BACKGROUND: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a crucial marker of glucose control that is widely utilized in the management of diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a diabetes management program (DMP) offered by a health insurance company, together with the effects of other factors associated with patient and physician characteristics, on the frequency of HbA1c testing in outpatient diabetes clinics in Slovakia.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the frequency of HbA1c measurements in patients under the care of physicians participating in the DMP with those who did not, spanning the years 2015 to 2019. In 2019, a total of 74,384 patients with diabetes were included in the analysis, of which 52% were men and 48% were women, with an average age of 64.1 years.
RESULTS: At the end of the study period, the average annual number of HbA1c measurements was significantly higher in patients treated by physicians participating in the DMP than in patients treated by physicians who were not (2.50 vs. 1.91 per year, respectively; P < 0.001). There was a substantial increase in HbA1c testing at least twice yearly in both groups, but the growth rate was greater in the group with DMP-engaged diabetologists (14.3%) compared to the diabetes specialists who were not involved in the DMP (5.1%). In the multivariate analysis, participation in the DMP was correlated with an increase in HbA1c tests per year by 0.7.
CONCLUSIONS: Physician participation in a DMP was found to significantly increase the number of HbA1c tests ordered by physicians, potentially leading to improved glycemic control.

OBJECTIVE: To map how frailty among older people is assessed at Swedish emergency departments and to describe fundamental nursing care actions for these patients.
METHODS: Descriptive national survey and a qualitative analysis of text.
METHODS: A majority (82%, n = 54) of the Swedish hospital-based emergency departments for adults were included, representing all six healthcare regions. An online survey was used to collect data, together with submitted local practice guidelines for older people at the emergency departments. Data were collected during February-October 2021. Descriptive and comparative statistics were performed together with a deductive content analysis framed by the Fundamentals of Care framework.
RESULTS: Sixty-five per cent (35 of 54) of the emergency departments identified frailty, with less than half of them using an established assessment instrument. Twenty-eight (52%) of the emergency departments have practice guidelines containing fundamental nursing actions for the care of frail older people. The majority of nursing actions in the practice guidelines were related to patients\' physical care needs (91%), followed by psychosocial care needs (9%). No actions could be identified as relational actions (0%) according to the Fundamentals of Care framework.
CONCLUSIONS: Many Swedish emergency departments identify frail older people, but they use a range of different assessment instruments. While practice guidelines directing fundamental nursing actions for frail older people are often in place, a holistic, person-centred view addressing the patient\'s physical, psychosocial and relational care needs is missing.
CONCLUSIONS: The population is growing older, and more people are needing more complex hospital care. Frail older people have an increased risk of negative outcomes. The use of a variety of assessment instruments for frailty may pose a challenge to equal care. To ensure a holistic, person-centred view of frail older people, the Fundamentals of Care framework can be used in developing and reviewing practice guidelines.
UNASSIGNED: Clinicians and non-health professionals were invited to review the survey to ensure face and content validity.

BACKGROUND: Recommendations of evidence- and formally consensus-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) represent a valuable source of quality indicators (QIs). Nevertheless, a standardized methodological procedure for developing QIs in the context of CPGs does not yet exist in Germany for all CPGs. For this reason, a methodological standard for the guideline-based development of QIs (QI Standard) was developed based on a structured consensus process involving multiple key stakeholders.
METHODS: The proposed content of the QI Standard was derived from evidence, drawing upon results of reviews and qualitative studies, and considered German manuals for guideline-based QI development of two guideline programs. A multi-perspective consensus panel, broadly representing key stakeholders from the German healthcare system with expertise in CPGs and/or quality management, was nominated to vote on recommendations for guideline-based development of QIs. The iterative, structured consensus process included a two-stage online survey based on the Delphi method (\"preliminary voting\") and a moderated final stakeholder conference where all those recommendations were definitely included in the QI Standard that received approval of more than 75 % (consensus criterion) of the consensus panel.
RESULTS: Based on the agreed QI Standard, the QI development process starts with a criteria-based selection of \"potential\" QIs which - in case of adoption - are published in CPGs as \"preliminary\" QIs and can achieve the status \"final\" after successful testing. The QI Standard is composed of a total of 30 recommendations, which are allocated to six areas: A) preparatory work steps for the guideline-based recommendation of QIs, B) QI development group and cooperation with the CPG group, C) development of potential QIs, D) critical appraisal of potential QIs, E) formal adoption and publication as well as F) piloting/testing of preliminary QIs and conversion into final QIs.
CONCLUSIONS: Before the QI Standard can be recommended for implementation in future CPGs, it should have been successfully tested in selected German CPG projects. In addition to methodological requirements for the QI development, it must be ensured that guideline groups have adequate resources for the implementation of the QI Standard.
CONCLUSIONS: By using the QI Standard, scientifically sound and healthcare-relevant QIs can be expected.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based and formally consensus-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) offer potential for the development of quality indicators (QIs). Although QIs are recommended as part of some CPGs, there is no accepted gold standard for the specific development process of guideline-based QIs. The purpose of this review, which is embedded in a mixed-methods research project, was to analyze the current state of methodological approaches for QI development in German CPGs to derive insights for the development of a national evidence-guided and consensus-based standard for guideline-based development of QIs.
METHODS: In order to identify valid CPGs containing recommendations for QIs, a search was carried out (July 31, 2016) via the guideline database of the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF). Based on a stratified random sample per guideline program (guidelines published by medical societies, National Program for Disease Management Guidelines (DMG), and the German Guideline Program in Oncology [GGPO]), 11 CPGs were selected. With regard to QIs, the specific development methodology, indications on their psychometric properties and how the quality of care should be examined by recommended QIs were extracted and compared by using the guideline documents.
RESULTS: In 35 of the 109 (16/85 medical societies, 4/8 DMG, 15/16 GGPO) (32 %) valid CPGs, a total of 372 QIs were recommended. Based on 11 randomly selected guidelines (5 published by medical societies, 1 DMG, 5 GGPO; a total of 109 QIs), the QI development methodology was inconsistent in all five medical societies guidelines (including QI presentation, usage and selection of guideline recommendations for QI derivation) compared to DMG and GGPO. Based on all 109 QIs, 2 (2 %) were presented as a quantitative measure with a reference range, and quality objectives were formulated for 17 (16 %). There was no guideline explicitly reporting about the results of a pilot study or data-based analysis of the psychometric properties of the recommended QIs. The GGPO guideline documents were the only ones providing information on the assessment of the quality of care based on recommended QIs.
CONCLUSIONS: The usage of the QI manuals of the DMG and GGPO leads to a largely standardized development of guideline-based QIs. In the CPGs of the medical societies - if at all - QIs are developed inconsistently and mostly unsystematically. Due to largely missing reference ranges and quality objectives, the identified QIs cannot yet be used to transparently identify potential quality deficits in health care. This requires results of pilot studies and further development of guideline-based QI.
CONCLUSIONS: A standard for QI development is needed for German guideline authors to seize the opportunity and develop clinically relevant, widely accepted and evidence-based QIs in the guideline development process. In addition, it must be ensured that appropriate structures are used or set up in order to be able to apply the recommended QIs in the German healthcare system.

