾斜动作,以及其在拔出试验期间的固定刚度,通过模型预测,并进行了参数研究,以研究锚的远端宽度和角圆角半径的影响,在这些措施上。针对绵羊肱骨标本的实验测试结果验证了模型预测。该模型可以合理地再现锚固件在植入阶段的倾斜动作。模型预测与实验结果的比较显示,在植入和拔出阶段都有相似的趋势,但位移幅度较小(终点:1.4vs.2.1mm和4.6mmvs.5.2mm,分别)。参数研究的结果表明,随着骨密度的增加,固定刚度显着增加。减小远端宽度和增加圆角半径改善了锚钉在低密度骨中的植入构型和固定刚度。对于高密度骨骼应用,然而,较大的远端宽度有利于提高固定刚度.
    The mechanical interaction of a tilting anchor and cancellous bones of various densities was simulated using finite element modeling. The model enjoyed a sophisticated representation of the bone, as an elasto-plastic material with large deformation capability. The anchor\'s tilting action during implantation phase, as well as its fixation stiffness during pull-out test, were predicted by the model and a parametric study was performed to investigate the effects of the anchor\'s distal width and corner fillet radius, on these measures. The model predictions were validated against the results of an experimental test on ovine humerus specimens. The model could reasonably reproduce the tilting action of the anchor during the implantation phase. Comparison of the model predictions with the experimental results revealed similar trends during both the implantation and the pull-out phases, but smaller displacement magnitudes (end points: 1.4 vs. 2.1 mm and 4.6 vs. 5.2 mm, respectively). The results of the parametric study indicated substantial increase in the fixation stiffness with increasing bone density. Reducing the distal width and increasing the fillet radius improved the anchor\'s implantation configuration and fixation stiffness in low-density bones. For high-density bone applications, however, a larger distal width was favored for improving the fixation stiffness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在肩部手术中经常进行二头肌肌腱长头的肌腱固定术,和全缝合锚钉作为固定方法变得越来越流行。然而,关于全缝线锚钉的最终失效载荷和皮质肱骨插入点的最佳插入角度仍然存在不确定性。
    目的:本研究的目的是比较经常用于肱二头肌肌腱固定术的三种类型的全缝合锚钉的生物力学特性。此外,在猪肱骨模型中观察到两种不同插入角度的影响。
    方法:三种类型的全缝线锚钉的极限失效载荷和失效模式(1.6FiberTak®,1.9FiberTak®,2.6FiberTak®,在12只新鲜冷冻的猪肱骨中以90°和45°的插入角度评估了适用于胸肌下二头肌肌腱固定术的Arthrex®)。锚固件以随机方式在沿着二头肌沟的三个不同插入部位均匀交替插入,并且将缝合线带围绕杆打结以进行拔出测试。总的来说,在通用试验机(Zwick&Roell)中评估了36个锚。
    结果:与1.9FiberTak®(677.8N±57.7N;426.3N±167.0N)相比,2.6FiberTak®在90°插入角(944.0N±169.7N;537.0N±308.8N)下显示出更高的极限失效载荷,p值:0.0080)和1.6FiberTak®(733.0N±67.6N;450.0N±155.8N,p值:0.0018)。所有类型的锚在90°插入角下比在45°插入角下显示出明显更高的极限破坏载荷和更小的标准偏差。主要失效模式是锚杆拔出。只有2.6FiberTak®锚在以90°插入角度放置时显示缝合线断裂作为主要失效模式。
    结论:所有三种全缝合锚钉都是适用于胸肱二头肌下肌腱固定术的固定方法。关于我们的数据,我们建议90°作为最佳插入角度。
    结论:外科医生应了解锚钉尺寸和全缝线锚钉插入角度的影响,以优化最终失效载荷并实现牢固固定。
    BACKGROUND: Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon is frequently performed in shoulder surgery, and all-suture anchors have become more popular as fixation methods. However, uncertainty still exists regarding the ultimate load to failure of all-suture anchors and the best insertion angle at a cortical humeral insertion point.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of three types of all-suture anchors frequently used for biceps tenodesis. In addition, the influence of two different insertion angles was observed in a porcine humeri model.
