Pulmonary Hypertension

肺动脉高压
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目的:文献报道慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)患者接受球囊肺血管成形术(BPA)的高并发症发生率,尤其是肺血流动力学不良的患者。这里,我们根据新的定义描述了双酚A的并发症.方法:从CTEPH数据库中选择所有在2023年9月15日前完成BPA治疗的CTEPH患者。根据2023年关于BPA治疗的共识文件,收集并分类围手术期并发症。分析肺血管阻力(PVR)患者亚组的并发症,≤或>6.6WU,和平均肺动脉压(mPAP),≤或>45mmHg,首先是BPA。结果:在此分析中,87名患者(63%的女性;平均年龄61.1±14.0岁;62%的双重PH靶向药物治疗)接受了426(平均每位患者4.9±1.6)BPA。只有14%的BPA治疗和47%的患者发生非严重并发症;31%的患者有胸部并发症。胸部并发症为轻度(71%)或中度(29%)。PVR>6.6WU(n=8)的患者接受了更多的BPA治疗(6.6±1.5对4.6±1.5,p=0.002),有更多的并发症(88%对41%的患者,p=0.020),并有更多的胸部并发症(17%vs.7%的BPA,p=0.013)比PVR≤6.6WU的患者。mPAP>45mmHg的患者(n=13)也有更多的BPA治疗(6.5±1.7对4.6±1.4,p<0.001),更多的并发症(77%对44%的患者,p=0.027)和更多的胸部并发症(14%对8%的BPA,p=0.039)比mPAP≤45mmHg的患者。结论:14%的BPA发生并发症,大多为轻度并发症。患有严重肺血流动力学的患者遭受更多(胸部)并发症。
    Background/Objectives: The literature reports high complication rates in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) who undergo balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), especially in patients with poor pulmonary hemodynamics. Here, we describe the complications of BPA based on the new definitions. Methods: All patients with CTEPH who completed BPA treatment before 15 September 2023 were selected from the CTEPH database. Peri-procedural complications were collected and classified according to the 2023 consensus paper on BPA treatment. Complications were analyzed in subgroups of patients with pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), ≤ or >6.6 WU, and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), ≤ or >45 mmHg, at first BPA. Results: In this analysis, 87 patients (63% women; mean age 61.1 ± 14.0 years; 62% on dual PH targeted medical therapy) underwent 426 (mean 4.9 ± 1.6 per patient) BPAs. Only non-severe complications occurred in 14% of BPA treatments and in 47% of the patients; 31% patients had a thoracic complication. The thoracic complications were mild (71%) or moderate (29%). Patients with a PVR > 6.6 WU (n = 8) underwent more BPA treatments (6.6 ± 1.5 versus 4.6 ± 1.5, p = 0.002), had more complications (88% versus 41% of patients, p = 0.020), and had more thoracic complications (17% vs. 7% of BPAs, p = 0.013) than patients with PVR ≤ 6.6 WU. Patients with mPAP > 45 mmHg (n = 13) also had more BPA treatments (6.5 ± 1.7 versus 4.6 ± 1.4, p < 0.001), more complications (77% versus 44% of patients, p = 0.027) and more thoracic complications (14% versus 8% of BPAs, p = 0.039) than patients with mPAP ≤ 45 mmHg. Conclusions: Complications occurred in 14% of BPAs and were mostly mild. Patients with severe pulmonary hemodynamics suffered more (thoracic) complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:急性右心室后负荷增加(急性肺心病)继发的急性右心室衰竭是一种危及生命的疾病,可能在不同的临床环境中出现。有发展或明显患有急性肺心病的患者通常患有急性肺部疾病(例如,肺栓塞,肺炎,ARDS),最初在急诊科进行管理,后来在重症监护病房进行管理。根据临床情况,涉及其他专业(心脏病学,肺炎,内科)。因此,协调提供护理特别具有挑战性,但是,如COVID-19大流行期间所示,对预后有重大影响。迫切需要一个共同的框架来管理急性肺心病,并纳入所有相关学科的观点。本临床共识文件的范围是提供右心室解剖和生理特性的最新实用概述,特别关注急性肺心病的病理生理学。急性右心室衰竭的现代诊断方法,包括危险分层,和急性肺心病的当代管理,包括特殊治疗和机械循环和通气支持。该文件包括心脏病专家的观点,肺病学家,急诊医生,和重症医师参与这些患者的护理,并专注于急诊部门和重症心血管护理单位发生的急性管理。
