Rabies Vaccines

狂犬病疫苗
  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Robust monitoring and reporting systems for rabies are lacking thus increasing the risk of underreporting. Highlighting the rabies cases brings to bear the needed urgent attention for more efforts at preventing and controlling the disease.
    OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiological characteristics of patients managed for clinical rabies at the largest referral facility in Ghana.
    METHODS: A retrospective single-center hospital-based chart review and data extraction were conducted for persons managed for clinical rabies infection at the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital from January 2008 to December 2019. Data analysis was done using STATA. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the epidemiological and clinical characteristics. Fisher\'s exact test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman\'s correlation coefficient were used to explore significant associations.
    RESULTS: A total of 28 cases were recorded over the period of review. All of them died and most (68%) of them were males. Twenty-one percent of them were less than 15 years old. Their median age interquartile range (IQR) was 31 years (25.5 years) and the median incubation period for rabies (IQR) was 60 days (60 days). The source of rabies for cases was mainly dog bites. The vaccination status of all the animals could not be ascertained. Majority (80%) of the patients took neither anti-rabies vaccine nor immunoglobulin as post-exposure prophylaxis after the dog bite. The median time of admission before death (interquartile range) was 2 days (2 days). Majority (82%) of the cases were furious rabies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Attention should be directed at mass vaccination of dogs as dog bites are common. Ensuring availability and access to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is also critical in averting rabies-related deaths.
    BACKGROUND: Des systèmes de surveillance et de déclaration robustes pour la rage font défaut, augmentant ainsi le risque de sousdéclaration. Mettre en lumière les cas de rage suscite l\'attention urgente nécessaire pour redoubler d\'efforts dans la prévention et le contrôle de la maladie.
    OBJECTIVE: Décrire les caractéristiques épidémiologiques des patients traités pour une rage clinique dans le plus grand établissement de référence au Ghana.
    UNASSIGNED: Une revue rétrospective des dossiers médicaux et une extraction de données basées à l\'hôpital ont été réalisées pour les personnes traitées pour une infection à la rage clinique à l\'Hôpital d\'Enseignement Korle-Bu de janvier 2008 à décembre 2019. L\'analyse des données a été effectuée à l\'aide de STATA. Des statistiques descriptives ont été utilisées pour résumer les caractéristiques épidémiologiques et cliniques. Le test exact de Fisher, le test de Kruskal-Wallis et le coefficient de corrélation de Spearman ont été utilisés pour explorer les associations significatives.
    UNASSIGNED: Un total de 28 cas ont été enregistrés sur la période examinée. Tous sont décédés et la plupart d\'entre eux (68%) étaient des hommes. Vingt et un pour cent d\'entre eux avaient moins de 15 ans. Leur âge médian (plage interquartile) était de 31 ans (25,5 ans) et la période d\'incubation médiane de la rage (plage interquartile) était de 60 jours (60 jours). La principale source de rage pour les cas était principalement les morsures de chiens. Le statut vaccinal de tous les animaux n\'a pas pu être déterminé. La majorité (80%) des patients n\'ont pris ni vaccin antirabique ni immunoglobuline en prophylaxie post-exposition après la morsure de chien. Le délai médian d\'admission avant le décès (plage interquartile) était de 2 jours (2 jours). La majorité (82%) des cas étaient atteints de rage furieuse.
    CONCLUSIONS: L\'attention devrait être dirigée vers la vaccination de masse des chiens car les morsures de chien sont courantes. Assurer la disponibilité et l\'accès à la prophylaxie post-exposition (PPE) est également crucial pour éviter les décès liés à la rage.
