BACKGROUND: Vertebral endplate defects are often implicated in degenerative disc disorders, yet their connection to patient-reported symptoms remains unclear. COX-2 and PGE-2 are known for their roles in inflammation and pain, with EP-4 receptor involvement in pain signaling. Examining their expression in vertebral endplate tissues may provide insights into pathomechanism of low back pain.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between endplate defects and patient-reported symptoms and to further clarify the role of the COX-2/PGE-2/EP-4 axis in the pathogenesis of chronic low back pain.
METHODS: Retrospective study.
METHODS: A total of 71 patients who had undergone single-level L4/5 or L5/S1 modified laminectomy decompression preserving proximal upper laminae and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery were included in this study, including 18 patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation, 19 with lumbar disc herniation accompanied by degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, and 34 with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
METHODS: Demographic data, Pfirrmann grade, Modic changes, endplate defect score, visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before surgery, 3-month and 6-month follow-up, and the percentage of immune-positive cells (COX-2, PGE-2, and EP-4) in endplate tissue sections.
METHODS: Patients were divided into defect and nondefect groups according to endplate morphology on lumbar MR. All intraoperative endplate specimens were immediately fixed in 10% formaldehyde, and then embedded in paraffin 3 days later for tissue sections. The outcome measures were compared between the defect group and nondefect group. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests and χ² tests. Pearson\'s rank correlation test was used to assess correlations between patient-reported symptoms and the percentage of immune-positive cells in the groups. Multivariable logistic regression models using the forward stepwise likelihood ratio method were used to identify the factors that were independently associated with endplate defects.
RESULTS: The age of Defect group was significantly higher than that of nondefect group (52.5±7.7 vs 57.2±9.1. p=.024). There were no significant differences in gender, diagnosis, BMI, comorbidities, or surgical level between the two groups. Modic changes (Type Ⅱ/Type Ⅲ) were more common in patients of Defect group than nondefect group (38.5% vs 11.1%, p<.001), and so was disc degeneration (Pfirrmann grade Ⅳ/Ⅴ) (69.2% vs 33.3%, p<.001). Defect group had significantly higher VAS-Back (6.5±2.0 vs 4.9±1.6, p<.001) and ODI scores (62.9±10.7 vs 45.2±14.8, p<.001) than nondefect group, while there was no significant differences between the two groups during the 3 and 6-month follow-up after surgery. Histologically, Defect group was characterized by upregulation of COX-2, PGE-2, and EP-4 in endplate tissue sections. Both in defect and nondefect groups, VAS-Back showed moderate positive correlations with the expressions of COX-2 (r=0.643; r=0.558, p both<.001), PGE-2 (r=0.611; r=0.640, p both<.001), and EP-4 (r=0.643; r=0.563, p both<.001). Multivariate regression analyses reveled that percentage of COX-2-positive cells was associated with endplate defects (OR=1.509, 95%CI [1.048-2.171], p=.027), as well as percentage of PGE-2-positive (OR=1.291, 95%CI [1.106-1.508], p=.001) and EP-4-positive cells (OR=1.284, 95%CI [1.048∼2.171], p=.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with endplate defects had worse quality of life, more severe disc degeneration and Modic changes, and up-regulated COX-2/PGE-2/EP-4 axis expression in cartilage endplates in patients with defected endplates. Inflammatory factors may significantly contribute to the onset and progression of chronic low back pain in patients with endplate defects, consequently impacting patient-reported symptoms.

EP4, a prostaglandin E2 receptor, has shown an immunosuppressive activity on cancer cells. This first-in-human study evaluated ONO-4578, a highly selective EP4 antagonist, as monotherapy and in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. A daily dose ranging from 30 mg to 100 mg of ONO-4578 monotherapy and that ranging from 2 mg to 60 mg of ONO-4578 with biweekly nivolumab 240 mg were administered. A total of 31 patients were enrolled, 10 receiving monotherapy and 21 receiving combination therapy. Overall, 26 patients experienced treatment-related adverse events. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in three patients; one of six patients receiving 100 mg monotherapy developed grade 3 duodenal ulcer and two of six patients receiving 60 mg combination therapy developed either grade 3 erythema multiforme or grade 3 increased amylase and grade 4 increased lipase. One patient with small-cell lung cancer who received 40 mg combination therapy had a partial response, and three patients with monotherapy and six patients with combination therapy had stable disease. Pharmacodynamics analyses showed that ONO-4578 had EP4 antagonistic activity at doses as low as 2 mg. In conclusion, the maximum tolerated dose of ONO-4578 alone or in combination with nivolumab was not reached. ONO-4578 was well tolerated at the tested doses and showed signs of antitumor activity. Considering safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics results, ONO-4578 40 mg daily with nivolumab 240 mg biweekly was selected as the recommended dose for future clinical trials. (Registration: JapicCTI-173,496 and NCT03155061).