    Acute right ventricular failure secondary to acutely increased right ventricular afterload (acute cor pulmonale) is a life-threatening condition that may arise in different clinical settings. Patients at risk of developing or with manifest acute cor pulmonale usually present with an acute pulmonary disease (e.g. pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome) and are managed initially in emergency departments and later in intensive care units. According to the clinical setting, other specialties are involved (cardiology, pneumology, internal medicine). As such, coordinated delivery of care is particularly challenging but, as shown during the COVID-19 pandemic, has a major impact on prognosis. A common framework for the management of acute cor pulmonale with inclusion of the perspectives of all involved disciplines is urgently needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:根据2022年ESC/ERS指南,重新评估计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影(CTPA)的心血管指标在预测肺动脉高压(PH)中的价值。
    方法:本观察性研究包括272例疑似PH患者(女性143例,平均年龄54.9±12.5岁)。对218例患者进行分组,以评估CTPA的心血管指标,并建立二元逻辑回归模型。其他54名患者被分组为验证组,以评估更新标准下预测模型的性能。基于平均肺动脉压(mPAP),患者分为三组:A组包括mPAP≤20mmHg的患者,B组包括20mmHg20mmHg方面的表现。
    结果:主要肺动脉直径(MPAd),MPAd/升主动脉直径比(MPAd/AAd比),右室游离壁厚度(RVFWT)在三组之间差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。MPAd的曲线下面积(AUC)大于MPAd/AAd比值和RVFWT。30.0mm的MPAd截止值具有83.1%的灵敏度和90.4%的特异性。二元逻辑回归模型的AUC(Z=-12.98187+0.31053MPAd+1.04863RVFWT)为0.938±0.018。在验证组中,AUC,灵敏度,特异性,预测模型的准确率分别为0.878,92.7%,76.9%,88.9%,分别。
    结论:根据更新的标准,阈值为30.0mm的MPAd在预测PH方面具有较好的敏感性和特异性。二元逻辑回归模型可以提高诊断准确性。
    在更新的标准下,阈值为30.0mm的主肺动脉直径对预测肺动脉高压具有较好的敏感性和特异性。二元逻辑回归模型可以提高诊断准确性。
    结论:•根据2022年ESC/ERS指南,30.0mm的MPAd临界值在预测mPAP>20mmHg时具有更好的敏感性和特异性•建立了二元逻辑回归模型(Z=-12.981870.31053MPAd1.04863RVFWT),并且具有敏感性,特异性,准确率为92.7%,76.9%,预测mPAP>20mmHg的比例为88.9%。•二元逻辑回归预测模型在预测mPAP>20mmHg方面优于MPAd。
    OBJECTIVE: To re-assess cardiovascular metrics on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in predicting pulmonary hypertension (PH) under the 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines.
    METHODS: This observational study retrospectively included 272 patients (female 143, mean age = 54.9 ± 12.5 years old) with suspected PH. 218 patients were grouped to evaluate cardiovascular metrics on CTPA and develop a binary logistic regression model. The other 54 patients were grouped into the validation group to assess the performance of the prediction model under the updated criteria. Based on mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), patients were divided into three groups: group A consisted of patients with mPAP ≤ 20 mmHg, group B included patients with 20 mmHg < mPAP < 25 mmHg, and group C comprised patients with mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg. Cardiovascular metrics among the three groups were compared, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were used to evaluate the performance of cardiovascular metrics in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg.