    UNASSIGNED: Rage, morsure de chien, post-exposition, prophylaxie, vaccination de masse.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一种被称为狂犬病的传染病(病毒科,Lyssavirus属)对哺乳动物中枢神经系统(CNS)造成严重损害。这种疾病已经存在了很长时间。大多数人类狂犬病病例发生在非洲和亚洲的欠发达地区。在病毒传播之后,弹状病毒进入周围神经系统并进入中枢神经系统,它的目标是脑并产生脑脊髓炎。咬后预防需要实验室确认人和动物的狂犬病。所有温血动物都可以传播Lyssavirus感染,而病毒也可以在冷血动物的细胞中发展。在21世纪,在100多个不同的国家,超过30亿人面临感染狂犬病病毒的危险,导致每年50,000-59,000人死亡。在暴露后预防(PEP)中处理狂犬病有三个重要因素,即伤口护理,服用抗狂犬病血清,和抗狂犬病疫苗。社会成本包括死亡,由于早逝而丧失了生产力,由于疫苗接种副作用而导致的疾病,以及接触这些致命疾病对人们造成的心理伤害。人类最常接触犬狂犬病,尤其是年轻人和穷人,很少有资源可用于治疗或预防暴露,使预防人类狂犬病具有挑战性。
    An infectious disease known as rabies (family Rhabdoviridae, genus Lyssavirus) causes severe damage to mammals\' central nervous systems (CNS). This illness has been around for a very long time. The majority of human cases of rabies take place in underdeveloped regions of Africa and Asia. Following viral transmission, the Rhabdovirus enters the peripheral nervous system and proceeds to the CNS, where it targets the encephalon and produces encephalomyelitis. Postbite prophylaxis requires laboratory confirmation of rabies in both people and animals. All warm-blooded animals can transmit the Lyssavirus infection, while the virus can also develop in the cells of cold-blooded animals. In the 21st century, more than 3 billion people are in danger of contracting the rabies virus in more than 100 different nations, resulting in an annual death toll of 50,000-59,000. There are three important elements in handling rabies disease in post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), namely wound care, administration of anti-rabies serum, and anti-rabies vaccine. Social costs include death, lost productivity as a result of early death, illness as a result of vaccination side effects, and the psychological toll that exposure to these deadly diseases has on people. Humans are most frequently exposed to canine rabies, especially youngsters and the poor, and there are few resources available to treat or prevent exposure, making prevention of human rabies challenging.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    “一个健康”(OH)方法是实现到2030年消除犬类介导的人类狂犬病的全球目标的最有希望的想法。然而,采取OH消除狂犬病的方法对不同的人来说可能意味着许多不同的事情。我们对从MEDLINEOVID检索到的经济评价(EEs)进行了系统审查,EmbaseOVID,全球健康OVID,CINAHLEBSCO和ECONLITEBSCO使用OH方法,旨在确定具有成本效益的干预措施集,这些干预措施可以结合起来实施最佳的基于OH的狂犬病消除计划,并突出知识库中的关键差距。我们的审查表明,解决狂犬病的最佳OH计划应将大规模狗疫苗接种和综合咬伤病例管理与有效使用暴露后预防相结合,并转向人类1周缩短的皮内狂犬病疫苗方案。我们建议,未来OH消除狂犬病干预措施的EEs应与实施研究一起进行,以确保拟议的干预措施是可行的,并采用更广泛的社会观点,同时考虑到人类健康和动物福利部门的成本和结果。系统审查已在PROSPERO注册。
    The \'One Health\' (OH) approach is the most promising idea in realising the global goal of eliminating canine-mediated human rabies by 2030. However, taking an OH approach to rabies elimination can mean many different things to different people. We conducted a systematic review scrutinizing economic evaluations (EEs) retrieved from MEDLINE OVID, Embase OVID, Global Health OVID, CINAHL EBSCO and ECONLIT EBSCO that used the OH approach with the intent of identifying cost-effective sets of interventions that can be combined to implement an optimal OH-based rabies elimination program and highlight key gaps in the knowledge base. Our review suggests that an optimal OH program to tackle rabies should incorporate mass dog vaccination and integrated bite case management in combination with efficient use of post-exposure prophylaxis along with a shift to a 1-week abbreviated intradermal rabies vaccine regimen in humans. We recommend that future EEs of OH interventions for rabies elimination should be performed alongside implementation research to ensure proposed interventions are feasible and adopt a wider societal perspective taking into account costs and outcomes across both the human health and animal welfare sectors. The systematic review has been registered with PROSPERO.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前WHO推荐的狂犬病暴露前预防(PrEP)是两次访问的疫苗接种时间表,但是有研究表明,单次访问时间表可能足以引发免疫力。
    方法:进行了文献综述,以检索和总结关于单次就诊狂犬病PrEP的已发表数据。PubMed数据库对1月1日之间发表的文章进行了筛选,2003年12月31日,2022年。对选择接受全文审查的文章和目前世界卫生组织关于狂犬病的主要出版物的参考书目进行了检索,以找到更多的参考资料,无论发布日期。主要结果是暴露后预防(PEP)后一周抗体水平≥0.5IU/mL的受试者在单次就诊时间表上接受狂犬病PrEP的百分比,无论PEP方案如何。
    结果:选择了11项研究纳入,共有935个科目,其中696人收到了模拟PEP时间表。在这696人中,有408人在第7天获得了血清学测试结果,和406名受试者(99.51%)在PEP后血清转化,关于PrEP和PEP之间的时间延迟或用于PEP的疫苗接种时间表没有任何差异。
    结论:如果在疑似狂犬病暴露后给予加强PEP,则单次就诊PrEP时间表似乎可以为大多数没有免疫受损状态的健康个体提供足够的保护。需要在现实生活中和不同年龄类别的进一步研究来证实这一发现,这可能会增加疫苗的可用性,从而增加脆弱人群的PrEP的可及性。
    The current WHO-recommended rabies pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are two-visit vaccination schedules, but there are studies suggesting that single visit schedules might be sufficient to prime the immunity.