    METHODS: The ultimate load to failure and failure mode of three types of all-suture anchors (1.6 FiberTak®, 1.9 FiberTak®, 2.6 FiberTak®, Arthrex®) applicable for subpectoral biceps tenodesis were evaluated at 90° and 45° insertion angles in 12 fresh-frozen porcine humeri. The anchors were inserted equally alternated in a randomized manner at three different insertion sites along the bicipital groove, and the suture tapes were knotted around a rod for pullout testing. In total, 36 anchors were evaluated in a universal testing machine (Zwick & Roell).
    RESULTS: The 2.6 FiberTak® shows higher ultimate loads to failure with a 90° insertion angle (944.0 N ± 169.7 N; 537.0 N ± 308.8 N) compared to the 1.9 FiberTak® (677.8 N ± 57.7 N; 426.3 N ± 167.0 N, p-value: 0.0080) and 1.6 FiberTak® (733.0 N ± 67.6 N; 450.0 N ± 155.8 N, p-value: 0.0018). All anchor types show significantly higher ultimate loads to failure and smaller standard deviations at the 90° insertion angle than at the 45° insertion angle. The major failure mode was anchor pullout. Only the 2.6 FiberTak® anchors showed suture breakage as the major failure mode when placed with a 90° insertion angle.
    CONCLUSIONS: All three all-suture anchors are suitable fixation methods for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Regarding our data, we recommend 90° as the optimum insertion angle.
    CONCLUSIONS: The influence of anchor size and insertion angle of an all-suture anchor should be known by the surgeon for optimizing ultimate loads to failure and for achieving a secure fixation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:钝性外伤性腹壁疝(TAUHs)是罕见的,但需要多种手术技术来修复,包括骨锚固定(BAF)时组织撕裂骨结构。本研究旨在对BAF技术用于钝性TAWH修复提供描述性分析。骨锚固定与无BAF修复进行比较,假设BAF修补术增加了疝复发。
    方法:对WTA钝器TAWH多中心研究进行二次分析,包括所有接受TAWH修复的患者。使用双变量分析将患有BAF的患者与没有BAF的患者进行比较。
    结果:176例患者接受了TAWH修复,其中41例(23.3%)接受了BAF。26例(63.4%)患者的组织固定在骨头上,其中7个用网眼加固。其余15名(36.6%)患者的桥接网固定在骨骼上。BAF组的年龄相似,性别,身体质量指数,与无BAF组相比,损伤严重程度评分。修复时间(1vs1天,P=.158),疝复发率(9.8%vs12.7%,P=.786),手术部位感染(SSI)(12.5%vs15.6%,P=.823)在队列之间都相似。
    结论:迄今为止最大的系列发现近四分之一的TAWH维修需要BAF。与无BAF修复相比,骨锚固定修复的疝复发率和SSI率相似。这表明这是修复TAWH的合理选择。然而,未来的前瞻性研究需要比较特定的BAF技术,并评估长期结局,包括以患者为中心的结局,如疼痛和生活质量.
    BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWHs) are rare but require a variety of operative techniques to repair including bone anchor fixation (BAF) when tissue tears off bony structures. This study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of BAF technique for blunt TAWH repair. Bone anchor fixation and no BAF repairs were compared, hypothesizing increased hernia recurrence with BAF repair.
    METHODS: A secondary analysis of the WTA blunt TAWH multicenter study was performed including all patients who underwent repair of their TAWH. Patients with BAF were compared to those with no BAF with bivariate analyses.
