COVID-19 is currently a major health problem, leading to respiratory, cardiovascular and neurological complications, with additional morbidity and mortality. Spinal infections are rare, representing around 1% of all bone infections and comprising less than 2 per 10,000 of all hospitalizations in tertiary care centers. Spondylodiscitis is a complex disease, with challenging diagnosis and management. We report the case of a 45-year-old man, non-smoker hospitalized for severe COVID-19 disease with respiratory failure. Post-COVID-19, in the 8th week after discharge, he was diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging with spondylodiscitis, but etiology was not confirmed by microbiological investigations. Antibiotics were used, considering the identification of MRSA from cultures of pleural fluid and nasal swab, but surgical intervention was not provided. Clinic, biologic and imagistic were improved, but rehabilitation and long term follow up are necessary. We concluded that spondylodiscitis with spinal abscess is a rare but severe complication post-COVID-19 disease, due to dysbalanced immune response related to the respiratory viral infection, endothelial lesions, hypercoagulation and bacterial superinfection.

There is limited information on canine spinal epidural empyema (SEE). The aim of this multicenter retrospective study is to describe the clinical presentation and outcome of dogs undergoing spinal surgery or conservative management for SEE. Forty-one dogs met the inclusion criteria; the SEE was treated surgically in 17 dogs and conservatively in 24 dogs. Two dogs underwent spinal surgery after failure of conservative management, meaning that 19 dogs in total had spinal surgery. Long-term (i.e., >6 months) follow-up was available in 35 dogs (19 conservatively treated and 16 surgically treated dogs). Recovery to a functional pet status was achieved in 15/19 (78.9%) conservatively treated and 12/16 (75%) surgically treated dogs. There was no significant difference (p = 1.000) in long-term outcome between conservatively and surgically treated dogs (78.9 and 75%, respectively). However, significantly more surgically treated dogs were non-ambulatory at presentation (9/17 vs. 5/24, p = 0.048) compared with conservatively treated dogs. This study suggests that conservative treatment may be appropriate for dogs with SEE that are ambulatory at presentation and that surgically treated dogs generally have good outcomes. Age may be a negative prognostic indicator as dogs with poor long-term outcomes were significantly older than dogs with a good long-term outcome (p = 0.048). A larger prospective randomized study may provide further insight on treatment and outcome of SEE in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the effectiveness of cefazolin and cloxacillin as definitive antibiotic therapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) spinal epidural abscess (SEA).
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with MSSA SEA from two academic hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, between 2014 and 2020. Patients treated with cefazolin were compared to those treated with cloxacillin. Co-primary outcomes included 90-day mortality, antibiotic failure, adverse reactions and recurrence. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores was used to balance important prognostic factors and to estimate an adjusted risk difference.
RESULTS: Of 98 patients with MSSA SEA, 50 and 48 patients were treated with cefazolin and cloxacillin, respectively. Mortality at 90 days was 8% and 13% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively (P = 0.52). The antibiotic failure rate was 12% and 19% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively (P = 0.41). The serious adverse reactions rate was 0% and 4% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively (P = 0.24). The recurrence rate was 2% and 8% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively (P = 0.20). The adjusted risk difference for mortality at 90 days was -1% [95% confidence interval (CI) -10% to 8%] favouring cefazolin. The adjusted risk differences for antibiotic failure, adverse reactions and recurrence were 1% (95% CI -12% to 14%), -5% (95% CI -11% to 2%) and -18% (-36% to -1%) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Cefazolin is likely as effective as an antistaphylococcal penicillin and may be considered as a first-line treatment for MSSA SEA.

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) patients have increased medical comorbidities and risk factors for infection compared with those without SEA. However, the association between frailty and SEA patients has not been documented.
A total of 46 SEA patients were randomly paired and matched by age and sex with a control group of patients with back pain who had presented to our emergency department from 2012 to 2017. Statistical analysis identified the risk factors associated with SEA and frailty using the modified frailty index (mFI), and the patients were stratified into robust, prefrail, and frail groups. We examined the value of the mFI as a prognostic predictor and evaluated the classic risk factors (CRFs).
The SEA patients had higher mFIs and CRFs (P = 0.023 and P < 0.001, respectively) and a longer length of stay (22.89 days vs. 1.72 days; P < 0.001). Of the mFI variables, only diabetes had a significant association with SEA (odds ratio [OR], 3.60; P = 0.012). Among the stratified mFI subgroups, a frail ranking (mFI >2) was the strongest risk factor for SEA (OR, 5.18; P = 0.003). A robust ranking (mFI, 0-1) was a weak negative predictor for SEA (OR, 0.41; P = 0.058). The robust patients were also more likely to be discharged to home (OR, 7.58; P = 0.002). Of the CRF variables, only intravenous drug use had a statistically significant association with SEA (OR, 10.72; P = 0.015).
Patients with SEA were more frail compared with the control back pain patients. Frailty was determined to be an independent risk factor for SEA, outside of the CRFs. The use of the mFI could be potentially useful in predicting the diagnosis, prognosticating, and guiding SEA treatment.

