Seizure control

癫痫发作控制
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本综述旨在总结现有的证据,证明拉莫三嗪(LTG)单药治疗妊娠合并癫痫(WWE)的妊娠妇女的不良妊娠结局和癫痫控制效果。
    方法:在包括Cochrane在内的各种数据库中进行了全面搜索,WebofScience,CBM,PubMed,Embase,CNKI,和妊娠登记中心数据库来确定相关研究。搜索截止到2024年1月。包括比较LTG与其他抗癫痫药物(ASM)治疗孕妇癫痫的研究。没有语言或地区限制。
    结果:共纳入19项研究进行分析,16项研究报告不良妊娠结局,6项研究报告癫痫控制结局.Meta分析显示,与卡马西平(CBZ)单药治疗相比,丙戊酸钠(VPA),和左乙拉西坦(LEV),LTG单药治疗在怀孕期间控制癫痫发作的能力稍弱,OR和95CI为0.65(0.57-0.75;CBZ),0.50(0.32-0.79;VPA),和0.55(0.36-0.84;LEV)。关于不良妊娠结局,LTG单药治疗的发生率明显低于CBZ,VPA,苯妥英(PHT),和苯巴比妥(PHB),OR和95CI的范围为0.30(0.25-0.35;VPA)至0.68(0.56-0.81;CBZ)。
    结论:基于荟萃分析,LTG和LEV似乎是控制妊娠期癫痫发作的首选药物。这篇综述为LTG单药治疗在妊娠WWE中的应用提供了进一步的支持。建立在临床医生现有证据的基础上。
    OBJECTIVE: This review aims to summarize existing evidence on the adverse pregnancy outcomes and seizure control effects of using lamotrigine (LTG) monotherapy in pregnancy women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in various databases including Cochrane, Web of Science, CBM, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Pregnancy Registration Center databases to identify relevant studies. The search was concluded up to January 2024. Studies comparing LTG with other antiseizure medications (ASMs) for treating epilepsy in pregnant women were included, with no language or regional restrictions.
    RESULTS: A total of 19 studies were included for analysis, with 16 studies reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes and 6 studies reporting seizure control outcomes. Meta-analysis showed that compared to monotherapy with carbamazepine (CBZ), sodium valproate (VPA), and levetiracetam (LEV), LTG monotherapy had a slightly weaker ability to control seizures during pregnancy, with ORs and 95 %CIs of 0.65 (0.57-0.75; CBZ), 0.50 (0.32-0.79; VPA), and 0.55 (0.36-0.84; LEV). Regarding adverse pregnancy outcomes, the occurrence rate of LTG monotherapy was significantly lower than that of CBZ, VPA, phenytoin (PHT), and phenobarbital (PHB), with ORs and 95 %CIs ranging from 0.30 (0.25-0.35; VPA) to 0.68 (0.56-0.81; CBZ).
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on meta-analysis, LTG and LEV appear to be preferred medications for controlling seizures during pregnancy. This review provides further support for the use of LTG monotherapy in pregnant WWE, building upon existing evidence for clinical practitioners.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    生酮饮食(KD)是一种高脂肪饮食,充足的蛋白质,和低碳水化合物饮食。由于饮食中的低碳水化合物含量和高脂肪含量,酮体在血液中增加。生酮饮食的最重要特征是它导致肝脏中酮体的产生。酮体是大脑葡萄糖的替代燃料,并形成细胞膜和甘油三酯生物合成所需的结构。生酮饮食提供了具有抗惊厥作用的癫痫发作控制的证据。在这次审查中,KD对癫痫发作控制的积极/消极影响,地点,重要性,生活质量,认知,并对难治性癫痫的治疗行为进行了检查。
    有关该主题的科学信息是从通过MEDLINE等数据库访问的文献中获得的,Embase,WebofScience,CochraneCentral,www.ClinicalTrials.gov,PubMed,科学直接,谷歌学者。
    尽管如今已开始将其用作许多疾病的治疗方法,KD的主要作用区域是耐药性癫痫。为了使这些患者的生酮饮食成功,有必要选择合适的病人,医疗和饮食计划,充分告知患者,并根据后续标准进行频繁监测。有人认为KD是癫痫最有效的治疗方法之一。
    KDs通常有限制的饮食模式,需要补充,生化发现和可能的副作用引发了饮食可持续性的问题。需要更多的临床研究来推广。
    Objective: The ketogenic diet (KD) is a high-fat, adequate-protein, and low-carb diet. Ketone bodies increase in the blood due to low carbohydrate content and high-fat content in the diet. The most important feature of the ketogenic diet is that it causes the production of ketone bodies in the liver. Ketone bodies are an alternative fuel to glucose for the brain and form the structure necessary for the cell membrane and biosynthesis of triglycerides. The ketogenic diet provides evidence on seizure control with anticonvulsant effects. In this review, the positive/negative effects of KD on seizure control, place, importance, quality of life, cognition, and behavior in the treatment of resistant epilepsy were examined.Methods: Scientific information on the subject was obtained from the literature accessed through databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar.Results: Although it has started to be used as a treatment method in many diseases today, the main area of effect of KD is drug-resistant epilepsy. In order for the ketogenic diet to be successful in these patients, it is necessary to choose the appropriate patient, medical treatment and diet plan, inform the patient sufficiently, and perform frequent monitoring in accordance with the follow-up criteria. It is argued that KD is one of the most effective treatments for epilepsy.Conclusion: The fact that KDs generally have a restricted diet pattern, the need for supplementation, biochemical findings and possible side effects raise the issue of diet sustainability. More clinical studies are needed to generalize.