[Purpose] Although prone positioning is used to increase oxygenation in various respiratory conditions, this positioning can lead to facial and limb pressure ulcers. The aim in this study was to investigate body pressure variations in the prone position for different facial orientations and upper extremity positions. [Participants and Methods] Nineteen healthy young women participated in this study. Body pressure (maximum body pressure on the face, chest, elbows, and knees) was measured in six different prone positions with different face orientations and upper extremity positions, and the median value of each body pressure measurement was compared among postures. [Results] Face pressure tended to decrease when face orientation coincided with the raised side of the upper limb. In contrast, elbow pressure tended to be lower when the orientation of the face did not coincide with that of the raised side of the upper limb. [Conclusion] Pressure on the face and elbows can be reduced by placing the upper limbs in the prone position. This suggests that targeted and specific positioning may be useful for limiting the incidence and severity of pressure ulcers in these areas.

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of adverse events in mechanically ventilated adults with COVID-19 who have undergone prone positioning. A total of 100 patients were included retrospectively; 60% were males, the mean age was 64.8 ± 9.1 years, and hospital mortality was 47%. In all, we recorded 118 removals of catheters and tubes in 66 patients; 29.6% were removals of a nasogastric tube, 18.6% of an arterial line, 14.4% of a urinary catheter, and 12.7% of a central venous catheter. Reintubation or repositioning of a tracheotomy tube was required in 19 patients (16.1%), and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 2 patients (1.7%). We recorded a total of 184 pressure ulcers in 79 patients (on anterior face in 38.5%, anterior thorax in 23.3% and any extremity anteriorly in 15.2%). We observed that body weight (p = 0.021; β = 0.09 (CI95: 0.01-0.17)) and the cumulative duration of prone positioning (p = 0.005; β = 0.06 (CI95: 0.02-0.11)) were independently associated with the occurrence of any adverse event. The use of prone positioning in our setting was associated with a greater number of adverse events than previously reported. Body weight and cumulative duration of prone positioning were associated with the occurrence of adverse events; however, other factors during a COVID-19 surge, such as working conditions, staffing, and staff education, could also have contributed to a high prevalence of adverse events.

UNASSIGNED: The prone position has been seen to benefit patients experiencing acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, performing this position in pregnant patients has been difficult and raises safety concerns.
UNASSIGNED: The current study aimed to test the use of a supportive pillow (Prone Pillow for Pregnant Patients or 4P) to address concerns regarding pregnant patients in prone position.
UNASSIGNED: The study prospectively evaluated the use of the prone pillow for patient comfort and usability among healthcare workers with qualitative and quantitative measures.
UNASSIGNED: A total of three patients were recruited alongside 16 healthcare workers assisting pregnant patients to the prone position. Overall, awake pregnant patients found the pillow to be comfortable while healthcare workers perceived the pillow to be useful in improving quality of care among awake and intubated pregnant patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The 4P is a potentially useful and beneficial product in placing pregnant patients in the prone position during episodes of acute respiratory distress. However, due to the limited sample size, more clinical trials are needed to evaluate the impact of this innovation in improving patient and healthcare worker safety.

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis pneumonia is an uncommon precipitant of acute respiratory distress syndrome and is associated with high mortality. Prone positioning ventilation has been proven to reduce mortality in patients with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. We investigated the effect of prone positioning on oxygenation and mortality in intubated patients with pneumocystis pneumonia comorbid with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.
METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective, observational, cohort study, eligible patients were enrolled at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021. Data on demographics, clinical features, ventilation parameters, arterial blood gas, and outcomes were collected. Patients were assigned to the prone cohort or supine cohort according to whether they received prone positioning ventilation. The main outcome was 28-day mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were included in the study. Sixty-three patients were enrolled in the prone cohort, and 16 patients were enrolled in the supine cohort. The 28-day mortality was 61.9% in the prone cohort and 68.8% in the supine cohort (P = 0.26), and 90-day mortality was 66.7% in the prone cohort and 68.8% in the supine cohort (P = 0.55). Patients in the supine cohort had fewer invasive mechanical ventilation days and more ventilator-free days. The incidence of complications was higher in the prone cohort than in the supine cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pneumocystis pneumonia and moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, prone positioning did not decrease 28-day or 90-day mortality. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number, ChiCTR2200063889. Registered on 20 September 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=174886 .

