Pseudomonas Infections

假单胞菌感染
  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is the most common autosomal recessive genetic multisystemic disease. In Germany, it affects at least 8000 people. The disease is caused by mutations in the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene leading to dysfunction of CFTR, a transmembrane chloride channel. This defect causes insufficient hydration of the airway epithelial lining fluid which leads to reduction of the mucociliary clearance.Even if highly effective, CFTR modulator therapy has been available for some years and people with CF are getting much older than before, recurrent and chronic infections of the airways as well as pulmonary exacerbations still occur. In adult CF life, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is the most relevant pathogen in colonisation and chronic infection of the lung, leading to further loss of lung function. There are many possibilities to treat PA-infection.This is a S3-clinical guideline which implements a definition for chronic PA-infection and demonstrates evidence-based diagnostic methods and medical treatment in order to give guidance for individual treatment options.
    Mukoviszidose (Cystic Fibrosis, CF) ist die häufigste autosomal-rezessiv vererbte Multisystemerkrankung. In Deutschland sind mind. 8000 Menschen betroffen. Die Erkrankung wird durch Mutationen im Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR)-Gen verursacht, welche zu einer Fehlfunktion des Chloridkanals CFTR führen. Dadurch kommt es in den Atemwegen zu einer unzureichenden Hydrierung des epithelialen Flüssigkeitsfilms und somit zu einer Reduktion der mukoziliären Clearance.Auch wenn seit einigen Jahren mit der CFTR-Modulatortherapie eine hochwirksame kausale CF-Therapie zur Verfügung steht und die Patienten größtenteils das höhere Erwachsenenalter erreichen, treten rezidivierende und chronische Infektionen der Atemwege sowie pulmonale Exazerbationen weiterhin auf. Im Erwachsenenalter zeigt sich v. a. die Kolonisation und chronische Infektion mit Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), die zu weiterem Verlust an Lungenfunktion führt. Für die medikamentöse Therapie der chronischen PA-Infektion stehen viele unterschiedliche Therapieoptionen zur Verfügung.Mit dieser S3-Leitlinie wird eine evidenzbasierte Diagnostik und Therapie der PA-Infektion dargelegt, um eine Orientierung bei der individuellen Therapieentscheidung zu geben.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已经制定了囊性纤维化(CF)的护理指南,以增强一致的护理并改善健康结果。我们确定了遵守CF护理指南是否可以预测2018年美国CF中心的铜绿假单胞菌发病率(Pa-IR)。
    方法:这项CF基金会患者注册横断面研究包括82个成人中心和132个儿科中心。对12条指南的坚持被分类定义(符合指南)或作为连续测量(根据指南接受治疗/评估的患者比例)。遵守个人指南与Pa-IR的关联,考虑与Pa-IR相关的中心和患者特征,并使用随机森林和加权最小二乘(WLS)分析进行建模.
    结果:所有合并中心的平均Pa-IR为0.2例/患者-年风险(SE0.0074)。每年≥4次细菌培养(54%的中心)和每年口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)(48%的中心)的指南依从性最低。年度非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)痰培养最高(98%)。符合指南的平均数量为6.7,儿科中心(7.3)高于成人中心(5.6)。(p<0.001)。符合的指南数量与Pa-IR呈负相关(β=-0.007,p=0.043)。每个指南的大环内酯类药物处方和年度OGTT与较低和较高的Pa-IR相关,分别。中心宽中心肺功能较低,体重指数低的pwCF比例较高,西南部的位置有较高的Pa-IR。
    结论:除了进行≥4次细菌培养/年和OGTT外,对指南的总体依从性很高。较高的Pa-IR与中心特征和较低的指南依从性相关。较低的Pa-IR以及对指南的更高依从性表明,专注于优质护理可以对Pa-IR产生积极影响。
    BACKGROUND: Care guidelines for cystic fibrosis (CF) have been developed to enhance consistent care and to improve health outcomes. We determined if adherence to CF care guidelines predicted P. aeruginosa incidence rates (Pa-IR) at U.S. CF centers in 2018.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional CF Foundation Patient Registry study included 82 adult and 132 pediatric centers. Adherence to 12 guidelines was defined categorically (guideline met) or as a continuous measure (proportion of patients being treated/evaluated per guideline). Association of adherence to individual guidelines with Pa-IR, accounted for center and patient characteristics relevant to Pa-IR and were modeled using random forests and weighted-least-squares (WLS) analyses.