E7046 is a highly selective, small-molecule antagonist of the E-type prostanoid receptor 4 (EP4) for prostaglandin E2, an immunosuppressive mediator of the tumor immune microenvironment. This first-in-human phase 1 study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose of E7046.
This first-in-human study enrolled 30 patients with advanced tumors of cancer types associated with high levels of myeloid infiltrates. E7046 was administered orally once-daily in sequential escalating dose cohorts (125, 250, 500, and 750 mg) with ≥6 patients per cohort. Tumor assessments were performed every 6 weeks. Paired tumor biopsies and blood samples, before and on treatment, were collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterization of the treatment.
No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and the MTD was not reached. E7046 had an elimination half-life (t1/2) of 12 hours, and drug exposure increased dose-dependently from 125 to 500 mg. Target modulation by E7046 was supported by changes in genes downstream of EP4 with concurrent enhanced antitumoral immune responses. A best response of stable disease (per irRECIST) was reported in 23% of patients treated with E7046 (n=30) (125 mg: n=2; 250 mg: n=2; 750 mg: n=3). Over half (4/7) of the patients with stable disease had treatment duration of 18 weeks or more, and three patients (3/15; 20%) achieved metabolic responses.
In this first-in-human study, E7046 administered orally once daily demonstrated manageable tolerability, immunomodulatory effects, and a best response of stable disease (≥18 weeks) in several heavily pretreated patients with advanced malignancies. The 250 and 500 mg doses are proposed for further development in the combination setting.
NCT02540291.

Canine studies of spontaneous osteoarthritis (OA) pain add valuable data supporting drug treatment mechanisms that may translate to humans. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study was conducted in client-owned dogs with moderate OA pain to evaluate efficacy of LYA, an inhibitor of microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES1), an EP4 antagonist (LYB), and carprofen, versus placebo. Of 255 dogs screened, 163 were randomized (placebo/LYA/LYB/carprofen: n = 43/39/42/39) and 158 completed treatment. Efficacy versus placebo was assessed using Bayesian mixed-effect model for repeated measure analyses of the Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) pain interference score (PIS; primary endpoint), pain severity score, and overall impression, as well as the Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs (LOAD) mobility score. The posterior probability that the difference to placebo was <0 at week 2 was 80% for LYA and 54% for LYB for CBPI PIS (both <95% predefined threshold). For secondary endpoints, the posterior probability that the difference to placebo was <0 at week 2 ranged from 89 to 96% for LYA and from 56 to 89% for LYB. The posterior probabilities comparing carprofen to placebo groups were ≥90% for all efficacy endpoints. The proportion of dogs with one or more adverse event was not significantly different from placebo (32.6%) for LYA (35.9%) or carprofen (25.6%), but the rate for LYB (59.5%) was higher versus placebo (P = 0.017). LYA treatment demonstrated consistent improvement in all efficacy measures, suggesting that inhibition of mPGES1 may be an effective treatment for chronic pain associated with OA.

The prostaglandin D2 receptor DP2 has been implicated in eosinophil infiltration and the development of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).
In this study, we investigated an involvement of PGE2 (EP1-EP4) and PGD2 (DP1) receptors in EoE by measuring their expression in peripheral blood eosinophils and esophageal mucosal biopsies of EoE patients and by performing migration and adhesion assays with eosinophils from healthy donors.
Expression of EP2 and EP4, but not EP1 and EP3, was decreased in blood eosinophils of patients with EoE vs. control subjects. Adhesion of eosinophils to esophageal epithelial cells was decreased by EP2 receptor agonist butaprost and EP4 agonist ONO-AE1-329, whereas DP1 agonist BW245C increased adhesion. In chemotaxis assays with supernatant from human esophageal epithelial cells, only ONO-AE1-329 but not butaprost or BW245C inhibited the migration of eosinophils. Expression of EP and DP receptors in epithelial cells and eosinophils was detected in sections of esophageal biopsies from EoE patients by immunohistochemistry. qPCR of biopsies from EoE patients revealed that gene expression of EP4 and DP1 was the highest among PGE2 and PGD2 receptors. Esophageal epithelial cells in culture showed high gene expression for EP2 and EP4. Activation of EP2 and EP4 receptors decreased barrier integrity of esophageal epithelial cells in impedance assays.
