We present a case of a 94-year-old female who presented to the emergency room with a fever and generalized weakness without an initial obvious source of infection. Throughout admission, she continued to be febrile despite broad-spectrum antibiotics. Several days into admission, the patient complained of severe back pain, necessitating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the entire spine. The imaging revealed an extensive epidural fluid collection consistent with a spinal epidural abscess. Fortunately, she did not have any neurological deficits and was treated conservatively with IV antibiotics with improvement. This case highlights this rare presentation and the importance of early diagnosis and management of spinal epidural abscesses.

A spinal epidural abscess is a rare condition characterized by the accumulation of pus between the dura mater and vertebral column, often caused by hematogenous spread from a distant site or local spread from infection in nearby structures. The abscess leads to compression of the spinal cord and can result in neurological damage, including dysfunction or permanent neurological deficits. Treatment of spinal epidural abscesses should not be delayed and requires a combination of decompression by surgical drainage and antibiotic therapy. The authors present a rare case in which a spinal epidural abscess developed from a hospital-acquired pressure ulcer, further complicated by bacteremia.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited consensus regarding management of spinal epidural abscesses (SEAs), particularly in patients without neurologic deficits. Several models have been created to predict failure of medical management in patients with SEA. We evaluate the external validity of 5 predictive models in an independent cohort of patients with SEA.
METHODS: One hundred seventy-six patients with SEA between 2010 and 2019 at our institution were identified, and variables relevant to each predictive model were collected. Published prediction models were used to assign probability of medical management failure to each patient. Predicted probabilities of medical failure and actual patient outcomes were used to create receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve used to quantify a model\'s discriminative ability. Calibration curves were plotted using predicted probabilities and actual outcomes. The Spiegelhalter z-test was used to determine adequate model calibration.
RESULTS: One model (Kim et al) demonstrated good discriminative ability and adequate model calibration in our cohort (ROC = 0.831, P value = 0.83). Parameters included in the model were age >65, diabetes, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, and neurologic impairment. Four additional models did not perform well for discrimination or calibration metrics (Patel et al, ROC = 0.580, P ≤ 0.0001; Shah et al, ROC = 0.653, P ≤ 0.0001; Baum et al, ROC = 0.498, P ≤ 0.0001; Page et al, ROC = 0.534, P ≤ 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Only 1 published predictive model demonstrated acceptable discrimination and calibration in our cohort, suggesting limited generalizability of the evaluated models. Multi-institutional data may facilitate the development of widely applicable models to predict medical management failure in patients with SEA.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare but dangerous condition, and traditional surgical methods are accompanied by extensive trauma and approach-related complications. Here we introduce the technique of full-endoscopic transforaminal debridement and decompression and evaluate its feasibility for treating brucellar thoracic SEA.
METHODS: We performed thoracic full-endoscopic transforaminal decompression and debridement on two patients with neurological deficits caused by brucellar SEA, which is mainly composed of granulation tissue rather than pus. Postoperative MRI was conducted to confirm the presence of any residual abscess compressing the nerves. Frankel grading was employed to assess the recovery of neurological function, and complications were documented.
RESULTS: There were no occurrences of dural tear, postoperative hematoma, or pulmonary complications. Their neurological function had significantly improved after surgery, and postoperative MRI confirmed no residual abscess compressing the spinal cord. During the 2-year follow-up, one patient achieved complete recovery (from Frankel-C to Frankel-E), while another patient improved from Frankel-A to Frankel-D. Neither patient experienced infection recurrence, instability, nor kyphotic deformity.
CONCLUSIONS: We described the novel application of transforaminal endoscopic surgery in brucellar thoracic granulomatous SEA and preliminarily indicated the feasibility of this technique as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed forms of cancer, and it is associated with several common symptoms and signs such as rectal bleeding, altered bowel habits, abdominal pain, anemia, and unintentional weight loss. Sciatica, a debilitating condition in which the patient experiences paresthesia and pain in the dermatome of associated lumbosacral nerve roots or sciatic nerve distribution, is not considered one of these. Here we present a case of colorectal cancer manifesting symptoms of sciatica alone.
METHODS: A 68-year-old male presented with progressive lower back pain radiating to his left thigh and calf over L5/S1 dermatome. Sciatica was suspected and initially underwent conservative treatment with analgesics. However, the symptoms progressed and MRI revealed an epidural abscess surprisingly. Surgical debridement was performed and pus culture isolated Streptococcus gallolyticus. Based on the strong association of S. gallolyticus with colorectal cancer, the presence of this pathogen prompted further tumor evaluation, even in the absence of the typical symptoms and signs. This investigation ultimately leads to the diagnosis of sigmoid adenocarcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, sciatica caused by S. gallolyticus infection of the spinal epidural space may serve as the initial presentation of colorectal cancer. Physicians should be aware of the strong association between S. gallolyticus and colorectal cancer. Based on what we currently know about the condition; a thorough systematic assessment of occult neoplasia for patients with S. gallolyticus infection is recommended.