    A literature review was conducted to retrieve and summarize published data on single visit rabies PrEP. PubMed database was screened for articles published between January 1st, 2003 and December 31st, 2022. The bibliographies of the articles chosen to undergo full text review and of the current major WHO publications on rabies were searched to find additional references, regardless of publication date. The primary outcome was the percentage of subjects having received rabies PrEP on single visit schedules who achieved antibody levels ≥0.5 IU/mL one week after post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), regardless of the PEP regimen.
    11 studies were selected for inclusion, totalling 935 subjects, of which 696 received a simulated PEP schedule. Of these 696, a serological test result on day 7 was available for 408 of them, and 406 subjects (99.51%) seroconverted after PEP without any difference regarding time delay between PrEP and PEP or the vaccination schedule used for PEP.
    Single visit PrEP schedules seem to confer sufficient protection in most healthy individuals without immunocompromised status if a booster PEP is administered after a suspected rabies exposure. Further studies in real-life settings and in different age categories are needed to confirm this finding, which may increase the availability of vaccines and thus the accessibility of PrEP for vulnerable populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    狂犬病是一种被忽视的人畜共患疾病,可以感染所有哺乳动物,包括人类。我们旨在总结目前对发病率的了解,东南亚狂犬病的危险因素和死亡率。
    基于2020年系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目的系统评价。
    Scopus,从2012年1月1日至2023年2月21日检索了WebofScience和PubMed。
    包括2012年至2023年之间发表的英文原版文章。
    九位独立审稿人提取数据并评估偏倚风险。使用混合方法评估工具对所包含的文章进行质量评估。
    本分析共包括8篇文章。在越南,狂犬病的发病率为每10万人口1.7至117.2。砂拉越的累积发病率估计为每10万人口1.7。在印度尼西亚,从2008年到2010年,报告了104例人类狂犬病病例,而在泰国,2010年至2015年,泰国共报告了46例狂犬病病例.在菲律宾,狂犬病的发病率为每100000人0.1至0.3。狂犬病病毒感染的风险增加与人口密度高有关,文盲,季节性模式和狗屠夫。病死率为100%。
    这项研究包括来自东南亚的研究,这可能不代表其他地区或大陆的狂犬病感染。此外,应该承认发表偏倚的作用,因为不包括灰色文献.东南亚狂犬病的发生是由于未接种疫苗的流浪狗和宠物狗数量众多,工作危险(越南的屠夫),农村地区没有狂犬病疫苗,以及关于狗咬伤后寻求治疗的重要性的错误信息。
    CRD42022311654。
    Rabies is a neglected zoonotic disease that can infect all mammals, including humans. We aimed to summarise the current knowledge of the incidence, risk factors and mortality of rabies in Southeast Asia.
    Systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020.
    Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed were searched from 1 January 2012 to 21 February 2023.
    Original English language articles published between 2012 and 2023 were included.
