Sinus tarsi approach

窦炎方法
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是比较扩展的外侧和窦入路治疗移位的跟骨关节内骨折的放射学和功能结果。这项回顾性研究涉及44例移位的跟骨关节内骨折患者。患者接受了扩展的外侧或窦入路治疗,并随访了至少一年。比较了两种方法之间的放射学和临床结果。与其他组相比,arsi窦入路组的手术等待时间更短,并发症发生率更低。美国骨科足踝协会踝足-后足评分没有显着差异,脚功能索引,或组间视觉模拟量表评分。在这两组中,放射学结果(伯勒角,跟骨宽度,跟骨高度)术后优于术前。对于治疗移位的跟骨关节内骨折,tarsi窦入路是一种安全有效的替代方法。与延长的外侧入路相比,它具有更低的并发症发生率和更短的手术等待时间。具有相似的功能和放射学结果。
    The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and functional outcomes of the extended lateral and sinus tarsi approaches for managing displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. This retrospective study involved 44 patients with displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The patients were treated with either the extended lateral or sinus tarsi approach and followed up for at least a year. The radiological and clinical outcomes were compared between the approaches. The waiting time for surgery was shorter and the complication rate was lower in the sinus tarsi approach group than in the other group. There were no significant differences in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score, Foot Function Index, or visual analog scale score between the groups. In both groups, the radiological outcomes (Böhler angle, calcaneal width, and calcaneal height) were better postoperatively than preoperatively. The sinus tarsi approach is a safe and effective alternative to the extended lateral approach for managing displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. It is associated with a lower complication rate and a shorter waiting time for surgery than the extended lateral approach, with similar functional and radiological outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:跟骨骨折的微创治疗具有相同的结果和较少的并发症。然而,他们在技术上要求很高,并且缺乏减少工具。为了克服这些问题,开发了一种跟骨交锁钉系统,可以使复位和固定微创和有效。我们回顾性研究了术中跟骨骨折的变量,并进行了随访,以评估使用跟骨交锁钉系统治疗的患者的预后。
    方法:回顾性分析2020年10月至2021年5月7个机构的所有跟骨交锁钉治疗的跟骨骨折患者。病人的特点,包括年龄,性别,损伤机制,桑德斯类型分类,吸烟状况,并记录了糖尿病。介绍了跟骨交锁钉和标准手术技术。术中变量,包括等待手术的日子,手术时间,失血,切口长度,和透视时间,被记录下来。并发症的结果,记录AOFAS评分和VAS评分,并与其他类似研究进行比较。
    结果:59名患者参与了这项研究;54名男性;5名女性;他们的平均年龄为47.5±9.2岁(范围为25-70岁)。这些骨折中有2个是桑德斯I型,这些骨折中有28个是桑德斯II型,这些骨折中有27个是桑德斯III型,其中2个是SandersIV型.手术时间平均131.9±50.5(30~240)分钟。失血量为36.9±41.1(1-250)ml。平均切口长度为3.5±1.8(1-8)cm;57个为关节窦切口;2个为闭合固定,无切口。手术期间的平均透视时间为12.3±3.6(10-25)秒。患者术后当天的VAS评分为2.4±0.7(1-3)。随访12个月的患者的AOFAS踝足-后足评分为93.3±3.6(85-99)。在后续行动中,所有患者的功能结局均良好.一名患者患有浅表感染。59例患者的并发症发生率为1.7%(1/59)。
    结论:跟骨交锁系统在跟骨骨折中可以获得满意的复位和固定,即使是SandersIV型.随访结果显示良好的功能。跟骨交锁钉可能是微创跟骨骨折固定的替代方法。
    BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive treatments for calcaneous fractures have the same outcomes and fewer complications. However, they are technically demanding, and there are a lack reduction tools. To overcome these problems, a calcaneous interlocking nail system was developed that can make reduction and fixation minimally invasive and effective. We retrospectively studied the calcaneous fracture variables intraoperatively and followed up to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with the calcaneous interlocking nail system.