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between the duration of the first prone positioning maneuver (PPM) and 90-day mortality in patients with C-ARDS.
METHODS: Retrospective, observational, and analytical study.
METHODS: COVID-19 ICU of a tertiary hospital.
METHODS: Adults over 18 years old, with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 disease requiring PPM.
METHODS: Multivariable analysis of 90-day survival.
METHODS: Duration of the first PPM, number of PPM sessions, 90-day mortality.
RESULTS: 271 patients undergoing PPM were analyzed: first tertile (n = 111), second tertile (n = 95) and third tertile (n = 65). The results indicated that the median duration of PDP was 14 h (95% CI: 10-16 h) in the first tertile, 19 h (95% CI: 18-20 h) in the second tertile and 22 h (95% CI: 21-24 h) in the third tertile. Comparison of survival curves using the Logrank test did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.11). Cox Regression analysis showed an association between the number of pronation sessions (patients receiving between 2 and 5 sessions (HR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.07-4.49); and those receiving more than 5 sessions (HR = 6.05; 95% CI: 2.78-13.16) and 90-day mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: while the duration of PDP does not appear to significantly influence 90-day mortality, the number of pronation sessions is identified as a significant factor associated with an increased risk of mortality.

UNASSIGNED: Previous studies suggest that prone positioning can increase PaO2/FiO2 and reduce mortality in moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Effect of prone positioning and high flow nasal oxygen has been studied individually in COVID-19 patients but their combined effect on patient\'s outcome is yet to be reported.
UNASSIGNED: In this study 120 severe COVID-19 positive patients were included and placed in awake prone positioning with high flow nasal oxygen. The efficacy in improving oxygenation with prone positioning and high flow nasal oxygen were evaluated by blood gas analysis. The primary outcome was a proportion of patients requiring non-invasive ventilation or invasive ventilation. The secondary outcomes were a comparison of arterial blood gas parameters and biochemical inflammatory parameters pre proning, end of first proning and end of last prone position in these patients.
UNASSIGNED: We found only 35 patients (34.3%) required the need for non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation support whereas 67 patients (65.7%) were managed successfully on high flow nasal oxygen along with awake prone positioning (p = 0.001). We found there were statistically significant improvements in arterial blood gas parameters and biochemical inflammatory markers after the end of last prone positioning with high flow nasal oxygen.
UNASSIGNED: Early application of prone positioning in combination with high flow nasal oxygen may help in avoiding mechanical ventilation by improving oxygenation and biochemical inflammatory markers.

BACKGROUND: Prone positioning (PP) has been proven to be a beneficial approach in enhancing survival outcomes for patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who need venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) support. The study utilized bedside lung ultrasound (LUS) to evaluate changes in lung aeration caused by PP in ARDS patients receiving V-V ECMO.
METHODS: This retrospective single-center study involved adult ARDS patients requiring V-V ECMO. The assessment of LUS involved examining specific dorsal lung regions, encompassing 16 areas, during three pre-defined time points: baseline (10 minutes prior), three-hour PP positioning, and 10-minute post-supine repositioning, all within the initial three days. Based on the oxygenation response to PP, patients were categorized into responder and non-responder groups. The primary outcome was LUS score changes during the initial three-day period. Secondary outcomes examined the impact of PP on the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (P/F) ratio, V-V ECMO weaning success, length of ICU stay, and hospital survival.
RESULTS: Among the enrolled patients (27 in total), 16 were responders and 11 were non-responders. In the responder group, the global LUS score underwent a significant reduction from 26.38 ± 4.965 at baseline to 20.75 ± 3.337 (p < 0.001) after the first PP session, which further decreased to 15.94 ± 2.816 (p< 0.001) after three days. However, no significant differences were observed among PP non-responders. The oxygenation reaction yielded comparable results. There was a significant correlation between the duration of daily PP and the reduction in global LUS score among PP responders (r = -0.855, p < 0.001). In cases where the global LUS score decreased by > 7.5 after three days of PP, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for predicting ECMO weaning success was 0.815, while it was 0.761 for predicting hospital survival.
CONCLUSIONS: LUS has the potential to predict the response to PP and evaluate the prognosis of ARDS patients with V-V ECMO, although more studies are demanded in the future.

Prone positioning (PP) homogenizes ventilation distribution and may limit ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The static and dynamic components of ventilation that may cause VILI have been aggregated in mechanical power, considered a unifying driver of VILI. PP may affect mechanical power components differently due to changes in respiratory mechanics; however, the effects of PP on lung mechanical power components are unclear. This study aimed to compare the following parameters during supine positioning (SP) and PP: lung total elastic power and its components (elastic static power and elastic dynamic power) and these variables normalized to end-expiratory lung volume (EELV).
This prospective physiologic study included 55 patients with moderate to severe ARDS. Lung total elastic power and its static and dynamic components were compared during SP and PP using an esophageal pressure-guided ventilation strategy. In SP, the esophageal pressure-guided ventilation strategy was further compared with an oxygenation-guided ventilation strategy defined as baseline SP. The primary endpoint was the effect of PP on lung total elastic power non-normalized and normalized to EELV. Secondary endpoints were the effects of PP and ventilation strategies on lung elastic static and dynamic power components non-normalized and normalized to EELV, respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and hemodynamic parameters.
Lung total elastic power (median [interquartile range]) was lower during PP compared with SP (6.7 [4.9-10.6] versus 11.0 [6.6-14.8] J/min; P < 0.001) non-normalized and normalized to EELV (3.2 [2.1-5.0] versus 5.3 [3.3-7.5] J/min/L; P < 0.001). Comparing PP with SP, transpulmonary pressures and EELV did not significantly differ despite lower positive end-expiratory pressure and plateau airway pressure, thereby reducing non-normalized and normalized lung elastic static power in PP. PP improved gas exchange, cardiac output, and increased oxygen delivery compared with SP.
In patients with moderate to severe ARDS, PP reduced lung total elastic and elastic static power compared with SP regardless of EELV normalization because comparable transpulmonary pressures and EELV were achieved at lower airway pressures. This resulted in improved gas exchange, hemodynamics, and oxygen delivery.
German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00017449). Registered June 27, 2019. https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017449.