    RESULTS: The mean Pa-IR was 0.2 cases/patient-years at risk (SE 0.0074) for all centers combined. Guideline adherence was lowest for ≥4 bacterial cultures/year (54% of centers) and annual oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (48% of centers), and highest for annual non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) sputum culture (98%). The mean number of guidelines met was 6.7 and higher for pediatric (7.3) than adult (5.6) centers, (p<0.001). The number of guidelines met correlated negatively with Pa-IR (β=-0.007, p = 0.043). Macrolide prescription and annual OGTT per guideline were associated with lower and higher Pa-IR, respectively. Centers with lower center-wide lung function, higher proportion of pwCF with low body-mass index, and location in the Southwest had higher Pa-IR.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall adherence to guidelines was high except for performing ≥4 bacterial cultures/year and OGTT. Higher Pa-IR was associated with center characteristics and lower guideline adherence. The lower Pa-IR with greater adherence to guidelines suggests that focusing on quality care can positively impact Pa-IR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    铜绿假单胞菌的最佳覆盖在发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者中是具有挑战性的,这是由于全球抗生素耐药性的逐渐增加。我们的目的是详细介绍血液系统恶性肿瘤患者对从血流感染(BSI)中分离出的铜绿假单胞菌的国际指南推荐的抗生素的当前耐药率。其次,我们旨在描述有多少患者接受了不适当的经验性抗生素治疗(IEAT)及其对死亡率的影响.我们做了一个回顾,西班牙14所大学医院血液系统恶性肿瘤患者最近20例由铜绿假单胞菌引起的BSI发作的多中心队列研究。在280例由铜绿假单胞菌引起的恶性血液病和BSI患者中,101(36%)的菌株对国际指南中推荐的至少一种β-内酰胺抗生素具有抗性,即,头孢吡肟,哌拉西林他唑巴坦,还有美罗培南.此外,21.1%和11.4%的菌株符合铜绿假单胞菌MDR和XDR标准,分别。即使在大多数情况下遵循国际准则,47例(16.8%)患者接受IEAT治疗,66例(23.6%)患者接受不适当的β-内酰胺经验性抗生素治疗。30天死亡率为27.1%。在多变量分析中,肺源(OR2.22,95%CI1.14~4.34)和IEAT(OR2.67,95%CI1.37~5.23)是与死亡率增加独立相关的因素.我们得出的结论是,恶性血液病患者中铜绿假单胞菌引起的BSI通常对国际指南中推荐的抗生素具有耐药性。这与频繁的IEAT和较高的死亡率有关。需要新的治疗策略。重要性铜绿假单胞菌引起的血流感染(BSI)与中性粒细胞减少患者的发病率和死亡率升高相关。出于这个原因,最佳的抗伪粒子覆盖是经验治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症的所有历史建议的基础.然而,近年来,多种抗生素耐药性的出现对治疗这种微生物引起的感染提出了挑战。在我们的研究中,我们假设恶性血液病患者中铜绿假单胞菌引起的BSI通常对国际指南中推荐的抗生素具有耐药性。这一观察结果与频繁的IEAT和死亡率增加有关。因此,需要一种新的治疗策略.