    METHODS: All patients in 7 institutions between October 2020 and May 2021 who had calcaneous fractures treated with calcaneous interlocking nails were retrospectively analyzed. The patient characteristics, including age, sex, injury mechanism, Sanders type classification, smoking status, and diabetes were recorded. The calcaneous interlocking nail and standard surgical technique were introduced. The intraoperative variables, including days waiting for surgery, surgery time, blood loss, incision length, and fluoroscopy time, were recorded. The outcomes of complications, AOFAS scores and VAS scores were recorded and compared with other similar studies.
    RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were involved in this study; 54 were male; 5 were female; and they had an average age of 47.5 ± 9.2 years (range 25-70). 2 of these fractures were Sanders type I, 28 of these fractures were Sanders type II, 27 of these fractures were Sanders type III, and 2 of these were Sanders type IV. The surgery time was 131.9 ± 50.5 (30-240) minutes on average. The blood loss was 36.9 ± 41.1 (1-250) ml. The average incision length was 3.5 ± 1.8 (1-8) cm; 57 were sinus tarsi incisions; and 2 were closed fixations without incisions. The average fluoroscopy time was 12.3 ± 3.6 (10-25) seconds during the surgery. The VAS score of patients on the day after surgery was 2.4 ± 0.7 (1-3). The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score in patients who had a follow-up of at 12 months was 93.3 ± 3.6(85-99). During the follow-up, all patients\' functional outcomes were good. One patient had a superficial infection. The rate of complications of the 59 patients was 1.7% (1/59).
    CONCLUSIONS: The calcaneous interlocking nail system can have satisfactory reduction and fixation in calcaneous fractures, even in Sanders type IV. The outcomes of follow-up showed good function. The calcaneous interlocking nail could be an alternative method for minimally invasive calcaneous fracture fixation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:移位的跟骨关节内骨折的微创入路可显著减少术后伤口并发症。一种微创方法,关节窦入路(STA)的应用越来越广泛。STA是,然而,由于其技术要求和腓肠神经(SN)损伤的风险,具有挑战性。这项研究的目的是确定SN及其分支,包括它们与STA的解剖关系,并描述STA的解剖窗口技术,包括确定将螺钉插入到距骨碎片中的安全角度。
    方法:32例成人尸体腿在膝盖处脱节并且不成对。对每个样品进行STA。确定了与切口相关的腓肠神经及其分支的解剖结构和分布。识别并选择三个手术窗口。Kirshner线通过每个窗口成对地插入到sustentaculumtali的中心。然后测量导线插入相对于SN或其分支的安全角度以及适当的术中钻孔角度。
    结果:没有一个样本的足底分支出现在远端窗口,而背侧分支占37.5%,主要SN仅占6.25%。在中间的窗口,背支最常见(43.75%),其次是足底支(25.00%)和SN(21.88%)。在近端窗口,SN在100%的样本中呈现,而背支在标本中无出现,足底分支在约15.63%的标本中出现。所有三个窗口都有自己可接受的平均角度,可将螺钉插入到支架上。
    结论:就避免腓肠神经损伤而言,远端窗是手术入路和跟骨手术螺钉固定最安全的方法。此外,该窗口为螺钉固定提供了一个宽的工作角度。
    BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures is significantly reducing postoperative wound complications. One minimally invasive method, the sinus tarsi approach (STA) has been increasingly widely used. STA is, however, challenging due to its technical demands and the risk of injury to the sural nerve (SN). The purpose of this study was to identify the SN and its branches including their anatomical relationship to the STA as well as to describe an anatomical windows technique for STA including determination of the safe angle for screw insertion into the sustentaculum tali fragment.
    METHODS: Thirty-two adult cadaveric legs were disarticulated at the knee and unpaired. STA was performed on each specimen. The anatomy and distribution of the sural nerve and its branches were identified in relation to the incision. Three surgical windows were identified and selected. Kirshner wires were inserted in pairs via each of the windows towards the center of the sustentaculum tali. The safe angle for wire insertion in relation to the SN or its branches was then measured as well as the appropriate intraoperative drilling angle.
