Source control

源代码控制
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定铜绿假单胞菌菌血症患者死亡率的预测因子。
    方法:回顾性研究。
    方法:这项研究在洛桑大学医院进行,瑞士纳入了2015年至2021年铜绿假单胞菌菌血症的成年患者。
    结果:在研究期间,包括278次铜绿假单胞菌菌血症。20个(7%)分离株具有多重耐药性。最常见的感染类型是下呼吸道感染(58次发作;21%)。脓毒症在大多数发作中存在(152;55%)。在203次(73%)发作中,在菌血症发作后48小时内进行了传染病咨询。在257(92%)次发作中,48小时内进行了适当的抗菌治疗。对于大多数事件(145;52%),源代码控制被认为是必要的,其中93例(64%)在48小时内接受此类干预。14天死亡率为15%(42次发作)。Cox多变量回归模型显示14天死亡率与脓毒症相关(P0.002;aHR6.58,CI1.95-22.16),和下呼吸道感染(P<0.001;aHR4.63,CI1.78-12.06)。相反,在菌血症发作48小时内进行干预,如传染病咨询(P0.036;HR0.51,CI0.27-0.96),和来源对照(P0.009;aHR0.17,CI0.47-0.64)与改善的结局相关。
    结论:我们的发现强调了早期感染性疾病咨询在推荐来源控制干预措施和指导铜绿假单胞菌菌血症患者抗菌治疗方面的关键作用。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of mortality among patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia.
    METHODS: Retrospective study.
    METHODS: This study conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland included adult patients with P. aeruginosa bacteraemia from 2015 to 2021.
    RESULTS: During the study period, 278 episodes of P. aeruginosa bacteraemia were included. Twenty (7%) isolates were multidrug-resistant. The most common type of infection was low respiratory tract infection (58 episodes; 21%). Sepsis was present in the majority of episodes (152; 55%). Infectious diseases consultation within 48 h of bacteraemia onset was performed in 203 (73%) episodes. Appropriate antimicrobial treatment was administered within 48 h in 257 (92%) episodes. For most episodes (145; 52%), source control was considered necessary, with 93 (64%) of them undergoing such interventions within 48 h. The 14-day mortality was 15% (42 episodes). The Cox multivariable regression model showed that 14-day mortality was associated with sepsis (P 0.002; aHR 6.58, CI 1.95-22.16), and lower respiratory tract infection (P < 0.001; aHR 4.63, CI 1.78-12.06). Conversely, interventions performed within 48 h of bacteraemia onset, such as infectious diseases consultation (P 0.036; HR 0.51, CI 0.27-0.96), and source control (P 0.009; aHR 0.17, CI 0.47-0.64) were associated with improved outcome.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the pivotal role of early infectious diseases consultation in recommending source control interventions and guiding antimicrobial treatment for patients with P. aeruginosa bacteraemia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:紧密贴合的口罩和呼吸器,在人体模型研究中,与宽松的口罩相比,改进了气溶胶源控制。这是否转化为人类尚不清楚。
    方法:我们比较了口罩(布和手术)和呼吸器(KN95和N95)作为COVID-19志愿者呼出气中SARS-CoV-2病毒载量的来源对照的有效性。志愿者(N=44,女性占43%)提供了成对的未掩盖和掩盖的呼吸样本,从而可以计算源控制因子。
    结果:所有的口罩和呼吸器都显著降低了呼出的病毒载量,没有合适的测试或培训。鸭嘴N95使呼出的病毒载量减少了98%(95%CI:97%-99%),并且显著优于KN95(p<0.001)以及布和外科口罩。布面罩优于外科面罩(p=0.027)和测试的KN95(p=0.014)。
    结论:这些结果表明,当呼吸道病毒感染在社区中普遍存在且与医疗保健相关的传播风险升高时,N95呼吸器可能成为疗养院和医疗机构的护理标准。
    背景:国防高级研究计划局,国家过敏和传染病研究所,疾病控制和预防中心,比尔和梅林达·盖茨基金会,还有流感实验室.
