Sentinel Lymph Node

前哨淋巴结
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    诱导:黑色素瘤是一种极具侵袭性的皮肤瘤形成,诊断和治疗的一个重要阶段是确定淋巴水平的传播。为了更准确的分期,进行前哨淋巴结活检技术,在大多数情况下,分别有2个地点,但是很少描述3个淋巴盆地前哨淋巴结的病例。病例报告:我们提出了一个位于右侧腰椎区域的黑色素瘤病例,从组织病理学特征的角度来看,其Breslow指数为4.2mm,在pT4b阶段分类。CT评估后,已确定有迹象表明可以进行前哨淋巴结技术和安全范围的切除。闪烁扫描显示前哨淋巴结在3个不同的区域被发现,分别为右腋窝和双侧腹股沟。结论:位于躯干上的黑色素瘤可以为前哨淋巴结提供不同的淋巴途径。与存在某些模式的四肢不同。在这种情况下识别这些淋巴结涉及从诊断和手术角度的挑战。
    Intreduction: Melanoma is an extremely aggressive form of skin neoplasia, an important stage in the diagnostic and treatment is identifying the dissemination at the lymphatic level. For a more accurate staging, the sentinel lymph node biopsy technique is performed, which in most of the time addresses one, respectively 2 locations, but cases with sentinel nodes in 3 lymphatic basins have rarely been described. Case report: We present a case of melanoma located in the right lumbar region, which from the point of view of histopathological features has a Breslow index of 4.2 mm, classified in the pT4b stage. After the CT evaluation was performed, it was decided that there is indication for performing the sentinel lymph node technique and excision with a margin of safety. Scintigraphy revealed that sentinel lymph nodes were identified in 3 different regions, respectively the right axilla and bilateral inguinal. Conclusions: Melanoma located on the trunk can present different lymphatic routes for the sentinel lymph nodes, unlike that on the limbs where certain patterns are present. Identifying these lymph nodes in cases like this involves a challenge both from a diagnostic and surgical point of view.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:子宫内膜上皮内瘤变(EIN)和不典型增生(AH)是公认的子宫内膜癌(EC)的前兆。目前大多数指南不建议对淋巴结(LN)进行常规手术评估,尽管最近的研究表明,在术前诊断为EIN/AH的患者中,前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检的使用有所增加。我们旨在评估LN阳性率及其对EIN/AH患者分期的影响。并发症,和辅助治疗。
    方法:在以下数据库中进行了系统评价和荟萃分析:使用OvidSP界面和PUBMED的MEDLINE(R),Embase,WebofScience,Clinicaltrials.gov和Cochrane图书馆。包括对诊断为EIN/AH的患者进行淋巴结评估的研究,提供LN评估结果和/或子宫切除术结果的比较,有无淋巴结评估。该分析在PROSPERO国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(CRD42023443598)上注册。
    结果:最初通过数据库搜索确定了总共447项研究。目前的分析包括7项研究,包括1791例非典型子宫内膜增生患者,他们接受了子宫切除术并进行淋巴结评估。在接受任何LN评估的患者中,阳性淋巴结的发生率为1.1%(95%CI0.3%-2%)。特异性SLN患者的LN阳性率为1.4%(95%CI0.2%-1.9%)。319(44.3%,95%CI34%-54.7%)最初诊断为EIN/AH的患者(n=699),最终升级为EC诊断。最终诊断为EC的患者中有15%接受了辅助治疗。并发症发生率没有显着差异。
    结论:我们的综述表明,在接受EIN/AH手术淋巴结评估的患者中,转移性LN的发生率<2%。然而,SLN标测的并发症发生率较低,并且可能对被诊断为恶性肿瘤的患者的术后治疗决策产生影响.
    OBJECTIVE: Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and atypical hyperplasia (AH) are recognized precursors for endometrial cancer (EC). Most current guidelines do not recommend the routine surgical evaluation of lymph nodes (LN), although recent studies indicate increased use of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN/AH. We aimed to evaluate the rates of positive LN and its effect on the incidence of upstaging of EIN/AH patients, complications, and adjuvant treatment administration.
    METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE(R) using the OvidSP interface and PUBMED, Embase, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane Library. Included were studies investigating lymph node evaluation in patients diagnosed with EIN/AH, presenting results of LN assessment and/or comparisons of hysterectomy results with and without lymph node assessment. This analysis was registered at PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42023443598).