    Nine independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The quality appraisal of included articles was carried out using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
    A total of eight articles were included in this analysis. In Vietnam, the incidence of rabies ranged from 1.7 to 117.2 per 100 000 population. The cumulative incidence in Sarawak was estimated at 1.7 per 100 000 population. In Indonesia, 104 human rabies cases were reported from 2008 to 2010, while in Thailand, a total of 46 rabies cases were reported in Thailand from 2010 to 2015. In the Philippines, the incidence of rabies ranged from 0.1 to 0.3 per 100 000 population. An increased risk of rabies virus infection was associated with a high population density, illiteracy, seasonal patterns and dog butchers. The case fatality rate was 100%.
    This study included research from Southeast Asia, which may not represent rabies infection in other regions or continents. In addition, the role of publication bias should be acknowledged as grey literature was not included. The occurrence of rabies in Southeast Asia is due to the high number of unvaccinated stray and pet dogs, working hazards (dog butchers in Vietnam), the unavailability of the rabies vaccine in rural regions and misinformation about the significance of seeking treatment after dog bites.
    CRD42022311654.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:狂犬病仍然是全球公共卫生的严重威胁,危害着人们的健康和公共卫生安全。在中华人民共和国,多部门和全面的预防和控制策略旨在广泛遏制人类狂犬病传播。这里,我们研究了中国狂犬病感染的现状,探索为响应世卫组织“到2030年零狂犬病死亡”的雄心而采取的战略干预措施,并严格评估在中国消除狗介导的狂犬病的制约因素和可行性。
    方法:本研究从五个角度分析和评估了中国犬介导狂犬病的消除过程:人类,狗,政策,挑战,和前景。关于中国狗介导狂犬病消除进展的循证数据来自许多来源;使用PubMed进行了文献检索,WebofScience和CNKI数据库,来自中国公共卫生科学数据中心的人类狂犬病病例分布数据以及政策和文件数据均来自中国相关部委的官方网站。
    结果:自2007年以来,中国狂犬病病例的发病率呈逐年下降趋势。实行政府主导,到2020年,多部门“一个健康”的方法已经将全国狂犬病死亡总数降至200人左右。报告人类狂犬病病例的省级行政区划(PLAD)数量在2020年也减少到21个,其中13个报告的病例少于10个。此外,在过去的二十年中,寻求狂犬病暴露后预防的门诊病人数量急剧增加,需求比最初高15倍。然而,仍然存在,中国不同地区狂犬病消除结果存在显著差距。迄今为止,尚未达到达到>75%的犬狂犬病疫苗接种率的目标。在欠发达城市和农村地区,狗的狂犬病免疫接种和狗管理的挑战需要与更有效的动物监测和野生动植物和牲畜的狂犬病风险一起解决。
    结论:中国政府主导,多部门“一个健康”的方法来打击狂犬病,并在过去十年取得了重大进展。制定和采用更具成本效益的“一个健康”战略可以实现更多有益于全国的狂犬病消除结果。“到2030年狂犬病零死亡”的宏伟目标可以通过狗大规模疫苗接种运动在狗中建立持久的群体免疫力来实现,狗种群管理,流行病学监测和大规模口服狂犬病疫苗的应用,以消除野生动物中的狂犬病,并部署具有成本效益的人类暴露后预防,和社区教育。
    BACKGROUND: Rabies continues to be a serious threat to global public health endangering people\'s health and public health safety. In the People\'s Republic of China, multi-sectoral and comprehensive prevention and control strategies have aimed to extensively curb human rabies transmission. Here, we examine the current state of rabies infection in China, explore strategic interventions put in place in response to WHO\'s ambition of \"Zero rabies deaths by 2030\" and critically assess the constraints and feasibility of dog-mediated rabies elimination in China.
    METHODS: This study analyzed and evaluated the process towards dog-mediated rabies elimination in China from five perspectives: namely, human, dog, policy, challenge, and prospects. Evidence-based data on progress of dog-mediated rabies elimination in China was derived from a number of sources; a literature search was undertaken using PubMed, Web of Science and CNKI databases, distribution data for human rabies cases as derived from the Data-center of the China Public Health Science and policy and document data were obtained from official websites of the relevant China ministries and commissions.