    RESULTS: 176 patients underwent repair of their TAWH with 41 (23.3%) undergoing BAF. 26 (63.4%) patients had tissue fixed to bone, with 7 of those reinforced with mesh. The remaining 15 (36.6%) patients had bridging mesh anchored to bone. The BAF group had a similar age, sex, body mass index, and injury severity score compared to the no BAF group. The time to repair (1 vs 1 days, P = .158), rate of hernia recurrence (9.8% vs 12.7%, P = .786), and surgical site infection (SSI) (12.5% vs 15.6%, P = .823) were all similar between cohorts.
    CONCLUSIONS: This largest series to date found nearly one-quarter of TAWH repairs required BAF. Bone anchor fixation repairs had a similar rate of hernia recurrence and SSI compared to no BAF repairs, suggesting this is a reasonable option for repair of TAWH. However, future prospective studies are needed to compare specific BAF techniques and evaluate long-term outcomes including patient-centered outcomes such as pain and quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:髌骨下极骨折,不像其他髌骨骨折,对传统的手术固定方法提出了挑战。本文介绍了克氏针张力带结合锚钉交叉固定治疗髌骨下极粉碎性骨折的临床技术和效果。
    方法:这项回顾性病例系列研究包括从2020年9月1日至2022年4月30日在我们机构治疗的14例髌骨下极粉碎性骨折患者。所有患者均使用Kirschner钢丝张力带和锚固螺钉交叉缝合技术进行手术。随访评估包括术后X线片以评估骨折愈合,以及临床参数,如愈合时间,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,运动范围(ROM),和Bostman得分。
    结果:所有患者平均随访超过12个月,没有内固定失败的病例。膝关节稳定性和功能均优异。X射线显示平均愈合时间约为10.79±1.53周,住院时间为5.64±1.15天,手术时间约为37.86±5.32分钟,术中出血量为33.29±8.15ml。一名患者经历了来自内部固定材料的刺激。在最后的后续行动中,Bostman评分平均28.29±0.83,膝关节屈曲达到131.07°±4.88°,所有患者都实现了膝关节完全伸展,VAS评分为0.36±0.63。
    结论:克氏针张力带与锚钉交叉缝合固定治疗髌骨下极粉碎性骨折的临床疗效满意。这种手术方法,其特点是简单和可靠,是临床实践的宝贵补充。
    OBJECTIVE: Fractures of the inferior patellar pole, unlike other patellar fractures, present challenges for traditional surgical fixation methods. This article introduces the clinical technique and outcomes of using Kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor screw cross-stitch fixation for comminuted inferior patellar pole fractures.
    METHODS: This retrospective case series study included 14 patients with comminuted inferior patellar pole fractures treated at our institution from September 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022. All patients underwent surgery using the Kirschner wire tension band with anchor screw cross-stitch technique. Follow-up assessments involved postoperative X-rays to evaluate fracture healing, as well as clinical parameters such as healing time, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, range of motion (ROM), and Bostman scores.
    RESULTS: All patients were followed for an average of over 12 months, with no cases of internal fixation failure. Knee joint stability and function were excellent. X-rays revealed an average healing time of approximately 10.79 ± 1.53 weeks, hospitalization lasted 5.64 ± 1.15 days, surgery took approximately 37.86 ± 5.32 minutes, and intraoperative blood loss was 33.29 ± 8.15 ml. One patient experienced irritation from the internal fixation material. At the final follow-up, the Bostman score averaged 28.29 ± 0.83, knee joint flexion reached 131.07° ± 4.88°, all patients achieved full knee extension, and the VAS score was 0.36 ± 0.63.
