PiazzolasulBrenta(帕多瓦,威尼托地区,意大利北部)是在2020年偶然发现的。从那以后,有关环境破坏的调查一直在进行中,而学校无论如何都在工作。本文的目的是双重的。一方面,叙述从1891年到现在该地区的分层用途:一个故事,说明了1960年代至1980年代之间在污染起源时化学肥料的加工及其遗忘。另一方面,通过恢复上个世纪对过去的叙述和当前的声音来揭示这种被遗忘的记忆,从而提供对正在进行的工作的第一次评估。工业遗产和使用的突然变化的区域本身表现出一个\'认知失调\'之间的危害性的地方,自从工厂活跃以来,人们就知道了,以及自上而下项目的惯性,以利益的名义和不同构思的发展概念传递。这种不和谐现在由学校来掌握,根据生态观点。关于环境和健康风险的参与性推理暗示了学校的公民使命,并要求与领土建立相互联系的关系。这些操作需要研究所内外的共鸣,它仍然没有被发现。危在旦夕的是需要重新连接世代之间的记忆以及人类和非人类实体之间的关系(即,环境)。在这些基础上,有可能建立一些科学公民,可以面对不确定性而不会产生瘫痪效应,但在一个新的,透明,以及关于一个地方和它本身的感觉的横向叙述。
Environmental pollution in the site of the high school \'Rolando da Piazzola\' in Piazzola sul Brenta (Padua, Veneto Region, Northern Italy) was discovered by chance in 2020. Since then, investigations on the environmental damage have been ongoing, while the school is anyway working. The purpose of this article is twofold. On the one hand, to narrate the stratification uses in the area from 1891 to nowadays: a story accounting for both the processing of chemical fertilizers at the origin of pollution and its oblivion between the 1960s and 1980s. On the other hand, to shed light on such forgotten memories by recovering last-century narratives and current voices on the past, thus providing a first assessment of a work in progress. The industrial legacy and the sudden change of use of the area itself exhibit a \'cognitive dissonance\' between the harmfulness of the place, known to the population since the factory was active, and the inertia of top-down projects, passed in the name of interests and variously conceived notion of development. Such dissonance is now to be grasped by the school, in the light of an ecological view. The participatory reasoning on the environmental and health risks alludes to the civic mission of the school and calls for a syntonic relationship with the territory. These operations require a
resonance inside and outside the institute, which has still not been found. What is at stake is the need to reconnect the memory between generations and the relationships between human and non-human entities (i.e., the environment). On these basis, it would be possible to build some scientific citizenship that can face uncertainty without paralyzing effect, but in a new, transparent, and horizontal narrative about the sense of a place and of itself.