    RESULTS: A total of 447 studies were initially identified through database searching. The current analysis includes 7 studies comprising 1791 atypical endometrial hyperplasia patients who underwent hysterectomy with lymph node assessment. The incidence of positive lymph nodes among those who had undergone any LN evaluation was found to be 1.1% (95% CI 0.3%-2%). The rate of positive LNs was 1.4% (95% CI 0.2%-1.9%) among those who had undergone specifically SLN. 319 (44.3%, 95% CI 34%-54.7%) patients of the patients initially diagnosed with EIN/AH (n = 699), were finally upgraded to EC diagnosis. Fifteen percent of the final EC diagnosed patients were treated with adjuvant treatment. No significant difference regarding complication rates was noticed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our review indicates that the rate of metastatic LNs is <2% in patients undergoing surgical nodal evaluation for EIN/AH. However, the rate of complication for SLN mapping is low and may have an impact on postoperative therapy decisions in those diagnosed with malignancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:估计有20%的口腔和口咽鳞状细胞癌(OOSCC)患者在颈淋巴结中存在微转移(Mi)或孤立的肿瘤细胞(ITC),这些肿瘤细胞无法通过标准的淋巴结组织学评估进行检测。淋巴结Mi和ITC可能是颈淋巴结清扫术后局部复发的原因之一。这项研究的目的是回顾有关Mi对OOSCC患者生存影响的现有数据。
    方法:在PubMed和Cochrane图书馆中检索报道Mi和ITC对患者生存影响的文章。两位作者使用Downs和Black指数独立评估了检索到的研究的方法学质量。还提取了研究类型的数据,纳入患者的数量,组织学分析的模式,统计分析,和预后影响。
    结果:共纳入16篇文献,共2064例患者。在纳入的16项研究中,8在Kaplan-Meier和/或多变量分析中揭示了Mi对至少一个终点的统计学显著影响。三项研究将Mi视为Ma,而五项研究发现Mi对生存率没有影响。只有一项研究证明了ITC对患者预后的影响,但在多变量分析中没有。
    结论:纳入本综述的大多数病例为口腔癌患者。这些发现提供了低确定性的证据,表明Mi对生存产生了负面影响。ITC的数据很少,因此无法得出关于它们对生存的影响的结论。应针对OOSCC定义区分Mi和ITC的下限阈值,因为现有阈值是基于来自不同肿瘤的数据。组织学,免疫组织学,OOSCC中Mi和ITC的解剖特征以及放疗对Mi的影响应分别针对口腔癌和口咽癌进行进一步研究。
    BACKGROUND: An estimated 20% of patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOSCC) have micrometastases (Mi) or isolated tumor cells (ITC) in the cervical lymph nodes that evade detection by standard histological evaluation of lymph node sections. Lymph node Mi and ITC could be one reason for regional recurrence after neck dissection. The aim of this study was to review the existing data regarding the impact of Mi on the survival of patients with OOSCC.
    METHODS: PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles reporting the impact of Mi and ITC on patient survival. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality of retrieved studies using the Downs and Black index. Data were also extracted on study type, number of included patients, mode of histological analysis, statistical analysis, and prognostic impact.
    RESULTS: Sixteen articles with a total of 2064 patients were included in the review. Among the 16 included studies, eight revealed a statistically significant impact of Mi on at least one endpoint in the Kaplan-Meier and/or multivariate analysis. Three studies regarded Mi as Ma, while five studies found no impact of Mi on survival. Only one study demonstrated an impact of ITC on patient\'s prognosis in the univariate but not in the multivariate analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: The majority of cases included in the review were patients with oral cancer. The findings provide low-certainty evidence that Mi negatively impacts survival. Data on ITC were scarcer, so no conclusions can be drawn about their effect on survival. The lower threshold to discriminate between Mi and ITC should be defined for OOSCC since the existing thresholds are based on data from different tumors. The histological, immunohistological, and anatomical characteristics of Mi and ITC in OOSCC as well as the effect of radiotherapy on Mi should be further investigated separately for oral and oropharyngeal carcinomas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:前哨淋巴结(SLN)是从癌症涉及的特定区域排出淋巴的第一个淋巴结。用于SLN评估的常用术中方法是触摸印迹细胞学(TIC)和冷冻切片(FS)。本研究旨在确定灵敏度,以组织病理学诊断为金标准的TIC和FS的特异性和准确性。
    方法:将节点沿它们的长轴切开,并在湿表面上印迹以清洁载玻片,然后进行甲苯胺蓝和快速Papanicolaou染色。随后,使用低温恒温器将淋巴结切片切成三个水平,并用苏木精和伊红染色剂染色。比较细胞学和FS结果,灵敏度,准确度,以组织病理学诊断为金标准,评估TIC和FS的阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。此外,汇集灵敏度,特异性,正预测值,对于meta分析中纳入的研究,评估了触摸印迹细胞学和冰冻切片的阴性预测值和诊断准确性.
