Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein D

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血清标志物KrebsvondenLungen-6(KL-6),表面活性剂蛋白A(SP-A),和表面活性蛋白D(SP-D)已用于诊断,鉴别诊断,间质性肺炎的预后预测。然而,测定血清和支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)KL-6、SP-D,和SP-A水平在预测慢性纤维化间质性肺炎(CFIP)预后中,特发性肺纤维化,和特发性非特异性间质性肺炎仍不清楚.我们旨在阐明测量血清和BALFKL-6,SP-A的意义,SP-D水平对CFIP患者预后的预测价值.
    方法:在2008年9月至2021年2月期间诊断为CFIP的173例患者中,有39例接受了支气管肺泡灌洗。其中,强迫肺活量(FVC)每年下降≥10%的患者或由于肺功能显著恶化而在接受随访肺功能检查时面临挑战的患者被归类为快速进展组.相反,FVC年下降<10%的个体被归入缓慢进展组.血清和BALFKL-6,SP-D,和SP-A水平,比较两组BALF/血清SP-D和SP-A比值。
    结果:在CFIP患者中,BALFSP-D水平(p=0.0111),BALFSP-A水平(p<0.0010),BALF/血清SP-D比值(p=0.0051),而BALF/血清SP-A比值(p<0.0010)在快速组显著低于缓慢组(p<0.0010)。接收器工作特性分析结果证明了诊断CFIP患者的出色性能,与BALFSP-D水平(曲线下面积[AUC],0.7424),BALFSP-A水平(AUC,0.8842),BALF/血清SP-D比值(AUC,0.7673),和BALF/血清SP-A比值(AUC,0.8556)。此外,BALFSP-A水平显示出显著优异的CFIP诊断能力.使用Kaplan-Meier方法进行的生存分析显示,BALFSP-A水平<1500ng/mL且BALF/血清SP-A比率<15.0的患者预后较差。
    结论:我们的结果表明,BALFSP-A测量可能有助于预测CFIP患者的预后。
    BACKGROUND: The serum markers Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), surfactant protein A (SP-A), and surfactant protein D (SP-D) have been used for the diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and prognosis prediction of interstitial pneumonia. However, the significance of measuring the serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) KL-6, SP-D, and SP-A levels in predicting the prognosis of chronic fibrosing interstitial pneumonia (CFIP), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia remains unclear. We aimed to clarify the significance of measuring the serum and BALF KL-6, SP-A, and SP-D levels in predicting the prognosis of patients with CFIP.
    METHODS: Among 173 patients who were diagnosed with CFIP between September 2008 and February 2021, 39 who underwent bronchoalveolar lavage were included in this study. Among these, patients experiencing an annual decrease in forced vital capacity (FVC) of ≥10% or those facing challenges in undergoing follow-up pulmonary function tests owing to significant deterioration in pulmonary function were categorized as the rapidly progress group. Conversely, individuals with an annual decrease in the FVC of <10% were classified into the slowly progress group. The serum and BALF KL-6, SP-D, and SP-A levels, as well as BALF/serum SP-D and SP-A ratios were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: Among the patients with CFIP, the BALF SP-D level (p=0.0111), BALF SP-A level (p<0.0010), BALF/serum SP-D ratio (p=0.0051), and BALF/serum SP-A ratio (p<0.0010) were significantly lower in the rapidly than in the slowly progress group (p<0.0010). The receiver operating characteristics analysis results demonstrated excellent performance for diagnosing patients with CFIP, with the BALF SP-D level (area under the curve [AUC], 0.7424), BALF SP-A level (AUC, 0.8842), BALF/serum SP-D ratio (AUC, 0.7673), and BALF/serum SP-A ratio (AUC, 0.8556). Moreover, the BALF SP-A level showed a notably superior CFIP diagnostic capability. Survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method revealed that patients with a BALF SP-A level of <1500 ng/mL and BALF/serum SP-A ratio of <15.0 had poor prognoses.