Preemptive analgesia

超前镇痛
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:牙周手术可以促进长时间的剧烈疼痛,特别是在需要外科手术的临床情况下。在这种情况下,还评估了超前镇痛在控制牙周侵入性手术患者术后疼痛和不适方面的实用性。这项研究评估了类固醇和非甾体抗炎药在牙周手术中预先口服镇痛的有效性和安全性。方法:本系统综述在以下电子来源中进行了搜索:Cochrane中央对照试验注册中心(CENTRAL),MEDLINE(通过PubMed),EMBASE(通过Ovid),WebofScience,虚拟健康图书馆和相关随机临床试验(RCT)的临床试验电子数据库;截至2023年7月发布。评估的主要结果是术后疼痛,水肿和牙关紧。对研究结果进行了叙述性综合。结果:六个RCT,共有250名参与者,包括在内。审查的研究有很高的偏倚风险,特别是由于参与者和人员的分配隐藏和致盲。RCT仅报告了结果疼痛。抢先使用地塞米松8毫克,依托考昔90mg或120mg和酮咯酸20mg似乎比安慰剂更有效地控制术后疼痛。讨论:评估的抗炎药被证明可有效控制术后疼痛。然而,鉴于缺乏研究的局限性,方法论上的偏见,药物和剂量的差异,报告限制了疼痛结局;需要进一步的随机对照试验证实这些药物在牙周外科手术中的有效性和安全性.
    Introduction: Periodontal procedures can promote prolonged intense pain, particularly in clinical situations requiring surgical procedures. In this context, preemptive analgesia has also been assessed for its utility in controlling post-operative pain and discomfort in patients undergoing periodontal invasive procedures. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of preemptive oral analgesia with steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in periodontal surgeries. Methods: This systematic review performed a search in the following electronic sources: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (via Ovid), Web of Science, Virtual Health Library and in clinical trials electronic databases for relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs); published up to July 2023. Primary outcomes assessed were post-operative pain, edema and trismus. A narrative synthesis of the findings was carried out. Results: Six RCTs, involving a total of 250 participants, were included. The studies reviewed had a high risk of bias, particularly due to allocation concealment and blinding of participants and personnel. The RCTs reported only the outcome pain. The preemptive use of dexamethasone 8 mg, etoricoxib 90 mg or 120 mg and ketorolac 20 mg seems to be more effective for controlling post-operative pain than placebo. Discussion: The anti-inflammatory drugs evaluated proved to be effective for controlling post-operative pain. However, given the limitations regarding lack of studies, methodological biases, disparities in drugs and doses, report restricted the pain outcome; further RCTs confirming the effectiveness and safety of these drugs in periodontal surgical procedures are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:近年来,腰椎疾病已成为越来越常见的健康问题。现代临床研究表明,一定剂量的围手术期镇痛可通过抑制外周致敏和中枢致敏过程减轻术后疼痛,这也被称为“先发制人镇痛,“非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)是一类通过抑制环氧合酶(COX)并影响前列腺素的产生而达到解热和镇痛作用的药物。我们的荟萃分析旨在评估非甾体抗炎药在腰椎手术患者围手术期超前镇痛的有效性和安全性。
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,ScienceDirect,Cochrane图书馆,以及符合纳入标准的WebofScience随机对照试验(RCTs)。共纳入12项临床研究,以评估腰椎手术围手术期NSAIDs超前镇痛的有效性和安全性。
    结果:12项研究,包括845名病人,符合纳入标准。结果表明,围手术期接受NSAIDs超前镇痛是有效和安全的。患者术后吗啡消耗量(P<0.05),视觉模拟量表(P<0.05),数值评定量表(P<0.05)与术后并发症无统计学相关性(P>0.05)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,非甾体抗炎药在腰椎手术围手术期的超前镇痛是有效和安全的,仍需要更多和更好的质量RCT和更深入的疼痛力学研究。
    OBJECTIVE: Lumbar spine disorders have become an increasingly common health problem in recent years. Modern clinical studies have shown that perioperative analgesia at certain doses can reduce postoperative pain by inhibiting the process of peripheral sensitization and central sensitization, which is also known as \"preemptive analgesia,\" Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a class of drugs that achieve antipyretic and analgesic effects by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX) and affecting the production of prostaglandins. Our meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of perioperative preemptive analgesia with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with lumbar spine surgery.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 12 clinical studies were included to assess the efficacy and safety of perioperative NSAIDs preemptive analgesia for lumbar spine surgery.