    结果:特异性,灵敏度,诊断准确性,触摸印迹细胞学的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为100%,88.2%,90%,分别为100%和60%。特异性,灵敏度,诊断准确性,冷冻切片的PPV和NPV为100%,94.1%,95%,分别为100%和75%。TIC和FS检测微转移的敏感性分别为60%和80%。触摸印迹细胞学的合并敏感性和特异性为85.24%(95%CI,83.46%-86.90%),和98.99%(95%CI,98.69%-99.23%)。冷冻切片检查的合并敏感性和特异性为90.45%(95%CI,85.15%-94.34%),和100%(95%CI,99.24%-100%)。
    结论:尽管FS在检测微转移方面的敏感性优于印迹细胞学,TIC是一种快速廉价的技术,可以在没有低温恒温器的偏远地区使用。两种技术在检测大转移方面的灵敏度相当。这项荟萃分析强调了触摸印记细胞学和冰冻切片检查在术中检测乳腺癌恶性肿瘤的准确性。
    BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) is the first lymph node to drain the lymph from a particular region involved by cancer. The commonly performed intraoperative methods for SLN evaluation are touch imprint cytology (TIC) and frozen section (FS). The present study aimed to determine the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of TIC and FS with histopathological diagnosis as gold standard.
    METHODS: The nodes were bissected along their long axis and wet surface was imprinted on to clean glass slides followed by toluidine blue and rapid Papanicolaou staining. Subsequently the lymph node slices were cut at three levels using the cryostat machine and stained with Hematoxylin and eosin stain. The cytological and FS findings were compared and the specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of TIC and FS was evaluated taking histopathological diagnosis as gold standard. In addition, pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy for touch imprint cytology and frozen section were assessed for the studies included in the meta-analysis.
    RESULTS: The specificity, sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of touch imprint cytology were 100%, 88.2%, 90%, 100% and 60% respectively. The specificity, sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, PPV and NPV of frozen section were 100%, 94.1%, 95%, 100% and 75% respectively. The sensitivity of TIC and FS for detection of micrometastasis was 60% and 80% respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for touch imprint cytology were 85.24% (95% CI, 83.46%-86.90%), and 98.99% (95% CI, 98.69%-99.23%) respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for frozen section examination were 90.45% (95% CI, 85.15%-94.34%), and 100% (95% CI, 99.24%-100%) respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Even though the sensitivity of FS was better than imprint cytology in detection of micrometastasis, TIC is a rapid inexpensive technique which can be utilized in remote areas in absence of cryostat machine. The sensitivity of the two techniques with respect to detection of macrometastasis was comparable. This meta-analysis highlights the accuracy of the touch imprint cytology and frozen section examination in the intra-operative detection of malignancy in breast cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:cN0腋下腋窝淋巴结状态的评估是通过前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)利用放射性同位素和蓝色染料的组合或同位素的替代品如吲哚菁绿(ICG)进行的。两者都非常资源密集型;这促进了低成本荧光素钠(FS)引导的SLNB技术的发展。这项系统评价和荟萃分析评估了FS指导的SLNB在早期乳腺癌中的诊断性能。
    目的:目的是评估FS对前哨淋巴结活检的诊断性能。
    方法:合格标准:使用FS进行SLNB的研究。
    方法:PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆和在线临床试验登记册。偏倚风险:使用QUADAS-2工具评估文章的偏倚风险。
    结果:主要的总结措施是使用随机效应模型的合并前哨淋巴结识别率(SLN-IR)和合并假阴性率(FNR)。
    结果:初步系统检索共检索到45篇。45项研究中有7项包括总共332名患者,纳入了荟萃分析。合并的SLN-IR为93.2%(95%置信区间[CI],0.87-0.97;87%至97%)。包括五项验证研究以汇集假阴性率,总共包括211名患者。合并的FNR为5.6%(95%置信区间[CI],2.9-9.07)。
    结论:荧光素引导的SLNB是检测临床淋巴结阴性早期乳腺癌患者淋巴结转移的可行选择。它实现了93%的高合并前哨淋巴结识别率(SLN-IR),用于检测腋窝淋巴结转移的假阴性率为5.6%。
    BACKGROUND: Evaluation of axillary lymph nodes status in cN0 axilla is performed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) utilizing a combination of radioactive isotope and blue dye or alternative to isotope like Indocyanine green (ICG). Both are very resource-intensive; which has prompted development of low-cost technique of Fluorescein Sodium (FS)-guided SLNB. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the diagnostic performance of FS-guided SLNB in early breast cancer.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FS for sentinel lymph node biopsy.
