Undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas (URCSs) represent a diagnostic challenge, and their optimal treatment is unknown. We aimed to define the clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome of URCS patients.
URCS patients treated from 1983 to 2019 at 21 worldwide sarcoma reference centres were retrospectively identified. Based on molecular assessment, cases were classified as follows: (1) CIC-rearranged round cell sarcomas, (2) BCOR::CCNB3-rearranged round cell sarcomas, (3) unclassified URCSs. Treatment, prognostic factors and outcome were reviewed.
In total, 148 patients were identified [88/148 (60%) CIC-rearranged sarcoma (median age 32 years, range 7-78), 33/148 (22%) BCOR::CCNB3-rearranged (median age 17 years, range 5-91), and 27/148 (18%) unclassified URCSs (median age 37 years, range 4-70)]. One hundred-one (68.2%) cases presented with localised disease; 47 (31.8%) had metastases at diagnosis. Male prevalence, younger age, bone primary site, and a low rate of synchronous metastases were observed in BCOR::CCNB3-rearranged cases. Local treatment was surgery in 67/148 (45%) patients, and surgery + radiotherapy in 52/148 (35%). Chemotherapy was given to 122/148 (82%) patients. At a 42.7-month median follow-up, the 3-year overall survival (OS) was 92.2% (95% CI 71.5-98.0) in BCOR::CCNB3 patients, 39.6% (95% CI 27.7-51.3) in CIC-rearranged sarcomas, and 78.7% in unclassified URCSs (95% CI 56.1-90.6; p < 0.0001).
This study is the largest conducted in URCS and confirms major differences in outcomes between URCS subtypes. A full molecular assessment should be undertaken when a diagnosis of URCS is suspected. Prospective studies are needed to better define the optimal treatment strategy in each URCS subtype.

CIC-rearranged sarcomas (CIC-RS) represent the most frequent subset of \"Ewing-like\" undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas. These tumors tend to be more aggressive than Ewing sarcomas. Moreover, treatment strategy can differ according to teams. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to describe the characteristics, treatments, and outcome for patients with CIC-RS included in the French NETSARC+ database.
Pediatric and adult patients from 13 French centers with a diagnosis of CIC-RS were registered from October 2008 to March 2021. Patients and tumors characteristics were collected from the national network NETSARC+ database (http://netsarc.sarcomabcb.org). CIC-RS diagnosis was pathologically and molecularly confirmed with a central review by expert pathologists. Two groups of patients were studied: those treated as classical Ewing sarcomas (cohort EwS) and those treated as high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (cohort STS) according to ESMO and/or EpSSG guidelines. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to compare survival.
Among 79 patients, the male/female sex ratio was 0.7 and the median age at diagnosis was 27 years (range 2-87). With a median follow-up of 37 months, 39 patients died of the disease. Median overall survival from diagnosis was 18 months, with no significant difference between both cohorts (p = 0.9). Nevertheless, when focusing on patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis (N = 21), all patients from cohort STS died of disease while some patients from cohort EwS were still alive and in complete remission.
FSG experience confirms the aggressive clinical course of CDS patients regardless of chemotherapy regimen.