UNASSIGNED: Spinal epidural abscesses (SEAs) are a devastating condition with high levels of associated morbidity and mortality. Hounsfield units (HUs), a marker of radiodensity on CT scans, have previously been correlated with adverse events following spinal interventions. We evaluated whether HUs might also be associated with all-cause complications and/or mortality in this high-risk population.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study was carried out within an academic health system in the United States. Adults diagnosed with a SEA between 2006 and 2021 and who also had a CT scan characterizing their SEA within 6 months of diagnosis were considered. HUs were abstracted from the 4 vertebral bodies nearest to, but not including, the infected levels. Our primary outcome was the presence of composite 90-day complications and HUs represented the primary predictor. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted adjusting for demographic and disease-specific confounders. In sensitivity testing, separate logistic regression analyses were conducted (1) in patients aged 65 and older and (2) with mortality as the primary outcome.
UNASSIGNED: Our cohort consisted of 399 patients. The overall incidence of 90-day complications was 61.2% (n=244), with a 7.8% (n=31) 90-day mortality rate. Those experiencing complications were more likely to have undergone surgery to treat their SEA (58.6% vs. 46.5%; p=.018) but otherwise the cohorts were similar. HUs were not associated with composite 90-day complications (Odds ratio [OR] 1.00 [95% CI 1.00-1.00]; p=.842). Similar findings were noted in sensitivity testing.
UNASSIGNED: While HUs have previously been correlated with adverse events in certain clinical contexts, we found no evidence to suggest that HUs are associated with all-cause complications or mortality in patients with SEAs. Future research hoping to leverage 3-dimensional imaging as a prognostic measure in this patient population should focus on alternative targets.
UNASSIGNED: Level III; Observational Cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare and life-threatening infection within the epidural space with significant functional impairment and morbidity. Active debate remains over whether to operate for SEAs, with limited existing data comparing the long-term survivability after surgical versus nonsurgical management.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the long-term survival of patients who underwent surgical and nonsurgical management for SEA.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: A total of 250 consecutive SEA patients.
METHODS: Survival and mortality rates, complications.
METHODS: All patients treated at a tertiary medical center for a primary SEA from January 2000 to June 2020 are identified. Data collection is by retrospective chart review. Cox proportional hazards regression models are used for all survival analyses while controlling for potential confounding variables and with multiple testing corrections.
RESULTS: A total of 35 out of 250 patients died with an overall all-cause mortality of 14%. More than half of all deaths occurred within 90 days after treatment. The 90-day, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates are 92.8%, 89.2%, and 86.4%, respectively. Among surgery patients, the all-cause mortality was 13.07%, compared to 16.22% for medically-managed patients. Surgical treatment (decompression, fusion, debridement) significantly reduced the risk of death by 62.4% compared to medical therapy (p=.03), but surgery patients experienced a significantly longer mean length of stay (p=.01). Risk factors of short-term mortality included hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 4+, and cardiac arrest. Risk factors of long-term mortality were immunocompromised state, elevated WBC count >12,000, sepsis, septic shock, ASA 4+, and cardiac arrest (p<.05). In terms of complications, surgically-managed patients experienced a higher proportion of deep vein thrombosis (p<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall long-term survivability of SEA treatment is relatively high at (86% at 5-year) in this study. The following SEA mortality risk factors were identified: hypoalbuminemia (short-term), immunocompromised state (long-term), leukocytosis (long-term), sepsis and septic shock (long-term), ASA 4+ and cardiac arrest (overall). For primary SEA patients, surgical management may reduce mortality risk compared to nonsurgical management.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the lack of evidence on the diagnostics, clinical course, treatment, and outcomes of patients with extremely rare spinal intradural abscess (SIA) and spinal epidural abscess (SEA), we retrospectively analyzed and compared a cohort of patients to determine the phenotyping of both entities.
METHODS: Over a period of 20 years, we retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of 78 patients with SIA and SEA.
RESULTS: The patients with SIA showed worse motor scores (MS scores) on admission (SIA: 20 ± 26 vs. SEA: 75 ± 34, p < 0.001), more often with an ataxic gait (SIA: 100% vs. SEA: 31.8%, p < 0.001), and more frequent bladder or bowel dysfunction (SIA: 91.7% vs. SEA: 27.3%, p < 0.001) compared to the SEA patients. Intraoperative specimens showed a higher diagnostic sensitivity in the SEA patients than the SIA patients (SIA: 66.7% vs. SEA: 95.2%, p = 0.024), but various pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus (SIA 33.3% vs. SEA: 69.4%) and Streptococci and Enterococci (SIA 33.3% vs. SEA: 8.1%, p = 0.038) were detected in both entities. The patients with SIA developed sepsis more often (SIA: 75.0% vs. SEA: 18.2%, p < 0.001), septic embolism (SIA: 33.3% vs. SEA: 8.3%, p = 0.043), signs of meningism (SIA: 100% vs. 18.5%, p < 0.001), ventriculitis or cerebral abscesses (SIA: 41.7% vs. SEA: 3.0%, p < 0.001), and pneumonia (SIA: 58.3% vs. SEA: 13.6%, p = 0.002). The mean MS score improved in both patient groups after surgery (SIA: 20 to 35 vs. SEA: 75 to 90); however, the SIA patients showed a poorer MS score at discharge (SIA: 35 ± 44 vs. SEA: 90 ± 20, p < 0.001). C-reactive protein (CrP) (SIA: 159 to 49 vs. SEA: 189 to 27) and leukocyte count (SIA: 15 to 9 vs. SEA: 14 to 7) were reduced at discharge. The SIA patients had higher rates of disease-related mortality (SIA: 33.3% vs. SEA: 1.5%, p = 0.002), had more pleural empyema (SIA: 58.3% vs. SEA: 13.6%, p = 0.002), required more than one surgery (SIA: 33.3% vs. SEA 13.6%, p = 0.009), were treated longer with intravenous antibiotics (7 ± 4 w vs. 3 ± 2 w, p < 0.001) and antibiotics overall (12 ± 10 w vs. 7 ± 3 w, p = 0.022), and spent more time in the hospital (SIA: 58 ± 36 vs. SEA: 26 ± 20, p < 0.001) and in the intensive care unit (SIA: 14 ± 18 vs. SEA: 4 ± 8, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlighted distinct clinical phenotypes and outcomes between both entities, with SIA patients displaying a markedly less favorable disease course in terms of complications and outcomes.