    Optimal coverage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is challenging in febrile neutropenic patients due to a progressive increase in antibiotic resistance worldwide. We aimed to detail current rates of resistance to antibiotics recommended by international guidelines for P. aeruginosa isolated from bloodstream infections (BSI) in patients with hematologic malignancies. Secondarily, we aimed to describe how many patients received inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT) and its impact on mortality. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of the last 20 BSI episodes caused by P. aeruginosa in patients with hematologic malignancies from across 14 university hospitals in Spain. Of the 280 patients with hematologic malignancies and BSI caused by P. aeruginosa, 101 (36%) had strains resistant to at least one of the β-lactam antibiotics recommended in international guidelines, namely, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem. Additionally, 21.1% and 11.4% of the strains met criteria for MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa, respectively. Even if international guidelines were followed in most cases, 47 (16.8%) patients received IEAT and 66 (23.6%) received inappropriate β-lactam empirical antibiotic treatment. Thirty-day mortality was 27.1%. In the multivariate analysis, pulmonary source (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.14 to 4.34) and IEAT (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.37 to 5.23) were factors independently associated with increased mortality. We concluded that P. aeruginosa-causing BSI in patients with hematologic malignancies is commonly resistant to antibiotics recommended in international guidelines, which is associated with frequent IEAT and higher mortality. New therapeutic strategies are needed. IMPORTANCE Bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by P. aeruginosa is related with an elevated morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients. For this reason, optimal antipseudomonal coverage has been the basis of all historical recommendations in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. However, in recent years the emergence of multiple types of antibiotic resistances has posed a challenge in treating infections caused by this microorganism. In our study we postulated that P. aeruginosa-causing BSI in patients with hematologic malignancies is commonly resistant to antibiotics recommended in international guidelines. This observation is associated with frequent IEAT and increased mortality. Consequently, there is a need for a new therapeutic strategy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    铜绿假单胞菌(PA)是我国第二常见的医院获得性肺炎(HAP)革兰阴性菌(16.9%-22.0%)。PA在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)中的比例约为1.0%,而在严重CAP中增加到1.8%-8.3%。有PA感染史的患者中PA占CAP的67.0%,支气管扩张,非常严重的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或气管切开术。考虑到PA引起的下呼吸道感染(LRTIs)的高疾病负担,加上近年来在这一领域的进展,中国胸科学会肺部感染大会更新了《中国成人下呼吸道铜绿假单胞菌感染管理专家共识(2014版)》,专注于病原体检测,诊断,抗菌治疗,综合管理,感染预防和控制。PA引起急性和慢性LTRI。急性LRTIs主要包括肺炎(CAP,HAP和呼吸机相关性肺炎),气管支气管炎,肺脓肿和脓胸。慢性LTRI的诊断应基于对(1)潜在的慢性结构性肺疾病的综合评估,比如支气管扩张,囊性纤维化,COPD,(2)存在LRTIs的临床表现;(3)在1年内从合格的下呼吸道标本中检测到的PA≥2次(至少间隔3个月)。当从下呼吸道标本中分离出PA时,区分感染与定植很重要。药物敏感性试验是PA耐药性检测的常规方法,是靶向治疗的基础。当药物敏感性试验显示可用药物的活性有限时,联合药敏试验建议选择体外具有累加或协同作用的抗菌药物进行联合治疗。PA分离株抗性机制的快速检测,如碳青霉烯酶表型确认试验,如果有建议。建议不要常规检测抗性基因以选择治疗剂。对于病情危重或有PA感染高危因素的急性LRTIs患者,在采集标本进行微生物学试验后,应启动涵盖PA的经验性抗菌治疗.在非危重的疑似PA肺炎患者中,应选择具有高肺脏浓度的抗PA活性的单一抗菌药物进行经验性治疗。然而,对于患有严重疾病(如败血症)或具有多药耐药(MDR)PA危险因素的患者,应使用两种不同类型的抗微生物药物的组合,这两种药物都可能敏感。抗菌方案应遵循药代动力学/药效学原则,以确保足够的剂量和给药频率。对于已确认的PALRTI,应根据药物敏感性选择抗生素。在没有重大基础疾病的患者中,建议使用具有足够肺部浓度的活性抗菌药物的单一治疗,而不是联合治疗;当所有可用的活性剂的肺内浓度都较差时,联合治疗是必须的。对于耐碳青霉烯PA(CRPA)或难以治疗的耐药性PA(DTR-PA)引起的LRTI,如果是一种新的酶抑制剂,例如头孢特洛赞/他唑巴坦,头孢他啶/阿维巴坦,亚胺培南/西司他丁/来巴坦显示体外敏感性,建议将其作为一线治疗;头孢地洛可以作为二线治疗。也可以考虑基于多粘菌素的联合疗法。耐药PALRTI的其他潜在成功方法包括延长β-内酰胺的输注时间,联合治疗和吸入抗菌治疗。在患有潜在慢性结构性肺病的患者中,抗菌方案(药物,剂量,给药途径,和治疗持续时间)应根据临床特征决定,药物敏感性,和治疗目标(控制加剧的症状,根除新兴的PA,或预防频繁恶化的患者的突然发作)。除了抗菌治疗,包括气道清除治疗(ACT)在内的综合护理,氧疗,应提供营养支持和器官功能保护。从医院感染预防和控制的角度,除了标准预防措施外,建议隔离和预防接触传输以阻止PA传输。有针对性的主动筛查,及时监测和反馈有助于MDR-PA的预防和控制。不建议全身和局部使用预防性抗菌药物。食病病上食病病患和戒病病患是经上口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口声声口口口声声口口口口声声口口声声口声声口声声口声声口口