    RESULTS: The plantar branch presented in the distal window in none of the samples, while the dorsal branches presented in 37.5% and the main SN presented in only 6.25%. In the middle window, the dorsal branch presented most often (43.75%) followed by the plantar branch (25.00%) and the SN (21.88%). In the proximal window, the SN presented in 100% of the samples, while the dorsal branch presented in none and the plantar branch presented in about 15.63% of the specimens. All three windows had their own acceptable average angle for screw insertion towards the sustentaculum tali.
    CONCLUSIONS: The distal window is the safest for surgical approach and for calcaneal surgery screw fixation in terms of avoiding sural nerve injury. In addition, that window provides a wide working angle for screw fixation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of Sanders type III calcaneal fractures treated with percutaneous poking reduction and K-wire fixation via a sinus tarsi approach (PPRKF) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Fifty-one patients with closed, unilateral, Sanders type III calcaneal fractures were randomly assigned to the PPRKF group (n = 26) or the ORIF group (n = 25). The clinical outcomes evaluated were time to surgery, blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, wound healing time, wound complications, and Maryland foot score. Radiological results were evaluated on lateral and axial X-rays and computed tomography images and included Böhler\'s angle, Gissane\'s angle, and calcaneal width. Compared with the ORIF group, the PPRKF group had shorter time to surgery, shorter operative time, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, shorter wound healing time, and fewer wound complications (p < .001). The postoperative Böhler\'s angle, Gissane\'s angle, and calcaneal width in both groups were significantly better than those measured preoperatively (p < .001) and did not differ between the PPRKF group and ORIF group (p> .05). Regarding clinical results, there was no significant difference in Maryland foot score between the two groups at 12 months after surgery (p > .05). Both PPRKF and ORIF can result in satisfactory clinical function. PPRKF is superior to ORIF in reducing the time to surgery, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, wound healing time, and wound complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    BACKGROUND: Locking plate osteosynthesis via an L-shaped lateral approach is the gold standard in treating displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. High complication rates are known for this approach. The most frequent complications are wound edge necrosis and superficial wound infections. To reduce complication rates, a locking intramedullary nail (C-Nail) was developed that can be implanted minimally invasively via a sinus tarsi approach. We compared the postoperative complication rate and the outcome of plate osteosynthesis versus C-Nail in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
    METHODS: All patients with calcaneal fractures who received osteosynthesis with either plate or C-Nail between January 2016 and October 2019 in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. A subgroup analysis was performed with matched pairs (matching Sanders type, age, Böhler\'s angle postoperative in normal range, 33 pairs). Endpoints were postoperative complication rate, bone healing, full weight-bearing and functional outcome. Treatment groups were compared using Fisher\'s exact test for binary data, and Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous data. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
    RESULTS: One hundred and one calcaneal fractures were included (C-Nail n = 52, plate n = 49). Patients with C-Nail developed significantly less postoperative complications (p = 0.008), especially wound edge necrosis (p < 0.001). Screw malposition was found more often in the C-Nail group. The rates of achieving full weight-bearing as well as bone healing were comparable in both groups, but in each case significant faster in the C-nail subgroup. The results of the matched-pairs analysis were comparable.
    CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in the C-Nail group. The C-Nail appears to be a successful alternative in the treatment of calcaneal fractures, even in Sanders IV fractures because of the minimal-invasive implantation as well as the high primary stability. Long-term analysis of this new implant including elaboration on functional outcome is planned.
    BACKGROUND: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS) DRKS00020395 . Date of registration 3 January 2020.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    OBJECTIVE: No randomized comparative study has compared the extensile lateral approach (ELA) and sinus tarsi approach (STA) for Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures. This randomized comparative study was conducted to confirm whether the STA was prone to fewer wound complications than the ELA.
    METHODS: Between August 2013 and August 2018, 64 patients with Sanders type 2 calcaneus fractures were randomly assigned to receive surgical treatment by the ELA (32 patients) and STA (32 patients). The primary outcome was development of wound complications. The secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, pain scored of a visual analogue scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, 36-item Short Form health survey, operative duration, subtalar joint range of motion (ROM), Böhler\'s angle and calcaneal width, and posterior facet reduction.