    METHODS: Eligibility criteria: Studies where SLNB was performed using FS.
    METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and online clinical trial registers. Risk of bias: Articles were assessed for risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool.
    RESULTS: The main summary measures were pooled Sentinel Lymph Node Identification Rate (SLN-IR) and pooled False Negative Rate (FNR) using random-effects model.
    RESULTS: A total of 45 articles were retrieved by the initial systematic search. 7 out of the 45 studies comprising a total of 332 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled SLN-IR was 93.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.97; 87% to 97%). Five validation studies were included for pooling the false negative rate and included a total of 211 patients. The pooled FNR was 5.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-9.07).
    CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescein-guided SLNB is a viable option for detection of lymph node metastases in clinically node negative patients with early breast cancer. It achieves a high pooled Sentinel Lymph Node Identification Rate (SLN-IR) of 93% with a false negative rate of 5.6% for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了解决常规前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的局限性,已开发出一种新型的混合示踪剂(吲哚菁绿[ICG]-99mTc-纳米胶体)。这项荟萃分析旨在比较新型混合示踪剂与使用ICG或放射性同位素(RI)治疗头颈部恶性肿瘤SLNB的常规方法之间的差异。本研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(CRD42023409127)中注册。PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,对Cochrane图书馆进行了系统搜索。这项研究包括在头颈部恶性肿瘤手术期间使用不同方式识别的前哨淋巴结(SLN)数量的原始数据。SLN的识别率是感兴趣的主要结果。无法从本文中推导出预后数据和并发症发生率。异质性检验(I2)确定了混合风险比(RR)的固定或随机效应模型的使用。总的来说,筛选了1275项研究,其中11人符合荟萃分析的纳入标准.在SLN识别头颈部恶性肿瘤中,ICG-99mTc-纳米胶体优于ICG或RI。在亚组分析中,SLNB中ICG和RI示踪剂的检出率相当,不管是什么设备,肿瘤类型,或肿瘤分期。总之,在SLN识别头颈部恶性肿瘤中,ICG-99mTc-纳米胶体的使用优于ICG或RI的单一技术。这项研究表明,使用ICG或RI的医院可能会发现将其实践更改为ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid是有益的,尤其是在头部和颈部,由于其优越的效力。
    To address the limitations of conventional sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), a novel hybrid tracer (indocyanine green [ICG]-99mTc-nanocolloid) has been developed. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the differences between the novel hybrid tracer and conventional methods using ICG or radioisotope (RI) for SLNB in head and neck malignancies. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023409127). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. This study included raw data on the number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) identified using different modalities during surgery for head and neck malignancies. The identification rate of SLNs was the main outcome of interest. Prognostic data and complication rate cannot be deduced from this article. The heterogeneity test (I2) determined the use of a fixed- or random-effects model for the pooled risk ratio (RR). Overall, 1275 studies were screened, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. In SLN identification of head and neck malignancies, ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid was superior to ICG or RI. In the subgroup analyses, the detection rates of ICG and RI tracers in SLNB were comparable, regardless of the device, tumor type, or tumor stage. In conclusion, in SLN identification of head and neck malignancies, the use of ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid is superior to the single technique of ICG or RI. This study suggests that Hospitals using ICG or RI may find it beneficial to change their practice to ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid, especially in the head and neck area, owing to its superior effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前,前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)越来越多地用于子宫内膜癌,但与系统性淋巴结清扫术相比,转移性淋巴结的遗漏率一直是一个令人担忧的问题。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估子宫内膜癌患者SLNB的假阴性率(FNR),并探讨与该FNR相关的危险因素。