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    To investigate whether published studies that identified a causal relationship between psychological stress and seizure worsening in patients with epilepsy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic considered the temporality of Hill\'s criteria.
    A systematic review approach was used to comprehensively search MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for relevant studies. Studies that reported an association between psychological stress and seizure worsening in patients with epilepsy during the COVID-19 pandemic were included accordingly. The quality of assessments in each study was evaluated and an assessment for considering temporality in the causal relationship between the two events in each study was carried out.
    Seventeen studies were included in the analysis. Most (14/17) were cross-sectional studies and only four out of these 17 studies (23.5%) considered temporality in the causality. Further, these four studies did not consider temporality in the study design, they only described it as a limitation.
    We found that many articles reported a causal relationship between psychological stress and seizure worsening without considering temporality. As both researchers and readers, we need to consider temporality when interpreting the causal relationship between increased psychological stress and seizure worsening in patients with epilepsy during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的50年里,已发表的研究提供了有关妊娠期癫痫发作控制的定量数据。这些研究的质量各不相同,特别是在评估癫痫发作控制的方式上。然而,大多数研究表明,怀孕期间癫痫发作发生率更有可能恶化而不是改善,尽管在大多数怀孕中,比率没有改变。几乎所有的研究都涉及患有抗癫痫药物治疗的癫痫的女性,但有一些证据表明,癫痫发作控制也倾向于恶化怀孕的妇女未经治疗的癫痫。可能导致癫痫发作恶化的因素是(I)患者不依从性,(ii)在怀孕期间增加抗癫痫药物清除率,导致相对于剂量较低的循环药物浓度,(iii)怀孕期间女性性激素水平较高的影响,雌激素是诱发癫痫的,孕酮是抗癫痫的,和(iv)不愿意在能够怀孕的妇女中使用潜在的丙戊酸致畸剂,剥夺他们对某些类型的癫痫最有效的药物。可以鼓励合规,但目前只有另一个因素是容易纠正的,即增加的药物清除率。这可以通过在怀孕期间增加抗癫痫药物剂量来补偿,以循环药物浓度测量为导向。这种做法似乎减少了怀孕期间癫痫发作恶化的机会,但到目前为止,它还没有提供一个完整的解决方案。
    Over the past 50 years, published studies have provided quantitative data on the control of epileptic seizures during pregnancy. The studies have varied in quality, and particularly in the ways in which seizure control has been assessed. However, most studies have shown that seizure occurrence rates are more likely to worsen than improve during pregnancy, though in most pregnancies the rates have been unaltered. Nearly all of the studies have involved women with antiseizure medication-treated epilepsy, but there is a little evidence that seizure control also tends to worsen in pregnancies of women with untreated epilepsy. The factors likely to contribute to the seizure worsening are (i) patient non-compliance, (ii) increased antiseizure medication clearance during pregnancy resulting in lower circulating drug concentrations relative to dose, (iii) the effects of the higher female sex hormone levels during pregnancy, oestrogens being pro-epileptogenic and progesterone anti-epileptogenic, and (iv) reluctance to use the potential teratogen valproate in women capable of pregnancy, depriving them of the most effective drug for certain types of epilepsy. Compliance can be encouraged, but at the present time only one other factor is readily correctable, i.e. the increased drug clearance. This can be compensated for by raising antiseizure medication dosage during pregnancy, guided by measurement of circulating drug concentrations. This course of action appears to reduce the chance of seizure disorder worsening during pregnancy, but so far it has not provided a complete solution to the issue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The objective of this study was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the effect of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on epileptiform discharge (ED) burden in genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE).