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is the second common Gram-negative bacterium for hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) in China (16.9%-22.0%). The proportion of PA in community acquired pneumonia (CAP) was about 1.0%, while increased to 1.8%-8.3% in severe CAP. PA accounted for 67.0% of CAP in patients with a history of PA infection, bronchiectasis, very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or tracheotomy. Considering the high disease burden of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) caused by PA, together with the progress in this field in recent years, the Pulmonary Infection Assembly of Chinese Thoracic Society updated the \"Chinese expert consensus on the management of lower respiratory tract infections of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in adults (2014 version)\", focusing on pathogen detection, diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, comprehensive management, infection prevention and control.PA causes both acute and chronic LTRIs. Acute LRTIs mainly include pneumonia (CAP, HAP and ventilator-associated pneumonia), tracheobronchitis, lung abscess and empyema. The diagnosis of chronic LTRIs should be based on a comprehensive assessment of (1) underlying chronic structural lung diseases, such as bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, COPD, or immunocompromised conditions; (2) the presence of clinical manifestations of LRTIs; and (3) ≥ two times (at least 3 months apart) of PA detected from eligible lower respiratory tract specimens within 1 year. It is important to distinguish infection from colonization when PA is isolated from lower respiratory tract specimens. Drug susceptibility test is a conventional method for PA resistance detection and serves as a basis for target therapy. When drug susceptibility test shows limited activity of available agents, combined susceptibility test is suggested to select antimicrobial drugs with additive or synergistic effect in vitro for combination therapy. Rapid test of resistance mechanisms of PA isolates, such as carbapenemase phenotype confirmation tests, is recommended if available. It is recommended not to routinely detect resistance genes for choosing therapeutic agents.For patients with acute LRTIs in critical condition or with high risk factors for PA infection, empirical antimicrobial therapy covering PA should be initiated after collecting specimens for microbiological tests. In patients with suspected PA pneumonia who are not critically ill, single antimicrobial drug of anti-PA activity with high lung concentration should be selected for empirical treatment. However, for patients with a serious condition such as sepsis or with risk factors for multidrug-resistant (MDR) PA, a combination of two different classes of antimicrobial drugs that are both potentially susceptible should be used. The antimicrobial regimen should follow pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics principles to ensure adequate dosage and administration frequency. For confirmed PA LRTIs, antibiotics should be selected based on drug sensitivity. In patients without significant underlying diseases, single therapy of an active antimicrobial with adequate pulmonary concentration is recommended rather than combination therapy; when all the available active agents have poor intrapulmonary concentrations, combination therapy is obligatory. For LRTIs caused by carbapenem-resistant PA (CRPA) or difficult-to-treat resistance PA (DTR-PA), if an agent of new enzyme inhibitor, such as ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam shows in vitro sensitivity, it is recommended as the first-line choice; cefiderocol may serve as the second-line treatment. Combination therapy based on polymyxins may also be considered. Other potentially successful approaches for drug-resistant PA LRTIs include extended infusion time of β-lactams, combination therapy and inhaled antimicrobial therapy.In patients with underlying chronic structural lung diseases, the antimicrobial regimen (drug, dosage, route of administration, and duration of therapy) should be decided according to clinical features, drug sensitivity, and treatment goals (control of exacerbated symptoms, eradication of new-emerging PA, or prevention of flare-ups in patients with frequent exacerbation).Along with antimicrobial therapy, comprehensive care including airway clearance therapy (ACT), oxygen therapy, nutritional support and organ function protection should be provided. From the perspective of nosocomial infection prevention and control, isolation and prophylaxis of contact transmission are recommended to block PA transmission in addition to standard prevention measures. Targeted active screening, timely monitoring and feedback can help the prevention and control of MDR-PA. The systemic and topical use of prophylactic antimicrobials is not recommended.
