Streptococcus pyogenes

化脓性链球菌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在比较当前有关急性咽炎管理的建议。2009年1月至2023年进行了文献检索。包括报告急性咽炎管理建议的文件,提取了相关数据,并对不同的建议进行描述性比较.通过AGREEII工具评估了指南的质量。包括19条指导方针,总体质量中等。可以区分三组:一组支持抗生素治疗A组β-溶血性链球菌(GABHS)以预防急性风湿热(ARF);第二组认为急性咽炎是一种自我解决的疾病,仅在选定病例中推荐抗生素;第三组根据每位患者的ARF风险识别不同的策略。如果预防ARF是主要目标,建议使用10天的抗生素疗程;相反,一些指南建议5-7天的课程,假设对症治愈是治疗的目标。青霉素V和阿莫西林是一线选择。在青霉素过敏的情况下,第一代头孢菌素是一个合适的选择。在β-内酰胺过敏的情况下,可以根据局部耐药率考虑克林霉素或大环内酯类药物。结论:来自不同国家的指南(GL)在急性咽炎的管理中提出了一些分歧,在诊断和治疗方法上,允许区分3种不同的策略。由于GABHS咽炎可能影响GABHS疾病的全球负担,最好在全球范围内定义一个共同的战略。进一步研究以下问题可能很有趣:不同医疗保健系统中诊断策略的成本效益分析;GABHS感染及其并发症的局部基因组流行病学;抗生素治疗GABHS咽炎对其并发症和侵袭性GABHS感染的影响;GABHS疫苗作为预防措施的作用。相关结果可以帮助制定未来的建议。已知:•GABHS疾病谱范围从浅表到侵入性感染和毒素介导的疾病。•GABHS约占儿童喉咙痛的25%,其管理是一个有争议的问题。新增功能:•在当前的GL中可以区分三种策略:预防ARF的抗生素治疗,只有在复杂的情况下才能使用抗生素,并根据个人ARF风险制定量身定制的策略。•抗生素治疗GABHS咽炎对其后遗症的影响仍然是主要的分歧点;需要进一步的研究以实现全球共享策略。
    This study aims to provide a comparison of the current recommendations about the management of acute pharyngitis. A literature search was conducted from January 2009 to 2023. Documents reporting recommendations on the management of acute pharyngitis were included, pertinent data were extracted, and a descriptive comparison of the different recommendations was performed. The quality of guidelines was assessed through the AGREE II instrument. Nineteen guidelines were included, and an overall moderate quality was found. Three groups can be distinguished: one group supports the antibiotic treatment of group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus (GABHS) to prevent acute rheumatic fever (ARF); the second considers acute pharyngitis a self-resolving disease, recommending antibiotics only in selected cases; the third group recognizes a different strategy according to the ARF risk in each patient. An antibiotic course of 10 days is recommended if the prevention of ARF is the primary goal; conversely, some guidelines suggest a course of 5-7 days, assuming the symptomatic cure is the goal of treatment. Penicillin V and amoxicillin are the first-line options. In the case of penicillin allergy, first-generation cephalosporins are a suitable choice. In the case of beta-lactam allergy, clindamycin or macrolides could be considered according to local resistance rates.    Conclusion: Several divergencies in the management of acute pharyngitis were raised among guidelines (GLs) from different countries, both in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach, allowing the distinction of 3 different strategies. Since GABHS pharyngitis could affect the global burden of GABHS disease, it is advisable to define a shared strategy worldwide. It could be interesting to investigate the following issues further: cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic strategies in different healthcare systems; local genomic epidemiology of GABHS infection and its complications; the impact of antibiotic treatment of GABHS pharyngitis on its complications and invasive GABHS infections; the role of GABHS vaccines as a prophylactic measure. The related results could aid the development of future recommendations. What is Known: • GABHS disease spectrum ranges from superficial to invasive infections and toxin-mediated diseases. • GABHS accounts for about 25% of sore throat in children and its management is a matter of debate. What is New: • Three strategies can be distinguished among current GLs: antibiotic therapy to prevent ARF, antibiotics only in complicated cases, and a tailored strategy according to the individual ARF risk. • The impact of antibiotic treatment of GABHS pharyngitis on its sequelae still is the main point of divergence; further studies are needed to achieve a global shared strategy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于抗生素治疗喉咙痛的国际指南存在冲突。
    目的:通过评估研究和评估指南II(AGREE)仪器评估无并发症急性A组β溶血性链球菌(GABHS)咽喉痛的指南质量。对严格发展分数高于60%的指南进行敏感性分析,并描述他们对分数的建议,测试,和抗生素治疗,包括他们的理由。
    方法:急性GABHS咽喉痛的指南文献综述,2000年1月至2019年12月在初级保健和二级保健中发表。PubMed数据库,采用加拿大医学协会信息库临床实践指南和国际网络指南.使用AGREEII工具评估指南的质量。指南分为2类:高质量的指南必须对发展的严谨性评分>60%,其他被列为低质量指南.