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that BALF SP-A measurement may be useful for predicting the prognosis in patients with CFIP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:支气管肺发育不良(BPD)引起的慢性呼吸道并发症仍然是早产最常见的并发症,并对以后的呼吸道有影响,心血管和神经发育结果。呼吸系统疾病的早期阶段的特征是内源性表面活性剂的快速消耗和缓慢的补充。外源性表面活性剂常规给予妊娠28周前出生的婴儿作为预防。内源性表面活性剂包括四种蛋白质,称为表面活性剂蛋白(SP)A,B,目前的牛衍生和猪衍生的表面活性剂制剂仅含有SPsB和C。SP-D作为先天免疫系统的一部分在肺免疫稳态中具有关键作用。使用重组SP-D的实验室研究表明炎症减少,这可能是降低BPD相关发病率的途径。响应使用人SPD(rfhSP-D)的重组片段,在I期安全性和剂量递增试验中,作为确定其在人体中的作用的第一阶段。
    方法:这是一个单中心,剂量递增,I期安全性研究旨在招募24例妊娠30周前出生的呼吸窘迫综合征婴儿。除了常规的表面活性剂替代疗法,参与者将通过气管内途径接受三种剂量的rfhSP-D,剂量为1mg/kg,2mg/kg或4mg/kg。该研究使用贝叶斯连续重新评估方法来做出剂量递增决策。本试验中的剂量限制性事件(DLE)将根据公布的新生儿不良事件严重程度评分进行分级。这项研究的主要结果是根据DLE的概况评估每个剂量水平的rfhSP-D的安全性,以建立rfhSP-D的推荐2期剂量(RP2D)。
    背景:RESPONSE研究已获得伦敦-布伦特NHS研究健康管理局伦理委员会的伦理批准。研究结果将发表在同行评审的期刊上,并在国家和国际会议上发表。
    背景:ISRCTN17083028,NCT05898633。
    方法:响应协议V.4.02024年7月24日。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic respiratory morbidity from bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remains the most common complication of preterm birth and has consequences for later respiratory, cardiovascular and neurodevelopmental outcomes. The early phases of respiratory illness are characterised by rapid consumption of endogenous surfactant and slow replenishment. Exogenous surfactant is routinely administered to infants born before 28 weeks of gestation as prophylaxis. Endogenous surfactant includes four proteins, known as surfactant proteins (SPs) A, B, C and D. Current bovine-derived and porcine-derived surfactant preparations only contain SPs B and C. SP-D has a key role in lung immune homeostasis as part of the innate immune system. Laboratory studies using recombinant SP-D have demonstrated reduced inflammation, which may be a pathway to reducing the associated morbidity from BPD. RESPONSE uses a recombinant fragment of human SP D (rfhSP-D), in a phase I safety and dose-escalation trial as the first stage in determining its effect in humans.
    METHODS: This is a single-centre, dose-escalation, phase I safety study aiming to recruit 24 infants born before 30 weeks gestation with respiratory distress syndrome. In addition to routine surfactant replacement therapy, participants will receive three doses of rfhSP-D via endotracheal route at either 1 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg. The study uses a Bayesian continual reassessment method to make dose escalation decisions. Dose-limiting events (DLE) in this trial will be graded according to the published Neonatal Adverse Event Severity Score. The primary outcome of this study is to evaluate the safety profile of rfhSP-D across each dose level based on the profile of DLE to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of rfhSP-D.
    BACKGROUND: The RESPONSE study has received ethical approval from London-Brent NHS Research Health Authority ethics committee. Results from the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN17083028, NCT05898633.