    RESULTS: The main pulmonary arterial diameter (MPAd), MPAd/ascending aorta diameter ratio (MPAd/AAd ratio), and right ventricular free wall thickness (RVFWT) showed significant differences among the three groups (p < 0.05). The area under curve (AUC) of MPAd was larger than MPAd/AAd ratio and RVFWT. A MPAd cutoff value of 30.0 mm has a sensitivity of 83.1% and a specificity of 90.4%. The AUC of the binary logistic regression model (Z =  - 12.98187 + 0.31053 MPAd + 1.04863 RVFWT) was 0.938 ± 0.018. In the validation group, the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the prediction model were 0.878, 92.7%, 76.9%, and 88.9%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Under the updated criteria, MPAd with a threshold value of 30.0 mm has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting PH. The binary logistic regression model may improve the diagnostic accuracy.
    UNASSIGNED: Under the updated criteria, the main pulmonary arterial diameter with a threshold value of 30.0 mm has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting pulmonary hypertension. The binary logistic regression model may improve diagnostic accuracy.
    CONCLUSIONS: • According to 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines, a MPAd cutoff value of 30.0 mm has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg • A binary logistic regression model (Z = - 12.98187 + 0.31053 MPAd + 1.04863 RVFWT) was developed and had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.7%, 76.9%, and 88.9% in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg. • A binary logistic regression prediction model outperforms MPAd in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    估计患病率约为1%,肺动脉高压(PH)在全球范围内带来了相关负担。在这次审查中,我们的目的是概述经修订的欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)/欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)PH诊断和治疗指南的新颖性及其对日常临床实践的启示.
    With an estimated prevalence of around 1%, pulmonary hypertension (PH) presents a relevant burden worldwide. In this review, we aim to give an overview of the novelties from the revised European Society of Cardiology (ESC) /European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of PH and their implication for the everyday clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这篇文章中,我们讨论了慢性血栓栓塞性肺疾病(CTEPD)的主题以及球囊肺血管成形术(BPA)在其治疗中的日益重要的作用。我们介绍了CTEPD的病理生理学,该病理生理学是由肺动脉血栓的不完全消退引起的,并导致血管狭窄和闭塞。本文主要关注慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)亚群,如果不治疗,其预后非常差。我们描述了一种治疗CTEPH的多模式方法,包括肺内膜切除术(PEA),BPA,和药物治疗。此外,概述了在BPA之前进行药物预处理的益处以及该程序本身的技术方面。需要强调的是,BPA不能替代PEA,但可以作为符合条件的患者的补充治疗方案。我们总结了疗效和治疗目标,包括BPA前后功能和生化参数的改善。在BPA之前接受riociguat预处理的患者显着减少了严重并发症的发生率。然而,老年患者仍然被认为是一个特别脆弱的群体。研究表明,在手术后的第一年,接受BPA的患者的预后与PEA相似,但BPA的长期预后仍不清楚。2022年ESC/ERS指南强调了BPA在CTEPH的多模式治疗中的重要作用,强调其有效性,并建议将其作为CTEPD患者的治疗选择,有和没有肺动脉高压。这篇综述总结了BPA的现有证据,患者选择,程序细节,和预后,并讨论了BPA在CTEPH管理中的潜在未来作用。
    In this article, we discuss the topic of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) and the growing role of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in its treatment. We present the pathophysiology of CTEPD which arises from an incomplete resolution of thrombi in the pulmonary arteries and leads to stenosis and occlusion of the vessels. The article focuses mainly on the chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) subpopulation for which prognosis is very poor when left untreated. We describe a multimodal approach to treating CTEPH, including pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), BPA, and pharmacological therapies. Additionally, the benefits of pharmacological pre-treatment before BPA and the technical aspects of the procedure itself are outlined. It is emphasized that BPA does not replace PEA but serves as a complementary treatment option for eligible patients. We summarized efficacy and treatment goals including an improvement in functional and biochemical parameters before and after BPA. Patients who received pre-treatment with riociguat prior to BPA exhibited a notable reduction in the occurrence of less severe complications. However, elderly patients are still perceived as an especially vulnerable group. It is shown that the prognosis of patients undergoing BPA is similar to PEA in the first years after the procedure but the long-term prognosis of BPA still remains unclear. The 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines highlight the significant role of BPA in the multimodal treatment of CTEPH, emphasizing its effectiveness and recommending its consideration as a therapeutic option for patients with CTEPD, both with and without pulmonary hypertension. This review summarizes the available evidence for BPA, patient selection, procedural details, and prognosis and discusses the potential future role of BPA in the management of CTEPH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:迄今为止完成的肺动脉高压的介入研究表明,对平均肺动脉压(mPAP)(≥25mmHg)和肺血管阻力(PVR)显著升高的症状患者有效。然而,在健康中,mPAP不超过20mmHg,PVR为2WU或更低,在休息。ESC/ERS指南最近已更新以反映这一点。关于这些新定义人群的性质(mPAP21-24mmHg和PVR>2-≤3WU)以及合并症在确定其自然史中的作用的公开数据有限。随着准则的改变,有必要更详细地了解这一人群和ESC/ERS指南的影响.
