Prophylactic cranial irradiation

预防性颅骨照射
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是恶性程度最高、病死率最高的肺癌病理类型,脑转移(BM)的发生率很高。到目前为止,预防性颅脑照射(PCI)已被认为是预防SCLC脑转移的有效治疗方法.PCI作为标准治疗方法长期应用于放疗和化疗后完全缓解的局限期SCLC(LS-SCLC)患者。然而,神经认知功能下降是PCI的主要关注点.针对PCI诱导的神经毒性的新治疗方法,包括海马保护或美金刚,已越来越多地纳入PCI的治疗干预措施。螺旋断层治疗,RapidArc,建议使用带有头部倾斜基板的体积调节电弧疗法(VMAT)进行海马保护。此外,在MRI和免疫治疗时代,PCI在SCLC患者中的意义存在争议.SCLCPCI患者应在临床试验中招募,因为这是改善现有护理标准的唯一方法。本文总结了SCLCPCI的当前治疗策略和困境。为临床决策提供理论依据,为PCI在临床的实践提供建议。
    Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most malignant pathological type of lung cancer with the highest mortality, and the incidence of brain metastasis (BM) is in high frequency. So far, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been suggested as an effective treatment for preventing brain metastasis of SCLC. PCI has long been applied to limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC) patients who have achieved complete remission after radiotherapy and chemotherapy as a standard treatment. However, the neurocognitive decline is a major concern surrounding PCI. New therapeutic approaches targeting PCI-induced neurotoxicity, including hippocampal protection or memantine, have been increasingly incorporated into the therapeutic interventions of PCI. Helical tomotherapy, RapidArc, and Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a head-tilting baseplate are recommended for hippocampal protection. Besides, in the MRI and immunotherapy era, the significance of PCI in SCLC patients is controversial. SCLC patients with PCI should be recruited in clinical trials since this is the only way to improve the existing standard of care. This review summarizes the current therapeutic strategy and dilemma over PCI for SCLC, providing a theoretical basis for clinical decision-making and suggestions for PCI practice in clinical.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对脑转移瘤(BMs)需要预防性头颅放疗(PCI)或全脑放疗(WBRT)的患者,海马回避(HA)已被证明可以保护神经认知功能和生活质量。这里,我们的目的是评估海马和海马周围BMs的发生率以及随后在接受海马保留放疗的患者中局部治疗不足的风险.
    方法:MEDLINE,Embase,和Scopus用“海马”“脑肿瘤”,和相关术语。包括关于PCI或WBRT后海马和/或海马周围BMs发生率或海马失败率的试验报告。
    结果:包括40条记录,涵盖总共5,374名患者,超过32,570名BMs。大多数试验采用5毫米的边缘来定义HA区。在报告BM发病率的试验中,4.4%(范围0-27%)和9.2%(3-41%)的患者有海马和海马周围的BMs,分别。海马BMs最常见的危险因素是BMs的总数。HA-PCI或HA-WBRT后HA区内报告的失败率为4.5%(0-13%),在大多数情况下,放射外科是可以挽救的。SCLC组织学与海马衰竭的高风险无关(OR=2.49;p=0.23)。在与常规(非HA)PCI或WBRT组比较的试验中,HA并不增加海马失败率(OR=1.90;p=0.17)。
    结论:海马和海马周围BMs的总体发生率相当低,随后HA-PCI或HA-WBRT后局部治疗不足的风险较低。在没有参与的患者中,海马体应幸免,以保持神经认知功能和生活质量。
    In patients requiring prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs), hippocampal avoidance (HA) has been shown to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life. Here, we aim to estimate the incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs and the subsequent risk of local undertreatment in patients undergoing hippocampal sparing radiotherapy.
    MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched with the terms \"Hippocampus\", \"Brain Neoplasms\", and related terms. Trials reporting on the incidence of hippocampal and/or perihippocampal BMs or hippocampal failure rate after PCI or WBRT were included.