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular features of small round cell sarcoma (SRCS) of the bone and soft tissue, and to compare the diagnostic value of different techniques. Methods: Seventy-two cases of SRCS of the bone and soft tissue diagnosed at People\'s Hospital, Peking University from January 2016 to March 2020 were recruited and retrospectively analyzed for pathological morphology, immunophenotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data. Next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on 13 difficult cases. Results: In the study cohort, the patients ranged in age from 4-55 years, with a male predominance. The most Ewing\'s sarcomas and osteosarcomas occurred in the bone, while CIC-rearranged sarcomas, BCOR-rearranged sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma and FUS-NFATc2 rearranged sarcoma occurred in soft tissue. Histologically, all cases were composed predominantly of small round cells. Most cases were positive for vimentin and CD99, and showed a variable reactivity for neurogenic markers. Muscle marker and epithelial marker were negative for most cases. Combined with clinical features, histopathologic findings, immunophenotype, FISH and NGS, we diagnosed 46 Ewing sarcomas, 14 osteosarcomas, 3 CIC-rearranged sarcomas, 1 BCOR-rearranged sarcoma, 1 synovial sarcoma, 1 clear cell soft tissue sarcoma, 1 extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, 1 FUS-NFATc2 rearranged sarcoma, and 4 undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas. Conclusions: SRCS of bone and soft tissue is a group of malignant mesenchymal tumors based on morphological features. Most cases can be diagnosed with a combination of clinical characteristics, morphological features and immunohistochemical phenotype, while some cases require such further tests as FISH and NGS technologies, and NGS can be useful in diagnosing and categorizing SRCS.
目的： 探讨骨及软组织小圆细胞肉瘤的病理形态学表现、免疫表型、分子遗传学特征及不同检测技术的诊断价值。 方法： 收集北京大学人民医院2016年1月至2020年3月72例原发于骨及软组织的小圆细胞肉瘤，对其病理形态学表现、免疫组织化学表型及荧光原位杂交（FISH）检测结果进行回顾性分析，并对其中13例疑难病例行二代测序检测。 结果： 本组病例年龄分布在4~55岁，以男性为主，其中尤文肉瘤及小细胞骨肉瘤好发于骨组织，以长骨多见，BCOR重排肉瘤、CIC重排肉瘤、滑膜肉瘤及骨外黏液样软骨肉瘤好发于软组织；病理形态均以弥漫浸润的小圆细胞为主，免疫组织化学染色显示，几乎所有病例均表达波形蛋白和CD99，不同程度地表达神经源性标志物，上皮源性标志物和肌源性标志物表达率低；结合临床特点、形态学、免疫组织化学染色、FISH或二代测序检测诊断尤文肉瘤46例、骨肉瘤14例及透明细胞软组织肉瘤1例；经二代测序诊断3例CIC重排肉瘤及BCOR重排肉瘤、滑膜肉瘤、骨外黏液样软骨肉瘤和FUS-NFATc2融合肉瘤各1例；另有4例经FISH及二代测序检测未发现特异性分子改变，诊断为未分化小圆细胞肿瘤。 结论： 骨及软组织的小圆细胞肉瘤大部分病例结合临床、病理形态表现及免疫表现可以诊断，部分病例需借助FISH、二代测序等分子检测手段协助诊断，其中二代测序检测技术，可为此类肿瘤提供更为精确的分类及诊断。.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma is a rare subtype of chondrosarcoma. The tumor has a characteristic bimorphic pattern with areas of poorly differentiated small round cell component and interspersed islands of well differentiated hyaline cartilage. Histological diagnosis of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma is very challenging especially in small biopsies when tumor presents with little cartilaginous component. In such cases, it is very difficult to distinguish mesenchymal chondrosarcoma from other round blue cell tumors like Ewing\'s sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, small cell osteosarcoma and desmoplastic round blue cell tumor. Immunohistochemically, mesenchymal chondrosarcoma stains positive for NKX2.2, CD99, S100 and SOX9. This immunoprofile is non-specific and overlaps with other round blue cell tumors. Till recently, there was no reliable immunohistochemical marker to differentiate mesenchymal chondrosarcoma from other round blue cell tumors. NKX3.1, though widely used as a diagnostic biomarker for prostatic adenocarcinoma, has been recently proposed by Yoshida et al. (2020) as a unique marker of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma and EWSR1-NFATC2 sarcoma.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to further explore utility of NKX3.1 as a diagnostic marker of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma.
METHODS: We applied NKX3.1 immunohistochemistry to 21 cases of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma and 32 cases of other round blue cell tumors.
RESULTS: 14 out of 21 cases (66.7%) of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma stained positive for NKX3.1 with nuclear expression in small round component. Cartilaginous component was predominantly negative. All other round blue cell tumors showed negative results.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our study results we suggest that NKX3.1 is a useful immunohistochemical marker in differentiating mesenchymal chondrosarcoma from its histological mimics.