    BACKGROUND: Tight-fitting masks and respirators, in manikin studies, improved aerosol source control compared to loose-fitting masks. Whether this translates to humans is not known.
    METHODS: We compared efficacy of masks (cloth and surgical) and respirators (KN95 and N95) as source control for SARS-CoV-2 viral load in exhaled breath of volunteers with COVID-19 using a controlled human experimental study. Volunteers (N = 44, 43% female) provided paired unmasked and masked breath samples allowing computation of source-control factors.
    RESULTS: All masks and respirators significantly reduced exhaled viral load, without fit tests or training. A duckbill N95 reduced exhaled viral load by 98% (95% CI: 97%-99%), and significantly outperformed a KN95 (p < 0.001) as well as cloth and surgical masks. Cloth masks outperformed a surgical mask (p = 0.027) and the tested KN95 (p = 0.014).
    CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that N95 respirators could be the standard of care in nursing homes and healthcare settings when respiratory viral infections are prevalent in the community and healthcare-associated transmission risk is elevated.
    BACKGROUND: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and The Flu Lab.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:链球菌菌血症与高死亡率相关。该研究旨在确定链球菌菌血症患者死亡率的预测因素。
    方法:这项回顾性研究在洛桑大学医院进行,瑞士,并纳入了2015年至2023年成人患者链球菌菌血症的发作。
    结果:在研究期间,包括861例链球菌菌血症。大多数发作被归类在米蒂斯组(348次发作;40%),其次是化脓性组(215;25%)。心内膜炎是菌血症的最常见来源(164;19%)。总体14天死亡率为8%(65次发作)。Cox多变量回归模型的结果表明,Charlson合并症指数>4(P0.001;HR2.87,CI1.58-5.22),S、化脓性(P0.011;HR2.54,CI1.24-5.21),脓毒症(P<0.001;HR7.48,CI3.86-14.47),下呼吸道感染(P0.002;HR2.62,CI1.42-4.81),尽管有必要,但在48小时内没有来源控制干预措施(P0.002;HR2.62,CI1.43-4.80)与14天死亡率相关.相反,在菌血症发病48小时内进行干预,如传染病咨询(P<0.001;HR0.29,CI0.17-0.48),和适当的抗菌治疗(P<0.001;HR0.28,CI0.14-0.57)与改善的结果相关。
    结论:我们的研究结果强调了传染病咨询在指导链球菌菌血症患者的抗菌治疗和推荐来源控制干预方面的关键作用。
    BACKGROUND: Streptococcal bacteremia is associated with high mortality. Thia study aims to identify predictors of mortality among patients with streptococcal bacteremia.
    METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, and included episodes of streptococcal bacteremia among adult patients from 2015 to 2023.
    RESULTS: During the study period, 861 episodes of streptococcal bacteremia were included. The majority of episodes were categorized in the Mitis group (348 episodes; 40%), followed by the Pyogenic group (215; 25%). Endocarditis was the most common source of bacteremia (164; 19%). The overall 14-day mortality rate was 8% (65 episodes). The results from the Cox multivariable regression model showed that a Charlson comorbidity index >4 (P .001; hazard ratio [HR], 2.87; confidence interval [CI]: 1.58-5.22), Streptococcus pyogenes (P = .011; HR, 2.54;CI: 1.24-5.21), sepsis (P < .001; HR, 7.48; CI: 3.86-14.47), lower respiratory tract infection (P = .002; HR, 2.62; CI: 1.42-4.81), and absence of source control interventions within 48 hours despite being warranted (P = .002; HR, 2.62; CI: 1.43-4.80) were associated with 14-day mortality. Conversely, interventions performed within 48 hours of bacteremia onset, such as infectious diseases consultation (P < .001; HR, 0.29; CI: .17-.48) and appropriate antimicrobial treatment (P < .001; HR, .28; CI: .14-.57), were associated with improved outcome.