UNASSIGNED: Though research exists regarding calcaneal fractures, the treatment approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) remains controversial. The most common approach, the extensile lateral approach (ELA), for the treatment of DIACFs has high rates of wound complications reported. In contrast, the sinus tarsi approach (STA) is becoming more popular due to its minimally invasive technique. The objective of this retrospective study is to investigate the incidence of wound complications in high-risk patients with DIACF following operative fixation via the STA.
UNASSIGNED: Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review was performed between 2007 and 2013 to assess high-risk patients for the presence of wound complications, including deep infections and delayed wound healing, following the use of STA for the management of DIACF\'s (n = 36). Demographics, risk factors, and secondary outcomes such as time to surgery were recorded.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 36 high-risk patients included in our study, seven had post-operative complications following operative fixation via the STA. Specifically, four patients had delayed wound healing, and three developed deep infections. Time to surgery had the greatest negative effect on postoperative complications and was influenced by age, sex, and the presence of a concomitant injury.
UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the STA is a viable option for high-risk patients with displaced intra-articular fractures. Additionally, time to surgery should be minimized, when possible, to reduce risks of post-operative complications, including infections and delayed wound healing.

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of Sanders type III calcaneal fractures treated with percutaneous poking reduction and K-wire fixation via a sinus tarsi approach (PPRKF) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Fifty-one patients with closed, unilateral, Sanders type III calcaneal fractures were randomly assigned to the PPRKF group (n = 26) or the ORIF group (n = 25). The clinical outcomes evaluated were time to surgery, blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, wound healing time, wound complications, and Maryland foot score. Radiological results were evaluated on lateral and axial X-rays and computed tomography images and included Böhler\'s angle, Gissane\'s angle, and calcaneal width. Compared with the ORIF group, the PPRKF group had shorter time to surgery, shorter operative time, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, shorter wound healing time, and fewer wound complications (p < .001). The postoperative Böhler\'s angle, Gissane\'s angle, and calcaneal width in both groups were significantly better than those measured preoperatively (p < .001) and did not differ between the PPRKF group and ORIF group (p> .05). Regarding clinical results, there was no significant difference in Maryland foot score between the two groups at 12 months after surgery (p > .05). Both PPRKF and ORIF can result in satisfactory clinical function. PPRKF is superior to ORIF in reducing the time to surgery, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, wound healing time, and wound complications.