    RESULTS: The incidence of human rabies cases in China have shown a downward trend year-on-year since 2007. Implementation of a government-led, multi-sectoral \"One Health\" approach to combating rabies has driven down the total number of rabies deaths nationwide to around 200 in 2020. The number of provincial-level administrative divisions (PLADs) reporting human cases of rabies has also decreased to 21 in 2020, 13 of which reported less than 10 cases. Furthermore, the number of outpatient visits seeking rabies post-exposure prophylaxis has risen dramatically over the past two decades, with demand being 15 times higher than it was initially. There remain however, significant gaps in rabies elimination outcomes across the different regions of China. To date the target of achieving a canine rabies vaccination rate of > 75% has not been met. The challenges of rabies immunization of dogs and dog management in underdeveloped cities and rural areas need to be addressed together with more effective animal surveillance and rabies risk from and too wildlife and livestock.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese government-led, multi-sectoral \"One Health\" approach to combating rabies and has made significant progress over the past decade. Development and adoption of more cost-effective One Health strategies can achieve more nationally beneficial rabies elimination outcomes. The ambitious target of \"Zero rabies deaths by 2030\" can be met through establishment of long-lasting herd immunity in dogs by means of dog mass vaccination campaigns, dog population management, epidemiological surveillance and the application of large-scale oral rabies vaccine to eliminate rabies in wild animals coupled with deployment of cost-effective human post-exposure prophylaxis, and community education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    狂犬病的暴露后预防(PEP)广泛使用且非常有效。然而,零星的突破性感染(即,已经开始PEP)的人患狂犬病。我们对1980年1月1日至2022年6月1日之间发表的文章进行了系统回顾,以描述突破性感染的特征。在审查了来自各大洲的3380篇文章后,我们确定了52篇文章,其中包括总共122次突破性感染。我们根据对核心实践的坚持对突破性感染进行分类(即,伤口清洁和疫苗施用)。在有数据的86次突破性感染中,从暴露到症状发作的中位时间为20天(IQR16-24).大多数(115名参与者中的89名[77%])在暴露后2天内接受了PEP。严重伤口(定义为涉及多个伤口部位或头部咬伤的伤口,脸,或颈部)是常见的(116[有数据]中的80[69%])。在122例病例中,有68例(56%)报告了与核心实践的偏差。突破性感染的其他可能原因包括狂犬病免疫球蛋白的施用错误,寻求医疗保健的延误,和合并症或免疫抑制。PEP生物制剂的冷链完整性评估和效力测试很少被评估(122例病例中有8[7%]),两者都没有被发现是突破性感染的原因。及时和适当的PEP管理对于预防狂犬病至关重要,尽管坚持核心做法,但高风险暴露或免疫抑制的人仍可能患上狂犬病,这种情况仍然非常罕见。
    Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for rabies is widely administered and highly effective. Nevertheless, sporadic breakthrough infections (ie, rabies in people who have started PEP) have been reported. We conducted a systematic review of articles published between Jan 1, 1980 and June 1, 2022 to characterise breakthrough infections. After reviewing 3380 articles from across all continents, we identified 52 articles, which included a total of 122 breakthrough infections. We classified breakthrough infections on the basis of adherence to core practices (ie, wound cleaning and vaccine administration). Of 86 breakthrough infections with data, median time from exposure to symptom onset was 20 days (IQR 16-24). Most (89 [77%] of 115) participants received PEP within 2 days of an exposure. Severe wounds (defined as those involving multiple wound sites or bites to the head, face, or neck) were common (80 [69%] of 116 [with data]). Deviations from core practices were reported in 68 (56%) of 122 cases. Other possible causes for breakthrough infections included errors in the administration of rabies immunoglobulin, delays in seeking health care, and comorbidities or immunosuppression. Cold-chain integrity assessments and potency testing of PEP biologics were only rarely assessed (8 [7%] of 122 cases), neither of which were found to be a cause of breakthrough infections. Timely and appropriate administration of PEP is crucial to prevent rabies, and although people with high-risk exposures or immunosuppression can develop rabies despite adherence to core practices, this occurrence remains exceedingly rare.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2007年,美国消除了狗维持的狂犬病病毒变体(DMRVV)。在2015-2019年期间,三只狂犬病犬从埃及进口到美国,DMRVV是地方性的。CDC制定了风险缓解策略,在与不同主题专家小组协商后,这允许在2019年5月10日至2020年12月31日期间从埃及进口296只狗,从而最大程度地降低了未来狂犬病狗进口的风险。经过广泛审查的风险缓解策略,其中包括狂犬病抗体滴度的血清学检测,提高了CDC的能力,以确保从埃及进口的狗在美国不构成公共健康风险。该策略可用于指导有关犬只进口的未来政策决定。
