Receptors, Cannabinoid

受体,大麻素
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抵抗性偏头痛是那些至少三类偏头痛预防失败的患者的特征。这些难以治疗的患者可能以心理障碍的高患病率为特征。内源性大麻素系统(ECS)的功能障碍,包括内源性大麻素同源物水平的改变,可能是几种精神疾病和偏头痛发病机制的基础。在这里,我们探讨了ECS主要成分的外周基因表达以及内源性大麻素和相关脂质的血浆水平是否与耐药性偏头痛的心理障碍有关。51例(年龄=46.0±11.7)患者根据DSM-5标准接受了全面的心理评估。在患者中,61%有人格障碍(PD),61%有情绪障碍(MD)。在这些心理障碍和周围ECS改变之间发现了几种关联。与非PD组相比,PD组血浆中的棕榈烯醇酰胺(PEA)水平较低。MD组的特征是二酰甘油脂肪酶α(DAGLα)和CB2(大麻素2)受体的mRNA水平较低。结果表明,在患有难治性偏头痛和情绪或人格障碍的患者中,ECS的某些成分存在外周功能障碍,并且血浆PEA水平发生变化。
    Resistant migraine characterizes those patients who have failed at least three classes of migraine prophylaxis. These difficult-to-treat patients are likely to be characterized by a high prevalence of psychological disturbances. A dysfunction of the endocannabinoid system (ECS), including alteration in the levels of endocannabinoid congeners, may underlie several psychiatric disorders and the pathogenesis of migraines. Here we explored whether the peripheral gene expression of major components of the ECS and the plasma levels of endocannabinoids and related lipids are associated with psychological disorders in resistant migraine. Fifty-one patients (age = 46.0 ± 11.7) with resistant migraine received a comprehensive psychological evaluation according to the DSM-5 criteria. Among the patients, 61% had personality disorders (PD) and 61% had mood disorders (MD). Several associations were found between these psychological disorders and peripheral ECS alterations. Lower plasma levels of palmitoiletanolamide (PEA) were found in the PD group compared with the non-PD group. The MD group was characterized by lower mRNA levels of diacylglycerol lipase α (DAGLα) and CB2 (cannabinoid-2) receptor. The results suggest the existence of peripheral dysfunction in some components of the ECS and an alteration in plasma levels of PEA in patients with resistant migraine and mood or personality disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    N-花生四酰基乙醇胺(也称为anandamide)和2-花生四酰基甘油是大麻素受体的活化剂。内源性大麻素系统还包括结构和功能相关的脂质介质,不针对大麻素受体,如油酰乙醇胺,棕榈酰乙醇胺,和硬脂酰乙醇胺。这些生物活性脂质参与各种生理过程,包括疼痛的调节。该研究的主要目的是分析这些脂质的血清水平与神经病变疼痛研究参与者的疼痛之间的关联。一个观察,横截面,多中心,研究项目中,无痛或疼痛性神经病变的糖尿病患者接受了深层表型鉴定。我们的假设是,与无痛性神经病变相比,疼痛性神经病变与较高的脂质水平有关。次要目的是分析其他患者报告的结果指标和与血脂水平相关的临床数据。使用液相色谱串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)分析血清样品中的脂质介质。疼痛组的血清anandamide水平明显升高,但效果较小(Cohend=0.31)。使用脂质数据的聚类分析,将患者分为“高水平”内源性大麻素组和“低水平”组。在高级别小组中,61%的病人有痛性神经病,与低水平组的45%相比(P=0.039)。这项工作只是具有相关性,这些发现与寻找针对内源性大麻素系统的镇痛药的相关性需要在未来的研究中确定。
    UNASSIGNED: N-arachidonoylethanolamine (also known as anandamide) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol are activators of the cannabinoid receptors. The endocannabinoid system also includes structurally and functionally related lipid mediators that do not target cannabinoid receptors, such as oleoylethanolamide, palmitoylethanolamide, and stearoylethanolamide. These bioactive lipids are involved in various physiological processes, including regulation of pain. The primary aim of the study was to analyze associations between serum levels of these lipids and pain in participants in the Pain in Neuropathy Study, an observational, cross-sectional, multicentre, research project in which diabetic patients with painless