    铜绿假单胞菌是难治性下呼吸道感染最常见致病菌之一,由于其耐药严重和易形成生物被膜,特别是近10多年来碳青霉烯类耐药株的出现,使其治疗更为困难;同时新的治疗药物和治疗策略不断问世,有必要加以评估以指导临床合理应用。中华医学会呼吸病学分会感染学组在《铜绿假单胞菌下呼吸道感染诊治专家共识(2014年版)》的基础上进行更新,并以临床诊治和预防的思路和技术为重点,以期为临床医生规范化诊治铜绿假单胞菌下呼吸道感染提供切实可行的参考。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文的目的是回顾当前美国胸科学会(ATS)/美国传染病学会(IDSA)社区获得性肺炎(CAP)指南和2021ATS非流感呼吸道病毒指南中概述的诊断测试建议。
    CAP中革兰氏染色的诊断测试,下呼吸道和血液培养,除非确定为严重CAP或具有耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)或铜绿假单胞菌感染的危险因素,否则不建议常规使用链球菌和军团菌尿抗原。在社区病毒传播期间,流感病毒检测仍然是一个强烈推荐。另一项2021年ATS临床实践指南回顾了在疑似CAP的成年人中使用非流感病毒病原体进行分子检测,并建议在患有严重CAP和/或各种免疫受损疾病的住院患者中进行检测。
    诊断测试仍然是确认和治疗CAP的重要组成部分。CAP指南包括有关下呼吸道革兰氏染色和培养的诊断测试的建议,血培养,军团菌和肺炎球菌尿抗原,流感病毒检测和血清降钙素原。强烈建议在社区传播期间进行流感病毒检测。然而,使用其他诊断方法,如革兰氏染色,下呼吸道和血液培养,和尿抗原检测取决于疾病的严重程度以及是否已确定患者具有MRSA或铜绿假单胞菌感染的强危险因素。2021年ATS临床实践文件不建议常规测试非流感呼吸道病毒,除非确定具有严重的CAP和/或各种免疫受损条件。
    The purpose of this article is to review diagnostic testing recommendations outlined in the current American Thoracic Society (ATS)/Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) guideline and the 2021 ATS guideline for noninfluenza respiratory viruses.
    Diagnostic testing in CAP with gram stain, lower respiratory and blood cultures, Streptococcal and Legionella urinary antigens are not routinely recommended unless identified as severe CAP or with risk factors for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Influenza virus testing remains a strong recommendation during periods of community viral spread.An additional 2021 ATS clinical practice guideline reviewed the use of molecular testing for noninfluenza viral pathogens in adults with suspected CAP and recommended testing in those hospitalized with severe CAP and/or various immunocompromising conditions.
    Diagnostic testing remains an important component of confirming and treating CAP. The CAP guideline includes recommendations surrounding diagnostic testing with lower respiratory gram stain and culture, blood cultures, Legionella and Pneumococcal urinary antigen, influenza viral testing and serum procalcitonin.There is a strong recommendation to obtain influenza virus testing during periods of community spread. However, the use of other diagnostics such as gram stain, lower respiratory and blood culture, and urinary antigen testing are dependent on severity of illness and whether a patient has been identified as having strong risk factors for MRSA or P. aeruginosa infection. The 2021 ATS clinical practice document did not routinely recommend testing noninfluenza respiratory viruses unless identified as having severe CAP and/or various immunocompromising conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺炎指南建议对具有特定危险因素的患者进行经验性双重抗伪粒子治疗。然而,对于何时使用双重抗伪粒子治疗缺乏共识,因为建议被认为是弱的,基于低质量的证据。
    本研究的目的是开发组合抗生素以评估铜绿假单胞菌的敏感性(P.铜绿假单胞菌)在呼吸道培养中对经验性抗生素的组合使用,并使用组合抗菌图来描述指南推荐双重抗假单胞菌治疗的特定风险因素的影响。
    对2014年9月至2018年9月铜绿假单胞菌呼吸道培养阳性的肺炎住院成人进行了回顾性队列研究。收集的数据包括人口统计,抗菌药物敏感性结果,以及指南推荐双重抗伪粒子治疗的危险因素。开发了组合抗生素图,并进行了逻辑回归分析,以确定对β-内酰胺类药物不敏感的危险因素。
    纳入了八百十九名患者,72%接受了抗生素治疗。β-内酰胺的敏感性范围为58%至69%,并且添加氟喹诺酮或氨基糖苷导致敏感性的统计学显着增加。然而,仅添加妥布霉素或阿米卡星的敏感率接近或超过90%,按肺炎类型和危险因素分层。基于指南的风险因素的存在通常会导致易感性降低。Logistic回归分析确定了与β-内酰胺类药物不敏感相关的三个危险因素:前90天静脉注射抗生素,养老院住宅,和开始时的机械通气。每个额外风险因素的累积存在影响β-内酰胺敏感率,在没有任何风险因素的情况下为93%,当所有三个风险因素共存时为39%。
    肺炎需要双重抗伪粒子治疗的危险因素应进行局部验证。当需要双重抗伪粒子治疗时,妥布霉素或阿米卡星具有提供足够的体外活性的最佳可能性。
    Guidelines for pneumonia recommend empiric dual antipseudomonal therapy in patients with specific risk factors. However, there is lack of consensus on when to use dual antipseudomonal therapy as the recommendations are rated as weak, based on low-quality evidence.