BACKGROUND: Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a small, round cell sarcoma that rarely occurs in solid organs, including the pancreas. A diagnostic overlap exists with other primary pancreatic neoplasms, especially for specimens from small biopsies and fine needle aspiration (FNA). To improve the diagnosis of this rare pancreatic tumor, we have reported a series of 13 cases of primary pancreatic ES and reviewed the cytopathologic, surgical pathology, clinical, and radiologic features of these neoplasms.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective case review of 13 patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic ES from 2 tertiary academic medical centers. A combination of cytology and histopathologic slides were reviewed, and the patient demographics, clinical information, somatic genetics, and radiologic findings were obtained from the electronic medical records.
RESULTS: Five FNA specimens from 5 patients and 8 surgical biopsy or resection specimens were identified and reviewed. The patients included 9 males and 4 females, with a median age of 27 years (range, 15-78 years). The cytology smears were highly cellular and showed a combination of complex tissue fragments and singly dispersed small round blue cells. The final diagnosis was ES for all 5 FNA specimens in accordance with the characteristic cytomorphology, diffuse and/or strong membranous immunolabeling for CD99, membranous β-catenin, and molecular confirmation of EWSR1 using fluorescence in situ hybridization or reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
CONCLUSIONS: The cytologic diagnosis of ES is challenging, especially in unusual locations such as the pancreas. However, the correct cytologic diagnosis is important because these patients will require neoadjuvant therapy before surgery. Confirmatory molecular studies should be required to render the diagnosis of pancreatic ES.

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 60-70% of high-grade round-cell sarcomas that lack the Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 (EWSR1) rearrangement harbour a rearrangement of the CIC gene, most commonly CIC-DUX4. Recent studies have established that CIC-rearranged sarcomas constitute a distinct group characterized by recognizable histology and immunoprofiles, such as positivity for ETV4 and WT1 and negativity for NKX2.2. Although these sarcomas are diagnosed increasingly in practice by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) with CIC break-apart probes, the optimal modality to diagnose these sarcomas has not been determined. In this study, we describe four round-cell sarcomas that showed false-negative results by CIC break-apart FISH assays.
RESULTS: These sarcomas showed characteristic histology of CIC-rearranged sarcomas, and all were immunohistochemically positive for ETV4 and WT1 and negative for NKX2.2. Although FISH showed non-atypical negative signals for CIC rearrangement, high-throughput RNA sequencing identified CIC-DUX4 and its fusion breakpoint in all cases. Their clinical and histological findings, as well as fusion points determined by RNA sequencing, did not differ significantly from those of nine FISH-positive CIC-DUX4 sarcoma cases. We estimated that the FISH false-negative rate for CIC-rearranged sarcomas was 14%. Although neither histology nor immunoprofiles (e.g. ETV4 and WT1) are entirely sensitive or specific for CIC-rearranged sarcomas, the observation that these four cases were identified successfully by such phenotypes suggested their practical utility.
CONCLUSIONS: CIC break-apart FISH assays missed a significant minority of CIC-DUX4 sarcomas, and full awareness of typical morphology and judicious immunohistochemical work-ups, including analyses of ETV4 and WT1, should complement diagnostic assessment.