    CONCLUSIONS: Kirschner wire tension band with anchor screw cross-stitch fixation for comminuted inferior patellar pole fractures delivered satisfactory clinical outcomes. This surgical method, characterized by its simplicity and reliability, is a valuable addition to clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:Bankart病变是肱骨关节最常见的病变之一。据报道,Bankart修复的几种双排缝合方法,可以提供更多的稳定性,还有更多的运动限制和并发症。因此,我们引入了一种新的双行Bankart修复技术,关键点双排缝合线,在中线使用一个锚。本文的目的是研究这种新方法的临床效果,并将其与单排缝线进行比较。
    方法:回顾性收集2010年10月至2014年6月行关键点双排缝合或单排缝合的78例患者。基本信息包括性别、年龄,优势臂,并收集了不稳定的发作次数。手术前,通过CT扫描测量关节盂骨丢失。视觉模拟量表,美国肩肘外科医生,加州大学洛杉矶分校的肩秤,在手术前和最后一次随访时评估主观肩价值。
    结果:44例患者(24例接受单排缝合,20例接受关键点双排缝合)均获成功随访。随访期为9.2±1.1年(范围,7.8-11.4年)。在最后一次随访中,所有临床评分均未检测到显著差异.单行组复发率为12.5%,双行组复发率为10%,分别(p=0.795)对单排组14例(31.8%)和双排组9例(26.5%)的患者进行了活动范围测试.仅在90°外展时的内旋差异有统计学意义(单排为48.9°,双排为76.7°,p=0.033)。
    结论:与单行缝合相比,Bankart病变的关键点双行缝合可获得相似的长期结果,一个内侧锚并没有导致有限的运动范围。低复发率和先前的生物力学结果也表明关键点双排缝合是一种可靠的方法。
    OBJECTIVE: Bankart lesion is one of the most common lesions of the glenohumeral joint. Several double-row suture methods were reported for Bankart repair, which could provide more stability, yet more motion limitation and complications. Therefore, we introduced a new double-row Bankart repair technique, key point double-row suture which used one anchor in the medial line. The purpose of this article is to investigate the clinical outcomes of this new method and to compare it with single-row suture.
    METHODS: Seventy-eight patients receiving key point double-row suture or single-row suture from October 2010 to June 2014 were collected retrospectively. The basic information including gender, age, dominant arm, and number of episodes of instability was collected. Before surgery, the glenoid bone loss was measured from the CT scan. The visual analogue scale, American shoulder and elbow surgeons, the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder scale, and subjective shoulder value were valued before surgery and at the last follow-up.
    RESULTS: Forty-four patients (24 patients receiving single-row suture and 20 patients receiving key point double-row suture) were followed up successfully. The follow-up period was 9.2 ± 1.1 years (range, 7.8-11.4 years). At the last follow-up, no significant differences were detected for any of the clinical scores. The recurrence rate was 12.5% for the single-row group and 10% for the double-row group, respectively (p = 0.795) 14 patients (31.8%) in the single-row group and nine patients (26.5%) in the double-row group were tested for active range of motion. A statistically significant difference was found only for the internal rotation at 90° abduction (48.9° for single-row and 76.7° for key point double-row, p = 0.033).