    Forty records were included, encompassing a total of 5,374 patients with over 32,570 BMs. Most trials employed a 5 mm margin to define the HA zone. In trials reporting on BM incidence, 4.4 % (range 0 - 27 %) and 9.2 % (3 - 41 %) of patients had hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs, respectively. The most common risk factor for hippocampal BMs was the total number of BMs. The reported failure rate within the HA zone after HA-PCI or HA-WBRT was 4.5 % (0 - 13 %), salvageable with radiosurgery in most cases. SCLC histology was not associated with a higher risk of hippocampal failure (OR = 2.49; p = 0.23). In trials comparing with a conventional (non-HA) PCI or WBRT group, HA did not increase the hippocampal failure rate (OR = 1.90; p = 0.17).
    The overall incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs is considerably low, with a subsequent low risk of local undertreatment following HA-PCI or HA-WBRT. In patients without involvement, the hippocampus should be spared to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者脑转移的风险很高。建议在该人群中进行预防性颅骨照射(PCI),以减少脑转移的发生率并延长生存期。我们旨在评估常规脑成像时代PCI在该人群中的疗效。据我们所知,这是首次系统评价和荟萃分析,目的是研究在完成一线治疗后经影像学检查证实未发生脑转移的患者中的使用情况.
    在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,在EMBASE中确定了对SCLC患者使用PCI的队列研究和对照试验,MEDLINE,中部,和灰色文献来源。文献检索于2023年11月12日进行。提取汇总数据。随机效应荟萃分析了PCI和无干预组之间总生存期的主要结局的风险比(HR)。这项研究在开放科学框架中注册,DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/BC359和PROSPERO,CRD42021249466。
    在确定的4318条记录中,223人有资格入选。109例报告了符合荟萃分析格式的总生存率;PCI与所有SCLC患者的生存期更长相关(HR0.59;95%CI,0.55-0.63;p<0.001;n=56,770例),局限期疾病患者(HR0.60;95%CI,0.55-0.65;p<0.001;n=78项研究;n=27,137例患者),和广泛期疾病患者(HR0.59;95%CI,0.51-0.70;p<0.001;n=28项研究;n=26,467例)。在所有研究中汇总时,研究之间的异质性是显着的(I2=73.6%;95%CI68.4%-77.9%)。亚组分析没有揭示异质性的来源。在对使用磁共振成像来排除所有患者在重诊时脑转移的研究的亚组分析中,接受或未接受PCI的患者的总生存期无显著差异(HR0.74;95%CI,0.52-1.05;p=0.08;n=9项研究;n=1384例).
    我们的研究结果表明,PCI治疗与生存获益相关,但当考虑到影像学证实没有脑转移的研究时,提示PCI带来的生存获益可能是治疗性的,而非预防性的.
    没有资金。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are at high risk for brain metastases. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is recommended in this population to reduce the incidence of brain metastases and prolong survival. We aimed to assesses the efficacy of PCI in this population in the era of routine brain imaging. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the use among patients who were radiographically confirmed not to have brain metastases after completion of first-line therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, cohort studies and controlled trials reporting on the use of PCI for patients SCLC were identified in EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and grey literature sources. The literature search was conducted on November 12, 2023. Summary data were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled hazard ratios (HR) for the primary outcome of overall survival between PCI and no intervention groups. This study is registered with the Open Science Framework, DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/BC359, and PROSPERO, CRD42021249466.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 4318 identified records, 223 were eligible for inclusion. 109 reported on overall survival in formats amenable to meta-analysis; PCI was associated with longer survival in all patients with SCLC (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.55-0.63; p < 0.001; n = 56,770 patients), patients with limited stage disease (HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.55-0.65; p < 0.001; n = 78 studies; n = 27,137 patients), and patients with extensive stage disease (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.51-0.70; p < 0.001; n = 28 studies; n = 26,467 patients). Between-study heterogeneity was significant when pooled amongst all studies (I2 = 73.6%; 95% CI 68.4%-77.9%). Subgroup analysis did not reveal sources of heterogeneity. In a subgroup analysis on studies that used magnetic resonance imaging to exclude presence of brain metastases at restaging among all patients, overall survival did not differ significantly between patients who did or did not receive PCI (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.52-1.05; p = 0.08; n = 9 studies; n = 1384 patients).
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggested that administration of PCI is associated with a survival benefit, but not when considering studies that radiographically confirmed absence of brain metastases, suggesting that the survival benefit conferred by PCI might be therapeutic rather than prophylactic.
