BACKGROUND: Mouse double minute-2 homolog (MDM2) plays a key role in downregulating p53 activity in hematologic malignancies, and its overexpression is associated with poor outcomes.
METHODS: This phase 1 study assessed the safety and efficacy of different dosing regimens of the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan as monotherapy and in combination with azacitidine (AZA) in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (monotherapy, n = 57; milademetan-AZA combination, n = 17) were treated. The maximum tolerated dose of milademetan was 160 mg once daily given for the first 14-21 days of 28-day cycles as monotherapy and on Days 5-14 in combination with AZA. Dose-limiting toxicities were gastrointestinal, fatigue, or renal/electrolyte abnormalities. Treatment-emergent adverse events related to milademetan occurred in 82.5% and 64.7% of participants in the monotherapy and AZA combination arms, respectively. Two participants (4.2%) in the monotherapy arm achieved complete remission (CR), and 1 (2.1%) achieved CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). Two participants (13.3%) achieved CRi in the combination arm. New TP53 mutations, detected only during milademetan monotherapy, were found pre-existing below standard detection frequency by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Milademetan was relatively well tolerated in this population; however, despite signals of activity, clinical efficacy was minimal.

OBJECTIVE: Classification of renal neoplasms on small tissue biopsies is in increasing demand, and maintaining broad differential diagnostic considerations in this setting is necessary. When evaluating a renal or perirenal tumour biopsy with sarcomatoid morphology, together with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma and sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma as top diagnostic considerations, it is vital to additionally consider the possibility of well-differentiated and de-differentiated liposarcoma.
RESULTS: This study reports a series of 30 biopsy samples from sites in or around the kidney collected from four institutions in which the correct diagnosis was either well-differentiated or de-differentiated liposarcoma. The majority (26 of 30, 87%) of lesions were accurately diagnosed on biopsy sampling, all of which incorporated testing for MDM2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) or a combination of the two as part of the diagnostic work-up. Tumour expression of MDM2 by IHC without confirmatory FISH analysis was sometimes (30%) sufficient to reach a diagnosis, but demonstration of MDM2 amplification by FISH was ascertained in the majority (57%) of biopsy samples. A diagnosis of de-differentiated liposarcoma was not definitively established until resection in four (13%) patients, as no MDM2 testing was performed on the corresponding pre-operative biopsies.
CONCLUSIONS: When a retroperitoneal tumour is not clinically suspected, histological consideration of a liposarcoma diagnosis may be overlooked. Implementation of ancillary immunohistochemical and cytogenetic testing can ultimately lead to a definitive diagnosis in this potentially misleading anatomical location.

BACKGROUND: Dedifferentiation occurs in approximately 10% of atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas (ALT/WDLPS), primarily in retroperitoneal or deep-seated tumors, conferring metastatic potential. Superficial dedifferentiated liposarcoma (sDDLPS) is rare, and its progression and natural history are poorly documented.
METHODS: We performed a 15-year retrospective review of our pathology database to identify cases of DDLPS in the skin or subcutaneous tissue. Diagnosis of primary sDDLPS required evidence of non-lipogenic sarcoma in the skin or subcutis, with concurrent ALT/WDLPS and/or MDM2 amplification.
RESULTS: We identified 14 cases of DDLPS involving skin or subcutis: 7 primary sDDLPS and 7 secondary lesions (3 from recurrent deep DDLPS and 4 from metastasis). Primary sDDLPS cases (4 females, 3 males; median age: 74) mainly presented as undifferentiated spindle cell or pleomorphic sarcoma. Tumor grades were grade 2 (5 cases) and grade 3 (2 cases), with three cases also showing grade 1 areas. MDM2 amplification was confirmed in 6 sDDLPSs for which FISH was successfully performed. Follow-up available for 6 sDDLPS patients showed 2 local recurrences, treated with re-excision and radiation therapy, with all disease-free at last follow-up (5-126 months). Of the 7 secondary cases, 2 had ongoing disease after multiple recurrences, 1 was disease-free, and all 4 with cutaneous metastasis died of disease (follow-up range: 24-263 months).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the importance of distinguishing between primary sDDLPS and secondary lesions due to their distinct prognoses. Metastasis or superficial extensions from deep DDLP correlate with a considerably worse prognosis than those originating in superficial tissues.

Mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) is a key negative regulator of the tumor suppressor p53. Blocking the MDM2-p53 interaction, and restoring p53 function, is therefore a potential therapeutic strategy in MDM2-amplified, TP53 wild-type tumors. MDM2 is amplified in several tumor types, including biliary tract cancer (BTC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), lung adenocarcinoma and bladder cancer, all of which have limited treatment options and poor patient outcomes. Brigimadlin (BI 907828) is a highly potent MDM2-p53 antagonist that has shown promising activity in preclinical and early-phase clinical studies. This manuscript describes the rationale and design of an ongoing phase IIa/IIb Brightline-2 trial evaluating brigimadlin as second-line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic BTC, PDAC, lung adenocarcinoma, or bladder cancer.
Brightline-2: a phase IIa/IIb trial of brigimadlin (BI 907828) in advanced BTC, PDAC, or other solid tumorsIn some types of cancer, including cancers of the bile duct, pancreas, bladder and lung, the number of copies of a gene called MDM2 is abnormally increased (MDM2 amplification). MDM2 usually regulates p53, a protein that stops cancer cells from growing uncontrollably. When MDM2 is amplified, the cell makes too much of the MDM2 protein, which prevents p53 from stopping cancer growth. Blocking the interaction between MDM2 and p53 may allow p53 to do its job again and stop cancer cells from growing.Brightline-2 is a clinical trial that is currently in progress. This trial is assessing the efficacy and safety of an investigational drug, brigimadlin (or BI 907828), in patients with selected advanced or metastatic cancers. To be included, patients must have advanced biliary tract cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, bladder cancer, or lung adenocarcinoma. The tumor must show amplification of MDM2 when tested by a laboratory. Patients will take a 45 mg tablet of brigimadlin by mouth, once every 3 weeks. In this trial, researchers are investigating the ability of the drug to shrink tumors, the side effects of the drug, and the impact of the drug on a patients\' quality of life.The goal of this trial is to assess the potential of brigimadlin as a new treatment option for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, bladder cancer, or lung adenocarcinoma.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05512377 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

The current criteria for utilizing MDM2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) in adipose-derived tumors were first introduced in 2015 and have been widely adopted. However, these criteria may fail to identify some atypical lipomatous tumors / well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDL) with mature adipocytic morphology in clinical practice, possibly due to the fact that the existing criteria are primarily based on biopsy cases. Hence, a criterion based on resection cases is needed. In this study, we included 87 adipose tissue tumors with mature adipocytic morphology which were first resected, as well as 9 consultation cases and 25 recurrent resection cases. The final diagnosis was based on MDM2 amplification status. Among the 87 first-time resection cohort, MDM2 FISH amplification was observed in only 2 (5%) of the 39 superficial cases. Marginal infiltration was significantly different in both the MDM2 FISH negative and positive groups (p < 0.05). Of the 37 intramuscular tumors, 17 (46%) showed MDM2 FISH amplification. The MDM2 amplification positive group had a larger tumor size than MDM2 amplification negative group (p = 0.042). Tumors of larger size (≥11 cm) were highly correlated with MDM2 amplification (p = 0.003), but still, 35.3% of the MDM2 amplification-positive cases had tumor sizes less than 11 cm. Eight (66.7%) out of twelve retroperitoneal/ pelvic cases were MDM2 FISH positive. Among the 25 recurrent cases, twenty (80%) of them had MDM2 FISH amplification. In conclusion, we recommend MDM2 FISH for: 1. superficial cases with marginal infiltration based on adequate margin sampling; 2. all intramuscular tumors, retroperitoneal/pelvic tumors and recurrent tumors, both in resection cases and biopsy cases.