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the pivotal role of infectious diseases consultation in guiding antimicrobial treatment and recommending source control interventions for patients with streptococcal bacteremia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:念珠菌菌血症与高死亡率相关,尤其是在危重患者中。我们的目的是确定念珠菌血症危重患者死亡率的预测因素,重点是可以改善预后的早期干预措施。
    方法:多中心回顾性研究。
    方法:这项回顾性研究于2015年至2021年在三家欧洲大学医院的重症监护病房进行。至少有一种念珠菌血培养阳性的成年患者。包括在内。不需要源控制的患者被排除。主要结果是14天死亡率。
    结果:共纳入409次念珠菌血症。大多数念珠菌与导管相关(173;41%),其次是来历不明(170;40%)。43%的发作发生感染性休克。总的来说,14天死亡率为29%。在Cox比例风险回归模型中,感染性休克(P0.001;HR2.20,CI1.38-3.50),SOFA评分≥10分(P0.008;HR1.83,CI1.18-2.86),和先前的SARS-CoV-2感染(P0.003;HR1.87,CI1.23-2.85)与14天死亡率相关,而联合早期适当的抗真菌治疗和来源控制(P<0.001;HR0.15,CI0.08-0.28),与没有早期适当抗真菌治疗或来源控制的患者相比,没有适当抗真菌治疗的早期来源控制(P<0.001;HR0.23,CI0.12-0.47)与更好的生存率相关。
    结论:在念珠菌病危重患者中,早期源控制与更好的预后相关。
    OBJECTIVE: Candidemia is associated with high mortality especially in critically ill patients. Our aim was to identify predictors of mortality among critically ill patients with candidemia with a focus on early interventions that can improve prognosis.
    METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study.
    METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in Intensive Care Units from three European university hospitals from 2015 to 2021. Adult patients with at least one positive blood culture for Candida spp. were included. Patients who did not require source control were excluded. Primary outcome was 14-day mortality.
    RESULTS: A total of 409 episodes of candidemia were included. Most candidemias were catheter related (173; 41%), followed by unknown origin (170; 40%). Septic shock developed in 43% episodes. Overall, 14-day mortality rate was 29%. In Cox proportional hazards regression model, septic shock (P 0.001; HR 2.20, CI 1.38-3.50), SOFA score ≥ 10 points (P 0.008; HR 1.83, CI 1.18-2.86), and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (P 0.003; HR 1.87, CI 1.23-2.85) were associated with 14-day mortality, while combined early appropriate antifungal treatment and source control (P < 0.001; HR 0.15, CI 0.08-0.28), and early source control without appropriate antifungal treatment (P < 0.001; HR 0.23, CI 0.12-0.47) were associated with better survival compared to those without neither early appropriate antifungal treatment nor source control.
    CONCLUSIONS: Early source control was associated with better outcome among candidemic critically ill patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症与高死亡率相关。目的是确定金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者死亡率的预测因子,并评估早期来源控制的作用。这项回顾性研究是在洛桑大学医院进行的,瑞士。包括2015年至2021年成年患者中金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的所有发作。在学习期间,包括839例金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症,其中7.9%是由于耐甲氧西林的分离株。菌血症与骨或关节感染有关(268;31.9%),其次是不明原因的菌血症(158;18.8%),经证实的心内膜炎(118;14.1%)和下呼吸道感染(79;9.4%)。28天总死亡率为14.5%。Cox多元回归模型显示,Charlson合并症指数>5(P<0.001),院内菌血症(P0.019),血培养阳性时间≤13h(P0.004),持续菌血症≥48小时(P0.004),脓毒症(P<0.001),不明原因菌血症(P0.036)和下呼吸道感染(P<0.001)与28天死亡率相关,而感染发病48h内的传染病咨询(P<0.001)与更好的生存率相关。在感染发作后48小时内,575次发作和345次发作(60.0%)进行源控制。第二个多变量分析的结果证实,早期来源控制(P<0.001)与更好的生存率相关。金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者的死亡率很高,早期来源控制是预后的关键决定因素。在48h内进行传染病咨询对降低死亡率具有重要作用。