    CONCLUSIONS: The key point double-row sutures for Bankart lesions could achieve similar long-term outcomes compared with single-row suture, and one medial anchor did not result in a limited range of motion. The low recurrence rate and previous biomechanical results also indicate the key point double-row suture is a reliable method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管双排缝线锚定(DRSA)技术已被证明是成功的,一种尚未解决的反复出现的失败模式是缝线撕裂肌腱。这项研究旨在通过结合撕裂停止元件来解决缝合线撕裂问题。作者假设,与更传统的技术相比,Rip-Stop小组将表现出更大的力量。
    本研究使用了12只配对的尸体足(n=24)。从每对中分配一个样本,以使用4.75mm无结锚(n=12)进行标准的双排(SDR)跟腱修复。对照组的匹配侧分为2个DRSA桥组:带有3.9mm锚的改良双排(MDR)桥或带有软近端锚和3.9mm的双排(RS-DR)桥修复远端行。在中立位置,标本经历了1000次循环(20-100N),然后负载到失败。位移,刚度,极限载荷,并记录故障模式。
    RS-DR的初始位移值最低,其次是SDR和MDR(1.3±0.4、2.7±1.4和3.2±1.3mm,分别)。当比较RS-DR与MDR的初始位移时检测到显著性(P=.038)。RS-DR的循环位移最低,其次是MDR和SDR(1.6±0.9,2.2±1.1和4.5±3.2mm,分别)。RS-DR和MDR的循环刚度相似(89.1±24.6和81.9±5.6N/mm,分别)。RS-DR极限载荷(1116.8±405.7N)大于SDR(465.6±352.7,P=.003)。
    与其他组相比,RS-DR修复的标本显示出位移值降低,极限载荷和刚度增加。此尸体模型的结果表明,在DRSA跟腱修复中添加切块比锚大小更有影响力。局限性包括这是一项零时生物力学研究,这不能模拟术后愈合和恢复期间的修复性能。
    跟腱修复的止裂技术可有效改善动态力学特性,并可减轻患者队列中通过肌腱的缝线撕裂。
    UNASSIGNED: Although double-row suture-anchored (DRSA) techniques for Achilles insertional tendinosis has proven successful, a reoccurring failure mode not yet addressed is suture tearing through the tendon. This study aims to address suture tearing by incorporating a rip-stop element. Authors hypothesized that the Rip-Stop group would demonstrate increased strength compared with more traditional techniques.
    UNASSIGNED: 12 paired cadaveric feet were used in this study (n = 24). One sample from each pair was assigned to receive the standard double-row (SDR) Achilles repair with 4.75-mm knotless anchors (n = 12). The control\'s matched sides were divided between 2 DRSA bridge groups: modified double-row (MDR) bridge with 3.9-mm anchors or rip-stop double-row (RS-DR) bridge repair with soft proximal anchors and 3.9-mm anchored distal row. In neutral position, specimens underwent 1000 cycles (20-100 N) followed by load to failure. Displacements, stiffness, ultimate load, and failure mode were recorded.
    UNASSIGNED: RS-DR had the lowest initial displacement values followed by SDR and MDR (1.3 ± 0.4, 2.7 ± 1.4, and 3.2 ± 1.3 mm, respectively). Significance was detected when comparing initial displacement of RS-DR to MDR (P = .038). Cyclic displacement was lowest for RS-DR, followed by MDR and SDR (1.6 ± 0.9, 2.2 ± 1.1, and 4.5 ± 3.2 mm, respectively). Cyclic stiffness was similar for RS-DR and MDR (89.1 ± 24.6 and 81.9 ± 5.6 N/mm, respectively). RS-DR ultimate load (1116.8 ± 405.7 N) was statistically greater than SDR (465.6 ± 352.7, P = .003).
    UNASSIGNED: RS-DR-repaired specimens demonstrated a decrease in displacement values and increased ultimate load and stiffness when compared to other groups. Results of this cadaveric model suggest that the addition of a rip-stop to DRSA Achilles repair is more impactful than anchor size. Limitations include that this was a time-zero biomechanical study, which cannot simulate the performance of the repairs during postoperative healing and recovery.