Leiomyosarcoma with adipocytic differentiation or lipoleiomyosarcoma is an uncommon sarcoma of the female genital tract with only a few individual reports in the literature. We therefore performed a morphologic, immunohistochemical, MDM2 gene amplification and RNA and DNA sequencing analysis of a series of gynecologic lipoleiomyosarcoma to better define the clinicopathologic spectrum. Six tumors from 6 patients were identified and classified as spindled lipoleiomyosarcoma (n = 2), mixed spindled and myxoid lipoleiomyosarcoma (n = 1), epithelioid lipoleiomyosarcoma with focal myxoid features (n = 1) and mixed spindled and epithelioid lipoleiomyosarcoma (n = 2). Patient age ranged from 41 to 64 years (mean: 49; median: 50). Primary location included uterine corpus (3), uterine corpus/cervix (2) and broad ligament (1). Tumor size ranged from 4.5 to 22 cm (mean: 11.2; median: 9.8). Four patients had metastasis at presentation or subsequently developed recurrent or distant disease. Patient status was known for 5: 2 dead of disease, 2 alive with disease and 1 alive without evidence of disease. Immunohistochemical expression of smooth muscle markers, ER, PR and WT-1 showed patterns similar to non-adipocytic gynecologic leiomyosarcomas. MDM2 amplification fluorescence in situ hybridization performed on 2 tumors was negative in 1 and equivocal in 1. Sequencing studies performed on 3 tumors found TP53 mutations in 3, with 1 tumor also having an ATRX alteration. No gene fusions were identified. Although lipoleiomyosarcomas have a diverse morphologic spectrum, our findings suggest the smooth muscle component shares morphologic and immunohistochemical features with female genital tract non-adipocytic leiomyosarcomas. Lipoleiomyosarcomas also have genetic alterations associated with non-adipocytic gynecologic leiomyosarcomas.

Leiomyomas with adipocytic differentiation typically occur in the uterus although they may arise at several sites in the female genital tract. While these are most commonly spindled leiomyomas with a component of adipocytic tissue (\"conventional lipoleiomyomas\"), there is a relatively ill-defined assortment of leiomyoma variants with adipocytic differentiation. We performed a morphologic, immunohistochemical and MDM2 gene amplification analysis of a large series of gynecologic leiomyomas with adipocytic differentiation to better define the clinicopathologic spectrum. Forty four tumors from 44 patients were identified and classified as conventional lipoleiomyoma (n = 21), adipocyte-rich lipoleiomyoma (defined as tumor volume >80 % adipocytes, n = 9); cellular lipoleiomyoma (n = 9); hydropic lipoleiomyoma (n = 3); and lipoleiomyoma with bizarre nuclei (n = 2). Patient age ranged from 32 to 83 years (mean 63; median 63). Primary location included uterine corpus (35), uterine cervix (3), uterine corpus/cervix (1), broad ligament (2), parametrium (2), and round ligament (1). Tumor size was 0.6-30 cm (mean 8; median 6). None of the 34 patients with follow up developed further disease (range 1-311 months; mean 65; median 41). Immunohistochemical expression of ER, PR, HMB45, Melan A, Cathepsin K and WT-1 in lipoleiomyomas and variants was similar to patterns in non-adipocytic gynecologic leiomyomas. MDM2 amplification fluorescence in situ hybridization performed on 14 tumors was negative in all. Our findings suggest female genital tract conventional lipoleiomyomas and lipoleiomyoma variants largely parallel their non-adipocytic counterparts in morphology and immunophenotype, and may be categorized using non-adipocytic leiomyoma histologic criteria.