    结果:15个指南之间的显著异质性涉及6个评估领域的得分。其中,6个指南在开发领域的严谨性方面得分超过60%,并使用了系统的文献检索方法,引用最近随机临床试验的荟萃分析。6个高质量指南中的大多数不再建议系统使用诊断评分和测试,也没有预防急性风湿热或局部并发症的抗生素治疗,除了高危患者。
    结论:主要差异强调只需要高质量的指南,基于充分评估的证据。对重症病例或高危患者限制抗生素处方可以避免抗生素耐药性。
    BACKGROUND: Conflicting international guidelines exist on the management of sore throat by antibiotics.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE) instrument the quality of guidelines for uncomplicated acute group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) sore-throat. To make a sensitivity analysis restricted to guidelines with a rigour of development score higher than 60% and to describe their recommendations on scores, tests, and antibiotic therapy, including their justification.
    METHODS: A guideline literature review of acute GABHS sore throat, published between January 2000 and December 2019 in primary care and secondary care. The PubMed database, the Canadian Medical Association Infobase on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the International Network Guidelines were used. The quality of guidelines was assessed using the AGREE II instrument. The guidelines were classified into 2 categories: high-quality guidelines had to rate >60% for the rigour of development score, the others were classified as low-quality guidelines.
    RESULTS: Significant heterogeneity between the 15 guidelines concerned the scores of the 6 assessment domains. Among them, 6 guidelines presented a score above 60% with regards to the rigor of development domain and used a systematic literature search method, citing meta-analyses of recent randomised clinical trials. Most of the 6 high-quality guidelines no longer recommended the systematic use of diagnostic scores and tests, nor antibiotic therapy to prevent acute rheumatic fever or loco-regional complications, except for high-risk patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Major discrepancies emphasise the need for only high-quality guidelines, based on adequately assessed evidence. Restricted antibiotic prescriptions to severe cases or high-risk patients would avoid antibiotic resistance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:A组β-溶血性链球菌(GAS)引起的咽炎被视为喉咙痛抗生素的主要适应症。在初级保健环境中,处方率远高于GAS的患病率。国际准则中的建议差异很大。德国指南建议对Centor或McIsaac评分≥3的患者考虑使用抗生素,首选是青霉素V7天,并为所有人推荐镇痛药。我们调查了,如果本指南的实施降低了抗生素处方率,如果在评分≥3的患者中进行快速抗原检测链球菌试验(RADT),则会进一步降低该比率。
    方法:HALS是一项开放的务实平行组三臂整群随机对照试验。德国北部的初级保健实践被随机分为三组:指南(GL组),对于评分≥3(GL-RADT组)或常规治疗(UC组)采用RADT的改良指南.研究小组(外展访问)对所有实践进行了访问和指导,并根据其小组提供了材料。这些做法被要求招募11名连续≥2年的急性喉咙痛患者,并且至少受到中度损害。每位患者都进行了GAS的研究咽拭子。首次咨询时的抗生素处方率是主要结果。
    结果:从2010年10月到2012年3月,68名全科医生在61个实践中招募了520名患者,516可以分析主要终点。两组之间的抗生素处方率没有差异(p=0.162),并且比GAS率高约三倍:GL组97/187名患者(52%;GAS=16%),GL-RADT-组74/172(43%;GAS=16%)和UC-组68/157(43%;GAS=14%)。在GL-RADT组中,55%的患者得分≥3,而GL组为35%(p<0.001)。调整后,在GL-RADT组中,与GL组相比,获得抗生素的OR为0.23(p=0.010),尽管90例Strep试验阴性的患者中有35例在GL-RADT组中使用了抗生素。每次实践的处方率涵盖了所有组的0%至100%的全部范围。
    结论:实施指南中提出的分数似乎不适合降低喉咙痛的抗生素处方,但从业者对阴性RADT的更好依从性应导致处方减少。
    背景:DRKS00013018,回顾性注册28.11.2017。
    Pharyngitis due to Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GAS) is seen as the main indication for antibiotics for sore throat. In primary care settings prescription rates are much higher than the prevalence of GAS. Recommendations in international guidelines differ considerably. A German guideline suggested to consider antibiotics for patients with Centor or McIsaac scores ≥ 3, first choice being penicillin V for 7 days, and recommended analgesics for all. We investigated, if the implementation of this guideline lowers the antibiotic prescription rate, and if a rapid antigen detection strep-test (RADT) in patients with scores ≥ 3 lowers the rate further.