or painful neuropathy underwent deep phenotyping. Our hypothesis was that painful neuropathy would be associated with higher levels of the 5 lipids compared with painless neuropathy. Secondary aims were to analyze other patient-reported outcome measures and clinical data in relationship to lipid levels. The lipid mediators were analyzed in serum samples using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Serum levels of anandamide were significantly higher in the painful group, but the effect size was small (Cohen d = 0.31). Using cluster analysis of lipid data, patients were dichotomized into a \"high-level\" endocannabinoid group and a \"low-level\" group. In the high-level group, 61% of patients had painful neuropathy, compared with 45% in the low-level group ( P = 0.039). This work is of a correlative nature only, and the relevance of these findings to the search for analgesics targeting the endocannabinoid system needs to be determined in future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大麻素受体2型(CB2R)的药理学调节有望治疗神经炎性疾病,如老年痴呆症。尽管CB2R的重要性,在疾病和组织特异性背景下,对其表达和下游信号传导的理解不足。在这里,我们报道了通过新型合成策略和平台试剂的应用实现的CB2R的第一个配体导向共价(LDC)标记。LDC修饰允许CB2R的可视化和研究,同时保持其在正构位点结合其他配体的能力。我们采用硅对接和分子动力学模拟来指导探针设计并评估CB2R的LDC标记的可行性。我们展示了选择性,通过在TR-FRET测定中利用荧光O-硝基苯并恶二唑(O-NBD)官能化探针共价标记CB2R的外周赖氨酸残基。使用O-NBD探针的快速概念验证启发了适用于活细胞实验的高级亲电试剂的掺入。为此,开发了针对N-磺酰基吡啶酮(N-SP)和N-酰基-N-烷基磺酰胺(NASA)LDC探针的新型合成策略,这允许共价递送适合于细胞研究的荧光团。通过放射性配体结合测定和TR-FRET实验表征LDC探针。此外,在常规流式细胞术和成像流式细胞术以及使用过表达和内源性表达小胶质细胞的共聚焦荧光显微镜中,探针被用于特异性可视化CB2R.
    Pharmacological modulation of cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2R) holds promise for the treatment of neuroinflammatory disorders, such as Alzheimer\'s disease. Despite the importance of CB2R, its expression and downstream signaling are insufficiently understood in disease- and tissue-specific contexts. Herein, we report the first ligand-directed covalent (LDC) labeling of CB2R enabled by a novel synthetic strategy and application of platform reagents. The LDC modification allows visualization and study of CB2R while maintaining its ability to bind other ligands at the orthosteric site. We employed in silico docking and molecular dynamics simulations to guide probe design and assess the feasibility of LDC labeling of CB2R. We demonstrate selective, covalent labeling of a peripheral lysine residue of CB2R by exploiting fluorogenic O-nitrobenzoxadiazole (O-NBD)-functionalized probes in a TR-FRET assay. The rapid proof-of-concept validation with O-NBD probes inspired incorporation of advanced electrophiles suitable for experiments in live cells. To this end, novel synthetic strategies toward N-sulfonyl pyridone (N-SP) and N-acyl-N-alkyl sulfonamide (NASA) LDC probes were developed, which allowed covalent delivery of fluorophores suitable for cellular studies. The LDC probes were characterized by a radioligand binding assay and TR-FRET experiments. Additionally, the probes were applied to specifically visualize CB2R in conventional and imaging flow cytometry as well as in confocal fluorescence microscopy using overexpressing and endogenously expressing microglial live cells.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大麻使用和遗传背景在精神病风险中的作用已被证明。然而,大麻和内源性大麻素受体基因变异性之间的相互作用对精神病的神经生物学基础的影响仍不确定。通过仅案例设计,包括首次发作的精神病患者(n=40),分为大麻使用者(50%)和非使用者(50%),我们旨在评估大麻使用与脑活动内源性大麻素受体基因的常见遗传变异之间的相互作用.通过对大麻素受体1型基因(CNR1;rs1049353)和大麻素受体2型基因(CNR2;rs2501431)的两个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)进行基因分型来评估遗传变异性。在执行n-back任务时获得功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据。基因×大麻相互作用模型证明了CNR1和CNR2基因型和大麻使用对不同大脑区域大脑活动的综合影响,比如尾状核,扣带皮质和眶额皮质。这些研究结果表明,大麻使用和大麻素受体遗传背景对首发精神病的脑功能具有共同作用,可能是通过对与奖励回路相关的大脑区域的影响。
