Psychotherapists

心理治疗师
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    未经评估:当治疗师的建议要求过于苛刻,超过了客户的准备进入变革时,客户可能会拒绝前进。我们的目的是了解治疗师在客户抵制认知行为疗法中的变革后立即表现如何。
    未经评估:我们分析了一个已恢复和未恢复的病例,都患有严重的抑郁症,跟着是同一个治疗师。通过治疗协作编码系统,我们分析了407个感兴趣的交易所。
    UNASSIGNED:在这两种情况下,客户在中间会议上更抵制前进,主要是由治疗师的挑战,以提高洞察力和辩论认知信念在恢复的情况下,并在未恢复的情况下寻求经验意义。在客户拒绝前进之后,治疗师倾向于坚持向同一方向挑战他们。在追回的案件中,治疗师在整个治疗过程中不断地这样做,有时在坚持或后退之间保持平衡。在未恢复的情况下,治疗师坚持要挑战,但主要是在最后一次会议上。偶尔,治疗师坚持要挑战,客户拒绝连续的交易。
    UNASSIGNED:我们的结果强调,要实现进步和变革,客户需要被推进变革,然而,这需要治疗师“对客户的熟练评估”才能及时移动。
    When therapists\' proposals are too demanding exceeding clients\' readiness to move into change, clients may resist advancing. We aimed to understand how a therapist behaved immediately after the client resisted advancing into change within Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy.
    We analyzed a recovered and an unrecovered case, both with Major Depression, and followed by the same therapist. Through the Therapeutic Collaboration Coding System, we analyzed 407 exchanges of interest.
    In both cases, clients resisted more in advancing at intermediate sessions, mainly by the therapist\'s challenges to raise insight and debate cognitive beliefs in the recovered case, and to seek experiential meanings in the unrecovered case. Immediately after clients resisted advancing, the therapist tended to insist on challenging them in the same direction. In the recovered case, the therapist did so continually throughout the therapy, sometimes balancing between insisting or stepping back. In the unrecovered case, the therapist insisted on challenging, but mostly at the final session. Occasionally, the therapist insisted on challenging, and clients resisted over consecutive exchanges.
    Our results reinforce that to enact progress and change clients need to be pushed into change, however it requires therapists\' skillful assessment of clients\' tolerance to move in time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    目标:由于冠状病毒大流行和危机,世界各地的心理治疗师被迫在一夜之间改用视频或远程治疗。迄今为止,只有少数关于通过互联网进行基于视频的心理动力学心理治疗的有效性的研究。因此,本研究的目的是检查症状改善,治疗关系,非语言同步过程,和在系统的单病例设计中的会话过程,并在长期心理动力导向的心理治疗中比较面对面与基于视频的方法。
    方法:我们检查了一个重度抑郁症患者的85个疗程,其心理动力心理治疗从面对面的设置转变为基于视频的设置。视频记录使用运动能量分析进行分析,使用代理同步方法计算非语言同步。进行时间序列分析以分析症状严重程度的变化,治疗关系,和会间进程。
    结果:结果显示症状严重程度有描述性改善,但并不重要,在整个心理治疗过程中。存在显著差异,然而,在治疗关系中,闭会期间的经验,以及面对面和基于视频的设置之间的同步行为。
    结论:结果表明,所提出的方法可以很好地研究基于视频的环境中的心理动力学心理治疗是否与面对面的环境中的工作方式相同的问题。
    Due to the coronavirus pandemic and crisis, psychotherapists around the world were forced to switch to video- or tele-based treatments overnight. To date, only a few studies on the effectiveness of video-based psychodynamic psychotherapy via the Internet exist. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to examine symptom improvement, therapeutic relationship, nonverbal synchrony processes, and intersession processes within a systematic single case design and compare face-to-face to video-based approaches in long-term psychodynamic-oriented psychotherapy.
    We examined 85 sessions of a client with major depression whose psychodynamic psychotherapy changed from a face-to-face setting to a video-based setting. Video recordings were analyzed using motion energy analysis, and nonverbal synchrony was computed using a surrogate synchrony approach. Time series analyses were performed to analyze changes in symptom severity, therapeutic relationship, and intersession processes.
    The results showed that symptom severity improved descriptively, but not significantly, across the entire course of psychotherapy. There were significant differences, however, in the therapeutic relationship, intersession experiences, and synchronous behavior between the face-to-face and video-based settings.
