UNASSIGNED: To compare the effectiveness of long and short proximal femoral nail anti-
rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of type A2.3 intertrochanteric fracture of femur (IFF).
UNASSIGNED: The clinical data of 54 patients with type A2.3 IFF admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the length of PFNA nail used in the operation, they were divided into long nail group (PFNA nail length>240 mm, 24 cases) and short nail group (PFNA nail length≤240 mm, 30 cases). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, fracture side, body mass index, and time from fracture to operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative reduction quality score, fracture healing, and complications of the two groups were recorded and compared. Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function of patients at 1 year after operation. According to the relationship between the fracture line of type A2.3 IFF and the lesser trochanter, the two groups of patients were divided into type Ⅰ(the fracture line extends to the level of the lesser trochanter), type Ⅱ(the fracture line extends to less than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter), and type Ⅲ (the fracture line extends to more than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter), and the postoperative stability and internal fixator loosening of each subtype were evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency in short nail group were significantly less than those in long nail group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative reduction quality score between the two groups ( P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-18 months, with an average of 13.5 months. The postoperative stability score of short nail group was significantly lower than that of long nail group ( P<0.05). The Harris score in the long nail group was significantly higher than that in the short nail group at 1 year after operation ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in Harris score grading between the two groups ( P>0.05). Complications occurred in 3 cases of the long nail group (including 1 case of coxa varus caused by external nail entry point and 2 cases of loose internal fixator), and 7 cases of the short nail group (including 1 case of coxa varus caused by external nail entry point and 6 cases of loose internal fixator). Neither group had any anterior femoral arch damage, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups ( P>0.05). The number of type Ⅲ patients was relatively small and not included in the statistics; there was no significant difference in the postoperative stability score and the incidence of internal fixator loosening between the long and short nail groups in type Ⅰ patients ( P>0.05). In type Ⅱ patients, the postoperative stability score and the incidence of internal fixation loosening in the long nail group were significantly better than those in the short nail group ( P<0.05).
UNASSIGNED: Long PFNA fixation for type A2.3 IFF has longer operation time and more intraoperative blood loss, but the overall stability of fracture is better after operation. For type A2.3 IFF with fracture line extending to less than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter, long PFNA is used for fixation, although the surgical trauma is large, but the postoperative stability is better than that of short PFNA; for type A2.3 IFF with fracture line extending to the lesser trochanter, there is no significant difference in postoperative stability between long and short PFNAs.
UNASSIGNED: 比较长、短股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-
rotation,PFNA)治疗A2.3型股骨转子间骨折(intertrochanteric fracture of femur,IFF)的临床疗效。.
UNASSIGNED: 回顾分析2020年1月—2022年12月收治且符合选择标准的54例A2.3型IFF患者临床资料,根据术中使用的PFNA主钉长度分为长钉组(PFNA主钉长度>240 mm,24例)和短钉组(PFNA主钉长度≤240 mm,30例)。两组患者性别、年龄、骨折侧别、身体质量指数、骨折至手术时间等基线资料比较差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)。记录并比较两组患者手术时间、术中失血量、术中透视次数、术中复位质量评分、骨折愈合情况及并发症发生情况;术后1年采用Harris评分评价患者髋关节功能。根据A2.3型IFF骨折线与小转子的关系,将两组患者细分为Ⅰ型(骨折线延伸至小转子水平)、Ⅱ型(骨折线延伸至小转子下方2 cm以内)、Ⅲ型(骨折线延伸至小转子下方2 cm以外),评价各亚型患者术后稳定性及内固定物松动情况。.
UNASSIGNED: 短钉组手术时间、术中失血量、术中透视次数均少于长钉组( P<0.05);两组术中复位质量评分比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。两组患者均获随访,随访时间12~18个月,平均13.5个月。短钉组术后稳定性评分低于长钉组( P<0.05)。术后1年长钉组Harris评分优于短钉组( P<0.05),但两组Harris评分等级比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。长钉组有3例发生并发症(包括1例入钉点偏外导致髋内翻,2例复位丢失均发生内固定物松动),短钉组有7例发生并发症(包括1例入钉点偏外导致髋内翻,6例复位丢失均发生内固定物松动),两组均无股骨前弓破损发生;两组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。Ⅲ型患者因例数较少未纳入统计;Ⅰ型患者中长、短钉组术后稳定性评分及内固定物松动发生率比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05);Ⅱ型患者中长钉组术后稳定性评分及内固定物松动发生率均明显优于短钉组( P<0.05)。.
UNASSIGNED: 长PFNA固定A2.3型IFF手术时间长、术中失血量多,但患者术后总体稳定性更好。对于骨折线延伸至小转子以下2 cm以内的A2.3型IFF使用长PFNA固定,虽然手术创伤大,但患者术后稳定性较短PFNA好;对于骨折线延伸至小转子水平的A2.3型IFF使用长、短PFNA固定术后稳定性无明显差异。.