    The role of both cannabis use and genetic background has been shown in the risk for psychosis. However, the effect of the interplay between cannabis and variability at the endocannabinoid receptor genes on the neurobiological underpinnings of psychosis remains inconclusive. Through a case-only design, including patients with a first-episode of psychosis (n = 40) classified as cannabis users (50%) and non-users (50%), we aimed to evaluate the interaction between cannabis use and common genetic variants at the endocannabinoid receptor genes on brain activity. Genetic variability was assessed by genotyping two Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP) at the cannabinoid receptor type 1 gene (CNR1; rs1049353) and cannabinoid receptor type 2 gene (CNR2; rs2501431). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data were obtained while performing the n-back task. Gene × cannabis interaction models evidenced a combined effect of CNR1 and CNR2 genotypes and cannabis use on brain activity in different brain areas, such as the caudate nucleus, the cingulate cortex and the orbitofrontal cortex. These findings suggest a joint role of cannabis use and cannabinoid receptor genetic background on brain function in first-episode psychosis, possibly through the impact on brain areas relevant to the reward circuit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    背景:Olorinab是一种高度选择性的,外周作用,大麻素受体2的完全激动剂。这项研究评估了olorinab治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征(IBS-D)和便秘(IBS-C)患者腹痛的疗效和安全性。
    方法:CAPTIVATE是2b阶段,随机化,双盲,安慰剂对照,平行组试验。根据罗马IV诊断为IBS-C和IBS-D的年龄在18-70岁之间的合格参与者接受了10mg的olorinab,25毫克,或50毫克,每日三次(TID)或安慰剂TID,持续12周。主要终点是患者报告的平均腹痛评分(AAPS)从基线到第12周的变化。
    结果:总共273名参与者被随机分配接受10mg奥洛林单抗(n=67),olorinab25mg(n=67),olorinab50mg(n=69),或安慰剂(n=70)。尽管所有组均观察到治疗反应,安慰剂和任何奥洛林单抗剂量之间,从基线到第12周的每周平均AAPS变化无显著差异.在对基线AAPS≥6.5的参与者的预设亚组分析中,与安慰剂(n=30)相比,olorinab50mg(n=35)显着改善了AAPS(p=0.014)。不良事件发生率在olorinab和安慰剂之间相当,没有报告严重不良事件或死亡。
    结论:尽管olorinab的耐受性良好,且每周AAPS得到改善,未达到主要终点.然而,在基线时患有中度至重度疼痛(AAPS≥6.5)的参与者中,与安慰剂相比,olorinab50mg显着改善了每周AAPS。
    结果:gov:NCT04043455。
    Olorinab is a highly selective, peripherally acting, full agonist of cannabinoid receptor 2. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of olorinab to treat abdominal pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) and constipation (IBS-C).
    CAPTIVATE was a phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Eligible participants aged 18-70 years with IBS-C and IBS-D diagnosed per Rome IV received olorinab 10 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg three times daily (TID) or placebo TID for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in patient-reported average abdominal pain score (AAPS) from baseline to Week 12.