    The results indicate that the presented methodology is well situated to investigate the question whether psychodynamic psychotherapy in video-based setting works in the sameway as in a face-to-face setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19的爆发引发了人们对弱势群体如何经历大流行的质疑。专注于先前存在精神健康状况的个人观点的研究仍然有限,跨国比较调查也是如此。在政府针对SARS-CoV-2病毒传播的措施在奥地利生效后的第一次封锁期间,我们收集了定性数据样本,捷克,德国,斯洛伐克。来自四个中欧国家的总共1690名心理治疗师回答了这样一个问题,即在前所未有的公共卫生条件的早期阶段,患者如何在会议中解决COVID-19大流行。我们采用描述性定性方法来确定关于COVID-19大流行如何影响患者的社会生态模型(SEM)水平的主题。在公共政策层面,紧张的环境条件与政府的缓解努力有关。在社区/社会层面,报告的关键主题是就业,限制获得教育和保健设施,社会经济后果,以及流行病本身。人际层面的关键主题是强迫接近,亲人感染的可能性,托儿服务,还有在家上学.个人层面的关键主题是感染新冠肺炎的可能性,不得不呆在家里/与世隔绝,和不断变化的环境。在SEM框架内,报告了对这些应激源的适应性和适应性不良反应,国家之间的相似性多于差异。词干的量化表明,适应不良反应占主导地位。
    The COVID-19 outbreak has raised questions about how vulnerable groups experience the pandemic. Research that focuses on the view of individuals with pre-existing mental health conditions is still limited, and so are cross-country comparative surveys. We gathered our sample of qualitative data during the first lockdown after governmental measures against the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus came into force in Austria, Czechia, Germany, and Slovakia. A total of n = 1690 psychotherapists from four middle European countries answered the question of how the COVID-19 pandemic was addressed in sessions by their patients during the early stage of unprecedented public health conditions. We employed a descriptive qualitative methodology to determine themes following levels of the social-ecological model (SEM) regarding how the COVID-19 pandemic affected patients. At the public policy level, stressful environmental conditions concerned the governmental mitigation efforts. At the level of community/society, reported key themes were employment, restricted access to educational and health facilities, socioeconomic consequences, and the pandemic itself. Key themes at the interpersonal level regarded forced proximity, the possibility of infection of loved ones, childcare, and homeschooling. Key themes at the individual level were the possibility of contracting COVID-19, having to stay at home/isolation, and a changing environment. Within the SEM framework, adaptive and maladaptive responses to these stressors were reported, with more similarities than differences between the countries. A quantification of word stems showed that the maladaptive reactions predominated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    案例制定是心理治疗师的核心工具,这有助于他们为个体患者量身定制心理治疗,特别是对于复杂和多层临床问题的治疗,如人格障碍(克莱默,2019)。在预测治疗过程的心理治疗研究中,病例制定方法仍未得到充分利用。本研究包括N=60例边缘性人格障碍患者,这些患者正在接受使用个性化治疗成分的简短治疗(n=31),与标准短暂治疗相比(n=29;Kramer等人。,2014).对于每位患者(两组均基于视频进行事后分析),我们进行了计划分析案例制定(Caspar,2019年):将配方中的具体信息转化为定量评分(在李克特型量表上),评估患者的互动一致性(与拮抗作用;Zufferey等人。,2019)。我们在治疗过程中对治疗联盟进展的逐次预测进行建模-由患者和治疗师评估,作为互动同意的功能,治疗的个体化,以及他们与会议号的互动。随着时间的推移,具有高一致性的患者的联盟评估显着增加。根据病例配方进行治疗,根据治疗师的评估,可以预测治疗联盟的会话增加。这项研究是第一个探索治疗联盟的个体内部和个体间动态与从病例配方中提取的个体信息的关系的研究。结果可能有助于理解复杂临床问题治疗开始时的关系挣扎,如边缘性人格障碍。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2022年APA,保留所有权利)。
    Case formulation is a central tool for psychotherapists, which helps them tailor psychotherapy to the individual patient, particularly for treatments for complex and multilayered clinical problems, such as personality disorders (Kramer, 2019). Case formulation methodologies are still underutilized in psychotherapy research in the prediction of therapy processes. The present study included N = 60 patients with borderline personality disorder undergoing a brief treatment using an individualized treatment component (n = 31), as compared with a standard brief treatment (n = 29; Kramer et al., 2014). For each patient (in both groups as post hoc analysis based on videos), we performed a Plan analysis case formulation (Caspar, 2019): the idiographic information from the formulation was translated into quantitative scores (on a Likert-type scale) assessing patient\'s interactional agreeableness (vs. antagonism; Zufferey et al., 2019). We modeled the session-by-session predictions of the progression of the therapeutic alliance-rated by the patient and the therapist-over the course of treatment, as a function of interactional agreeableness, the individualization of treatment, as well as their interaction with the session number. Patients with high levels of agreeableness have a significant increase in their alliance assessment over time. Treatment based on the case formulation predicted session-by-session increase of the therapeutic alliance as rated by the therapists. This study was the first to explore intra- and interindividual dynamics of the therapeutic alliance in relationship with idiographic information extracted from case formulations. The results may help understand relationship struggles at the beginning of therapy for complex clinical problems, such as borderline personality disorder. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Previous research indicates that not all children, adolescents and adults suffering from PTSD receive psychotherapy and if they do, trauma is not always considered during therapy. One reason for this undertreatment might be a limited readiness of licenced psychotherapists (LPTs) to treat patients who have experienced a trauma and thus suffer from PTSD symptoms.