    S. aureus bacteremia is associated with high mortality. The aim was to identify predictors of mortality among patients with S. aureus bacteremia and evaluate the role of early source control. This retrospective study was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. All episodes of S. aureus bacteremia among adult patients from 2015 to 2021 were included. During the study period, 839 episodes of S. aureus bacteremia were included, of which 7.9% were due to methicillin-resistant isolates. Bacteremias were related to bone or joint infections (268; 31.9%), followed by bacteremia of unknown origin (158; 18.8%), proven endocarditis (118; 14.1%) and lower-respiratory tract infections (79; 9.4%). Overall 28-day mortality was 14.5%. Cox multivariate regression model showed that Charlson comorbidity index > 5 (P < 0.001), nosocomial bacteremia (P 0.019), time to blood culture positivity ≤ 13 h (P 0.004), persistent bacteremia for ≥ 48 h (P 0.004), sepsis (P < 0.001), bacteremia of unknown origin (P 0.036) and lower respiratory tract infection (P < 0.001) were associated with 28-day mortality, while infectious diseases consultation within 48 h from infection onset (P < 0.001) was associated with better survival. Source control was warranted in 575 episodes and performed in 345 episodes (60.0%) within 48 h from infection onset. Results from a second multivariate analysis confirmed that early source control (P < 0.001) was associated with better survival. Mortality among patients with S. aureus bacteremia was high and early source control was a key determinant of outcome. Infectious diseases consultation within 48 h played an important role in reducing mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脓毒症是医院最常见的死亡原因,和腹腔内感染(IAI)占脓毒症病因的很大一部分。我们调查了IAI引起的脓毒症患者的临床结局和影响死亡率的因素。
    方法:这项前瞻性队列研究的事后分析包括2126例败血症患者,他们访问了韩国16家三级医院(2019年9月至2020年2月)。该分析包括219名年龄>19岁的患者,他们因IAI引起的败血症而进入重症监护病房。
    结果:感染性休克的发生率为47%,在非幸存者组中明显更高(58.7%vs42.3%,p=0.028)。28天的总死亡率为28.8%。在多变量逻辑回归中,在调整了年龄之后,性别,Charlson合并症指数,还有乳酸,仅凝血功能障碍(比值比:2.78[1.47-5.23],p=0.001)是独立相关的,在对每个风险因素进行调整后,只有简化急性生理学评分III(SAPS3)(p<0.001)和连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)(p<0.001)与较高的28日死亡率独立相关.
    结论:SAPS3评分和CRRT导致的急性肾损伤与28天死亡率增加独立相关。与IAI引起的其他器官功能障碍患者相比,凝血病患者可能需要额外的支持,因为凝血病患者的预后较差。
    BACKGROUND: Sepsis is the most common cause of death in hospitals, and intra-abdominal infection (IAI) accounts for a large portion of the causes of sepsis. We investigated the clinical outcomes and factors influencing mortality of patients with sepsis due to IAI.
    METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study included 2126 patients with sepsis who visited 16 tertiary care hospitals in Korea (September 2019-February 2020). The analysis included 219 patients aged > 19 years who were admitted to intensive care units owing to sepsis caused by IAI.