    UNASSIGNED: No funding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    避免海马的颅骨放射治疗(HA-CRT)在神经认知功能(NCF)中的作用,脑转移瘤(BM),肺癌的总生存期(OS)尚不清楚。
    进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估HA-CRT对肺癌的影响。收集了有关避免海马预防性颅骨照射(HA-PCI)和全脑放射治疗(HA-WBRT)的研究数据。
    共14项研究,包括5项随机对照试验,包括在内。NCF的重点主要是通过霍普金斯言语学习测试修订或自由和提示选择性提醒测试。放疗后6个月,总召回表现下降的参与者的总比例,延迟召回,神经认知测试中的歧视为0.22(95%CI0.15,0.29),0.20(95%CI0.13,0.27),和0.14(95%CI0.05,0.24)。12个月后,比例为0.16(95%CI0.08,0.23),0.10(95%CI0.04,0.16),和0.04(95%CI0,0.09)。对于HA区复发,HA-CRT与CRT的RR为2.72(95%CI0.53,13.87),对于2年的BM,为1.20(95%CI0.82,1.75)。关于SCLC中的HA-PCI,1年BM率为0.12(95%CI0.07,0.17),2年BM率为0.20(95%CI0.16,0.25)。对于使用BM的NSCLC中的HA-WBRT,2年颅内进展率为0.38(95%CI0.13,0.62).HA-CRT和CRT在OS上无显著差别。
    HA-CRT在肺癌中似乎是安全的,但它可能不会超过传统的CRT。比较HA-CRT和CRT的更大的随机对照试验是有必要的。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022360890,标识符CRD42022360890。
    UNASSIGNED: The role of cranial radiation therapy with hippocampus avoidance (HA-CRT) in neurocognitive function (NCF), brain metastasis (BM), and overall survival (OS) in lung cancer remains unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of HA-CRT in lung cancer. Data from studies on hippocampal-avoidance prophylactic cranial irradiation (HA-PCI) and whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) were pooled.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 14 studies, including 5 randomized controlled trials, were included. The focus of NCF was mainly via the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised or the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test. At 6 months post-radiotherapy, the pooled proportion of participants with decline in the performance of total recall, delayed recall, and discrimination in neurocognitive tests were 0.22 (95% CI 0.15, 0.29), 0.20 (95% CI 0.13, 0.27), and 0.14 (95% CI 0.05, 0.24) respectively. After 12 months, the proportion were 0.16 (95% CI 0.08, 0.23), 0.10 (95% CI 0.04, 0.16), and 0.04 (95% CI 0, 0.09) respectively. For HA zone relapse, the RR of HA-CRT versus CRT was 2.72 (95% CI 0.53, 13.87), and for 2-year BM, it was 1.20 (95% CI 0.82, 1.75). Regarding HA-PCI in SCLC, the 1-year BM rate was 0.12 (95% CI 0.07, 0.17), and the 2-year BM rate was 0.20 (95% CI 0.16, 0.25). For HA-WBRT in NSCLC with BM, the 2-year intracranial progression rate was 0.38 (95% CI 0.13, 0.62). There was no significant difference in OS between HA-CRT and CRT.
    UNASSIGNED: HA-CRT appears to be safe in lung cancer, but it may not outperform conventional CRT. Larger RCTs comparing HA-CRT and CRT are warranted.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022360890, identifier CRD42022360890.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:预防性头颅照射(PCI)是小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者的辅助治疗选择。然而,其疗效和相关危险因素尚未明确定义.在这项研究中,作者旨在系统评估PCI在SCLC治疗计划中的有效性和作用.
    方法:PubMed,Scopus,WebofScience,和Cochrane数据库使用以下关键术语及其等价物进行搜索:“大脑,“\”放射治疗,“\”转移,“预防”,“和”小细胞肺癌。“比较总生存期(OS)的研究,无进展生存期(PFS),无脑转移生存率(BMFS),接受PCI和未接受PCI的患者之间的脑转移发生率被认为是合格的.使用非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具评估偏倚风险。对上述结果进行Meta分析,并根据不同因素进行分组。
    结果:作者确定了1983年至2022年间发表的74项研究,其中31,551例SCLC患者,其中26.7%接受PCI。这些研究是前瞻性随机和回顾性观察研究的混合。接受PCI治疗的局限期疾病患者的OS较好,PFS,和BMFS比那些没有接受PCI。接受PCI的患者的OS时间也明显更长,并且发生脑转移的时间明显晚。然而,关于广泛期SCLC的研究结果并不乐观.