    方法:对2009年至2017年期间转诊到英国肺动脉高压(PH)中心的患者的肺血流动力学和合并症在预测生存中的作用进行了全国性的回顾性评估。总的来说,2929名患者被纳入研究。患者按mPAP(<21mmHg,21-24mmHg,和≥25mmHg)和PVR(≤2WU,>2-≤3WU,和>3WU),mPAP<21mmHg组968(33.0%),mPAP21-24mmHg组689(23.5%),mPAP≥25mmHg组1272例(43.4%)。
    结果:在整个人群中,生存率与mPAP和PVR呈负相关。mPAP(21-24mmHg)或PVR(>2-≤3WU)轻度升高的患者的生存率低于正常压力(mPAP<21mmHg)和正常PVR(PVR≤2WU)的患者,与肺部和心脏疾病无关[mPAP的风险比(HR)1.36,95%置信区间(CI)1.14-1.61,P=.0004HR1.28,95%CI1.10-1.49,PVR的P=.0012]。在mPAP轻度升高的患者中,当校正肺部和心脏病合并症时,轻度升高的PVR仍然是生存的独立预测因子(HR1.33,95%CI1.01-1.75,P=.042vs.HR1.4,95%CI1.06-1.86,P=0.019)。68.2%的mPAP21-24mmHg患者有潜在的心脏或肺部疾病的证据。血液动力学轻度异常的患者没有比血液动力学正常的患者更有症状。不包括心脏病和肺病患者,结缔组织疾病与PH患者的生存率较差有关。在这个评估mPAP为21-24mmHg的亚群中,存活曲线仅在5年后发散。
    结论:本研究支持ESC/ERS指南在PH人群中的诊断类别变化。新纳入的患者的死亡率增加,与严重的肺部或心脏病无关。这一新类别中的大多数患者患有潜在的心脏或肺部疾病,而不是孤立的肺血管病变。如果存在合并症,死亡率较高。严格的表型分析对于确定哪些患者有进行性血管病理性疾病的风险以及哪些患者的监测和招募可能受益是至关重要的。这项研究提供了对新指南定义的人群的见解。
    OBJECTIVE: Interventional studies in pulmonary arterial hypertension completed to date have shown to be effective in symptomatic patients with significantly elevated mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (≥25 mmHg) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 3 Wood Unit (WU). However, in health the mPAP does not exceed 20 mmHg and PVR is 2 WU or lower, at rest. The ESC/ERS guidelines have recently been updated to reflect this. There is limited published data on the nature of these newly defined populations (mPAP 21-24 mmHg and PVR >2-≤3 WU) and the role of comorbidity in determining their natural history. With the change in guidelines, there is a need to understand this population and the impact of the ESC/ERS guidelines in greater detail.
    METHODS: A retrospective nationwide evaluation of the role of pulmonary haemodynamics and comorbidity in predicting survival among patients referred to the UK pulmonary hypertension (PH) centres between 2009 and 2017. In total, 2929 patients were included in the study. Patients were stratified by mPAP (<21 mmHg, 21-24 mmHg, and ≥25 mmHg) and PVR (≤2 WU, > 2-≤3 WU, and >3 WU), with 968 (33.0%) in the mPAP <21 mmHg group, 689 (23.5%) in the mPAP 21-24 mmHg group, and 1272 (43.4%) in the mPAP ≥25 mmHg group.