    METHODS: RESPONSE Protocol V.4.0 24th July 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:评价艾氯胺酮联合远端肢体缺血预处理(LIP)对老年胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者的肺保护作用。
    方法:这项随机试验是在160例肺癌择期胸腔镜手术患者中进行的,随机分为对照组(注射生理盐水和假LIP),艾氯胺酮组,LIP组,和艾氯胺酮+LIP基团(n=40)。麻醉诱导前,根据分组,患者接受0.5mg/kg艾氯胺酮或10ml生理盐水静脉注射(对照组).LIP是通过在左下肢的the窝上方1-2cm处施加止血带以阻断血流5分钟,间隔5分钟,连续3次,通过在不加压的情况下施加止血带30分钟进行假LIP。在诱导前(T0)计算氧合指数(OI)和肺泡-动脉PO2差值(A-aDO2),在单肺通气(OLV)30分钟(T0.5)和1小时(T1)时,并在双肺通气后1小时(T3)。血清SP-D水平,通过ELISA在T0,T1,T2(OLV的2小时)测量CC-16和TNF-α,T3,术后24h(T4)。记录患者的住院时间和术后肺部并发症。
    结果:与对照组相比,其他3组患者的CC-16、SP-D和TNF-α水平显著降低,住院时间缩短,肺部感染和肺不张的发生率较低(均P<0.05)。血清CC-16、SP-D和TNF-α水平,住院,联合治疗组并发症发生率明显低于或短于艾氯胺酮组和LIP组(均P<0.05)。
    结论:在接受胸腔镜肺癌根治术的老年患者中,艾氯胺酮联合LIP治疗可通过增强抗炎反应减轻急性肺损伤,缩短术后住院时间,减少肺部并发症,促进患者康复。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of esketamine combined with distal limb ischemic preconditioning (LIP) for lung protection in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical surgery for lung cancer.
    METHODS: This randomized trial was conducted in 160 patients undergoing elective thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer, who were randomized into control group (with saline injection and sham LIP), esketamine group, LIP group, and esketamine + LIP group (n=40). Before anesthesia induction, according to the grouping, the patients received an intravenous injection with 0.5 mg/kg esketamine or 10 ml saline (in control group). LIP was induced by applying a tourniquet 1-2 cm above the popliteal fossa in the left lower limb to block the blood flow for 5 min for 3 times at the interval of 5 min, and sham LIP was performed by applying the tourniquet without pressurization for 30 min. Oxygenation index (OI) and alveolar-arterial PO2 difference (A-aDO2) were calculated before induction (T0), at 30 min (T0.5) and 1 h (T1) of one-lung ventilation (OLV), and at 1 h after two-lung ventilation (T3). Serum levels of SP-D, CC-16 and TNF-α were measured by ELISA at T0, T1, T2 (2 h of OLV), T3, and 24 h after the operation (T4). The length of hospital stay and postoperative pulmonary complications of the patients were recorded.
    RESULTS: Compared with those in the control group, the patients in the other 3 groups had significantly lower CC-16, SP-D and TNF-α levels, shorter hospital stay, and lower incidences of lung infection and lung atelectasis (all P < 0.05). Serum CC-16, SP-D and TNF-α levels, hospital stay, incidences of complications were significantly lower or shorter in the combined treatment group than in esketamine group and LIP group (all P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical surgery for lung cancer, treatment with esketamine combined with LIP can alleviate acute lung injury by enhancing anti-inflammatory response to shorten postoperative hospital stay, reduce lung complications and promote the patients\' recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:由严重急性呼吸道综合症冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引起的2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行已导致全球发病率和死亡率显着。本研究旨在探讨血清血管内皮生长因子A(VEGF-A)在COVID-19患者中的临床意义及其与病情严重程度和肺损伤的关系。
    方法:我们前瞻性收集了2020年6月至2021年1月期间71例住院COVID-19患者的数据。根据住院期间的氧气需求,将患者分为轻度或重度。使用ELISA试剂盒测量血清VEGF-A水平。
    结果:与轻度病例相比,重度COVID-19患者血清VEGF-A水平显著升高。此外,VEGF-A水平与白细胞计数呈正相关,中性粒细胞计数,和淋巴细胞计数。值得注意的是,血清表面活性蛋白-D(SP-D),肺泡上皮细胞损伤的指标,在VEGF-A水平升高的患者中明显更高。
    结论:这些结果表明,血清VEGF-A水平升高可作为COVID-19的预后生物标志物,因为它指示SARS-CoV-2感染引起的肺泡上皮细胞损伤。此外,我们观察到VEGF-A与中性粒细胞活化之间的相关性,在内皮细胞损伤期间的免疫反应中起作用,表明血管生成可能参与疾病进展。需要进一步的研究来阐明COVID-19中VEGF-A升高的潜在机制。
    The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in significant global morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of serum vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) in COVID-19 patients and its association with disease severity and pulmonary injury.