    RESULTS: The incidence of septic shock was 47% and was significantly higher in the non-survivor group (58.7% vs 42.3%, p = 0.028). The overall 28-day mortality was 28.8%. In multivariable logistic regression, after adjusting for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and lactic acid, only coagulation dysfunction (odds ratio: 2.78 [1.47-5.23], p = 0.001) was independently associated, and after adjusting for each risk factor, only simplified acute physiology score III (SAPS 3) (p < 0.001) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (p < 0.001) were independently associated with higher 28-day mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: The SAPS 3 score and acute kidney injury with CRRT were independently associated with increased 28-day mortality. Additional support may be needed in patients with coagulopathy than in those with other organ dysfunctions due to IAI because patients with coagulopathy had worse prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    源头控制在感染性休克的管理中很重要。我们研究了需要源控制干预的脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者与不需要此类干预的患者的结局差异,以及源控制时机对各种临床结局的影响。
    方法:2020年2月28日至2021年3月31日的前瞻性观察性研究。
    方法:第四医学中心医学ICU。
    方法:250名成人(≥18岁)ICU患者。
    方法:无。
    结果:患者分为药物治疗组和源对照组。需要源控制的患者进一步分为早期(干预<24小时)和晚期(≥24小时)源对照组。主要结果是30天和ICU死亡率。次要结果是ICU和住院时间(LOS),机械通气的天数,需要肾脏替代治疗.共有45.9%的患者进行了源控制。其中,44.7%的患者进行了早期源控制,55.3%的患者进行了晚期源控制.在医疗对照组与来源对照组或早期与晚期来源对照组中,30天死亡率或ICU死亡率没有显着差异。与医疗组相比,来源对照组的平均住院LOS(11.5vs17.4d;p<0.01)和ICULOS(5.2vs7.7d;p<0.01)更长。延迟源控制的患者的医院LOS(12.5vs21.4d;p<0.01)和ICULOS(5.2vs9.7d;p<0.01)也比早期源控制的患者更长。其他结果无显著差异。
    结论:尽管死亡率相似,延迟源控制的患者ICU和医院LOS更长.早期源头控制可以提高感染性休克患者的医疗保健利用率。
    Source control is important in management of septic shock. We studied differences in outcomes of patients with sepsis and septic shock who required source control intervention compared with those who did not need such intervention and the effect of the timing of source control on various clinical outcomes.
    METHODS: Prospective observational study from February 28, 2020, to March 31, 2021.
    METHODS: Medical ICU of academic quaternary medical center.
    METHODS: Two hundred five adult (≥18 yr) ICU patients.
    METHODS: None.
    RESULTS: Patients were divided into a medical treatment group and a source control group. Patients requiring source control were further divided into early (intervention performed < 24 hr) and late (≥ 24 hr) source control groups. The primary outcomes were 30-day and ICU mortality. Secondary outcomes were ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), days on mechanical ventilation, and need for renal replacement therapy. A total of 45.9% patients underwent source control. Of these, early source control was performed in 44.7% and late source control in 55.3% of patients. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality or ICU mortality in the medical versus source control groups or in early versus late source control groups. Compared with the medical group, mean hospital LOS (11.5 vs 17.4 d; p < 0.01) and ICU LOS (5.2 vs 7.7 d; p < 0.01) were longer in the source control group. The hospital LOS (12.5 vs 21.4 d; p < 0.01) and ICU LOS (5.2 vs 9.7 d; p < 0.01) were also longer in patients who had delayed source control than in patients who had early source control. There were no significant differences in other outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although mortality was similar, patients who had delayed source control had a longer ICU and hospital LOS. Early source control may improve health care utilization in septic shock patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    In a multifacility prospective cohort study, we identified 116 acute care, 26 long-term care, and 67 rehabilitation patients who received direct care from a universally masked healthcare worker while communicable with COVID-19. Among 133(64%) patients with at least 14-day follow-up, 3 (2.3%, 95% CI, 0.77-6.4) became positive for SARS-CoV-2. Universal masking, embedded with other infection control practices, is associated with low risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from healthcare workers to patients and residents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Analyzing the data of the International Register of Open Abdomen (IROA), the feasibility of open abdomen treatment has been demonstrated at every age. This new analysis on the IROA database investigates the risk factors for mortality in elderly patients treated with open abdomen for intra-abdominal infection.
    METHODS: Data were derived from the IROA, a prospective observational international cohort study that enrolled patients treated with open abdomen worldwide. A univariate analysis of potential risk factors was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients older than 65 years and treated with open abdomen for intra-abdominal infection. End point was overall mortality, calculated within 30 days after open abdomen management, after 1-month and 1-year follow-up.