    结论:PCI是局限期SCLC患者的有效选择。它改进了OS和PFS,延迟脑转移,并降低脑转移的发生率。然而,在MRI监测的充分随访下,它可能不会使广泛期SCLC患者受益.最后,纳入研究的异质性和发表偏倚是本研究的主要局限性.
    Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is a companion treatment option for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. However, its efficacy and associated risk factors have not been clearly defined. In this study, the authors aimed to systematically assess the effectiveness and role of PCI in the treatment plan of SCLC.
    The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched using the following key terms and their equivalents: \"brain,\" \"radiotherapy,\" \"metastases,\" \"prophylactic,\" and \"small cell lung cancer.\" Studies comparing overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), and incidence of brain metastases between patients receiving PCI and those not receiving it were considered eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Meta-analysis was conducted on the mentioned outcomes with subgrouping based on different factors.
    The authors identified 74 studies published between 1983 and 2022 with 31,551 SCLC patients, of whom 26.7% received PCI. The studies were a mix of prospective randomized and retrospective observational studies. Patients with limited-stage disease receiving PCI had better OS, PFS, and BMFS than those not receiving PCI. Patients receiving PCI also had significantly longer OS times and developed brain metastases significantly later. However, findings regarding extensive-stage SCLC were not as promising.
    PCI is an effective option for limited-stage SCLC patients. It improves OS and PFS, delays brain metastases, and reduces the incidence of brain metastases. However, it might not benefit patients with extensive-stage SCLC under adequate follow-up with MRI surveillance. Finally, the heterogeneity of the included studies and publication bias were the main limitations of this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    在患有局限期小细胞肺癌(LS-SCLC)的患者中使用预防性颅骨照射(PCI)在现代脑磁共振成像(MRI)分期中仍然存在争议。为此,我们在此进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以调查这些患者的总生存期(OS).
    对PubMed和EMBASE数据库的相关研究进行了综述,并使用固定效应模型获得集合危险风险。使用了PRISMA2020清单。
    确定了15项回顾性研究,共有2,797例LS-SCLC患者纳入分析,其中1,391人接受了PCI。对于所有纳入的患者,PCI与OS改善相关[风险比(HR):0.64,95%置信区间(CI):0.58-0.70]。亚组分析和敏感性分析相结合,提示PCI对OS的影响独立于原发肿瘤治疗,完全反应比例(CR),中位年龄,PCI剂量,出版年,等。此外,重建了8项研究中1,588例接受胸部放疗(TRT)作为主要肿瘤治疗的患者的OS曲线,和汇集的2-,局限期患者的3年和5年OS率为59%,而非42%,42%vs.29%和26%与PCI组和非PCI组的19%(HR:0.69,95%CI:0.61-0.77),分别。从2项研究中重建的339例接受根治性手术作为原发肿瘤治疗的患者的OS曲线显示出更好的结果。和汇集的2-,PCI组和非PCI组的3年和5年OS率分别为85%和85%。71%,70%vs.56%和52%vs.39%(HR:0.59,95%CI:0.40-0.87),分别。
    这项荟萃分析表明,在现代预处理MRI分期中,PCI对LS-SCLC患者的OS具有显着的有益作用。然而,考虑到大多数纳入研究的对照组没有指南建议的严格的脑MRI随访,PCI相对于无PCI加脑MRI监测的治疗策略的优越性尚不清楚.