    We prospectively collected data from 71 hospitalized COVID-19 patients between June 2020 and January 2021. Patients were classified as either mild or severe based on their oxygen requirements during hospitalization. Serum VEGF-A levels were measured using an ELISA kit.
    In comparison to mild cases, significantly elevated serum VEGF-A levels were observed in severe COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, VEGF-A levels exhibited a positive correlation with white blood cell count, neutrophil count, and lymphocyte count. Notably, serum surfactant protein-D (SP-D), an indicator of alveolar epithelial cell damage, was significantly higher in patients with elevated VEGF-A levels.
    These results suggest that elevated serum VEGF-A levels could serve as a prognostic biomarker for COVID-19 as it is indicative of alveolar epithelial cell injury caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Additionally, we observed a correlation between VEGF-A and neutrophil activation, which plays a role in the immune response during endothelial cell injury, indicating a potential involvement of angiogenesis in disease progression. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of VEGF-A elevation in COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:在过去的几十年中,牙周炎患者,牙周治疗已被证明可减少与系统性炎症性疾病早期风险相关的局部和系统性生物标志物的潜在释放.这项研究评估了非手术牙周治疗(NSPT)对生长分化因子15(GDF-15)和相关循环生物标志物如谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶1(GPx-1)的疗效。C反应蛋白(hs-CRP),和表面活性剂蛋白D(SP-D)在牙周患者中,并探讨了基线时GDF-15水平高的受试者在6个月随访时NSPT后是否显示出增加的临床益处。
    方法:对于这种双臂,平行随机临床试验,牙周炎患者被随机分配接受象限刮削和根面刮削(Q-SRP,n=23,中位年龄51岁)或全口消毒(FMD,n=23,中位年龄50岁)治疗。记录所有入选患者的临床和牙周参数。主要结果是分析GDF-15和GPx-1,hs-CRP的血清浓度变化,通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和浊度测定技术,在NSPT后的基线和30、90和180天随访时和SP-D。
    结果:与口蹄疫相比,Q-SRP组患者的临床牙周参数显着改善(p<0.05),GDF-15的平均水平降低(p=0.005),hs-CRP(p<0.001),治疗6个月后,SP-D(p=0.042)和GPx-1浓度增加(p=0.025)。在治疗6个月时,一些牙周参数与GDF-15,GPx-1,hs-CRP的平均浓度之间存在显着关联,和SP-D(所有参数p<0.05)。最后,方差分析显示,治疗后6个月,Q-SRP治疗显着影响GDF-15的减少(p=0.015),SP-D(p=0.026)和GPx-1的上调(p=0.045)。
    结论:结果表明,经过6个月的治疗,两种NSPT方案都改善了牙周参数并分析了生物标志物,但Q-SRP比FMD方法更有效。此外,基线GDF-15和SP-D水平较高的患者在6个月随访时从NSPT获益更多.
    背景:NCT05720481。
    During the last decades, in patients with periodontitis, periodontal treatment has been shown to reduce the potential release of local and systemic biomarkers linked to an early risk of systemic inflammatory disorders. This study evaluated the efficacy of non-surgical-periodontal treatment (NSPT) on growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) and related circulating biomarkers such as glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPx-1), c-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and surfactant protein D (SP-D) in periodontal patients and explored whether subjects who had high GDF-15 levels at baseline showed increased clinical benefits following NSPT at 6-months follow-up.
