UNASSIGNED: Hypofractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer has been widely studied. However, in the postoperative setting it has been less explored. The objective of this prospective study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy in postoperative prostate cancer.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective study was designed to include patients with prostate cancer with an indication of postoperative radiotherapy as adjuvant or salvage. A hypofractionated radiotherapy scheme of 51 Gy in 17 fractions was performed with the possibility of treating the pelvis at a dose of 36 Gy in 12 fractions sequentially. Safety was evaluated based on acute and late toxicity [according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale and Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03], International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) over time, and quality of life.
UNASSIGNED: From August 2020 to June 2022, 31 patients completed treatment and were included in this report. 35.5% of patients received elective treatment of the pelvic nodal areas. Most patients reported minimal or low acute toxicity, with an acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) grade 3 or greater toxicity of 3.2% and 0%, respectively. The evolution in time of the IPSS remained without significant differences (p = 0.42). With the exception of a significant improvement in the domains of hormonal and sexual symptoms of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire, the rest of the domains [EPIC, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core quality of life questionnaire (C-30) and Prostate Cancer module (PR-25)] were maintained without significant differences over time. With a follow-up of 15.4 months, late GI and GU grade 2 toxicity was reported greater than 0% and 9.6%, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Hypofractionated radiotherapy in postoperative prostate cancer appears to be safe with low reports of relevant acute or late toxicity. Further follow-up is required to confirm these results.
UNASSIGNED: The protocol was approved by the accredited Medical Ethical Committee of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. All participants accepted and wrote informed consent.

BACKGROUND: Whether patients with cT1 - 2N1M0 breast cancer can benefit from postoperative radiotherapy (RT) after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore whether postoperative RT can benefit this group of patients in terms of survival.
METHODS: We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data to conduct a retrospective review of women with cT1 - 2N1M0 breast cancer diagnosed between 20 and 80 years of age who received NAC between 2010 and 2015. Our study compared the impact of postoperative RT on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in breast cancer patients using propensity score matching (PSM) and performed subgroup analysis.
RESULTS: This study finally included 1092 cT1 - 2N1M0 breast cancer patients. Regardless of the patient\'s PSM status, postoperative RT was significantly associated with OS of cT1-2N1M0 breast cancer patients who received NAC. Specifically, the 10-year OS rate was 78.7% before PSM matching, compared with 71.1% in patients who did not receive postoperative RT, and the difference was more significant after PSM matching, which was 83.1% and 71.1% respectively. However, postoperative RT did not significantly benefit CSS in patients with cT1 - 2N1M0 breast cancer who received NAC. The 10-year CSS rate was 81.4% VS 76.2% (P = 0.085) before PSM matching and 85.8% VS 76.2%(P = 0.076) after matching. Due to the intersection of OS and CSS curves, this restricted mean survival time (RMST) method was chosen as a supplement. After 60 months, the OS difference in RMST between the postoperative RT group and the non-radiotherapy (noRT) group was 7.37 months (95%CI: 0.54-14.21; P = 0.034), and the CSS difference was 5.18 months (95%CI: -1.31-11.68; P = 0.118). Subgroup analysis found that in patients with right-sided breast cancer, postoperative RT improved the patient\'s OS (HR = 0.45, 95%CI: 0.21-0.95, P = 0.037) and CSS (HR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.18-0.98, P = 0.045).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that additional postoperative RT improved the OS of cT1 - 2N1M0 breast cancer patients who received NAC, but failed to improve their CSS. It is worth noting that in the subgroup analysis of patients with right-sided breast cancer, we observed significant improvements in OS and CSS. And further prospective studies are still needed to verify the effect of postoperative RT in different subgroups.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk patients with stage pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy.
UNASSIGNED: Data from NSCLC patients within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were analyzed. The study examined the association between lymph node ratio (LNR) and both cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) using restricted cubic spline curves. Patients were categorized into high- and low-risk groups based on established LNR cut-off values, and survival outcomes were compared between those receiving postoperative radiotherapy and those who did not within the high-risk group.
UNASSIGNED: The study included 1,690 patients. An LNR threshold of 0.29 was identified for both CSS and OS. Patients with an LNR ≥ 0.29 demonstrated significantly worse CSS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37 - 1.78; P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.28 - 1.62; P < 0.001) compared to those with an LNR < 0.29. In the high-risk group (LNR ≥ 0.29), postoperative radiotherapy did not significantly affect CSS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.82 - 1.17; P = 0.809) or OS (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.81 - 1.11; P = 0.533).
UNASSIGNED: LNR is a significant prognostic factor in patients with stage pIIIA-N2 NSCLC post complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. A higher LNR (≥ 0.29) is associated with poorer CSS and OS. However, postoperative radiotherapy does not confer survival benefits in these high-risk patients. Our findings suggest that postoperative radiotherapy should not be routinely performed in this subgroup. Further research is required to explore effective treatment strategies for these patients.

