BACKGROUND: To protect from toxicity at supra-essential doses of selenium, it is important to determine dose levels at which adverse effects occur.
METHODS: We identified relevant literature on the repeated dosage of selenium and extracted dose descriptors on reported endpoints, except on genotoxicity/carcinogenicity.
RESULTS: Selenium forms with toxicological data were organic ones: selenomethionine, selenocystine/selenocysteine; and inorganic ones, including selenite (SeO32-), selenate (SeO42-), selenium sulphide (SeS2), selenide (Se2-) and selenium nanoparticles. Clinical signs of selenium toxicity in humans include a garlicky-smelling breath, hair loss, and nail changes. One human study showed increased mortality following daily ingestion of 300 µg Se per day for 5 years, equal to a lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) of ∼4.3 µg/kg bw/days. The corresponding no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was ∼2.9 µg Se/kg bw/day. One study reported an increased risk of type 2 diabetes after ∼2.9 µg Se/kg bw/day, but other studies with similar doses found no increases in mortality or incidence of type 2 diabetes. NOAELs on affected body weight in animal studies were 0.24-1.2 mg Se/kg bw/day. Other endpoints of selenium toxicity in animals include hepatotoxicity with a NOAEL as low as 2 µg/kg bw/day in rats, as well as gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and reproductive toxicities with NOAELs of 0.6 (gastrointestinal), 0.08, and 0.4 (cardiovascular) and ≥ 0.04 mg Se/kg bw/day (reproductive), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Dose descriptors describing selenium toxicity were as low as 2-3 µg Se/kg bw/day.

Selenium (Se) is distributed into different environmental compartments by natural and anthropogenic activities, and generally discharged in the form of selenate [SeO42-] and selenite [SeO32-], which are both toxic. Physical-chemical and biological treatment processes have been reported to exhibit good treatment efficiencies for Se from aqueous streams, only a few demonstrated to achieve effluent concentrations <5 μg/L. Moreover, there are only a few numbers of studies that describe the progress in technological developments over the last decade. Therefore, to unify the state of knowledge, identify ongoing research trends, and determine the challenges associated with available technologies, this systematic review critically analyses the published research on Se treatment. Specific topics covered in this review include (1) Se chemistry, toxicity, sources and legislation, (2) types of Se treatment technologies, (3) development in Se treatment approaches, (4) Se recovery and circular economy and (5) future prospects. The current research has been found to majorly focused on Se removal via adsorption techniques. However, the key challenges facing Se treatment technologies are related to the presence of competing ions in the solution and the persistence of selenate compared to selenite during their reduction.

Cervical cancer, the third most common cancer in women, is caused in nearly all cases by a persistent infection with high-risk types of the human papillomavirus. Although human papillomavirus infections are 80%-90% transient and disappear spontaneously within 24 months, human papillomavirus infections that remain are at risk of developing cervical lesions. Different therapeutical approaches have been tested to promote the regression of low-grade lesions or prevent progression. They include the application of 5-fluorouracil, curcumin, imiquimod, interferons, Vitamin D, and others. Also, the effect of probiotics and vaginal therapy with carboxy-methyl-beta glucan was assessed. Review of the literature and presentation of the last study data are presented. Clearance of high-risk human papillomavirus seemed to be promoted by treatment with a new vaginal gel containing a highly disperse SiO2 and an anti-oxidative combination of citric acid and sodium. This gel showed, after 6 months, an improvement of cytological Pap findings (ASC-US, LSIL, ASC-H, or HSIL) in 80.9% of the participants. Similarly, there was a clearing of hr-human papillomavirus in 53% of cases after 3 months of gel administration. The percentage increased slightly in the non-treated control group from 78.3% at baseline to 83% after 3 months. The percentage of patients who were tested positive for p16/Ki67 reduced from 75% at baseline to 5.3% in the treatment group after 6 months, while the percentage decreased only slightly in the non-treated group (baseline: 91.5%; 6 months: 75.2%). The examined vaginal gel may support the healing of conspicuous cytological findings (ASC-US, LSIL, ASC-H, or HSIL) and clearance of hr-human papillomavirus positive results.

Although it is generally accepted that selenium (Se) is important for life, it is not well known which forms of organic and/or inorganic Se compound are the most biologically active. In nature Se exists mostly in two forms, namely as selenite with fourvalent and selenate with sixvalent cations, from which all other inorganic and organic species are derived. Despite a small difference in their electronic structure, these two inorganic parent compounds differ significantly in their redox properties. Hence, only selenite can act as an oxidant, particularly in the reaction with free and/or protein- bound sulhydryl (SH) groups. For example, selenite was shown to inhibit the hydroxyl radicalinduced reduction and scrambled reoxidation of disulfides in human fibrinogen thus preventing the formation of highly hydrophobic polymer, termed parafibrin. Such a polymer, when deposited within peripheral and/or cerebral circulation, may cause irreversible damage resulting in the development of cardiovascular, neurological and other degenerative diseases. In addition, parafibrin deposited around tumor cells produces a protease-resistant coat protecting them against immune recognition and elimination. On the other hand, parafibrin generated by Ebola\'s protein disulfide isomerase can form a hydrophobic \'spike\' that facilitates virus attachment and entry to the host cell. In view of these specific properties of selenite this compound is a potential candidate as an inexpensive and readily available food supplement in the prevention and/or treatment of cardiovascular, neoplastic, neurological and infectious diseases.

暂无摘要。

Selenite cataract is a fairly recently described, experimental animal model for cataract (1). Selenite cataract has been extensively characterized histologically (2) and biochemically (3,4). The model has been particularly useful for studies on the roles of calcium accumulation and lens proteolysis in cataract formation (4). This review describes current knowledge of the biochemical mechanism for selenite cataract and indicates how the model may be used for further understanding of cataractogenesis in general.