    We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science Core Collection databases using the keywords \'genetic generalized epilepsy\', \'antiepileptic drugs\' and \'epileptiform discharge\'. Primary human studies published in English that reported the effect of AEDs on EDs captured on electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings of at least 24 h in duration in patients with GGE were included.
    Six studies published between 1984 and 2017, which reported the effect of AEDs on EDs, involving a total of 116 patients with GGE, were analyzed. Our systematic review found a tendency for AEDs to reduce ED density, frequency, cumulative duration, and burst duration in GGE. Furthermore, we found evidence that the AED-mediated reduction in ED burden was associated with improved seizure control and cognitive outcomes.
    Antiepileptic drugs tend to reduce ED burden in GGE, but the significance of this association remains uncertain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生酮饮食(KD)是一种非药物治疗方法,可减少小儿难治性癫痫患者的癫痫发作,并取得中度至高度的成功。在医院发起,父母继续在家治疗,确保维持高脂肪与低碳水化合物/蛋白质的比例,以实现代谢性酮症。我们进行了系统评价,以检查使用KD减少癫痫发作的有孩子家庭的生活质量(QoL)。从2007年至2014年,使用以下关键术语和组合对文献进行了系统回顾:“癫痫,“\”生酮饮食,\"\"孩子,\"\"家庭,“和”生活质量。“我们加入了CINAHL,Medline,PubMed,和PsycINFO。删除重复项后,我们按标题和摘要筛选了598篇论文。文章比较了替代饮食,如阿特金斯饮食和KD,或者那些关注KD和社会成本的人,被排除在外。剩下18篇文章,包括7项干预研究(随机对照试验和准实验),7项描述性研究(回顾性),2观察性研究,和2个案例研究。大多数参与者在5岁时被诊断为癫痫,并进行了抗癫痫药(AEDs)的试验,出院后一直在使用KD。QoL很少被报告为主要变量,并以多种方式定义。我们发现了可能影响QoL的反复出现的主题:减少癫痫发作的功效,营养状况,儿童成长和发展,以及儿童和家庭的社会心理影响。主要的心理因素是需要为父母提供咨询和对预期结果的明确期望。不依从性和辍学率很常见,但不幸的是,原因和时机没有得到很好的记录,其中一些可能与QoL有关。KD在减少癫痫发作方面的成功解决了父母的主要关切。进一步的研究应解决KD依从性和辍学率,并调查生活质量的影响因素。
    The ketogenic diet (KD) is a nonpharmacologic treatment to reduce seizures with moderate to high success in pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy. Initiated in hospital, parents continue the treatment at home ensuring the ratio of high fat to low carbohydrate/protein is maintained to achieve metabolic ketosis. We conducted a systematic review to examine the quality of life (QoL) for families with a child using the KD for the reduction in epileptic seizures. A systematic review of the literature was conducted from 2007-2014 using key terms and combinations of: \"epilepsy,\" \"ketogenic diet,\" \"children,\" \"family,\" and \"quality of life.\" We accessed CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, and PsycINFO. After removing duplicates, we screened 598 papers by title and abstract. Articles comparing alternate diets such as the Atkins diet to the KD, or those focusing on the KD and societal costs, were excluded. Eighteen articles remained, including 7 intervention studies (randomized controlled trial and quasiexperimental), 7 descriptive studies (retrospective), 2 observational studies, and 2 case studies. Most participants were diagnosed with epilepsy at the age of 5 y, and had a trial of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and had been using the KD after discharge from the hospital. QoL was infrequently reported as a primary variable and was defined in a variety of ways. We found recurring themes that could affect QoL: efficacy of seizure reduction, nutritional status, child growth and development, and child and family psychosocial impact. The dominant psychological factor was the need for counseling for parents and clear expectations on expected outcomes. Nonadherence and dropout rates were frequent, but unfortunately the reasons and timing were not well documented, and some of these could be associated with QoL. The success of the KD in seizure reduction addressed a primary parental concern. Further research should address KD adherence and dropout rates, and investigate factors of quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号