    UNASSIGNED: The use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients suffering from limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) remains controversial in modern brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging. To this end, a systematic review with meta-analysis was hereby performed to investigate the overall survival (OS) in these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Relevant studies from the PubMed and EMBASE databases were reviewed, and pooled hazard risks were obtained using fixed-effects models. The PRISMA 2020 checklist was used.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifteen retrospective studies were identified, with a total of 2,797 patients with LS-SCLC included in the analysis, 1,391 of which had received PCI. For all included patients, PCI was associated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58-0.70]. The combination of subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis suggested that the effect of PCI on OS was independent of primary tumor treatment, proportion of complete response (CR), median age, PCI dose, publication years, etc. Additionally, the OS curve of 1,588 patients having undergone thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) as the primary tumor treatment from 8 studies were reconstructed, and the pooled 2-, 3- and 5-year OS rates of limited stage patients were 59% vs. 42%, 42% vs. 29% and 26% vs. 19% (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.61-0.77) in the PCI group and the no PCI group, respectively. Another reconstructed OS curve of 339 patients having undergone radical surgery as the primary tumor treatment from 2 studies presented better results, and the pooled 2-, 3- and 5-year OS rates of in the PCI group and the no PCI group were 85% vs. 71%, 70% vs. 56% and 52% vs. 39% (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.40-0.87), respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis demonstrates a significant beneficial effect of PCI on the OS in patients with LS-SCLC in modern pretreatment MRI staging. However, considering the absence of a strict follow-up of brain MRI recommended by the guideline for the control group from most of the included studies, the superiority of PCI to the treatment strategy of no PCI plus brain MRI surveillance remains unclear.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) reduces brain metastasis incidence in lung cancer, however with risk of neurocognitive decline. Nevertheless, risk factors for neurocognitive decline after PCI remain unclear.
    METHODS: We systematically reviewed the PubMed database according to the PRISMA guideline. Inclusion criteria were: randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational/single arm trials evaluating PCI, including ≥20 patients, reporting neurocognitive test results for lung cancer. Primary aim: evaluate risk factors associated with neurocognitive decline after PCI.
    RESULTS: Twenty records were eligible (8 different RCTs, 8 observational studies), including 3553 patients in total (858 NSCLC, 2695 SCLC) of which 73.6% received PCI. Incidence of mild/moderate cognitive decline after PCI varied from 8 to 89% (grading not always provided); for those without PCI, this was 3.4-42%. Interestingly, 23-95% had baseline cognitive impairment. Risk factors were often not reported. In one trial, both age (>60 years) and higher PCI dose (36 Gy) including twice-daily PCI were associated with a higher risk of cognitive decline. In one trial, white matter abnormalities were more frequent in the concurrent or sandwiched PCI arm, but without significant neuropsychological differences. One trial identified hippocampal sparing PCI to limit the neurocognitive toxicities of PCI and another reported an association between hippocampal dose volume effects and memory decline. As neurocognition was a secondary endpoint in most RCTs, and was assessed by various instruments with often poor/moderate compliance, high-quality data is lacking.
    CONCLUSIONS: Age, PCI dose, regimen and timing might be associated with cognitive impairment after PCI in lung cancer patients, but high-quality data is lacking. Future PCI trials should collect and evaluate possible risk factors systematically.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:本研究的目的是根据最新发表的数据重新评估预防性颅骨照射(PCI)在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的疗效,并确定可能更有可能从PCI中受益的亚组。方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,和Cochrane数据库用于比较NSCLC患者PCI和非PCI的随机试验。我们汇集了随机对照试验的数据,并比较了PCI组和非PCI组之间的脑转移(BM)和总生存期(OS)。结果:包括1,462例患者在内的7项研究符合当前的荟萃分析。与非PCI组相比,PCI组BM下降(RR=0.37,95%CI:0.26-0.52),但OS相似(HR=1.01,95%CI:0.87-1.22)。在BM的亚组分析中,通过病理学(鳞状细胞癌或非鳞状细胞癌)和局部治疗方式(手术或不手术),PCI减少了亚组的BM。然而,对于表现状况较差的患者,PCI未能降低BM(WHO2-3)。PCI相关毒性的发生率较低,大多数NSCLC患者对PCI的耐受性良好。在NAVLT研究中报告了低度神经认知功能(NCF)下降,在RTOG0214中报告了即时和延迟回忆的更大恶化。PCI术后生活质量(QOL)无显著差异。结论:PCI降低了BM的发生率,除了表现状况较差的患者。然而,PCI不能显著延长NSCLC的OS。个体患者数据荟萃分析可以识别可以通过PCI实现OS延长的患者。