    UNASSIGNED: A rip-stop technique for Achilles repair effectively improves dynamic mechanical characteristics and may mitigate suture tearing through tendon in a patient cohort.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:开放式缝合(OSu)和微型螺钉锚固(MsA)是两种常用的开放式椎间盘复位手术,用于颞下颌关节(TMJ)的前椎间盘移位(ADD)。这项研究评估了单中心两种外科手术之间的椎间盘位置稳定性(DPS)和髁突骨骼重塑(CBR)的差异。
    方法:使用磁共振成像(MRI)扫描的回顾性队列研究(术前,术后1周和12个月),对2016年1月至2021年6月在一个中心通过两种手术技术(OSu和MsA)进行了开放TMJ椎间盘复位手术的所有患者进行了手术。预测变量是技术(OSu和MsA)。结果变量为DPS和CBR。随访期间,DPS被评为良好,可接受和差,CBR被评为改进,不变,退化。采用多因素分析比较12个月时的DPS和CBR,包括年龄,性别,威尔克斯舞台,术前骨骼状态(正常,轻度/中度异常)和椎间盘重新定位的程度(正常,过度校正,并向后重新定位)。DPS和CBR的相对风险(RR)通过多变量逻辑回归计算。
    结果:385名583个关节的患者被纳入研究。12个月时MRI显示514个关节(93.5%)有良好的DPS,344个关节(62.5%)的CBR有所改善。多变量分析显示,OSu的DPS较高(RR=2.95;95%置信区间[CI],1.27至6.85)和比MsA更好的CBR(RR=1.58;95CI,1.02至2.46)。在影响DPS的因素中,女性比男性有更好的结果(RR=2.63;95CI,1.11~6.26),并且过度矫正或向后重新定位的椎间盘比正常重新定位的椎间盘更稳定(RR=5.84;95CI,2.58~13.20).CBR的改善随着年龄的增加而降低(RR=0.91;95CI,0.89至0.93)。术前轻度/中度异常骨状态与正常术前骨状态相比,CBR改善的可能性更高(RR=2.60;95CI,1.76至3.83)。
    结论:OSu的DPS和CBR优于MsA。性别和椎间盘重新定位的程度影响了DPS,年龄和术前骨骼状态影响CBR。
    OBJECTIVE: Open suturing (OSu) and mini-screw anchor (MsA) are two commonly used open disc repositioning surgeries for anterior disc displacement (ADD) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). This study assesses the differences in disc position stability (DPS) and condylar bone remodelling (CBR) between these two surgical procedures in a single centre.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using MRI scans (pre-operation, 1 week and 12 months post-operation) of all patients who had open TMJ disc repositioning surgery from January 2016 to June 2021 at one centre through two surgical techniques (OSu and MsA) was performed. The predictor variable was technique (OSu and MsA). Outcome variables were DPS and CBR. During follow-up, DPS was rated as good, acceptable and poor, and CBR was graded as improved, unchanged, and degenerated. Multivariate analysis was used to compare the DPS and CBR at 12 months after adjusting five factors including age, sex, Wilkes stage, preoperative bone status (normal, mild/moderate abnormal) and the degree of disc repositioning (normal, overcorrected, and posteriorly repositioned). Relative risk (RR) for DPS and CBR was calculated by multivariate logistic regression.
    RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-five patients with 583 joints were included in the study. MRIs at 12 months showed that 514 joints (93.5%) had good DPS, and 344 joints (62.5%) had improved CBR. Multivariate analysis revealed that OSu had higher DPS (RR=2.95; 95% CI, 1.27-6.85) and better CBR (RR=1.58; 95% CI, 1.02-2.46) than MsA. Among the factors affecting DPS, females had better results than males (RR=2.63; 95% CI, 1.11-6.26) and overcorrected or posteriorly repositioned discs were more stable than normally repositioned discs (RR=5.84; 95% CI, 2.58-13.20). The improvement in CBR decreased with age increasing (RR=0.91; 95% CI, 0.89-0.93). Preoperative mild/moderate abnormal bone status had a higher probability of improved CBR compared to normal preoperative bone status (RR=2.60; 95% CI, 1.76-3.83).