    A total of 273 participants were randomized to receive olorinab 10 mg (n = 67), olorinab 25 mg (n = 67), olorinab 50 mg (n = 69), or placebo (n = 70). Although a treatment response was observed across all groups, the weekly change in average AAPS from baseline to Week 12 was not significantly different between placebo and any olorinab dose. In a prespecified subgroup analysis of participants with a baseline AAPS ≥6.5, olorinab 50 mg (n = 35) significantly improved AAPS compared with placebo (n = 30) (p = 0.014). Adverse event rates were comparable between olorinab and placebo and there were no reported serious adverse events or deaths.
    Although olorinab was well-tolerated and improved weekly AAPS, the primary endpoint was not met. However, in participants with moderate-to-severe pain at baseline (AAPS ≥6.5), olorinab 50 mg significantly improved weekly AAPS compared with placebo.
    gov: NCT04043455.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:大麻的作用被认为是由其成分与内源性大麻素系统之间的相互作用介导的。Delta-9-四氢大麻酚(THC)与中枢大麻素受体结合,而大麻二酚(CBD)可能会影响内源性大麻素的功能,而不会直接作用于大麻素受体。我们研究了THC与不同剂量的CBD共同给药对健康志愿者血浆内源性大麻素水平的影响。方法:在一个随机的,双盲,四臂交叉研究,健康志愿者(n=46)吸入含有10mgTHC加上0、10、20或30mgCBD的大麻蒸气,在四个实验会议中。疗程之间的中位时间为14天(IQR=20)。在吸入前采集血液样本,并在0-,5-,15-,吸入后90分钟。THC的血浆浓度,CBD,anandamide,2-花生四酰基甘油(2-AG),和相关的非大麻素脂质使用液相色谱-质谱法进行测量。结果:服用大麻引起血浆中anandamide浓度的急性增加(18.0%,0.042ng/mL[95CI:0.023-0.062]),和非大麻素乙醇酰胺,二十二碳四烯醚乙醇胺(DEA;+35.8%,0.012ng/mL[95CI:0.008-0.016]),油酰乙醇胺(+16.1%,0.184ng/mL[95CI:0.076-0.293]),和N-花生四酰基-L-丝氨酸(+25.1%,0.011ng/mL[95CI:0.004-0.017])(p<0.05)。CBD对anandamide的血浆浓度无明显影响,使用三种剂量中任何一种的2-AG或相关的非大麻素类脂。在四场会议上,阿南达胺和DEA的吸入前浓度逐渐下降,从0.254ng/mL[95CI:0.223-0.286]到0.194ng/mL[95CI:0.163-0.226],从0.039ng/mL[95CI:0.032-0.045]到0.027ng/mL[95CI:0.020-0.034](p<0.05),分别。讨论:THC诱导血浆中anandamide和非大麻素乙醇酰胺的急性升高,但没有证据表明这些作用受到CBD共同管理的影响.在较高剂量的CBD或长期给药后,这种作用可能是明显的。治疗前anandamide和DEA水平的逐步降低可能与反复暴露于THC或参与者对测试程序的焦虑程度降低有关,需要进一步调查。该研究在clinicaltrials.gov(NCT05170217)上注册。
    Background: The effects of cannabis are thought to be mediated by interactions between its constituents and the endocannabinoid system. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) binds to central cannabinoid receptors, while cannabidiol (CBD) may influence endocannabinoid function without directly acting on cannabinoid receptors. We examined the effects of THC coadministered with different doses of CBD on plasma levels of endocannabinoids in healthy volunteers. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, four-arm crossover study, healthy volunteers (n=46) inhaled cannabis vapor containing 10 mg THC plus either 0, 10, 20, or 30 mg CBD, in four experimental sessions. The median time between sessions was 14 days (IQR=20). Blood samples were taken precannabis inhalation and at 0-, 5-, 15-, and 90-min postinhalation. Plasma concentrations of THC, CBD, anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), and related noncannabinoid lipids were measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Results: Administration of cannabis induced acute increases in plasma concentrations of anandamide (+18.0%, 0.042 ng/mL [95%CI: 0.023-0.062]), and the noncannabinoid ethanolamides, docosatetraenylethanolamide (DEA; +35.8%, 0.012 ng/mL [95%CI: 0.008-0.016]), oleoylethanolamide (+16.1%, 0.184 ng/mL [95%CI: 0.076-0.293]), and N-arachidonoyl-L-serine (+25.1%, 0.011 ng/mL [95%CI: 0.004-0.017]) (p<0.05). CBD had no significant effect on the plasma concentration of anandamide, 2-AG or related noncannabinoid lipids at any of three doses used. Over the four sessions, there were progressive decreases in the preinhalation concentrations of anandamide and DEA, from 0.254 ng/mL [95%CI: 0.223-0.286] to 0.194 ng/mL [95%CI: 0.163-0.226], and from 0.039 ng/mL [95%CI: 0.032-0.045] to 0.027 ng/mL [95%CI: 0.020-0.034] (p<0.05), respectively. Discussion: THC induced acute increases in plasma levels of anandamide and noncannabinoid ethanolamides, but there was no evidence that these effects were influenced by the coadministration of CBD. It is possible that such effects may be evident with higher doses of CBD or after chronic administration. The progressive reduction in pretreatment anandamide and DEA levels across sessions may be related to repeated exposure to THC or participants becoming less anxious about the testing procedure and requires further investigation. The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05170217).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的是在萌出的不同阶段表征牙齿牙髓中的内源性大麻素系统(ECS)。果肉:爆发的前磨牙(EPM),爆发前的第三磨牙(PThM),使用骨内(IThM)和爆发期(EThM)(每组n=12)。ECS成分作为大麻素受体(CBr1和CBr2)的信使RNA表达,通过RT-PCR测量anandamide合成(NAPE-PLD)和降解(FAAH)酶。使用Studentt检验分析两组之间的比较以及单向方差分析和Tukey后检验的多重比较(统计学显著性:p<0.05)。CBr2,NAPE-PLD和FAAH的mRNA表达在研究阶段相似,IThM低于PThM和EThM,在EThM中最低(p<0.01);值得注意的是,在EThM中未检测到CBr2mRNA表达。CBr1mRNA在IThM和PThM之间没有显着差异,但在EThM中更低(p<0.01)。EThM中CBr2的缺失和CBr1的存在表明ECS通过CBr1参与了牙齿萌出过程中牙齿和骨组织稳态的介质。
    The aim was to characterise the endocannabinoid system (ECS) in the dental pulp of teeth at different stages of eruption. Pulp of: erupted premolars (EPM), third molars in pre-eruptive (PThM), intraosseous (IThM) and eruptive stages (EThM) (n = 12 each group) were used. Messenger RNA expression of components of the ECS as cannabinoid receptors (CBr1 and CBr2), and anandamide synthetizing (NAPE-PLD) and degradation (FAAH) enzymes were measured by RT-PCR. Data were analysed using Student\'s t-test for comparisons between two groups and one-way analysis of variance and Tukey\'s post-test for multiple comparisons (statistical significance: p < 0.05). mRNA expression of CBr2, NAPE-PLD and FAAH was similar in the studied stages, was lower in IThM than in PThM and EThM, and the lowest in EThM (p < 0.01); of note, CBr2 mRNA expression was not detected in EThM. CBr1 mRNA did not differ significantly between IThM and PThM but was lower in EThM (p < 0.01). The absence of CBr2 and presence of CBr1 in EThM suggest the involvement of the ECS via CBr1 as a mediator of tooth and bone tissue homeostasis during tooth eruption.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这一章中,我们将描述允许验证基因启动子区域中CpG岛的存在的生物信息学工具。我们还将描述确定特定转录因子的共识基序所需的工具,以大鼠1型大麻素受体基因(R_Cnr1)为例进行研究。