Activation of EP2 and EP4 receptors may inhibit eosinophil recruitment to the esophageal mucosa. However, their activation could negatively affect esophageal barrier integrity suggesting that eosinophilic rather than epithelial EP2 and EP4 have a protective role in EoE.

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn\'s disease (CD) cause significant morbidity and are increasing in prevalence among all populations, including African Americans. More than 200 susceptibility loci have been identified in populations of predominantly European ancestry, but few loci have been associated with IBD in other ethnicities.
We performed 2 high-density, genome-wide scans comprising 2345 cases of African Americans with IBD (1646 with CD, 583 with UC, and 116 inflammatory bowel disease unclassified) and 5002 individuals without IBD (controls, identified from the Health Retirement Study and Kaiser Permanente database). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated at P < 5.0 × 10-8 in meta-analysis with a nominal evidence (P < .05) in each scan were considered to have genome-wide significance.
We detected SNPs at HLA-DRB1, and African-specific SNPs at ZNF649 and LSAMP, with associations of genome-wide significance for UC. We detected SNPs at USP25 with associations of genome-wide significance for IBD. No associations of genome-wide significance were detected for CD. In addition, 9 genes previously associated with IBD contained SNPs with significant evidence for replication (P < 1.6 × 10-6): ADCY3, CXCR6, HLA-DRB1 to HLA-DQA1 (genome-wide significance on conditioning), IL12B,PTGER4, and TNC for IBD; IL23R, PTGER4, and SNX20 (in strong linkage disequilibrium with NOD2) for CD; and KCNQ2 (near TNFRSF6B) for UC. Several of these genes, such as TNC (near TNFSF15), CXCR6, and genes associated with IBD at the HLA locus, contained SNPs with unique association patterns with African-specific alleles.
We performed a genome-wide association study of African Americans with IBD and identified loci associated with UC in only this population; we also replicated IBD, CD, and UC loci identified in European populations. The detection of variants associated with IBD risk in only people of African descent demonstrates the importance of studying the genetics of IBD and other complex diseases in populations beyond those of European ancestry.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the relaxant effect of stimulation of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2 ) receptor subtype EP2 as well as the involvement of a cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent pathway related to stimulation of EP2 receptors in urethral function in rats by evaluating effects of PGE2 and selective EP2 receptor agonist CP-533,536.
METHODS: Effects of PGE2 and CP-533,536 on cAMP accumulation were assessed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells expressing rat EP2 or EP4 receptors. Relaxant responses to PGE2 and CP-533,536 (0.01-10 µmol/L) in rat urethral tissue pre-contracted with 10 µmol/L phenylephrine were evaluated, and cAMP levels in isolated rat urethral tissue treated with these compounds were determined as well. The effects of PGE2 and CP-533,536 (0.003-0.3 mg/kg intravenously) on urethral perfusion pressure (UPP) in anesthetized rats were also evaluated.
RESULTS: PGE2 concentration-dependently increased the accumulation of cAMP in cells expressing rat EP2 (EC50 value = 1.3 nmol/L) and EP4 receptors (EC50 value = 17 nmol/L). While CP-533,536 similarly increased the accumulation of cAMP in cells expressing rat EP2 receptors (EC50 value = 3.0 nmol/L), no such effects were noted in cells expressing rat EP4 receptors up to 10 µmol/L. Both PGE2 and CP-533,536 produced relaxation and increased cAMP levels in urethral tissues in a concentration-dependent manner. PGE2 and CP-533,536 both dose-dependently decreased UPP in anesthetized rats.
CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results suggest that stimulation of EP2 receptors induces relaxation likely via activation of cAMP-dependent mechanisms in rat urethral tissue, leading to a reduction of UPP.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of grapiprant for treatment of pain in dogs with osteoarthritis (OA).
OBJECTIVE: Grapiprant will relieve pain as measured by the owner\'s and veterinarian\'s evaluation of pain in dogs with OA. Another objective was evaluation of the safety of grapiprant.
METHODS: Two hundred and eighty-five client-owned dogs with OA were enrolled and treated with grapiprant or placebo with 262 cases (N = 131 in each group) evaluable for the effectiveness analysis.
METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, masked, placebo-controlled study dogs were treated daily with grapiprant (2 mg/kg) per OS or placebo. Owners completed an evaluation using the Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Success was defined as improvement in the CBPI. Veterinary assessments were made on screening and days 14 and 28. Safety was evaluated by physical examination, evaluation of clinical pathology results, and owner observations.