    HALS was an open pragmatic parallel group three-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial. Primary care practices in Northern Germany were randomized into three groups: Guideline (GL-group), modified guideline with a RADT for scores ≥ 3 (GL-RADT-group) or usual care (UC-group). All practices were visited and instructed by the study team (outreach visits) and supplied with material according to their group. The practices were asked to recruit 11 consecutive patients ≥ 2 years with an acute sore throat and being at least moderately impaired. A study throat swab for GAS was taken in every patient. The antibiotic prescription rate at the first consultation was the primary outcome.
    From October 2010 to March 2012, 68 general practitioners in 61 practices recruited 520 patients, 516 could be analyzed for the primary endpoint. Antibiotic prescription rates did not differ between groups (p = 0.162) and were about three times higher than the GAS rate: GL-group 97/187 patients (52%; GAS = 16%), GL-RADT-group 74/172 (43%; GAS = 16%) and UC-group 68/157 (43%; GAS = 14%). In the GL-RADT-group 55% of patients had scores ≥ 3 compared to 35% in GL-group (p < 0.001). After adjustment, in the GL-RADT-group the OR was 0.23 for getting an antibiotic compared to the GL-group (p = 0.010), even though 35 of 90 patients with a negative Strep-test got an antibiotic in the GL-RADT-group. The prescription rates per practice covered the full range from 0 to 100% in all groups.
    The scores proposed in the implemented guideline seem inappropriate to lower antibiotic prescriptions for sore throat, but better adherence of practitioners to negative RADTs should lead to fewer prescriptions.
    DRKS00013018, retrospectively registered 28.11.2017.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:美国传染病学会(IDSA)关于A组链球菌(GAS)咽炎的指南建议不要对3岁以下的患者进行常规检查,没有咽炎的患者,和症状提示病毒感染的患者。A组链球菌测试可能在某些临床环境中被过度使用;因此,我们进行这项研究是为了评估儿科急诊科(ED)患者对IDSA指南的依从性.
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究描述了2016年出现2例城市儿科ED的18岁以下患者,这些患者接受了快速抗原检测以检测GAS咽炎。如果主诉不提示GAS感染和/或患者年龄小于3岁,则测试被归类为不符合IDSA指南。适当的非参数检验按IDSA测试合规性状态比较组。
    结果:共有13,585例患者符合纳入标准;5255例(39%)不符合IDSA测试指南,大多数是由于主诉与GAS咽炎不一致(67%),其次是由于年龄小于3岁(48%)。在测试不合规的患者中,51%的人被开了抗生素,和返回相遇更有可能发生(13%对10%,P<0.001)。在那些不符合GAS测试的患者中,返回遭遇更常见的导致呼吸道诊断(60%对45%,P<0.001)。
    结论:在所有接受GAS检测的儿科ED患者中,近40%不符合IDSA指南,并且与更高的复诊率相关。不符合GAS检测的潜在负面结果包括误诊,抗生素的不当使用,过敏反应,失去上学的日子。有必要采取知情干预措施以减少不必要的GAS测试。
    OBJECTIVE: The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines regarding group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis advise against routine testing for patients younger than 3 years, patients without pharyngitis, and patients with symptoms suggesting a viral infection. Group A streptococcal testing may be overused in some clinical settings; thus, we conducted this study to evaluate compliance with the IDSA guidelines in a pediatric emergency department (ED) setting.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study describes patients younger than 18 years presenting to 2 urban pediatric EDs in 2016 who underwent rapid antigen detection testing for GAS pharyngitis. Testing was classified as noncompliant with the IDSA guidelines if the chief complaint was not indicative of GAS infection and/or the patient age was younger than 3 years. Appropriate nonparametric tests compared groups by IDSA testing compliance status.