    RESULTS: A total of 116 patients was analyzed with mean age of 76 ± 7 years. Definitive closure was achieved in 93 patients (93/116, 80.2%) for a mean open abdomen duration of 5.0 ± 5.0 days. Complicated patients were 101 (101/116, 87.1%) for a total of 201 complications. Overall, 62 out of 116 patients (53.4%) died: 23 patients (23/62, 37.1%) during open abdomen management, 29 patients (46.8%) within 30 days after abdominal closure, 9 patients (14.5%) after 1-month follow-up, and 1 patient (1.6%) after 1-year follow-up. Age did not affect mortality (75 ± 6 years in alive patients versus 77 ± 7 years in dead patients, p = 0.773). Definitive abdominal closure was the most important factor to prevent mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that age alone cannot be considered a determinant for death, even in elderly patients managed with open abdomen for severe intra-abdominal infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹膜源控制的时机和充分性是急性腹膜炎患者管理中最重要的支柱。因此,急性腹膜炎的早期预后评估对于评估严重程度并建立及时和适当的治疗至关重要。这项研究的目的是确定急性腹膜炎患者住院死亡率的临床和实验室预测因素,并开发一个警告评分系统。基于易于识别和评估的变量,全球接受。
    这项全球多中心观察性研究在2018年2月1日至2018年5月31日的4个月研究期间,包括56个国家的153个外科部门。
    共纳入3137名患者,1815名(57.9%)男性和1322名(42.1%)女性,年龄中位数为47岁(四分位间距[IQR]28-66)。整体住院死亡率为8.9%,中位住院时间为6天(IQR4-10)。使用多变量逻辑回归,确定了与住院死亡率相关的独立变量:年龄>80岁,恶性肿瘤,严重的心血管疾病,严重的慢性肾病,呼吸频率≥22次呼吸/分钟,收缩压<100mmHg,AVPU响应量表(语音和无响应),空气中血氧饱和度(SpO2)<90%,血小板计数<50,000个细胞/mm3,乳酸>4mmol/l。这些变量用于创建PIPAS严重性评分,急性腹膜炎患者的床边预警评分。0-1分患者的总死亡率为2.9%,2-3分患者的总死亡率为22.7%,4-5分患者的总死亡率为46.8%,7-8分患者的总死亡率为86.7%。
    简单的PIPAS严重程度评分可以在全球范围内使用,可以帮助临床医生识别治疗失败和死亡的高风险患者。
    Timing and adequacy of peritoneal source control are the most important pillars in the management of patients with acute peritonitis. Therefore, early prognostic evaluation of acute peritonitis is paramount to assess the severity and establish a prompt and appropriate treatment. The objectives of this study were to identify clinical and laboratory predictors for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute peritonitis and to develop a warning score system, based on easily recognizable and assessable variables, globally accepted.
    This worldwide multicentre observational study included 153 surgical departments across 56 countries over a 4-month study period between February 1, 2018, and May 31, 2018.
    A total of 3137 patients were included, with 1815 (57.9%) men and 1322 (42.1%) women, with a median age of 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 28-66). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 8.9%, with a median length of stay of 6 days (IQR 4-10). Using multivariable logistic regression, independent variables associated with in-hospital mortality were identified: age > 80 years, malignancy, severe cardiovascular disease, severe chronic kidney disease, respiratory rate ≥ 22 breaths/min, systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg, AVPU responsiveness scale (voice and unresponsive), blood oxygen saturation level (SpO2) < 90% in air, platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm3, and lactate > 4 mmol/l. These variables were used to create the PIPAS Severity Score, a bedside early warning score for patients with acute peritonitis. The overall mortality was 2.9% for patients who had scores of 0-1, 22.7% for those who had scores of 2-3, 46.8% for those who had scores of 4-5, and 86.7% for those who have scores of 7-8.
    The simple PIPAS Severity Score can be used on a global level and can help clinicians to identify patients at high risk for treatment failure and mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号