    RESULTS: Although four patients (12.5%) in the ELA groups and none in the STA group experienced complications, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.113). VAS and AOFAS score were significantly better in the STA group than in the ELA group at six months (p = 0.017 and p = 0.021), but not at 12 months (p = 0.096 and p = 0.200) after surgery. The operation time was significantly shorter in the STA group than in the ELA group (p < 0.001). The subtalar joint ROM was significantly better in the STA group (p = 0.015). Assessment of the amount of postoperative reduction compared with the uninjured limb showed significant restoration of calcaneal width in the ELA group compared with that in the STA group (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The ELA group showed higher frequency of wound complications than the STA group for Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures even though this was not statistically significant. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):286-293.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的移位的跟骨关节内骨折的理想治疗方法一直是争论的话题。这项研究的目的是比较放射学结果,累积辐射暴露,手术时间,手术时间到了,微创手术(MIS)和切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗跟骨骨折的伤口愈合时间和成本。方法回顾性研究2012年至2019年在我单位手术的39例跟骨,其中20例接受了ORIF,19例接受了MIS手术。结果39例(37例)跟骨手术,其中20个有开放程序,19个有MIS程序,每组包括一个双侧手术。MIS组患者的平均年龄为42.18岁(范围:15-68岁),开放组患者的平均年龄为43岁(范围:21-75岁)。在骨折中,53.84%(n=21)为桑德斯III型,28.20%(n=11)为II型,17.94%(n=7)为IV型。两组间Bohler角度和Gissane角度的平均校正无统计学差异。用于每个开放程序的植入物的平均成本为882.79英镑,每个MIS程序的植入物成本为142.89英镑。与开放手术(0.392mGy)相比,MIS中累积X射线剂量的平均利用率(0.764mGy)明显更高。MIS的平均手术时间为64.9分钟,开放手术的平均手术时间为106.3分钟。MIS的平均等待时间为6.6天,ORIF的平均等待时间为9.8天。MIS中的伤口愈合(平均13.4天)比ORIF(平均17.2天)更快。所有这些差异具有统计学意义。结论微创跟骨骨折手术速度更快,成本更低,可以更早地进行。它与早期伤口愈合有关,虽然它需要更高的累积辐射剂量。
    Objectives The ideal treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures continues to be a subject of debate. The aim of the study was to compare the radiological outcome, cumulative radiation exposure, surgical time, time to surgery, wound healing times and cost involved in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for calcaneal fractures. Methods This was a retrospective study of 39 calcaneum operated in our unit during 2012 to 2019, of which 20 had undergone ORIF and 19 had been operated upon following MIS. Results A total of 39 calcanea (37 patients) were operated, of which 20 had open procedure and 19 had MIS procedure, including one bilateral surgery in each group. Mean age of the patients in the MIS group was 42.18 years (range: 15-68 years) and that of the patients in the open group was 43 years (range: 21-75 years). Of the fractures, 53.84% (n = 21) was Sanders type III, 28.20% (n = 11) was type II and 17.94% (n = 7) was type IV. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean correction of Bohler\'s angle and Gissane\'s angle between the groups. The mean cost for implant used for each open procedure was £882.79, and the implant cost for each MIS procedure was £142.89. Mean utilisation of cumulative X-ray dose was significantly higher in MIS (0.764 mGy) in comparison to open surgery (0.392 mGy). The average surgical time for MIS was 64.9 minutes and that of open surgery was 106.3 minutes. Average waiting time for MIS was 6.6 days and that for ORIF was 9.8 days. Wound healing was quicker (average 13.4 days) in MIS than ORIF (average 17.2 days). All these differences were statistically significant. Conclusions Minimally invasive calcaneal fracture surgery is quicker and cheaper and can be performed earlier. It is associated with early wound healing, although it requires higher cumulative radiation dose.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在过去的十年中,在移位的跟骨关节内骨折(DIACF)的手术治疗中,相对于可伸展的外侧入路(ELA),主要是因为手术部位感染率(SSIs)较低。然而,大多数研究都是小型和回顾性的.这项研究的目的是评估STA在一个大的,前瞻性系列患者,并确定SSIs的预测因子。