    RESULTS: A total of 13,585 patient encounters met inclusion criteria; 5255 (39%) were noncompliant with the IDSA testing guidelines, the majority due to a chief complaint inconsistent with GAS pharyngitis (67%) and secondarily due to the age of younger than 3 years (48%). Among the patients with noncompliant testing, 51% were prescribed an antibiotic, and return encounters were more likely to occur (13% vs 10%, P < 0.001). Return encounters more commonly resulted in respiratory diagnoses in those with noncompliant GAS testing (60% vs 45%, P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 40% of all pediatric ED encounters with GAS testing were noncompliant with the IDSA guidelines and were associated with greater return encounter rates. Potential negative outcomes from noncompliant GAS testing include misdiagnosis, inappropriate use of antibiotics, allergic reactions, and loss of school days. Informed interventions to reduce unnecessary GAS testing are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的30年中,妊娠期和产褥期侵袭性A组链球菌(GAS)疾病的发病率在全球范围内不断增加。产后A组链球菌感染,特别是链球菌中毒性休克综合征(TSS)和坏死性筋膜炎,可能危及生命,难以治疗。尽管有抗生素和支持治疗,在某些情况下,先进的广泛手术,与侵袭性A组链球菌产后子宫内膜炎相关的死亡率,坏死性筋膜炎,中毒性休克综合征仍然很高,高达40%的产后败血症死亡。现在,全球每年有超过75,000人死亡。与非孕妇相比,产后妇女的GAS疾病发病率增加了20倍。尽管发病率很高,许多侵入性GAS感染没有及时诊断,导致可能可预防的孕产妇和新生儿死亡。本文就Ob/Gyn领域GAS感染的具体特点,产生了提高我们意识的指导方针,早期识别并及时治疗。提供了新的欧洲阴道GAS定植患病率数据,连同两个原始案例。此外,建议将需氧性阴道炎作为侵袭性GAS疾病的补充危险因素。
    There has been an increasing worldwide incidence of invasive group A streptococcal (GAS) disease in pregnancy and in the puerperal period over the past 30 years. Postpartum Group A streptococci infection, and in particular streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (TSS) and necrotizing fasciitis, can be life threatening and difficult to treat. Despite antibiotics and supportive therapy, and in some cases advanced extensive surgery, mortality associated with invasive group A streptococcal postpartum endometritis, necrotizing fasciitis, and toxic shock syndrome remains high, up to 40% of postpartum septic deaths. It now accounts for more than 75,000 deaths worldwide every year. Postpartum women have a 20-fold increased incidence of GAS disease compared to non-pregnant women. Despite the high incidence, many invasive GAS infections are not diagnosed in a timely manner, resulting in potentially preventable maternal and neonatal deaths. In this paper the specific characteristics of GAS infection in the field of Ob/Gyn are brought to our attention, resulting in guidelines to improve our awareness, early recognition and timely treatment of the disease. New European prevalence data of vaginal GAS colonization are presented, alongside two original case histories. Additionally, aerobic vaginitis is proposed as a supplementary risk factor for invasive GAS diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The most common bacterial cause of pharyngitis is infection by Group A β-hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS), commonly known as strep throat. 5-15% of adults and 15-35% of children in the United States with pharyngitis have a GABHS infection. The symptoms of GABHS overlap with non-GABHS and viral causes of acute pharyngitis, complicating the problem of diagnosis. A careful physical examination and patient history is the starting point for diagnosing GABHS. After a physical examination and patient history is completed, five types of diagnostic methods can be used to ascertain the presence of a GABHS infection: clinical scoring systems, rapid antigen detection tests, throat culture, nucleic acid amplification tests, and machine learning and artificial intelligence. Clinical guidelines developed by professional associations can help medical professionals choose among available techniques to diagnose strep throat. However, guidelines for diagnosing GABHS created by the American and European professional associations vary significantly, and there is substantial evidence that most physicians do not follow any published guidelines. Treatment for GABHS using analgesics, antipyretics, and antibiotics seeks to provide