    三个数据库(PubMed,Embase,WebofScience)由两名独立的审阅者从初始数据库构建到2023年1月进行了搜索。
    如果研究包括10名或更多被诊断患有国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)I期或更高级别子宫内膜癌的妇女,研究技术采用前哨淋巴结定位活检,报告的结果指标包括假阴性和/或FNR。
    两位作者独立审阅了摘要和全文。通过随机效应meta分析和meta回归综合FNR和与FNR相关的因素。
    我们确定了62项符合条件的研究。62篇文章的总体FNR为4%(95%CL3-5)。与低风险子宫内膜癌患者相比,高危子宫内膜癌患者的FNR没有显着差异。术中是否使用冷冻切片的FNR没有差异。术中使用的染料类型(吲哚菁绿/蓝染料)与假阴性率没有显着相关。与替代注射技术相比,宫颈注射降低了FNR。与其他Tc-99m相比,吲哚菁绿降低了FNR。术后病理超常降低FNR。
    替代注射技术(子宫颈除外),Tc-99m染料示踪剂,和术后病理超常的缺乏是子宫内膜癌SLNB患者高FNR的危险因素;因此,我们应警惕此类人群SLNB后转移性淋巴结的漏诊.
    http://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42023433637。
    UNASSIGNED: Currently, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is increasingly used in endometrial cancer, but the rate of missed metastatic lymph nodes compared to systemic lymph node dissection has been a concern. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB in patients with endometrial cancer and to explore the risk factors associated with this FNR.
    UNASSIGNED: Three databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) were searched from initial database build to January 2023 by two independent reviewers.
    UNASSIGNED: Studies were included if they included 10 or more women diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I or higher endometrial cancer, the study technique used sentinel lymph node localization biopsy, and the reported outcome metrics included false negative and/or FNR.
    UNASSIGNED: Two authors independently reviewed the abstracts and full articles. The FNR and factors associated with FNR were synthesized through random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 62 eligible studies. The overall FNR for the 62 articles was 4% (95% CL 3-5).There was no significant difference in the FNR in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer compared to patients with low-risk endometrial cancer. There was no difference in the FNR for whether frozen sections were used intraoperatively. The type of dye used intraoperatively (indocyanine green/blue dye) were not significantly associated with the false negative rate. Cervical injection reduced the FNR compared with alternative injection techniques. Indocyanine green reduced the FNR compared with alternative Tc-99m. Postoperative pathologic ultrastaging reduced the FNR.
    UNASSIGNED: Alternative injection techniques (other than the cervix), Tc-99m dye tracer, and the absence of postoperative pathologic ultrastaging are risk factors for a high FNR in endometrial cancer patients who undergo SLNB; therefore, we should be vigilant for missed diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes after SLNB in such populations.
    UNASSIGNED: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023433637.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们发现需要平衡临床指南的应用和定制的方法,以在淋巴结微转移(MIC)环境中随访宫颈癌(CC)患者。这篇综述旨在确定目前对MIC阳性CC病例的管理知识。
    方法:我们讨论了与MIC+病例相关的预后和复发监测风险。对文献和相关文章的电子数据库进行了分析。
    结果:15项研究,(4882名患者),包括在我们的系统审查中。而结果表明,MIC显著恶化早期CC的预后。低容量淋巴结疾病的三级预防算法可以根据淋巴结疾病的负担对随访进行分层,并提供有助于提高随访绩效的数据。
    结论:MIC使预后恶化,应按照算法建议进行管理。然而,此算法必须进行外部验证。分离的肿瘤细胞(ITC)的临床影响尚不清楚。
    OBJECTIVE: We found a need for balancing the application of clinical guidelines and tailored approaches to follow-up of cervical cancer (CC) patients in the lymph node micrometastatic (MICs) setting. This review aimed to determine the current knowledge of management of MIC-positive CC cases.