    CONCLUSIONS: OSu had better DPS and CBR than MsA. Sex and the degree of disc repositioning impacted DPS, while age and preoperative bone status affected CBR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景随着关节镜技术和缝合锚钉技术的发展,改良的Brostratm技术取得了显著进展。然而,尚不清楚哪种材料最适合治疗前腓骨韧带损伤(ATFL)。本研究评估了2种缝合锚钉(金属与生物可降解材料)在关节镜ATFL修复中的短期疗效。材料与方法2018年1月至2019年12月,82例踝关节疾病伴ATFL损伤患者(男51例,女31例)通过Brostringm-Gould手术进行关节镜下缝合锚修复。平均年龄为38.70±9.35岁(范围,18-54岁)。对每位患者进行随访。美国骨科足踝协会评分(AOFAS),卡尔松踝关节功能评分(KAFS),视觉模拟评分(VAS)用于评估功能状态和疼痛。结果所有患者随访时间为21.21±2.19个月(范围,18-25个月)。两组均未发现并发症。两组患者术前临床及功能评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组的功能评分均显著升高(P<0.001)。在最后一次随访中,可生物降解组的平均AOFAS评分为93.00(90.00,96.00),金属组的平均AOFAS评分为93.50(91.00,96.00)(P=0.31).可生物降解组的平均KAFS评分为91.50(85.00,95.00),金属组的平均KAFS评分为93.00(90.00,95.50)(P=0.10);可生物降解组的平均VAS评分为1.50(1.00,1.80),金属组的平均VAS评分为1.30(0.98,1.70)(P=0.22)。结论关节镜下缝合锚钉修复ATFL损伤可改善CAI预后。在短期随访中,使用金属或可生物降解的缝合锚钉的临床和功能结果没有统计学上的显着差异。
    BACKGROUND With the development of arthroscopy and suture anchor, the modified Brostrӧm technique has made remarkable progress. However, it is unclear which material is most suitable for treating anterior talofibular ligament injury (ATFL). This study evaluated the short-term efficacy of 2 suture anchors (metal vs biodegradable materials) in arthroscopic ATFL repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS From January 2018 to December 2019, 82 patients with ankle disorders (51 men and 31 women) with ATFL injury received arthroscopic repair with suture anchor through the Brostrӧm-Gould procedure. The mean age was 38.70±9.35 years (range, 18-54 years). Each patient was followed up. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS), Karlsson Ankle Functional Score (KAFS), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate functional status and pain. RESULTS All patients were followed up for 21.21±2.19 months (range, 18-25 months). No complications were found either group. Preoperative clinical and functional scores in both groups had no significant difference (P>0.05). The functional score increased significantly in both groups (P<0.001). At the last follow-up, the mean AOFAS score was 93.00 (90.00, 96.00) in the Biodegradable group and 93.50 (91.00, 96.00) in the Metallic group (P=0.31). The mean KAFS score was 91.50 (85.00, 95.00) in the Biodegradable group and 93.00 (90.00, 95.50) in the Metallic group (P=0.10); the mean VAS score was 1.50 (1.00, 1.80) in the Biodegradable group and 1.30 (0.98, 1.70) in the Metallic group (P=0.22). CONCLUSIONS Arthroscopic repair of ATFL injury with suture anchors can improve the prognosis of CAI. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical and functional outcomes with metal or biodegradable suture anchors at short-term follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:本研究旨在评估下一代的安全性和有效性,全缝合锚钉在肩袖撕裂关节镜修复患者中,与已建立的固体缝合锚钉相比。
    方法:2019年4月至2021年1月,前瞻性,比较,在三家三级医院对中国民族进行的随机对照非劣效性研究纳入了需要关节镜治疗的肩袖撕裂患者(18~75岁).患者被随机分为两组,接受全缝合锚钉或固体缝合锚钉。并随访了12个月。主要结果是12个月随访时的Constant-Murley评分。MRI评估确定了肩袖修复的再撕裂率(定义为Sugaya分类4和5)。在所有随访点进行安全性评价以确定不良事件(AE)。
    结果:120例肩袖撕裂患者(平均年龄,58.3年;62.5%为女性;60名接受全缝合锚钉)接受治疗。5例患者失访。两个队列均显示基线和6个月之间Constant-Murley评分显着改善(p<0.001),6至12个月(p<0.001)。两组患者术后12个月Constant-Murley评分差异无统计学意义(p=0.122)。12个月的再撕裂率分别为5.7%和1.9%,在所有缝合和固体缝合锚组群中,分别为(P=0.618)。术中锚钉拔出2例,两者都成功解决了。无术后再手术或其他锚钉相关不良事件报告。
    结论:在接受肩袖撕裂关节镜修复的患者中,在12个月的随访中,全缝合锚钉的临床性能与已建立的固体缝合锚钉的临床性能相当。两组之间的再撕裂率在统计学上没有显着差异。
    To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a next-generation, all-suture anchor in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears, compared with that of an established solid suture anchor.