    RESULTS: Survival was negatively correlated with mPAP and PVR in the population as a whole. Survival in patients with mildly elevated mPAP (21-24 mmHg) or PVR (>2-≤3WU) was lower than among those with normal pressures (mPAP <21 mmHg) and normal PVR (PVR ≤ 2WU) independent of comorbid lung and heart disease [hazard ratio (HR) 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.61, P = .0004 for mPAP vs. HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.49, P = .0012 for PVR]. Among patients with mildly elevated mPAP, a mildly elevated PVR remained an independent predictor of survival when adjusted for comorbid lung and heart disease (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.75, P = .042 vs. HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.06-1.86, P = .019). 68.2% of patients with a mPAP 21-24 mmHg had evidence of underlying heart or lung disease. Patients with mildly abnormal haemodynamics were not more symptomatic than patients with normal haemodynamics. Excluding patients with heart and lung disease, connective tissue disease was associated with a poorer survival among those with PH. In this subpopulation evaluating those with a mPAP of 21-24 mmHg, survival curves only diverged after 5 years.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the change in diagnostic category of the ESC/ERS guidelines in a PH population. The newly included patients have an increased mortality independent of significant lung or heart disease. The majority of patients in this new category have underlying heart or lung disease rather than an isolated pulmonary vasculopathy. Mortality is higher if comorbidity is present. Rigorous phenotyping will be pivotal to determine which patients are at risk of progressive vasculopathic disease and in whom surveillance and recruitment to studies may be of benefit. This study provides an insight into the population defined by the new guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管已知肺康复(PR)对慢性呼吸系统疾病患者的益处,这种治疗方法没有得到充分利用。以证据为基础的指南应该使人们对PR的已证实的益处有更多的了解,强调公关在循证医疗保健中的作用,反过来,促进对慢性呼吸道疾病患者的PR转诊和更有效的递送。方法:多学科小组制定了六个研究问题,针对特定患者组(慢性阻塞性肺疾病[COPD],间质性肺病,和肺动脉高压)和PR递送模型(远程康复,维护公关)。使用系统评价对治疗效果进行量化。建议的分级,评估,使用开发和评估方法来制定临床建议。建议:专家组做出了以下判断:对COPD稳定期成人的PR(中等质量证据)和COPD加重住院后的PR(中等质量证据),强烈建议对患有间质性肺病的成人进行PR(中等质量证据),有条件推荐成人肺动脉高压患者的PR(低质量证据),强烈建议为慢性呼吸系统疾病患者提供基于中心的PR或远程康复选择(中等质量证据),以及有条件建议为COPD成人患者提供有监督的维持PR或初始PR后的常规护理(低质量证据)。结论:这些指南为慢性呼吸系统疾病患者的PR循证递送提供了依据。
    Background: Despite the known benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for patients with chronic respiratory disease, this treatment is underused. Evidence-based guidelines should lead to greater knowledge of the proven benefits of PR, highlight the role of PR in evidence-based health care, and in turn foster referrals to and more effective delivery of PR for people with chronic respiratory disease. Methods: The multidisciplinary panel formulated six research questions addressing PR for specific patient groups (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], interstitial lung disease, and pulmonary hypertension) and models for PR delivery (telerehabilitation, maintenance PR). Treatment effects were quantified using systematic reviews. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to formulate clinical recommendations. Recommendations: The panel made the following judgments: strong recommendations for PR for adults with stable COPD (moderate-quality evidence) and after hospitalization for COPD exacerbation (moderate-quality evidence), strong recommendation for PR for adults with interstitial lung disease (moderate-quality evidence), conditional recommendation for PR for adults with pulmonary hypertension (low-quality evidence), strong recommendation for offering the choice of center-based PR or telerehabilitation for patients with chronic respiratory disease (moderate-quality evidence), and conditional recommendation for offering either supervised maintenance PR or usual care after initial PR for adults with COPD (low-quality evidence). Conclusions: These guidelines provide the basis for evidence-based delivery of PR for people with chronic respiratory disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号