    For this two-arm, parallel randomized clinical trial, patients with periodontitis were randomly allocated to receive quadrant scaling and root-planing (Q-SRP, n = 23, median age 51 years old) or full-mouth disinfection (FMD, n = 23, median age 50 years old) treatment. Clinical and periodontal parameters were recorded in all enrolled patients. The primary outcome was to analyse serum concentrations changes of GDF-15 and of GPx-1, hs-CRP, and SP-D at baseline and at 30, 90, and 180-days follow-up after NSPT through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and nephelometric assay techniques.
    In comparison with FMD, patients of the Q-SRP group showed a significant improvement in clinical periodontal parameters (p < 0.05) and a reduction in the mean levels of GDF-15 (p = 0.005), hs-CRP (p < 0.001), and SP-D (p = 0.042) and an increase of GPx-1 (p = 0.025) concentrations after 6 months of treatment. At 6 months of treatment, there was a significant association between several periodontal parameters and the mean concentrations of GDF-15, GPx-1, hs-CRP, and SP-D (p < 0.05 for all parameters). Finally, the ANOVA analysis revealed that, at 6 months after treatment, the Q-SRP treatment significantly impacted the reduction of GDF-15 (p = 0.015), SP-D (p = 0.026) and the upregulation of GPx-1 (p = 0.045).
    The results evidenced that, after 6 months of treatment, both NSPT protocols improved the periodontal parameters and analyzed biomarkers, but Q-SRP was more efficacious than the FMD approach. Moreover, patients who presented high baseline GDF-15 and SP-D levels benefited more from NSPT at 6-month follow-up.
    NCT05720481.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目标:在系统性硬化症(SSc)患者中,我们研究了用于SSc相关间质性肺病(SSc-ILD)诊断和危险分层的复合血清生物标志物组.
    方法:我们分析了640名参与者中的28种生物标志物:259例SSc-ILD患者和179例无ILD的SSc患者(澳大利亚硬皮病队列研究),172例特发性肺纤维化患者(IPF对照)(澳大利亚IPF注册),和30个健康对照。综合指数是从与ILD相关的生物标志物在多变量分析中在经验阈值处得到的。我们评估了识别ILD的指标的性能,特别是SSc-ILD,以及它与肺功能的关系,射线照相术上的疾病程度,推导和验证队列中与患者健康相关的生活质量。鉴定了区分SSc-ILD与IPF对照的生物标志物。
    结果:复合生物标志物指数,包含表面活性剂蛋白D(SP-D),Ca15-3和细胞间粘附分子1(ICAM-1),与SSc-ILD诊断密切相关,独立于年龄,性别,吸烟史,和肺功能(对于生物标志物指数评分3,合并调整比值比为12.72(95%置信区间4.59-35.21)(P<0.001)。综合指数增强了个体生物标志物在SSc-ILD鉴定中的性能。在SSc患者中,较高的指数与较差的基线疾病严重程度相关(生物标志物指数评分3相对于生物标志物指数评分0,预测的强迫肺活量百分比的校正绝对变化为-17.84%,预测的一氧化碳百分比的扩散能力为-20.16%;两者均P<0.001).
    结论:复合血清生物标志物指数,包括SP-D,Ca15-3和ICAM-1可以改善基线时SSc患者ILD的识别和危险分层。
    In patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), we investigated composite serum biomarker panels for the diagnosis and risk stratification of SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD).
    We analyzed 28 biomarkers in 640 participants: 259 patients with SSc-ILD and 179 SSc patients without ILD (Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study), 172 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF-controls) (Australian IPF Registry), and 30 healthy controls. A composite index was developed from biomarkers associated with ILD in multivariable analysis derived at empirical thresholds. We evaluated the performance of the index to identify ILD, and specifically SSc-ILD, and its association with lung function, disease extent on radiography, and patient health-related quality of life in derivation and validation cohorts. Biomarkers to distinguish SSc-ILD from IPF-controls were identified.