METHODS: A retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic score for mortality and treatment failure in Spinal epidural abscess (SEA), based on simplicity and multidimensional assessment principles.
METHODS: One-hundred-fifty patients were reviewed. Variables assessed included comorbidities, functional status, clinical presentation, Frankel classification, and biochemical and radiological parameters. The main outcomes were the 90-day mortality and treatment failure, corresponding to any intensification of the initial treatment plan. Variables were sorted out with a factorial analysis. Logistic regressions were performed, and the new score was derived from the coefficients. ROC curves with Area Under Curve, calibration plots, and cross-validation were performed.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients (29%) had treatment failure, and 15 died (10%) by 90 days. Factorization created 3 groups: Comorbidities (C), Severity (S), and Function (F). For 90-day mortality, Odds ratios were 1.20 (P = .0002), 1.15, (P = .03), 1.36, (P < 10-4) for C, S, F, respectively. The new score \'CSF\' had 1 point per item, ranging from zero to 3. OR increased by 1.2/point for 90-day mortality (P < 10-4), AUC was .86. For failures OR increased by 1.15/point (P = .014), AUC was .58, and increased to .64 for patients who survived after 90 days, probably due to competing risks.
CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities, Severity, and Function is a new simplistic tool, easy to use in daily practice; its performances were excellent for 90-day mortality, and acceptable for failures. Simple tools are more likely to be adopted into practice. External validation of this technique is desirable.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the incidence of spinal epidural abscesses (SEA) has tripled in number and nonoperative management has risen in popularity. While there has been a shift towards reserving surgical intervention for patients with focal neurologic deficits, a third of patients will still fail medical management and require surgical intervention. Failure to understand long-term quality of life and functional outcomes hinders effective decision making and prognostication.
OBJECTIVE: To describe patterns and associated factors impacting long-term quality of life following treatment of spinal epidural abscess.
METHODS: Multicenter cohort study at two urban academic tertiary referral centers and two community centers.
METHODS: Adult patients treated for a spinal epidural abscess.
METHODS: EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5L (EQ5D), Neuro-Quality of Life Lower Extremity - Mobility (Short Form; NeuroQoL-LE), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (short form 4a; PROMIS PF), and PROMIS Global Mental Health score (PROMIS Mental).
METHODS: Eligible patients were enrolled and administered questionnaires. Multivariable analysis assessed the influence of ambulatory status on HRQL, adjusting for covariates including age, biologic sex, Charlson comorbidity index, intravenous drug use, management approach, and ASIA grade on presentation.
RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were enrolled (mean age 60.5 years, 46% male). Thirty-four patients (58%) underwent operative management. Mean standard deviation (SD) results for HRQL measures were: EQ5D 0.51 (0.37), EQ5D visual analogue scale 60.34 (25.11), NeuroQoL Lower extremity 41.47 (10.64), PROMIS physical function 39.49 (10.07), and PROMIS Global Mental Health 44.23 (10.36). Adjusted analysis demonstrated ambulatory status at presentation, and at 1 year, to be important drivers of HRQL, irrespective of other factors including IVDU and ASIA grade. Patients with independent ambulatory function at 1 year had mean EQ5D utility of 0.65 (95% CI 0.55, 0.75), whereas those requiring assistive devices saw a 49% decrease with mean EQ5D utility of 0.32 (0.14, 0.51). Ambulatory status was associated with global and physical function but did not impact overall health self-assessment or mental health scores.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that ambulatory status was the most important factor associated with long-term HRQL regardless of other factors such as ASIA grade or IVDU. Given prior literature demonstrating the protective effect of operative intervention on ambulatory function, this highlights ambulatory dysfunction as a potential indication for surgery and a marker of poor long-term prognosis, even in the absence of focal neurologic deficits. Our work also highlights the importance of optimized long-term rehabilitation strategies aimed to preserve ambulatory function in this high-risk population.
METHODS: Level III, cohort study.