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is an uncommon and highly morbid infection of the epidural space. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are known to be at increased risk of developing SEA; however, there are no studies that have described the risk factors and outcomes of SEA in ESRD patients utilizing the United States Renal Data System (USRDS).
To determine risk factors, morbidity, and mortality associated with SEA in ESRD patients, a retrospective case-control study was conducted using the USRDS. ESRD patients diagnosed with SEA between 2005 and 2010 were identified, and logistic regression was performed to examine correlates of SEA, as well as risk factors associated with mortality in SEA-ESRD patients.
The prevalence of SEA amongst ESRD patients was 0.39% (n = 1,697). Patients with SEA were more likely to be male [adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.22], black (OR = 1.19), diabetic (OR = 1.26), with catheter access (OR = 1.29), and less likely to be ≥65 years old (OR = 0.64). Osteomyelitis, bacteremia/septicemia, MRSA, and endocarditis were all significantly associated with increased risk of SEA (OR = 1.54-5.14). Age ≥65 years (HR = 1.45), urinary tract infections (HR = 1.26), decubitus ulcers (HR=1.37), and post-SEA paraplegia (HR = 1.25) were significantly associated with mortality among those with SEA.
As described in previous literature, risk factors for SEA included infections, diabetes, and indwelling catheters. Additionally, clinicians should be aware of the risk factors for mortality in SEA-ESRD patients. As the largest study of SEA to date, our report identifies important risk factors for SEA in ESRD patients, and novel data regarding their mortality-associated risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Spinal epidural hematoma and abscess are rare complications of neuraxial anesthesia but can cause severe neurologic deficits. The incidence of these complications vary widely in existing studies and the risk factors remain uncertain. We estimated the incidence of these complications and explored associations using a national inpatient database in Japan.
METHODS: Using Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination data on surgical inpatients who underwent neuraxial anesthesia from July 2010 to March 2017, we identified patients with spinal epidural hematoma and/or abscess. We investigated age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, antithrombotic therapy, type of surgery, admission, and hospital for association with these complications. The incidences of spinal epidural hematoma and abscess were estimated separately, and a nested case-control study was performed to examine factors associated with these complications.
RESULTS: We identified 139 patients with spinal epidural hematoma and/or abscess among 3,833,620 surgical patients undergoing neuraxial anesthesia. The incidences of spinal epidural hematoma and abscess were 27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 22 to 32) and 10 (7 to 13) per one million patients, respectively. Spinal anesthesia was associated with significantly fewer complications compared with epidural or combined spinal epidural anesthesia (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.32). Antiplatelet agent (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.06 to 3.91) and anticoagulants (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.85) were not significantly associated with these complications.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis identified the incidences of spinal epidural hematoma and/or abscess after neuraxial anesthesia. Additional large-scale studies are warranted to examine the incidences and factors associated with these complications.
RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Les hématomes et abcès périduraux sont des complications rares de l’anesthésie neuraxiale qui peuvent toutefois provoquer des atteintes neurologiques graves. L’incidence de ces complications est très variable dans les études existantes et les facteurs de risque demeurent incertains. Nous avons estimé l’incidence de ces complications et exploré les associations en analysant une base de données nationale des patients hospitalisés au Japon. MéTHODE: En nous fondant sur la base de données japonaise Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC – un système de paiement des soins de santé uniformisé) de juillet 2010 et mars 2017, nous avons identifié les patients chirurgicaux hospitalisés ayant reçu une anesthésie neuraxiale et ayant souffert d’un hématome et/ou d’un abcès péridural. Nous avons examiné l’âge, le sexe, l’indice de comorbidité de Charlson, le traitement antithrombotique, le type de chirurgie, l’admission et l’établissement pour déterminer si ces facteurs étaient associés à ces complications. Les incidences d’hématomes et d’abcès périduraux rachidiens ont été séparément estimées, et une étude cas témoins imbriquée a été réalisée pour examiner les facteurs associés à ces complications. RéSULTATS: Nous avons identifié 139 patients ayant souffert d’un hématome et/ou d’un abcès péridural parmi les 3 833 620 patients chirurgicaux ayant reçu une anesthésie neuraxiale. Les incidences d’hématome et d’abcès périduraux rachidiens étaient de 27 (intervalle de confiance [IC] 95 %, 22 à 32) et 10 (7 à 13) par million de patients, respectivement. La rachianesthésie était associée à un nombre significativement plus faible de complications comparativement à une anesthésie péridurale ou péridurale rachidienne combinée (rapport de cotes, 0,15; IC 95 %, 0,08 à 0,32). Aucune association significative n’a été observée entre les agents antiplaquettaires (rapport de cotes, 0,49; IC 95 %, 0,06 à 3,91) ou les anticoagulants (rapport de cotes, 1,65; IC 95 %, 0,95 à 2,85) et ces complications. CONCLUSION: Cette analyse a identifié les incidences d’hématome et/ou d’abcès péridural après une anesthésie neuraxiale. Des études supplémentaires de grande envergure sont nécessaires pour examiner les incidences et les facteurs associés à ces complications.