RESULTS: Grapiprant treatment improved pain compared to placebo on day 28 (48.1 and 31.3% treatment successes respectively; P = .0315). The pain interference score (PIS) and pain severity score (PSS) improved in the grapiprant group compared to placebo (P = .0029 and 0.0022, respectively). Veterinary assessments were significantly better in the grapiprant-treated dogs (P = .0086). Grapiprant generally was well tolerated, but a higher percentage of treated dogs (17.02%) had occasional vomiting as compared to the placebo group (6.25%).
CONCLUSIONS: Grapiprant is an effective treatment for alleviation of pain in dogs with OA, and represents a modality of treatment that may be better tolerated than current options.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic parameters of up to 15 dose levels of ONO-4232, a selective agonist for the EP4 subtype of the prostaglandin E2 receptor, with a dual left ventricular lusitropic and venodilatory action, in healthy, adult, male and female volunteers.
In this randomized, single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, sequential-group escalation, first in human study, ONO-4232 (0.001, 0.003, 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.12, 0.15, 0.18, or 0.27 ng/kg/min) or placebo was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion over 3 hours. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic data were collected during dosing and over a period of 3 days (Day -1 to Day 2), and at the follow-up visit (Day 7 [±2 days]).
Fifty-seven subjects received ONO-4232 and 19 subjects received placebo. Ten of the planned 15 cohorts (dose range, 0.001-0.27 ng/kg/min) were conducted. A total of 34 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 23 subjects. Overall, the majority of TEAEs were mild. No serious TEAEs or deaths were reported and no subjects discontinued due to adverse events. The most frequently reported TEAE was infusion site erythema. A decrease in systolic blood pressure from baseline occurred for ONO-4232 subjects compared with placebo that was statistically significant for the 0.08 ng/kg/min dose, and a dose-dependent increase in heart rate starting at 0.04 ng/kg/min and achieving statistical significance compared with placebo at 0.15 ng/kg/min and above. More orthostatic events occurred in the higher-dose groups and the dose escalation was terminated due to increasing occurrences of orthostatic hypotension/intolerance. Plasma concentrations of ONO-4232 reached steady state approximately 2 hours after the start of infusion and then declined rapidly after the end of infusion, and systemic exposure appeared to increase in a dose-proportional manner. Approximately 30% of the administered dose of ONO-4232 was excreted in the urine.
In healthy adults ONO-4232 was generally well tolerated in the dose range of 0.001 to 0.27 ng/kg/min. There were dose-related changes in systolic blood pressure and heart rate. Infusion site erythema, which was likely associated with a venodilatory effect and possible evidence for the pharmacologic effects of ONO-4232, occurred increasingly with increasing dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters appeared to be dose-proportional. The study results support further evaluation of the cardiovascular effects of this first-in-class selective left ventricular lusitropic and venodilatory drug in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin E receptor 4 (PTGER4) is implicated in immune regulation and bone metabolism. The aim of this study was to analyze its role in radiological joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: Six independent cohorts of patients with RA of European or North American descent were included, comprising 1789 patients with 5083 sets of X-rays. The Hospital Clínico San Carlos Rheumatoid Arthritis, Princesa Early Arthritis Register Longitudinal study, and Hospital Universitario de La Paz early arthritis (Spain) cohorts were used as discovery cohorts, and the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic (The Netherlands), Wichita (United States), and National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases (United States and Canada) cohorts as replication cohorts. First, the PTGER4 rs6896969 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was genotyped using TaqMan assays and available Illumina Immunochip data and studied in the discovery and replication cohorts. Second, the PTGER4 gene and adjacent regions were analyzed using Immunochip genotyping data in the discovery cohorts. On the basis of pooled p values, linkage disequilibrium structure of the region, and location in regions with transcriptional properties, SNPs were selected for replication. The results from discovery, replication, and overall cohorts were pooled using inverse-variance-weighted meta-analysis. Influence of the polymorphisms on the overall radiological damage (constant effect) and on damage progression over time (time-varying effect) was analyzed.
RESULTS: The rs6896969 polymorphism showed a significant association with radiological damage in the constant effect pooled analysis of the discovery cohorts, although no significant association was observed in the replication cohorts or the overall pooled analysis. Regarding the analysis of the PTGER4 region, 976 variants were analyzed in the discovery cohorts. From the constant and time-varying effect analyses, 12 and 20 SNPs, respectively, were selected for replication. Only the rs76523431 variant showed a significant association with radiographic progression in the time-varying effect pooled analysis of the discovery, replication, and overall cohorts. The overall pooled effect size was 1.10 (95 % confidence interval 1.05-1.14, p = 2.10 × 10(-5)), meaning that radiographic yearly progression was 10 % greater for each copy of the minor allele.
CONCLUSIONS: The PTGER4 gene is a candidate risk factor for radiological progression in RA.