    RESULTS: Twelve studies, including 845 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that perioperative receipt of NSAIDs for preemptive analgesia was effective and safe. Patient\'s postoperative morphine consumption (P < 0.05), visual analog scale (P < 0.05), and numerical rating scale (P < 0.05) were not statistically associated with postoperative complications (P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that NSAIDs are effective and safe for preemptive analgesia in the perioperative period of lumbar spine surgery and that more and better quality RCTs and more in-depth studies of pain mechanics are still needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估先发制人药物联合给药(PDC)缓解炎症事件(疼痛,肿胀,和三端子)在下颌第三磨牙手术中。根据PRISMA指南进行了PROSPERO注册的系统评价(CRD4202234546)。在六个主要数据库和灰色文献中进行了搜索。不包括使用拉丁字母(罗马)的语言编写的研究。筛选潜在的随机对照试验(RCTs)是否合格。评估Cochrane的风险-2.0(RoB)工具。基于投票计数和效果方向图的无荟萃分析综合(SWiM)。九项研究(低RoB)符合资格标准,并被纳入数据分析,共484名患者。PDC主要涉及皮质类固醇(Cort)和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)。Cort和其他药物的PDC主要减少疼痛评分(术后6和12小时)和肿胀(术后48小时)。NSAIDs和其他药物的PDC主要在随访6、8和24h时降低疼痛评分;术后48h肿胀和三联肌强度改善。最常用的救护药物是扑热息痛,Dipyrone,还有扑热息痛加可待因.个别研究的结果表明,摄入的抢救镇痛药的消耗量减少。总之,本SWiM中包含的临床试验的现有证据表明,PDC可能有助于降低与下颌第三磨牙手术相关的炎症结果的严重程度,尤其是手术后第一个小时的疼痛评分,以及术后期间的抢救镇痛消耗量。
    This study aimed to evaluate the scientific evidence on the effect of preemptive drug coadministration (PDC) for relieving inflammatory events (pain, swelling, and trismus) in mandibular third molar surgery. A PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD42022314546) was conducted according to the PRISMA guide. The searches were carried out in six primary databases and the gray literature. Studies not written in languages with the Latin alphabet (Roman) were excluded. Potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were screened for eligibility. Cochrane\'s Risk of Bias-2.0 (RoB) tool was assessed. A synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) based on a vote counting and an effect direction plot. Nine studies (low RoB) fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included for data analysis, with a total of 484 patients. PDC mostly involved corticosteroids (Cort) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). PDC of Cort and other drugs mainly reduced pain scores (6 and 12 h postoperatively) and swelling (48 h postoperatively). PDC of NSAIDs and other drugs mainly reduced pain scores at 6, 8, and 24 h follow-up; swelling and trismus intensity ameliorated at 48 h postoperatively. The most frequently prescribed rescue medication was paracetamol, dipyrone, and paracetamol plus codeine. Results from individual studies have shown reduced consumption of ingested rescue analgesics. In summary, the available evidence from clinical trials included in this SWiM suggests that PDC may provide benefits in reducing the severity of inflammatory outcomes related to mandibular third molar surgery, especially the pain scores in the first hours after surgery, and the rescue analgesic consumption during the postoperative period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    术后疼痛很普遍,通常治疗不足。存在未经治疗或治疗欠佳的术后疼痛可能转变为慢性术后疼痛的风险。这可能是具有挑战性的治疗。临床指南推荐使用多模式镇痛,包括非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs),对乙酰氨基酚,and,在某些情况下,阿片类药物。NSAIDs是一类具有不同属性的药物,例如环加氧酶(COX)-1或COX-2选择性,行动的开始,和镇痛效力。NSAIDs与胃肠道和心血管副作用有关,应在最短的有效持续时间内以最低有效剂量给药,但对术后疼痛有效。阿片类药物在术后镇痛中的作用由来已久,但最近受到了审查。阿片类药物通常用于多模式镇痛剂组合中,使得在不牺牲镇痛剂益处的情况下最小化阿片类药物的总消耗。对于已经接受阿片类药物治疗或患有阿片类药物使用障碍的手术患者,需要特殊的临床考虑。术后镇痛特别有用的固定剂量组合产品是右酮洛芬-曲马多,这赋予安全有效的术后疼痛控制,并降低持续术后疼痛的风险。
    Postoperative pain is prevalent and often undertreated. There is a risk that untreated or suboptimally treated postoperative pain may transition into chronic postoperative pain, which can be challenging to treat. Clinical guidelines recommend the use of multimodal analgesia, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and, in some cases, opioids. NSAIDs are a broad class of drugs with different attributes such as cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-1 or COX-2 selectivity, onset of action, and analgesic potency. NSAIDs are associated with gastrointestinal and cardiovascular side effects and should be administered at the lowest effective dose for the shortest effective duration but can be effective in postoperative pain. The role of opioids in postoperative analgesia is long-standing but has recently come under scrutiny. Opioids are often used in multimodal analgesic combinations in such a way as to minimize the total consumption of opioids without sacrificing analgesic benefit. Special clinical considerations are required for surgical patients already on