    In this chapter, we will describe the bioinformatic tools that allow verifying the presence of CpG islands in a gene promoter region. We will also describe the tools needed to identify consensus motifs for specific transcription factors, focusing on the study of rat type-1 cannabinoid receptor gene (R_Cnr1) as a case study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大麻素受体1(CB1R)和大麻素受体2(CB2R)是G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR),其在通过(部分)激动剂激活时激活多种途径,包括G蛋白途径和β-抑制素的募集。这些途径的活化水平的差异导致有偏差的信号传导。这里,我们描述了使用PathHunter®测定表征配体诱导或抑制β-抑制素募集至人CB1R和CB2R的效力和功效的详细方案。这是一种使用β-半乳糖苷酶互补系统的细胞测定,该系统具有化学发光读数,可以在384孔板中进行。我们已经成功地使用此测定法来表征一组参考配体(两种激动剂,拮抗剂,和反向激动剂)对人CB1R和CB2R,其中一些例子将在这里介绍。
    Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) and cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2R) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that activate a variety of pathways upon activation by (partial) agonists including the G protein pathway and the recruitment of β-arrestins. Differences in the activation level of these pathways lead to biased signaling. Here, we describe a detailed protocol to characterize the potency and efficacy of ligands to induce or inhibit β-arrestin recruitment to the human CB1R and CB2R using the PathHunter® assay. This is a cellular assay that uses a β-galactosidase complementation system which has a chemiluminescent read-out and can be performed in 384-well plates. We have successfully used this assay to characterize a set of reference ligands (both agonists, antagonists, and an inverse agonist) on human CB1R and CB2R, of which some examples will be presented here.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    星形胶质细胞中大麻素CB1受体介导的功能高度依赖于这些神经胶质细胞中相对于神经元部位的CB1受体分布,特别是在正常或病理条件下附近的突触。然而,CB1受体在星形胶质细胞区室中的分布情况仍未完成,因为这些细胞中的CB1受体表达很少,而且星形胶质细胞的鉴定有限.胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)通常用作星形胶质标记。然而,因为GFAP是一种细胞骨架蛋白,主要局限于星形胶质细胞体及其主要分支,对于星形胶质细胞中CB1受体分布的定位似乎并不理想.因此,需要其他标记来破译实际的星形胶质细胞CB1受体。在这项工作中,我们比较了谷氨酸天冬氨酸转运体(GLAST)和GFAP对星形胶质细胞中CB1受体定位的影响.我们通过免疫电子显微镜发现,与GFAP相比,GLAST显示了几乎三倍的星形胶质细胞面积和四倍的星形胶质细胞膜。此外,星形胶质细胞的这种更好的可视化与在GLAST阳性星形胶质细胞中检测到12%的总CB1受体标记相关.
    The cannabinoid CB1 receptor-mediated functions in astrocytes are highly dependent on the CB1 receptor distribution in these glial cells relative to neuronal sites, particularly at the nearby synapses under normal or pathological conditions. However, the portrait of the CB1 receptor distribution in astroglial compartments remains uncompleted because of the scarce CB1 receptor expression in these cells and the limited identification of astrocytes. The glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is commonly used as astroglial marker. However, because GFAP is a cytoskeleton protein mostly restricted to the astroglial cell bodies and their main branches, it seems not ideal for the localization of CB1 receptor distribution in astrocytes. Therefore, alternative markers to decipher the actual astroglial CB1 receptors are required. In this work, we have compared the glutamate aspartate transporter (GLAST) versus GFAP for the CB1 receptor localization in astrocytes. We found by immunoelectron microscopy that GLAST reveals almost three-fold astroglial area and four-fold astroglial membranes compared to GFAP. In addition, this better visualization of astrocytes was associated with the detection of 12% of the total CB1 receptor labeling in GLAST-positive astrocytes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号