    METHODS: We addressed prognostic and risk of recurrence monitoring impacts associated with MIC+ cases. The electronic databases for literature and relevant articles were analysed.
    RESULTS: Fifteen studies, (4882 patients), were included in our systematic review. While the results show that MICs significantly worsen prognosis in early CC. A tertiary prevention algorithm for low volume lymph node disease may stratify follow-up according to the burden of nodal disease and provide data that helps improve follow-up performance.
    CONCLUSIONS: MICs worsen prognosis and should be managed as suggested by the algorithm. However, this algorithm must be externally validated. The clinical impact of isolated tumor cells (ITC) remains unclear.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然历史审判的一般结论得到了广泛认可,在复杂的临床情况下,乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检(SNB)确切适应症的细微差别往往仍是争论的焦点,需要进一步阐明.
    方法:两名审稿人(JFB和GNM)独立地在电子数据库中搜索包括SNB作为主要干预措施的研究。过滤器仅用于检索临床试验(随机或实验性非随机);排除非肿瘤学结果。选定的研究被认为构建了一个叙述性综述,重点是纳入标准和生存结果。其次是建议。
    结果:选择了十四个(n=14)试验,包括11项(n=11)前期手术的随机试验,和三项(n=3)新辅助治疗后手术的单组临床试验。所有前期手术试验都提供了SNB的长期生存数据,相当于或不低于腋窝解剖,在没有明显腺病的肿瘤中(对于较大的T3和T4肿瘤要谨慎)-推荐等级:A.在最大5厘米的肿瘤中,如果两个前哨淋巴结对大转移呈阳性,则不需要完整的腋窝淋巴结清扫,并且计划进行放射治疗-推荐等级:A.如果有两个以上的前哨淋巴结对大转移呈阳性,或者前哨节点以外的正节点,建议进行完整的腋窝清扫-推荐等级:A.新辅助化疗后,考虑到10%是可接受的假阴性率,SNB可能会提供给cN0阴性的患者,并且对于cN1(对cN2的警告)患者变为临床阴性;如果取回至少两个前哨淋巴结,则可能不需要进行完整的腋窝清扫,并且没有残留疾病-推荐等级:B。
    结论:SNB可以在大多数临床阴性淋巴结中进行。新辅助化疗后,SNB是可行的,对于cN0和cN1肿瘤可能具有可接受的性能,尽管仍在等待前瞻性生存数据。
    BACKGROUND: While general conclusions of historical trials are widely recognized, the nuances regarding precise indications of Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNB) in breast cancer in complex clinical scenarios often remain a source of debate and require further elucidation.
    METHODS: Two reviewers (JFB and GNM) independently searched electronic databases for studies including SNB as the main intervention. Filters were applied to retrieve only clinical trials (randomized or experimental non-randomized); non-oncological outcomes were excluded. The selected studies were considered to construct a narrative review focused on inclusion criteria and survival outcomes, followed by recommendations.
    RESULTS: Fourteen (n = 14) trials were selected, including eleven (n = 11) randomized trials for upfront surgery, and three (n = 3) single-group clinical trials for surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. All trials for upfront surgery provided long-term survival data for SNB, that was equivalent or non-inferior to axillary dissection, in tumors without palpable adenopathy (caution for larger T3 and T4 tumors) - Grade of recommendation: A. In tumors up to 5 cm, complete axillary dissection is not necessary if up to two sentinel nodes are positive for macrometastasis, and radiation therapy is planned - Grade of recommendation: A. If there are more than two sentinel nodes positive for macrometastasis, or a positive node other than the sentinel one, complete axillary dissection is recommended - Grade of recommendation: A. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, considering 10% as an acceptable false negative rate, SNB might be offered for cN0 patients who have remained negative, and for cN1 (caution for cN2) patients become clinically negative; complete axillary dissection might not be necessary if at least two sentinel lymph nodes are retrieved, and there is no residual disease - Grade of recommendation: B.
    CONCLUSIONS: SNB can be performed in most cases of clinically negative nodes. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, SNB is feasible and may have acceptable performance for cN0 and cN1 tumors, although prospective survival data is still awaited.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号