    方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,纳入2012年8月至2019年1月在我们的1级创伤中心接受DIACF手术治疗的所有连续患者,并随访至少一年.所有手术程序均由两名专业的足踝创伤外科医生使用STA进行。使用多项逻辑回归,确定了SSIs的危险因素。
    结果:共纳入214例跟骨骨折237例,其中179例接受了切开复位内固定,58例接受了一期关节固定术。大多数患者为男性(73.6%),平均年龄为45.9岁。有16例患者发生SSI(6.8%),其中9例(3.8%)为深部感染,7例(3%)为浅表感染。多变量分析指出,受伤后一周内的手术增加了SSI的机会,以及ASA为2或更高,并且在手术过程中失血超过150cc。
    结论:本研究证实通过STA治疗的DIACF患者发生SSI的风险较低。SSI的重要预测因素是受伤后一周内的手术,2或更高的ASA和失血>150cc。
    BACKGROUND: In the last decade, the sinus tarsi approach (STA) has gained interest over the extensile lateral approach (ELA) in the operative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF\'s), mainly because of the lower rate of surgical site infections (SSIs). However, most studies are small and retrospective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of SSIs of the STA in a large, prospective series of patients and to identify predictors for SSIs.
    METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, all consecutive patients who were operatively treated for a DIACF in our Level 1 trauma center between August 2012 and January 2019 were included and followed for at least one year. All operative procedures were performed by two specialized foot and ankle trauma surgeons using the STA. Using multinomial logistic regression, risk factors for SSIs were identified.
    RESULTS: A total of 237 calcaneal fractures in 214 patients were included, of which 179 underwent open reduction and internal fixation and 58 a primary arthrodesis. Most patients were male (73.6%) and the mean age was 45.9 years. There were 16 patients that developed a SSI (6.8%), of which 9 (3.8%) were deep and 7 (3%) were superficial infections. The multivariate analysis pointed out that surgery within one week after injury increased the chance of a SSI, as well as an ASA of 2 or higher and more than 150 cc of blood loss during the procedure.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the low risk of SSI in DIACFs treated via STA. Significant predictors for SSIs were surgery within one week after injury, ASA of 2 or higher and blood loss > 150cc.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term outcomes after percutaneous reduction (PR) and screw fixation versus plate fixation via the sinus tarsi approach (STA) for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF).
    METHODS: This retrospective study included a total of 150 patients (June 2008-August 2011), comprising 85 men and 65 women (mean age, 38.4 years), who were assigned to the PR group or the STA group. The inclusion criteria were DIACF (>2 mm) including Sanders type II and III, closed fracture, unilateral fracture, no history of smoking or no smoking during hospitalization and 3 months after surgery, and follow-up time not less than 8 years. The exclusion criteria were clear surgical contraindications (severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases), local or systemic infection symptoms, diagnosis with diabetes or lower extremity vascular disease, and Sanders type IV or open fractures. Outcomes were assessed by means of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scores, radiographic images, and postoperative complications.
    RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 8.7 years (range, 8.0-10.0 years). The AOFAS scores in the PR group during the follow-up period were 54.2 ± 5.1, 85.8 ± 4.0, 88.1 ± 3.8, 87.9 ± 3.6, 87.8 ± 3.9, 86.9 ± 3.9, respectively, and in the STA group were 55.0 ± 5.6, 84.5 ± 5.2, 87.1 ± 3.8, 86.9 ± 3.8, 87.7 ± 3.3, and 87.6 ± 2.8, respectively. There was no significant difference in AOFAS scores, Bohler\'s angle, Gissane\'s angle, calcaneal length, and height between the two groups (P > 0.05). The good to excellent rate of the PR group (80.8%) was less than that of the STA group (91.7%) (P = 0.055). For Sanders III fractures, the good to excellent rate of the PR group (33.3%) was less than that of the STA group (76.9%) (P = 0.029). For calcaneal width recovery, the STA group performed better than the PR group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the PR group (12.8%) was lower than that in the STA group (27.8%) (P = 0.026), of which the incidence of wound complications was 3.8% in the PR group and 13.9% in the STA group (P = 0.041). In addition, there was no significant difference in other postoperative complications such as sural nerve injury, peroneus longus and brevis muscle injury, calcaneal valgus symptoms, lateral impingement symptoms, and subtalar arthritis (P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: From the 8-10-year follow-up results of PR and STA as surgical procedures for the treatment of DIACF, it was found that there was no significant difference in the overall efficacy between them. STA was found to be superior to the PR in terms of the recovery of calcaneal width, providing more stable fixation for Sanders III fractures. PR was found to be more effective in reducing wound complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:骨窦入路和微型骨板已用于跟骨关节内骨折。然而,关节窦入路对侧壁的暴露有限,这使得它具有挑战性,以获得出色的解剖复位的跟骨身体。更重要的是!完全恢复跟骨的宽度,同时防止跟内翻,用迷你板也很难。旨在解决上述问题,我们的研究重点是使用Steinmann别针牵开器进行复位,并使用圆形钢板通过tarsi窦入路进行固定。
    方法:2017年3月至2019年1月,对15例闭合性跟骨骨折患者,采用Steinmann别针牵开器辅助经桡骨窦入路复位环形钢板内固定术治疗。所有这些患者均接受了积极的术后临床和放射学评估。
    结果:对15例患者均进行了术后随访,最后一次随访时,视觉模拟评分(VAS)为1.44±0.63,美国骨科足踝评分(AOFAS)踝足评分为84.31±5.03。Böhler角(30.81±3.56°),宽度(37.83±4.87mm),长度(87.4±3.33mm),跟骨高度(86.23±5.36mm)与术前相比(-0.94±10.06°,45.67±5.68mm,82.72±5.54mm,76.32±7.98mm),这些参数在6-19个月的随访后保持良好。
    结论:我们目前的研究表明,Steinmannpin牵开器辅助经tarsi窦入路环形钢板内固定复位可能是治疗SandersII型和III型跟骨骨折的安全有效方法。Böhler的角度,高度,长度,跟骨的身体在术后得到了很好的恢复,并在最后的随访和罕见的术后并发症中得到了维持。
    背景:这项研究已经注册。唯一的标识号是研究登记处5092。
    BACKGROUND: Sinus tarsi approach and mini-calc plate have been used for intra-articular calcaneal fractures. However, the sinus tarsi approach has limited exposure to the lateral wall, which makes it challenging to obtain an excellent anatomic reduction of the calcaneal body. What is more! To restore the width of the calcaneal body entirely and prevent the heel varus simultaneously with mini-calc plate was tough as well. Aimed to solve the aforementioned problems, our study focused on using the Steinmann pin retractor for reduction and the circle plate for fixation via the sinus tarsi approach.
    METHODS: From March 2017 to January 2019, 15 patients with closed calcaneal fractures were treated with the method of Steinmann pin retractor-assisted reduction and circle plate fixation via the sinus tarsi approach. All these patients received a positive postoperative clinical and radiological evaluation.
    RESULTS: A postoperative follow-up was done for each of the 15 patients, and the following scores and parameters were observed: value of visual analogue scale (VAS) was 1.44 ± 0.63, and The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot score was 84.31 ± 5.03 at the last follow-up. The Böhler angle (30.81 ± 3.56°), width (37.83 ± 4.87 mm), length (87.4 ± 3.33 mm), and height (86.23 ± 5.36 mm) of the calcaneus were improved significantly in comparison with preoperative values (- 0.94 ± 10.06°, 45.67 ± 5.68 mm, 82.72 ± 5.54 mm, 76.32 ± 7.98 mm), and these parameters were maintained excellently after 6-19 months\' follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our present study suggested that Steinmann pin retractor-assisted reduction with circle plate fixation via the sinus tarsi approach may serve as a safe and effective method for Sanders type II and type III calcaneus fractures. The Böhler angle, height, length, and body of the calcaneus were excellently restored postoperatively and maintained at last follow-up and rare postoperative complications.
    BACKGROUND: This study has been registered. The unique identifying number is research registry 5092.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号