    A composite biomarker index, comprising surfactant protein D (SP-D), Ca15-3, and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), was strongly associated with SSc-ILD diagnosis, independent of age, sex, smoking history, and lung function (for biomarker index score 3, pooled adjusted odds ratio was 12.72 (95% confidence interval 4.59-35.21) (P < 0.001). The composite index strengthened the performance of individual biomarkers for SSc-ILD identification. In SSc patients, a higher index was associated with worse baseline disease severity (for biomarker index score 3 relative to biomarker index score 0, the adjusted absolute change in forced vital capacity percent predicted was -17.84% and the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide percent predicted was -20.16%; both P < 0.001).
    A composite serum biomarker index, comprising SP-D, Ca15-3, and ICAM-1, may improve the identification and risk stratification of ILD in SSc patients at baseline.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是严重冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)的表现之一,以呼吸依从性低和氧合不良为主要特征,死亡率为50%-94%。表面活性剂,包括表面活性蛋白D(SP-D),有维持呼吸顺应性的作用。本研究旨在分析重症COVID-19肺炎患者血清SP-D水平与呼吸顺应性及ARDS的关系。
    未经评估:本研究为横断面研究。受试者为接受有创机械通气治疗的成人逆转录-聚合酶链反应确认的COVID-19患者。所有数据均来自医疗记录。统计分析采用Spearman检验,曼-惠特尼测试,和接收器工作特性曲线。
    UNASSIGNED:血清SP-D水平与静态呼吸顺应性显著相关(P=0.009;相关系数[rs]=0.467)。血清SP-D水平与ARDS严重程度相关(P<0.001)。SP-D水平对ARDS严重程度有很强的诊断价值,最佳截断值为44.24ng/mL(灵敏度92.3%;特异性94.1%)。ARDS严重程度也与呼吸顺应性显著相关(P=0.005;相关系数0.496)。
    UNASSIGNED:较高的血清SP-D水平与较低的呼吸顺应性相关,ARDS严重程度,并可用于诊断识别严重ARDS患者。
    UNASSIGNED: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the manifestations of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with low respiratory compliance and poor oxygenation as main characteristics and mortality rate of 50%-94%. Surfactants, including surfactant protein D (SP-D), have a role in maintaining respiratory compliance. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between serum SP-D levels with respiratory compliance and ARDS in patients with critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was a cross-sectional study. Subjects were adult reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 patients who had ARDS treated with invasive mechanical ventilation. All data were obtained from medical records. Statistical analysis was done using Spearman test, Mann-Whitney test, and receiver operating characteristic curve.
    UNASSIGNED: Serum level of SP-D was significantly correlated with static respiratory compliance (P = 0.009; correlation coefficient [rs] = 0.467). Serum SP-D levels correlated with ARDS severity (P < 0.001). SP-D levels had a very strong diagnostic value for ARDS severity, with an optimal cutoff value of 44.24 ng/mL (sensitivity 92.3%; specificity 94.1%). ARDS severity also correlated significantly with respiratory compliance (P = 0.005; correlation coefficient 0.496).
    UNASSIGNED: Higher serum SP-D levels were associated with lower respiratory compliance, ARDS severity, and may be utilized diagnostically to identify patients with severe ARDS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Study
    在这项试点研究中,我们旨在确定具有自身免疫特征的间质性肺炎(IPAF)之间的致病途径差异,结缔组织疾病相关的间质性肺病(CTD-ILD),特发性间质性肺炎(IIPs)。招募了40名参与者:9名参加IPAF,15带CTD-ILD,16与IIP。转化生长因子β(TGF-β1)的浓度,表面活性剂蛋白A和D(SP-A,SP-D),白细胞介素8(IL-8),用ELISA法测定支气管肺泡灌洗液(BAL)中的趋化因子1(CXCL1)。我们发现,IPAF组的IL-8和TGF-β1浓度明显低于CTD-ILD组(分别为p=0.008和p=0.019),但与IIP组的浓度相似。IL-8(rs=0.46;p=0.003)和CXCL1(rs=0.52;p=0.001)与BAL总细胞计数(TCC)存在显着相关性。多元回归模型显示,IL-8(β=0.32;p=0.037)和CXCL1(β=0.45;p=0.004)是BALTCC的重要预测因子。我们揭示了不同ILD患者的IL-8和TGF-β1BAL浓度不同,并发现IL-8是IPAF中BALTCC的预测因子。然而,这需要在多中心合作研究(ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier:NCT03870828)中确认.
