Despite evidence suggesting the benefit of prophylactic regional antibiotic delivery (RAD) to sternal edges during cardiac surgery, it is seldom performed in clinical practice. The value of topical vancomycin and gentamicin for sternal wound infections (SWI) prophylaxis was further questioned by recent studies including randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to comprehensively assess the safety and effectiveness of RAD to reduce the risk of SWI.We screened multiple databases for RCTs assessing the effectiveness of RAD (vancomycin, gentamicin) in SWI prophylaxis. Random effects meta-analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was any SWI; other wound complications were also analysed. Odds Ratios served as the primary statistical analyses. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed.Thirteen RCTs (N = 7,719 patients) were included. The odds of any SWI were significantly reduced by over 50% with any RAD: OR (95%CIs): 0.49 (0.35-0.68); p < 0.001 and consistently reduced in vancomycin (0.34 [0.18-0.64]; p < 0.001) and gentamicin (0.58 [0.39-0.86]; p = 0.007) groups (psubgroup = 0.15). Similarly, RAD reduced the odds of SWI in diabetic and non-diabetic patients (0.46 [0.32-0.65]; p < 0.001 and 0.60 [0.44-0.83]; p = 0.002 respectively). Cumulative Z-curve passed the TSA-adjusted boundary for SWIs suggesting adequate power has been met and no further trials are needed. RAD significantly reduced deep (0.60 [0.43-0.83]; p = 0.003) and superficial SWIs (0.54 [0.32-0.91]; p = 0.02). No differences were seen in mediastinitis and mortality, however, limited number of studies assessed these endpoints. There was no evidence of systemic toxicity, sternal dehiscence and resistant strains emergence. Both vancomycin and gentamicin reduced the odds of cultures outside their respective serum concentrations\' activity: vancomycin against gram-negative strains: 0.20 (0.01-4.18) and gentamicin against gram-positive strains: 0.42 (0.28-0.62); P < 0.001. Regional antibiotic delivery is safe and effectively reduces the risk of SWI in cardiac surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Sternotomy wound complications are more frequent after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) compared to other cardiac surgeries, primarily due to additional risk factors, including immunosuppression. Flap closure often becomes necessary for definitive treatment, although there is a scarcity of data on the outcomes of sternal wound reconstruction in this specific population.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 604 sternal wound reconstructions performed by a single surgeon between 1996 and 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised patients who underwent OHT as their primary cardiac procedure. Surgical interventions involved sternal hardware removal, debridement, and muscle flap closure.
RESULTS: The study included 66 patients, with culture-positive wound infection being the most common indication for reconstruction (51.5%). The median duration between transplantation and sternal wound reconstruction was 25 days. Bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flaps (n = 63), rectus abdominis flaps (n = 2), or pectoralis major turnover flaps (n = 1) were used. Intraoperative wound cultures revealed positivity in 48 patients (72.7%), with Staphylococcus epidermidis being the most frequently cultured organism (25.0%). The overall complication rate was 31.8%, and two patient deaths were related to sternal wounds, resulting from multiorgan failure following septic shock. The majority of the patients reported excellent long-term functional and esthetic outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Sternal wounds following OHT pose a significant morbidity risk. Our strategy focuses on immediate and aggressive antibiotic therapy, thorough debridement, and definitive closure with bilateral pectoralis myocutaneous advancement flaps. This approach has demonstrated complication and mortality rates comparable to the general cardiac surgery population, as well as excellent functional and esthetic results.

Around 36,000 cardiac operations are undertaken in the United Kingdom annually, with most procedures undertaken via median sternotomy. Wound complications occur in up to 8% of operations, with an associated mortality rate of around 47% in late or undetected cases.
To undertake a systematised literature review to identify pre-operative, peri-operative and post-operative risk factors associated with sternal wound complications.
Healthcare databases were searched for articles written in the English language and published between 2013 and 2021. Inclusion criteria were quantitative studies involving patients undergoing median sternotomy for cardiac surgery; sternal complications and risk factors.
1360 papers were identified, with 25 included in this review. Patient-related factors included: high BMI; diabetes; comorbidities; gender; age; presenting for surgery in a critical state; predictive risk scores; vascular disease; severe anaemia; medication such as steroids or α-blockers; and previous sternotomy. Peri-operative risk increased with specific types and combinations of surgical procedures. Sternal reopening was also associated with increased risk of sternal wound infection. Post-operative risk factors included a complicated recovery; the need for blood transfusions; respiratory complications; renal failure; non-diabetic hyperglycaemia; sternal asymmetry and sepsis.
Pre, peri and post-operative risk factors increase the risk of sternal wound complications in cardiac surgery. Generic risk assessment tools are primarily designed to provide mortality risk scores, with their ability to predict risk of wound infection questionable. Tools that incorporate factors throughout the operative journey are required to identify patients at risk of surgical wound infection.

Introduction: Deep sternal wound infection following major cardiac surgery is a deleterious complication with sequelae that can be life threatening. The use of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in management of sternal wounds with resultant right ventricular rupture has been documented in the cardiothoracic and to a lesser extent in the reconstructive literature. Methods/Case Report: We present a case of a 67-year-old male patient who suffered from right ventricular perforation from a floating rib following debridement of a deep sternal wound infection and placement of a vacuum-assisted closure device. Results: Despite meticulous debridement and ensuring the release of all retrosternal adhesions, massive bleeding was encountered shortly after application of the vacuum-assisted closure device. Fortunately, quick identification of the complication and the application of direct manual pressure allowed for swift return to the operating room for repair of the defect. The patient secondarily underwent definitive closure of the mediastinal wound with an omental flap and bilateral pectoral advancement flaps. Discussion: Following the conclusion of this article, the reconstructive surgeon should be able to (1) identify patients at risk for ventricular perforation, (2) exhaust all means intraoperatively to prevent cardiac perforation when using vacuum-assisted closure therapy, (3) comprehend the physiology associated with vacuum-assisted closure use in this patient population, (4) have protocols in place for the management of patients with deep sternal wound infection with vacuum-assisted closure therapy postoperatively, and (5) understand basic tenets of ventricular rupture treatment should this occur to ensure prompt repair and survival.