    Between April 2019 and January 2021, a prospective, comparative, randomized controlled noninferiority study conducted on people with Chinese ethnicity at 3 tertiary hospitals enrolled patients (18-75 years) requiring arthroscopic treatment for rotator cuff tears. Patients were randomized into 2 cohorts receiving either all-suture anchor or solid suture anchor and followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was the Constant-Murley score at the 12-month follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging assessments determined the rate of retear of rotator cuff repair (defined as Sugaya classification 4 and 5). Safety evaluation was performed at all follow-up points to determine the adverse events (AEs).
    In total, 120 patients with rotator cuff tears (mean age, 58.3 years; 62.5% female; 60 receiving all-suture anchor) underwent treatment. Five patients were lost to follow-up. Both cohorts showed significant improvement in Constant-Murley scores between baseline and 6 months (P < .001) and between 6 and 12 months (P < .001). There were no significant differences in Constant-Murley scores between the 2 cohorts at 12 months (P = .122) after operation. The retear rate at 12 months was 5.7% and 1.9% in the all-suture and solid suture anchor cohorts, respectively (P = .618). There were 2 cases of intraoperative anchor pullout, both of which were successfully resolved. No cases of postoperative reoperation or other anchor-related AEs were reported.
    The all-suture anchor offered equivalent clinical performance to an established solid suture anchor at the 12-month follow-up in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears. The retear rate was not statistically significantly different between the 2 cohorts.
    Level I, randomized controlled trial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:研究临床使用中与不可吸收缝线锚钉典型功能失效模式相关的机械性能,并支持产品设计,开发和验证。
    方法:通过检索相关不良事件数据库,总结了不可吸收缝线锚钉的典型功能失效模式,通过研究与功能失效相关的力学性能,进一步分析了功能失效的影响因素。检索公开的测试数据进行验证,为研究人员提供参考。
    结果:不可吸收缝线锚钉的典型功能失效模式包括锚钉失效,缝合失败,固定松动,插入器故障,这与产品的机械性能有关,如拧入扭矩和拧入锚的断裂扭矩,敲入锚的插入力,缝合强度,系统疲劳试验前后的拉脱力和疲劳试验后的缝合线伸长率。
    结论:企业应注意通过材料提高产品的机械性能水平,结构设计和缝合编织工艺,确保产品的安全性和有效性。
    OBJECTIVE: To study the mechanical properties related to the typical functional failure modes of non-absorbable suture anchor in clinical use, and to support product design, development and verification.
    METHODS: By retrieving the database of relevant adverse events, the typical functional failure modes of non-absorbable suture anchor were summarized, and the influencing factors of functional failure were further analyzed by studying the mechanical properties related to functional failure. The publicly available test data was retrieved for verification and provided reference for the researchers.
    RESULTS: The typical functional failure modes of non-absorbable suture anchor include anchor failure, suture failure, fix loosening, inserter failure, which are related to the mechanical properties of products, such as screw-in torque and break torque of screw-in anchors, insertion force of knock-in anchors, suture strength, pull-out force before and after system fatigue test and elongation of sutures after fatigue test.
    CONCLUSIONS: Enterprises should pay attention to improving the mechanical performance level of products through material, structural design and the suture weaving process to ensure the safety and effectiveness of products.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号