    In this pilot study, we aim to determine differences in pathogenetic pathways between interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF), connective-tissue-disease-associated interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILDs), and idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs). Forty participants were recruited: 9 with IPAF, 15 with CTD-ILDs, and 16 with IIPs. Concentration of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β1), surfactant proteins A and D (SP-A, SP-D), interleukin 8 (IL-8), and chemokine 1 (CXCL1) were assessed with ELISA assay in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. We revealed that IL-8 and TGF-β1 concentrations were significantly lower in the IPAF group than in the CTD-ILD group (p = 0.008 and p = 0.019, respectively), but similar to the concentrations in the IIP group. There were significant correlations of IL-8 (rs = 0.46; p = 0.003) and CXCL1 (rs = 0.52; p = 0.001) and BAL total cell count (TCC). A multivariate regression model revealed that IL-8 (β = 0.32; p = 0.037) and CXCL1 (β = 0.45; p = 0.004) are significant predictors of BAL TCC. We revealed that IL-8 and TGF-β1 BAL concentrations vary in patients with different ILDs and found that IL-8 is a predictor of BAL TCC in IPAF. However, this needs to be confirmed in a multicenter cooperative study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03870828).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    背景:非结核性分枝杆菌肺病(NTM-LD)的发病率在中老年人群中达到高峰,与衰老相吻合;因此,慢性传染病会加速老年人的虚弱和精神健康恶化。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较NTM-LD和支气管扩张(BE)患者的身体和精神虚弱的患病率.
    方法:使用Kihon检查表问卷(KCQ)评估新诊断为NTM-LD和BE的患者的身体和精神弱点,并确定有需要护理风险的患者。此外,医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)评分和肺泡区域的慢性炎症生物标志物(表面活性蛋白[SP]-A,SP-D,和人阳离子抗菌蛋白[hCAP]/LL-37)在NTM-LD和BE患者之间进行了评估和比较。
    结果:招募的33例NTM和36例BE患者的背景特征没有显着差异。KCQ显示,诊断时虚弱的NTM患者的比例高于虚弱的BE患者(48.5%vs.22.2%,p=0.026)。NTM组HADS评分明显高于BE组(p<0.01)。支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)hCAP/LL-37和SP-D水平显著增高(p=0.001),但NTM组血清hCAP/LL-37水平显著低于BE组(p=0.023)。然而,两组BALF和血清SP-D水平差异无统计学意义。
    结论:诊断时虚弱的NTM患者的数量明显高于虚弱的BE患者。生物标志物分析表明,前者比后者具有更多的局部肺部炎症。
    背景:该试验在临床试验注册中心(UMIN000027652)进行了前瞻性注册。
    BACKGROUND: The incidence of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTM-LD) peaks in middle- and old age groups, coinciding with senescence; thus, chronic infectious diseases can accelerate frailty and worsen mental health in the elderly. In this study, we aimed to compare the prevalence of physical and psychiatric frailty between patients with NTM-LD and bronchiectasis (BE).
    METHODS: The Kihon Checklist Questionnaire (KCQ) was used to assess physical and psychiatric frailties and identify those at risk of requiring care among patients with newly diagnosed NTM-LD and BE. Additionally, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores and chronic inflammatory biomarkers of the alveolar region (surfactant protein [SP]-A, SP-D, and human cationic antibacterial protein [hCAP]/LL-37) were assessed and compared between NTM-LD and BE patients.
    RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the background characteristics between the 33 NTM and 36 BE patients recruited. The KCQ revealed that the proportion of frail NTM patients at diagnosis was higher than that of frail BE patients (48.5% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.026). HADS scores were significantly higher in the NTM group than in the BE group (p < 0.01). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) hCAP/LL-37 and SP-D levels were significantly higher (p = 0.001), but serum hCAP/LL-37 levels were significantly lower in the NTM group than in the BE group (p = 0.023). However, there were no significant differences in the BALF and serum SP-D levels between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The number of frail NTM patients at diagnosis was significantly higher than that of frail BE patients. Biomarker analysis suggested that the former had more localized lung inflammation than the latter.