    The aim of this study is to explore the association between the readiness of LPTs to treat patients with PTSD symptoms and different patients\' and therapists\' characteristics.
    We used case vignettes to assess the readiness of LPTs in Germany in a nationwide online survey (N = 768). The vignettes described patients with PTSD and were adapted to the age group mainly treated by the therapists (children/adolescents vs. adults). The patients\' characteristics in the otherwise identical vignettes were randomized for patient gender (female vs. male) and symptom cluster (internalizing vs. externalizing). Rating scales were used to assess readiness. Additionally, therapists\' characteristics (age, trauma-specific training, perceived fears/doubts, and objective barriers to treating the vignette patient) were assessed.
    The patients\' characteristics did not influence the treatment readiness of the LPTs. Regarding therapists\' characteristics, LPTs working mainly with children and adolescents, and those who had completed trauma-specific training reported a higher readiness to treat the vignette patient.
    Regarding the treatment of patients suffering from PTSD symptoms of different ages, our study indicated that the assessed therapists\' characteristics were more relevant for the treatment readiness of LPTs than the patients\' characteristics of age or symptom type.
    Antecedentes: Las investigaciones previas indican que no todos los niños, adolescentes y adultos que sufren de TEPT reciben psicoterapia, y si la reciben, el trauma no siempre es considerado durante la terapia. Una razón para este tratamiento insuficiente puede ser una limitada disposición de los psicoterapeutas licenciados (LPT por su sigla en inglés) para tratar pacientes que han experimentado un trauma y que por tanto sufren de síntomas de TEPT.Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es explorar la asociación entre la disposición de los LPT para tratar pacientes con síntomas de TEPT y diferentes características de los pacientes y los terapeutas.Método: Utilizamos viñetas de casos para evaluar la disposición de los LPT en Alemania en un estudio en línea a nivel nacional (N = 768). Las viñetas describían pacientes con TEPT y fueron adaptadas al grupo etario tratado principalmente por los terapeutas (niños/adolescentes vs adultos). Las características de los pacientes en las viñetas por lo demás idénticas fueron aleatorizadas por género de los pacientes (femenino vs masculino), y grupos sintomáticos (internalizantes vs externalizantes). Se utilizaron escalas para evaluar la disposición. Adicionalmente, fueron evaluadas las características de los terapeutas (edad, entrenamiento específico en trauma, miedos/dudas percibidos) y barreras objetivas para tratar al paciente de la viñeta).Resultados: Las características de los pacientes no influyeron sobre la disposición a tratamiento de los LPT. En relación a las características de los terapeutas, los LPT que trabajaban principalmente con niños y adolescentes, y quienes habían completado un entrenamiento específico en trauma reportaron una mayor disposición para tratar al paciente de la viñeta.Conclusiones: En relación al tratamiento de pacientes de diferentes edades que sufren de síntomas de TEPT, nuestro estudio indicó que las características evaluadas de los terapeutas fueron más relevantes para la disposición a tratamiento de los LPT que las características de los pacientes respecto a edad y tipo de síntomas.
    背景: 先前研究表明, 并非所有患有 PTSD 的儿童、青少年和成人都接受心理治疗, 并且如果他们接受治疗, 创伤在治疗过程中并不总被考虑在内。这种治疗不足的一个原因可能是执业心理治疗师 (LPT) 对治疗经历创伤并因此患有 PTSD 症状的患者的准备有限。目的: 本研究旨在探讨 LPT 治疗患有 PTSD 症状的患者的准备情况与不同患者和治疗师特征之间的关联。方法: 我们在一项全国性在线调查中使用案例记录来评估德国 LPT 的准备情况(N = 768)。这些记录描述了 PTSD 患者, 并匹配了主要由治疗师治疗的年龄组 (儿童/青少年与成人)。其他相同记录中的患者特征随机化为患者性别 (女性与男性) 和症状簇(内化与外化)。使用评分量表评估准备情况。此外, 还评估了治疗师的特征(年龄、特定创伤培训、感知恐惧/怀疑以及治疗案例患者的客观障碍)。结果: 患者特征不影响 LPT 的治疗准备情况。关于治疗师特征, 主要治疗儿童和青少年的 LPT 以及那些完成了创伤特定培训的治疗师报告说, 他们对于治疗案例患者准备更足。结论: 我们的研究表明, 对于不同年龄的 PTSD 症状患者的治疗, 被评估的治疗师特征与 LPT 的治疗准备情况比患者年龄或症状类型特征更相关。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号