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) combined with prone positioning in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) and atelectasis and its effect on pulmonary function.
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 94 children with MPP and atelectasis who were hospitalized in Ordos Central Hospital of Inner Mongolia from November 2020 to May 2023. The children were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group, with 47 children in each group. The children in the treatment group were given conventional treatment, BAL, and prone positioning, and those in the control group were given conventional treatment and BAL. The two groups were compared in terms of fever, pulmonary signs, length of hospital stay, lung recruitment, and improvement in pulmonary function.
RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the treatment group had significantly shorter time to improvement in pulmonary signs and length of hospital stay and a significantly higher rate of lung recruitment on day 7 of hospitalization, on the day of discharge, and at 1 week after discharge (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the treatment group had significantly higher levels of forced vital capacity (FVC) as a percentage of the predicted value, forced expiratory volume (FEV) in 1 second as a percentage of the predicted value, ratio of FEV in 1 second to FVC, forced expiratory flow at 50% of FVC as a percentage of the predicted value, forced expiratory flow at 75% of FVC as a percentage of the predicted value, and maximal mid-expiratory flow as a percentage of the predicted value on the day of discharge and at 1 week after discharge (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the time for body temperature to return to normal between the two groups (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of children with MPP and atelectasis, BAL combined with prone positioning can help to shorten the time to improvement in pulmonary signs and the length of hospital stay and promote lung recruitment and improvement in pulmonary function.
目的: 探讨支气管肺泡灌洗（bronchoalveolar lavage, BAL）联合俯卧位在儿童肺炎支原体肺炎（Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia, MPP）伴肺不张中的疗效及对肺功能的影响。方法: 前瞻性选取2020年11月2023年5月在内蒙古鄂尔多斯市中心医院住院治疗的94例MPP伴肺不张的患儿为研究对象，随机分为治疗组和对照组，每组各47例。治疗组在常规治疗及BAL基础上加以俯卧位治疗，对照组给予常规治疗及BAL。比较两组患儿发热、肺部体征、住院时间、肺复张和肺功能改善情况。结果: 治疗组肺部体征改善时间、住院时间短于对照组，住院第7天、出院当天及出院后1周肺复张有效率高于对照组（P<0.05）。治疗组出院当天及出院后1周用力肺活量占预测值百分比、第1秒用力呼气量占预测值百分比、第1秒用力呼气量/用力肺活量、用力呼出50%肺活量的呼气流量占预测值百分比、用力呼出75%肺活量的呼气流量占预测值百分比及最大呼气中期流量占预测值百分比均高于对照组（P<0.05）。两组患儿体温降至正常时间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论: BAL联合俯卧位在儿童MPP伴肺不张治疗中，有利于缩短肺部体征改善时间及住院时间，有利于肺复张和肺功能的改善。.

UNASSIGNED: Prone positioning is one type of postural lung recruitment manoeuvre that has been widely studied regarding the benefits and physiological changes of the cardiorespiratory system. However, prone positioning is not very comfortable for the patients because they have to lie on their stomachs for a while when the oxygen therapy and other monitoring devices are still attached. Based on patient observations, some patients will change to more comfortable positions, namely using the right/left lateral decubitus position. The purpose of this research was to examine the physiological impact of prone and lateral decubitus position in non-intubated patients who were diagnosed with severe COVID-19.
UNASSIGNED: It was a prospective cohort study in subsequent people with severe COVID-19 who obtained a non-rebreathing mask or high-flow nasal cannula at a University Hospital between 1 June and 10 September 2021. The study lasted for a total of 2021 days and involved 48 patients. The patients assumed the prone positioning or lateral decubitus every morning and afternoon for 4 h and were measured for cardiorespiratory parameters and blood gas analysis. It has been reported in line with the STROCSS criteria.
UNASSIGNED: Dynamic changes based on cardiorespiratory parameters and blood gas analysis parameters in patients with prone and lateral decubitus position in patients with severe COVID-19 receiving conventional oxygen therapy (via non-rebreathing mask) or high-flow nasal cannula did not show any significant difference.
UNASSIGNED: The physiological effect of prone positioning and lateral decubitus in non-intubated patients with severe COVID-19 are similar. Accordingly, lateral decubitus can be an alternative for postural lung recruitment manoeuvres and warrants further randomized trials.