    BACKGROUND: This trial was prospectively registered in the Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN 000027652).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经提出了几种机制来解释为什么慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)损害冠状动脉事件的预后。我们旨在探讨与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者预后较差相关的COPD变量。
    前瞻性纳入PCI治疗的急性冠脉事件患者。出院后一个月,临床特征,用Charlson指数测量的合并症,并收集预后冠状动脉评分(logisticEuroSCORE;GRACE2.0)。支气管扩张剂后肺活量测定,动脉僵硬度,并测量血清炎症和心肌生物标志物。肺血浆生物标志物(表面活性蛋白D,去肌肽,和Clara细胞分泌蛋白-16)用ELISA测定。COPD由固定比率定义(FEV1/FVC<70%)。还使用调整和未调整的ANCOVA分析将肺活量测定值作为连续变量进行分析。最后,我们评估了由非分层肺活量测定值和肺生物标志物定义的呼吸模式的存在.
    共纳入164名平均年龄为65(±10)岁的患者(79%为男性)。在56(34%)患者中诊断出COPD(68%以前未诊断)。COPD患者有较长的吸烟史,在EuroSCORE(p<0.0001)和GRACE2.0(p<0.001)量表上得分较高,和更多的合并症(p=0.006)。COPD患者脉搏波速度确定的动脉僵硬度增加(7.35m/svs6.60m/s;p=0.006)。COPD患者的高敏T肌钙蛋白(p=0.007)和表面活性蛋白D(p=0.003)的血清值也较高。在调整后的ANCOVA分析中,FEV1%仍然与动脉僵硬度和表面活性蛋白D显著相关。在集群探索中,53%的患者有呼吸模式。
    COPD影响了1/3的急性冠脉事件患者,并且经常未确诊。几个机制,包括动脉僵硬度和SPD,在COPD患者中增加。它们与预后的关系应通过队列的纵向随访来证实。
    Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain why chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) impairs the prognosis of coronary events. We aimed to explore COPD variables related to a worse prognosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
    Patients with an acute coronary event treated by PCI were prospectively included. One month after discharge, clinical characteristics, comorbidities measured with the Charlson index, and prognostic coronary scales (logistic EuroSCORE; GRACE 2.0) were collected. Post-bronchodilator spirometry, arterial stiffness, and serum inflammatory and myocardial biomarkers were measured. Lung plasmatic biomarkers (Surfactant protein D, desmosine, and Clara cell secretory protein-16) were determined with ELISA. COPD was defined by the fixed ratio (FEV1/FVC <70%). Spirometric values were also analyzed as continuous variables using adjusted and non-adjusted ANCOVA analysis. Finally, we evaluated the presence of a respiratory pattern defined by non-stratified spirometric values and pulmonary biomarkers.
    A total of 164 patients with a mean age of 65 (±10) years (79% males) were included. COPD was diagnosed in 56 (34%) patients (68% previously undiagnosed). COPD patients had a longer smoking history, higher scores on the EuroSCORE (p < 0.0001) and GRACE 2.0 (p < 0.001) scales, and more comorbidities (p = 0.006). Arterial stiffness determined by pulse wave velocity was increased in COPD patients (7.35 m/s vs 6.60 m/s; p = 0.006). Serum values of high sensitive T troponin (p = 0.007) and surfactant protein D (p = 0.003) were also higher in COPD patients. FEV1% remained significantly associated with arterial stiffness and surfactant protein D in the adjusted ANCOVA analysis. In the cluster exploration, 53% of the patients had a respiratory pattern.
    COPD affects one-third of patients with an acute coronary event and frequently remains undiagnosed. Several mechanisms, including arterial stiffness and SPD, were increased in COPD patients. Their relationship with the prognosis should be confirmed with longitudinal follow-up of the cohort.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号