opioid regimens or with opioid use disorder. A particularly useful fixed-dose combination product for postoperative analgesia is dexketoprofen-tramadol, which confers safe and effective postoperative pain control and reduces the risk of persistent postoperative pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Lesion or disease of the somatosensory system leads to the development of neuropathic pain. Peripheral neuropathic pain encompasses damage or injury of the peripheral nervous system. On the other hand, 10-15% of individuals suffer from acute postoperative pain followed by persistent pain after undergoing surgeries. Antidepressants, anticonvulsants, baclofen, and clonidine are used to treat peripheral neuropathy, whereas opioids are used to treat postoperative pain. The negative effects associated with these drugs emphasize the search for alternative therapeutics with better efficacy and fewer side effects. Curcumin, a polyphenol isolated from the roots of Curcuma longa, possesses antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties. Furthermore, the low bioavailability and fast metabolism of curcumin have led to the advent of various curcumin formulations. The present review provides a comprehensive analysis on the effects of curcumin and its formulations in preclinical and clinical studies of neuropathic and postoperative pain. Based on the positive outcomes from both preclinical and clinical studies, curcumin holds the promise of mitigating or preventing neuropathic and postoperative pain conditions. However, more clinical studies with improved curcumin formulations are required to involve its use as adjuvant to neuropathic and postoperative drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The objective of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia at pain control in women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.
    Eligible studies, published through May 31, 2016, were retrieved through Medline, Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    We included randomized controlled trials with the primary outcome of pain control in women receiving a preemptive medication prior to total abdominal hysterectomy. Comparators were placebo, different doses of the same medication as intervention, or other nonnarcotic or narcotic medication.
    Study data were extracted by one reviewer and confirmed by a second reviewer. For each outcome we graded the quality of the evidence. Studies were classified by the type of medication used and by outcome type.
    Eighty-four trials met eligibility, with 69 included. Among nonnarcotic medications, paracetamol, gabapentin, and rofecoxib combined with gabapentin resulted in improvements in pain assessment compared with placebo and other nonnarcotic medications. Patient satisfaction was higher in patients who were given gabapentin combined with paracetamol compared with gabapentin alone. Use of preemptive paracetamol, gabapentin, bupivacaine, and phenothiazine resulted in less narcotic usage than placebo. All narcotics (ketamine, morphine, fentanyl) resulted in improved pain control compared with placebo. Narcotics had a greater reduction in pain assessment scores compared with nonnarcotics, and their use resulted in lower total narcotic usage.
    Preemptive nonnarcotic and narcotic medications prior to abdominal hysterectomy decrease total narcotic requirements and improve patient postoperative pain assessment and satisfaction scores.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The purpose of preemptive analgesia is to reduce postoperative pain, contributing to a more comfortable recovery period and reducing the need for narcotic pain control. The efficacy of preemptive analgesia remains controversial. This systematic review of the literature evaluated the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, and gabapentin as preemptive oral analgesics for surgical patients. Included articles were limited to studies of adult patients that compared the difference in postoperative pain between control and treatment groups. Of 40 studies reviewed, 14 met the inclusion criteria, including two on NSAIDs, four on COX-2 inhibitors, and eight on gabapentin. Research was predominantly conducted outside the United States. Gabapentin and COX-2 inhibitors were found to be the most effective preemptive analgesics for postoperative pain control. As part of a collaborative team, perioperative nurses and certified RN anesthetists are responsible for ongoing pain assessment and management for preemptive analgesic interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号