    The objectives of this study were to develop combination antibiograms to assess the susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) in respiratory cultures to combinations of empiric antibiotics and to use combination antibiograms to delineate the impact of specific risk factors for which guidelines recommend dual antipseudomonal therapy.
    A retrospective cohort study was conducted of adults hospitalized with pneumonia with positive respiratory cultures for P. aeruginosa between September 2014 and September 2018. Data collected included demographics, antimicrobial susceptibility results, and risk factors for which guidelines recommend dual antipseudomonal therapy. Combination antibiograms were developed and logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for nonsusceptibility to beta-lactams.
    Eight hundred nineteen patients were included and 72% received antibiotics. Beta-lactam susceptibility ranged from 58% to 69% and addition of a fluoroquinolone or aminoglycoside resulted in statistically significant increases in susceptibility. However, only addition of tobramycin or amikacin provided susceptibility rates approaching or exceeding 90% stratified by pneumonia type and risk factors. Presence of guideline-based risk factors generally resulted in reduced susceptibility rates. Logistic regression identified three risk factors associated with nonsusceptibility to beta-lactams: intravenous antibiotics in the previous 90 days, nursing home residence, and mechanical ventilation at onset. The cumulative presence of each additional risk factor affected beta-lactam susceptibility rates, which were 93% in the absence of any risk factors and 39% when all three risk factors co-existed.
    Risk factors necessitating dual antipseudomonal therapy for pneumonia should be locally validated. When dual antipseudomonal therapy is indicated, tobramycin or amikacin have the best likelihood of providing adequate in vitro activity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:坏死性外耳炎是外耳道的进行性感染,其延伸影响颞骨和邻近结构。疾病进程的进展可导致严重的后遗症,包括脑神经麻痹和死亡.目前没有正式公布的治疗指南。
    目的:本研究旨在整合现有证据和我们自己的回顾性病例系列数据,以制定优化坏死性外耳炎患者管理的指南。
    方法:对NHSLothian内坏死性外耳炎病例的回顾性回顾,苏格兰,在2013年至2018年期间,以及PubMed评论。
    结果:普遍出现迹象,建立症状和患者人口统计学数据.此外,定义了与不良结局相关的病例特征.该指南的一个关键特征是定义初始强化治疗的高危患者。评估调查和结果,并适当调整治疗。
    结论:这种多部门方法促进了简洁,坏死性外耳道炎管理的系统指南。最初的患者结果似乎很有希望。
    BACKGROUND: Necrotising otitis externa is a progressive infection of the external auditory canal which extends to affect the temporal bone and adjacent structures. Progression of the disease process can result in serious sequelae, including cranial nerve palsies and death. There is currently no formal published treatment guideline.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to integrate current evidence and data from our own retrospective case series in order to develop a guideline to optimise necrotising otitis externa patient management.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of necrotising otitis externa cases within NHS Lothian, Scotland, between 2013 and 2018, was performed, along with a PubMed review.
    RESULTS: Prevalent presenting signs, symptoms and patient demographic data were established. Furthermore, features of cases associated with adverse outcomes were defined. A key feature of the guideline is defining at-risk patients with initial intensive treatment. Investigations and outcomes are assessed and treatment adjusted appropriately.
    CONCLUSIONS: This multi-departmental approach has facilitated the development of a succinct, systematic guideline for the management of necrotising otitis externa. Initial patient outcomes appear promising.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号