    Dog-maintained rabies virus variant (DMRVV) was eliminated in the United States in 2007. During 2015–2019, three dogs with rabies were imported into the United States from Egypt, where DMRVV is endemic. CDC developed a risk mitigation strategy, in consultation with a diverse group of subject matter experts, that permitted 296 dogs to be imported from Egypt during May 10, 2019–December 31, 2020, minimizing the risk for future rabid dog importations. The broadly vetted risk mitigation strategy, which included serologic testing for rabies antibody titer, improved CDC’s ability to ensure that imported dogs from Egypt posed no public health risk in the United States. This strategy could be used to guide future policy decisions regarding dog importations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评价我国人用狂犬病疫苗暴露后的安全性和免疫原性。
    从PubMed进行了系统搜索,EMBASE,CNKI和Cochrane图书馆数据库,辅以手工检索。根据纳入和排除标准,在独立文献筛选后,使用Stata16.0软件进行荟萃分析,由两名评估人员进行数据提取和质量评估。
    共纳入32项研究。发现在PEP后接种狂犬病疫苗可以诱导机体产生足够的RVNA。埃森和萨格勒布方案均显示出良好的免疫原性,PEP后全身事件和局部事件没有显着差异,但在萨格勒布方案下进行PEP后局部和全身事件的发生率相对较高。
    对于中国人来说,PEP后接种狂犬病疫苗对预防人类狂犬病具有相对较好的免疫功效和可接受的安全性。调查还发现,萨格勒布方案在狂犬病预防方面与埃森方案相当,安全性可接受。
    To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of rabies vaccine for human use after post-exposure in China.
    A systematic search was performed from PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and Cochrane Library database, supplemented by manual retrieval. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software after independent literature screening, data extraction and quality assessment by two evaluators.
    A total of 32 studies were included. It was found that rabies vaccination after PEP could induce the body to produce sufficient RVNA. Both Essen and Zagreb regimens showed good immunogenicity, with no significant difference in systemic events and local events after PEP, but a relatively high incidence of local and systemic events after PEP under the Zagreb regimen.
    For the Chinese population, rabies vaccination after PEP has shown relatively a good immune efficacy and acceptable safety for preventing human rabies. The survey also found that the Zagreb regimen was comparable to the Essen regimen in terms of rabies prophylaxis with an acceptable safety profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究对三种人用狂犬病疫苗进行了综合评价和比较。系统检索了七个电子数据库。Cochrane手册v5.1.0用于评估偏倚风险。使用随机效应模型来组合个体比率,网络荟萃分析用于成对比较。包括27篇文章,共有18,630名参与者。HDCV总不良反应的合并发生率明显低于PCECV。HDCV给药导致局部疼痛的发生率较低,发烧,和弱点比纯化的Vero细胞疫苗。HDCV引起局部疼痛和发热的发生率低于PCECV。在第7天的血清转化率或第14天的狂犬病病毒中和抗体滴度方面没有观察到显着差异。与其他两种狂犬病疫苗相比,HDCV在安全性方面表现出优势,而在免疫原性方面没有观察到相同的情况。
    This study comprehensively evaluated and compared three human rabies vaccines. Seven electronic databases were systematically searched. The Cochrane Handbook v5.1.0 was used to assess the risk of bias. A random-effects model was used to combine individual rates, and network meta-analysis was used for pairwise comparisons. Twenty-seven articles were included, with a total of 18,630 participants. The pooled incidence of the total adverse reaction to HDCV was significantly lower than that of PCECV. HDCV administration resulted in a lower incidence of local pain, fever, and weakness than purified Vero cell vaccine. HDCV caused a lower incidence of local pain and fever than PCECV. No significant difference was observed in terms of the seroconversion rate on day 7 or the rabies virus-neutralizing antibody titer on day 14. HDCV demonstrated superiority in terms of safety compared with the other two rabies vaccines, while the same was not observed in terms of immunogenicity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号