In this study, we present six cases of epithelioid dedifferentiated liposarcoma to further characterize its clinical and pathological features. The patients are all adult men with age at presentation ranging from 46 to 64 years (median 58.5 years). The patients presented with nonspecific symptoms of retroperitoneal mass, intermittent dull pain or discomfort. None of the patients had any prior history of a primary tumor. Radiological examinations revealed the presence of ill-demarcated heterogenous mass located in the deep soft tissue, including retroperitoneum (4 cases), pelvis and trunk (1 case each). Grossly, they appeared as solid tumors with focal areas of necrosis being presented in 2 cases. Histologically, all tumors were characterized by sheets of epithelioid cells that displayed marked cellular atypia and brisk mitotic activity. Variable portion of atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma was present in 3 cases. By immunohistochemistry, the high-grade epithelioid component in all 6 cases showed strong and diffuse nuclear staining of MDM2, CDK4 and P16, with partial expression of AE1/AE3 in 3 cases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed high-level amplification of MDM2 in all 6 cases, with co-amplification of CDK4 in 3 cases. Follow up information showed that two patients died of the disease within one year despite multidisciplinary treatment. Due to the striking epithelioid appearance, this rare variant of dedifferentiated liposarcoma may be confused with undifferentiated epithelioid sarcoma, poorly differentiated carcinoma, mesothelioma or other malignancies with epithelioid phenotype. The study presented herein further highlights the aggressive clinical behavior of this unique tumor type. For patients with advanced disease, CDK4 inhibitor may provide an optional targeted treatment.

Primary cardiac sarcomas are rare and their clinicopathologic features are heterogeneous. Among them, particularly intimal sarcoma is a diagnostic challenge due to nonspecific histologic features. Recently, MDM2 amplification reported to be a characteristic genetic event in the intimal sarcoma. In this study, we aimed to identify the types and incidence of primary cardiac sarcomas that occurred over 25 years in tertiary medical institutions, and to find clinicopatholgical significance through reclassification of diagnoses using additional immunohistochemistry (IHC).
We reviewed the primary cardiac sarcoma cases between January 1993 and June 2018 at Asan Medical Center, South Korea, with their clinicopathologic findings, and reclassified the subtypes, especially using IHC for MDM2 and then, analyzed the significance of prognosis.
Forty-eight (6.8%) cases of a primary cardiac sarcoma were retrieved. The tumors most frequently involved the right atrium (n = 25, 52.1%), and the most frequent tumor subtype was angiosarcoma (n = 23, 47.9%). Seven cases (53.8%) were newly reclassified as an intimal sarcoma by IHC for MDM2. Twenty-nine (60.4%) patients died of disease (mean, 19.8 months). Four patients underwent a heart transplantation and had a median survival of 26.8 months. This transplantation group tended to show good clinical outcomes in the earlier stages, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.318). MDM2 positive intimal sarcoma showed the better overall survival (p = 0.003) than undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Adjuvant treatment is beneficial for patient survival (p < 0.001), particularly in angiosarcoma (p < 0.001), but not in intimal sarcoma (p = 0.154).
Our study supports the use of adjuvant treatment in primary cardiac sarcoma, as it was associated with a significantly better overall survival rate. Further consideration of tumor histology may be important in determining the optimal use of adjuvant treatment for different types of sarcomas. Therefore, accurate diagnosis by MDM2 test is important condsidering patient\'s prognosis and treatment.

Intimal sarcoma is an extremely rare, life-threatening malignant neoplasm. Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) amplification is observed in >70% of intimal sarcomas. Milademetan, an MDM2 inhibitor, may provide clinical benefit in this patient population. We conducted a phase Ib/II study in patients with MDM2-amplified, wild-type TP53 intimal sarcoma as a substudy of a large nationwide registry for rare cancers in Japan. Milademetan (260 mg) was administered orally once daily for 3 days every 14 days, twice in a 28-day cycle. Of 11 patients enrolled, 10 were included in the efficacy analysis. Two patients (20%) showed durable responses for >15 months. Antitumor activity correlated with TWIST1 amplification (P = 0.028) and negatively with CDKN2A loss (P = 0.071). Acquired TP53 mutations were detected in sequential liquid biopsies as a novel exploratory resistance mechanism to milademetan. These results suggest that milademetan could be a potential therapeutic strategy for intimal sarcoma.
Strategies to optimize outcomes could include the use of new biomarkers (TWIST1 amplification and CDKN2A loss) to select patients with MDM2-amplified intimal sarcoma who might benefit from milademetan and combination with other targeted treatments. Sequential liquid biopsy of TP53 can be used to evaluate disease status during treatment with milademetan. See related commentary by Italiano, p. 1765. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1749.