    Background: The purpose of this study was to reevaluate the efficacy of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the most recent published data and to identify subgroups who may be more likely to gain benefit from PCI. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized trials comparing PCI with non-PCI in NSCLC patients. We pooled the data of randomized controlled trials and compared brain metastasis (BM) and overall survival (OS) between PCI group and non-PCI group. Results: Seven studies including 1,462 patients were eligible for the current meta-analysis. Compared to non-PCI group, PCI group achieved decreased BM (RR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.26-0.52) but similar OS (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.87-1.22). In subgroup analyses of BM, PCI decreased BM for subgroups by pathology (squamous cell carcinoma or non-squamous cell carcinoma) and local treatment modality (surgery or no surgery). However, PCI failed to reduce BM for patients with poor performance status (WHO 2-3). The incidence of PCI related toxicities was low and PCI was well-tolerated by the majority of NSCLC. Low grade neurocognitive function (NCF) decline was reported in NAVLT study and greater deterioration in immediate and delayed recall was reported in RTOG 0214. No significant difference in quality of life (QOL) after PCI was reported. Conclusion: PCI reduces the incidence of BM except for patients with poor performance status. However, PCI fails to prolong OS significantly for NSCLC. An individual patient data meta-analysis may identify patients that could achieve OS prolongation with PCI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) improves survival and prevents intracranial recurrence (IR) in limited stage (LS) and extensive stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, despite PCI, IR affects 12%-45%, and limited data exist regarding salvage brain reirradiation (ReRT). We performed a population-based review of IR in SCLC.
    Demographic, treatment, and outcome data of consecutive patients (N = 371) with SCLC assessed at a tertiary cancer centre (01/2013-12/2015) were abstracted, and summary statistics calculated. Kaplan-Meier estimates and univariate and multivariate analysis (MVA) via the Cox proportional hazard model were performed.
    Median age was 66.1 years, and 59.8% were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2. Median survival was 24 months (95% CI 18.3-29.7 months) for LS (N = 103) and 7 months (95% CI 6.1-7.9 months) for ES (N = 268). 72 of 103 patients with LS and 97 of 214 of those with ES received PCI. 54 of 268 ES presented with brain metastases (BM) of whom 46 of 54 received whole brain RT (WBRT). 18.9% (32/169) recurred post-PCI (13 LS; 19 ES) and 30.4% (14/46) recurred after WBRT. Of those who recurred/progressed after cranial RT, 56.5% (26/46) had <5 BM, 39.1% had no extracranial disease, and 50% were ECOG 0-2. In retrospect, 17 of 46 would have been candidates for salvage stereotactic radiosurgery: 13 post-PCI and 4 post-WBRT.
    This cohort challenges commonly held beliefs that IR is always diffuse, associated with clinical deterioration, and synchronous with systemic failure. Approximately 1 in 3 SCLC patients with IR after PCI or WBRT appear clinically appropriate for salvage stereotactic radiosurgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The efficacy of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in treating patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has not been clear, and recent randomized studies have demonstrated conflicting results from previously published findings. The purpose of this study was to reevaluate the efficacy of PCI in patients with SCLC and to assess factors associated with its efficacy.
    METHODS: We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of PCI in patients with SCLC. A literature search was performed using EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. We pooled the data and compared overall survival (OS) and brain metastasis (BM) between patients treated with PCI (PCI group) and patients without PCI treatment (observation group).
    RESULTS: Of the 1074 studies identified in our analysis, we selected seven studies including 2114 patients for the current meta-analysis. Our results showed that the PCI group showed decreased BM (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.38-0.55, P < 0.001) and prolonged OS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.67-0.99, P < 0.001). However, in terms of OS, the pooled analysis showed a high heterogeneity (I2 = 74.1%, P = 0.001). In subgroup analyses of OS, we found that the heterogeneity mainly came from patients with brain imaging after initial chemoradiotherapy (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.74-1.18, P = 0.59).
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that PCI has a significant effect on decreasing BM but little benefit in prolonging OS when brain imaging was introduced to confirm lack of BM after initial chemoradiotherapy and before irradiation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号