The incidence of spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is rising, yet there are few reports discussing readmission rates or predisposing factors for readmission after treatment. The aims of the present study were to determine the rate of 90-day readmission following medical or surgical treatment of SEA in an urban population, identify patients at increased risk for readmission, and delineate the principal causes of readmission.
Neurosurgery records from two large urban institutions were reviewed to identify patients who were treated for SEA. Patients who died during admission or were discharged to hospice were excluded. Univariate analysis was performed using chi-square and Student t-tests to identify potential predictors of readmission. A multivariate logistic regression model, controlled for age, body mass index, sex, and institution, was used to determine significant predictors of readmission.
Of 103 patients with identified SEA, 97 met the inclusion criteria. Their mean age was 57.1 years, and 56 patients (57.7%) were male. The all-cause 90-day readmission rate was 37.1%. Infection (sepsis, osteomyelitis, persistent abscess, bacteremia) was the most common cause of readmission, accounting for 36.1% of all readmissions. Neither pretreatment neurological deficit (p = 0.16) nor use of surgical versus medical management (p = 0.33) was significantly associated with readmission. Multivariate analysis identified immunocompromised status (p = 0.036; OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1-11.5) and hepatic disease (chronic hepatitis or alcohol abuse) (p = 0.033; OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.7) as positive predictors of 90-day readmission.
The most common indication for readmission was persistent infection. Readmission was unrelated to baseline neurological status or management strategy. However, both hepatic disease and baseline immunosuppression significantly increased the odds of 90-day readmission after SEA treatment. Patients with these conditions may require closer follow-up upon discharge to reduce overall morbidity and hospital costs associated with SEA.

To identify clinical characteristics associated with pyogenic spinal infection among adults presenting to a community emergency department (ED) with neck or back pain. A secondary objective was to describe the frequency of these characteristics among patients with spinal epidural abscess (SEA).
We conducted a prospective cohort study in a community ED enrolling adults with neck or back pain in whom the ED provider had clinical concern for pyogenic spinal infection. Study phase 1 (Jan 2004-Mar 2010) included patients with and without pyogenic spinal infection. Phase 2 (Apr 2010-Aug 2018) included only patients with pyogenic spinal infection. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses for association of clinical characteristics with pyogenic spinal infection.
We enrolled 232 and analyzed 223 patients, 89 of whom had pyogenic spinal infection. The median age was 55 years and 102 patients (45.7%) were male. The clinical characteristics associated with pyogenic spinal infection on multivariate analysis of study phase 1 included recent soft tissue infection or bacteremia (OR 13.5, 95% CI 3.6 to 50.7), male sex (OR 5.0, 95% CI 2.5 to 10.0), and fever in the ED or prior to arrival (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 6.0). Among patients with SEA (n = 61), 49 (80.3%) had at least one historical risk factor, 12 (19.7%) had fever in the ED, and 8 (13.1%) had a history of intravenous drug use.
Male sex, fever, and recent soft tissue infection or bacteremia were associated with pyogenic spinal infection in this prospective ED cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have shown that in carefully selected patients, conservative treatment alone can be an option in the management of spinal epidural abscess (SEA). The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors of outcome in patients with spontaneous SEA treated conservatively.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all patients with spontaneous SEA treated with antibiotics alone from January 2012 to December 2015 was conducted in a 1200-bed tertiary referral center. Demographic, clinical, microbiological, and radiological characteristics were analyzed. Failure of medical treatment was defined as the need for delayed surgical intervention, no neurological improvement or deterioration, death due to the infection, or relapse after hospital discharge.
RESULTS: We identified 21 patients diagnosed with spontaneous SEA treated conservatively. Median age was 72 years and 10 patients were male. Eleven patients presented with radicular weakness and/or radicular sensory deficit, or incomplete cord injury. Inflammatory markers were markedly elevated in all patients. Thirteen patients were successfully treated with conservative treatment, while among 8 patients with treatment failure, 1 died due to the infection. Presence of serious neurological deficits and infection due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were associated with failure of conservative treatment. Notably, neither the extension nor the location of the abscess on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was associated with failed medical management.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients with spontaneous SEA can respond to antibiotic treatment alone. However, in patients with infection due to MRSA or with severe neurological impairment, conservative management has an increased risk of failure.

Spinal epidural abscess is a rare clinical entity with considerable morbidity. Even with prompt diagnosis and treatment, many patients are left with persistent residual neurological deficits. The present study details the outcome in 23 patients of primary pyogenic spinal epidural abscess, addressing the outcome following late presentation at a neurological facility. At presentation only 2 patients had relatively preserved neurological status. Eleven patients were paraplegic. All the patients underwent laminectomy and evacuation of abscess. A good functional outcome was observed in almost half of the patients, and there was a significant reduction in the number of the patients with severe disability. Factors influencing the outcome are described in this study.