UNASSIGNED: Bridging anticoagulation is used in vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) patients undergoing invasive procedures and involves complex risk assessment in order to prevent thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Our aim was to assess guideline compliance and identify factors associated with bridging and especially, non-compliant bridging.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review of 256 patient records in 13 Dutch hospitals was performed. Demographic, clinical, surgical and care delivery characteristics were collected. Compliance to the American College of Chest Physicians ninth edition guideline (AT9) was assessed. Multilevel regression models were built to explain bridging use and predict non-compliance.
UNASSIGNED: Bridging use varied from 15.0 to 83.3% (mean = 41.8%) of patients per hospital, whereas guideline compliance varied from 20.0 to 88.2% (mean = 68.5%) per hospital. Both established thromboembolic risk factors and characteristics outside thromboembolic risk assessment were associated with bridging use. Predictors for overuse were gastrointestinal surgery (OR 14.85, 95% CI 2.69-81.99), vascular surgery (OR 13.01, 95% CI 1.83-92.30), non-elective surgery (OR 8.67, 95% CI 1.67-45.14), lowest 25th percentile socioeconomic status (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-1.02) and use of VKA reversal agents (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.04-1.16).
UNASSIGNED: Bridging anticoagulation practice was not compliant with the AT9 in 31.5% of patients. The aggregated AT9 thromboembolic risk was inferior to individual thromboembolic risk factors and other characteristics in explaining bridging use. Therefor the AT9 risk seems less important for the decision making in everyday practice. Additionally, a heterogeneous implementation of the guideline between hospitals was found. Further research and interventions are needed to improve bridging anticoagulation practice in VKA patients.

The progressive rise in multimorbidity has made management of complex patients one of the most topical and challenging issues in medicine, both in clinical practice and for healthcare organizations. To make this easier, a score of clinical complexity (CC) would be useful. A vector model to evaluate biological and extra-biological (socio-economic, cultural, behavioural, environmental) domains of CC was proposed a few years ago. However, given that the variables that grade each domain had never been defined, this model has never been used in clinical practice. To overcome these limits, a consensus meeting was organised to grade each domain of CC, and to establish the hierarchy of the domains. A one-day consensus meeting consisting of a multi-professional panel of 25 people was held at our Hospital. In a preliminary phase, the proponents selected seven variables as qualifiers for each of the five above-mentioned domains. In the course of the meeting, the panel voted for five variables considered to be the most representative for each domain. Consensus was established with 2/3 agreement, and all variables were dichotomised. Finally, the various domains were parametrized and ranked within a feasible vector model. A Clinical Complexity Index was set up using the chosen variables. All the domains were graphically represented through a vector model: the biological domain was chosen as the most significant (highest slope), followed by the behavioural and socio-economic domains (intermediate slope), and lastly by the cultural and environmental ones (lowest slope). A feasible and comprehensive tool to evaluate CC in clinical practice is proposed herein.

Following a recommendation of the National Advisory Council for the Concerted Action in Health Care, the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) have promoted, supported and coordinated the development of clinical practice guidelines in Germany since 1995. The allocation of the responsibility for guideline development in the scientific societies corresponded to the principle of subsidiarity, in contrast to other countries counting on government-organised guideline programmes. To fulfil internationally consented criteria of high-quality guidelines, a quality improvement system was established relying on frequent assessments of the current state. Today, high-quality clinical practice guidelines developed by the scientific societies organised under the umbrella of the AWMF are an indispensable tool for various initiatives to improve healthcare in the German healthcare system. The next challenging goal is to establish a theory-driven framework allowing for a systematic implementation and evaluation of guidelines in Germany on the basis of existing approaches. However, success in this endeavour will require further research and funding.