symptom relief, shorten the duration of illness, prevent nonsuppurative and suppurative complications, and decrease the risk of contagion, while minimizing the unnecessary use of antibiotics. There is broad agreement that antibiotics with narrow spectrums of activity are appropriate for treating strep throat. But whether and when patients should be treated with antibiotics for GABHS remains a controversial question. There is no clearly superior management strategy for strep throat, as significant controversy exists regarding the best methods to diagnose GABHS and under what conditions antibiotics should be prescribed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    CRISPR/Cas9系统的简单适用性和容易的目标编程消除了以前基因组编辑工具的主要界限。使其成为产生位点特异性基因组改变的首选工具。它的多功能性和功效已在各种生物体中得到证明;然而,准确预测指导RNA效率仍然是一个独立于生物体的挑战。因此,设计最佳的指导RNA对于最大化实验结果至关重要。这里,我们总结了指导RNA设计的当前知识,并强调了不同实验系统之间的差异。
    The simple applicability and facile target programming of the CRISPR/Cas9-system abolish the major boundaries of previous genome editing tools, making it the tool of choice for generating site-specific genome alterations. Its versatility and efficacy have been demonstrated in various organisms; however, accurately predicting guide RNA efficiencies remains an organism-independent challenge. Thus, designing optimal guide RNAs is essential to maximize the experimental outcome. Here, we summarize the current knowledge for guide RNA design and highlight discrepancies between different experimental systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    An update of the Spanish consensus document on the diagnosis and treatment of acute tonsillopharyngitis is presented. Clinical scores should not be used to prescribe antibiotics, unless microbiological tests are not available or there is a child at risk of rheumatic fever. There is no score better than those set out in the previous consensus. Microbiological tests are recommended in proposed cases, regardless of the result of the scores. Penicillin is the treatment of choice, prescribed twice a day for 10 days. Amoxicillin is the first alternative, prescribed once or twice a day for the same time. First-generation cephalosporins are the treatment of choice in children with non-immediate reaction to penicillin or amoxicillin. Josamycin and midecamycin are the best options for children with immediate penicillin allergic reactions, when non-beta-lactam antibiotics should be used. In microbiological treatment failure, and in streptococcal carriers, the treatments proposed in the previous consensus are still applicable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    2018年,荷兰起草了第一份关于坏死性软组织感染(NSTIs)的指南。其目的是规范这种疾病的护理,以减少变异,从而提高护理质量。本指南是所有处理这种毁灭性疾病的医疗保健提供者的基准;它侧重于诊断,治疗方案和护理组织。鉴于发病率低,NSTIs的复杂性和暴发性过程,重要的是要确保持续的专业护理。因此,建议就转介给专门中心达成区域协议。手术探查仍是诊断的金标准。经验性抗生素方案取决于疾病的发作是社区还是医院,如果它的病因学是单抗微生物(I型)或多微生物(II型)。该指南建议,如果革兰氏染色显示链球菌,则应开始静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)治疗。如果排除A组链球菌作为病原体,则必须停用IVIg。
    In 2018 the first Dutch guideline on necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) was drafted. Its aim is to standardize the care of this disease in order to reduce variation, and thereby improve the quality of care. This guideline is a benchmark for all healthcare providers who deal with this devastating disease; it focuses on diagnostics, treatment options and organization of care. Given the low incidence, the complexity and the fulminant course of NSTIs, it is important to ensure continuous specialized care. Therefore it is recommended to make regional agreements about referral to specialized centres. Surgical exploration remains the gold standard for diagnosis. The empirical antibiotic regimen depends on if the onset of disease is community or nosocomial, and if its aetiology is a monomicrobial (type I) or a polymicrobial (type II). The guideline recommends that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy be started if gram staining reveals streptococci. IVIg must be discontinued if group-A streptococcus is excluded as a causative agent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号