Subsets of primitive round-cell sarcomas remain difficult to diagnose and classify. Among these is a rare round-cell sarcoma that harbors a CIC gene rearrangement known as CIC-rearranged undifferentiated round-cell sarcoma, which is most commonly fused to the DUX4 gene. Owing to its aggressive clinical behavior and potential therapeutic implications, accurate identification of this novel soft tissue sarcoma is necessary. Definitive diagnosis requires molecular confirmation, but only a few centers are as yet able to perform this test. Several studies have shown that PEA3 subfamily genes, notably ETV4 (belonging to the family of ETS transcription factors), are upregulated in CIC-rearranged undifferentiated round-cell sarcomas. We performed a detailed immunohistochemical analysis to investigate ETV4 expression in CIC-rearranged undifferentiated round-cell sarcomas and their potential mimics (especially Ewing sarcomas). The study cohort included 17 cases of CIC-rearranged undifferentiated round-cell sarcomas, and 110 tumors that morphologically mimic CIC-rearranged undifferentiated round-cell sarcomas: 43 Ewing sarcomas, 25 alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas, 20 poorly differentiated round-cell synovial sarcomas, 10 desmoplastic round-cell tumors, 5 BCOR-CCNB3 sarcomas, 5 lymphoblastic lymphomas, and 2 rhabdoid tumors. All CIC-rearranged undifferentiated round-cell sarcomas (on core needle biopsies and open biopsies) were ETV4-positive with a strong diffuse nuclear pattern. Among the other 110 tumors, only six cases (four Ewing sarcomas, one alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, and one desmoplastic round-cell tumor) showed focal (<5% of tumor cells) and very weak nuclear expression of ETV4; all other tumors were completely negative for ETV4. We conclude that systematic immunohistochemical analysis of ETV4 makes it possible to diagnose undifferentiated round-cell sarcomas (with no molecular markers for sarcoma-associated translocation) such as CIC-rearranged undifferentiated round-cell sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Differentiation of Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT) and Ewing-like tumors remains problematic. Certain ESFT with morphological and immunohistochemical (IHC) profiles lack the EWSR1-ETS transcript. To improve diagnostic accuracy we investigated the presence of several specific transcripts in 200 small round cell tumors (SRCT) displaying ESFT morphology and immunophenotype in which EWSR1 FISH analysis was non-informative or negative.
METHODS: 200 tumors (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) were analyzed by RT-PCR. All tumors were tested for EWSR1-ETS, EWSR1/WT1, PAX3/7-FOX01 or SYT/SSX transcripts, and the negative tumors were subsequently analyzed for CIC/DUX4, BCOR/CCNB3 and CIC/FOX04 transcripts.
RESULTS: 133 (66.5%) ESFT displayed one of the above EWSR1-ETS translocations. Three cases (1.5%) revealed the SYT-SSX transcript for Synovial sarcoma, and one (0.5%) a EWSR1-WT1 transcript for Desmoplastic Small Round Cell tumor. The CIC-DUX4 translocation was found in six Ewing-like tumors (3%) with CD99 positivity. The BCOR-CCNB3 gene fusion was observed in 5 tumors (2.5%) displaying round or spindle cells with strong CCNB3 IHC expression in 3 tumors. Moreover, RT-PCR failed to detect any gene fusion transcripts in 19 tumors (9.5%) and were considered \"undifferentiated small round cell sarcoma\" (SRCS). Molecular biology results were non-informative in 33 SRCTs (16.5%) due to RNA degradation through inadequate fixation and/or decalcification.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of 200 SRCTs confirms the molecular heterogeneity of neoplasms with ESFT morphology and highlight that molecular studies with RT-PCR including new emerging gene fusion transcripts are mandatory for the diagnosis when EWSR1 FISH is negative or non-informative. The incidence of CIC-DUX4, BCOR-CCNB3 and CIC-FOX04 transcripts was relatively low. A small group of Ewing-like sarcomas or undifferentiated SRCS remains unclassified. Adopting appropriate tissue fixation and processing protocols is important to avoid degradation of fixed/embedded tissue when no frozen tumor is available.

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) was first reported in 1989. Generally, DSRCT is considered to be an aggressive malignant neoplasm that mainly occurs in the abdominal cavity and has been often seen in adolescents and young male adults. In the present study, a total of 18 cases of DSRCT reported in China between October 1998 and June 2006, including one case treated by the authors, were reviewed and analyzed. Among them, 14 had tumors in the abdominal cavity; the other four cases had tumors in the left fossa orbitalis, the root of the tongue, the soft tissue behind the left eyeball, and the abdominal wall (umbilicus). Overall, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 52.36%, 27.92%, and 27.92%, respectively. The survival rate of DSRCT patients is disappointing; however, the survival of patients who had resection of the tumor or received comprehensive clinical treatment is satisfactory.

The primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET)/Ewing family of tumors (EFT) and desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) portend a grave prognosis. Ongoing research in similar neurocrest-derived neoplasms has implicated both the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) in the pathogenesis of these neoplasms. Acetylcholine has been reported to impart a modulatory effect on chemotaxis and proliferation, an effect ameliorated by anticholinergic drugs. The aim of our study is to characterize the pattern of expression of mAChR and nAChR in PNET/EFT and DSRCT, in hopes of discovering a potential target for therapeutic improvements. We examined 34 cases of PNET/EFT and 2 DSRCT retrospectively by immunohistochemical studies. We found that AChRs are overexpressed in a significant number of PNET/EFT and DSRCT. The Western blot analysis of 3 human Ewing sarcoma cell lines confirms the presence of AChRs. Future studies are planned to confirm these results as well as to investigate their potential therapeutic implications.