There are no large-scale datasets that analyze the relationship between postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and various cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the incidences of CVDs with PORT using a national population-based database.
Patients diagnosed with NSCLC who underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy were included from 2007 to 2017. Patients with a prior diagnosis of heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AFib), or heart surgery were excluded. A total of 11,141 patients were included in the final analysis. PORT was used in 1334 patients. Most patients received lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection.
Major adverse cardiac events mostly occurred within 3-4 years from the diagnosis. After the median follow-up duration of 70.6 months, HF was the most diagnosed disease (5.3 %), followed by AFib (4.5 %), stroke (4.1 %), and pulmonary embolism (3.5 %). All the incidences of clinically significant CVDs did not differ by PORT. This result remained unchanged after the propensity score matching comparison. Age ≥ 65, underlying hypertension, and history of ischemic heart disease were the most related factors to the occurrence of HF and AFib. No significant difference in CVD-free survivals according to PORT status was observed. When stratified by proposed scoring, there were no subgroups showed increased incidence by PORT.
These results suggest that PORT had no significant impact on various CVD occurrences in NSCLC patients without underlying heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the shifting patterns of the mediastinum, including the target volume and the isocenter point during the postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) process of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to observe the occurrence of radiation injury. Additionally, we investigated the significance of mid-term assessment during the implementation of the PORT process.
METHODS: We established coordinate axes based on bone anatomy and measured the mediastinum\'s three-dimensional direction and the shift of the isocenter point\'s shift in the PORT process. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon, Kruskal-Wallis, and the Chi-square test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: In this study, the analysis of patients revealed that the shift of anterior and posterior mediastinum (X), left and right mediastinum (Y), upper and lower mediastinum (Z), anterior and posterior isocenter point (Xi), and the left and right isocenter points (Yi) in the PORT process were 0.04-0.53, 0.00-0.84, 0.00-1.27, 0.01-0.86, and 0.00-0.66cm, respectively. The shift distance of the mediastinum was Z>Y>X, and the shift distance of the isocenter point was Xi>Yi. According to the ROC curve, the cut-off values were 0.263, 0.352, 0.405, 0.238, and 0.258, respectively, which were more significant than the cut-off values in 25 cases (25%), 30 cases (30%), 30 cases (30%), 17 cases (17%), and 15 cases (15%). In addition, there was a significant difference in the shift of the mediastinum and the isocenter point (all P=0.00). Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistically significant difference between mediastinal shift and resection site in X, Y, and Z directions (P=0.355, P=0.239, P=0.256), surgical method (P=0.241, P=0.110, P=0.064). There was no significant difference in the incidence of RE and RP in PORT patients (P>0.05). No III-IV RP occurred. However, the incidence of ≥ grade III RE in the modified plan cases after M-S was significantly lower than in the original PORT patients, 0% and 7%, respectively (P=0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study provides evidence that mediastinal shift is a potential complication during the PORT process for patients with N2 stage or R1-2 resection following radical resection of NSCLC. This shift affects about 20-30% of patients, manifesting as actual radiation damage to normal tissue and reducing the local control rate. Therefore, mid-term repositioning of the PORT and revision of the target volume and radiation therapy plan can aid in maintaining QA and QC during the treatment of NSCLC patients and may result in improved patient outcomes.

UNASSIGNED: This study aims to analyze the prognosis of null-margin (≤1.0 mm) hepatectomy (NH) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) adhering to the major vessels and explore the value of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in these patients.
UNASSIGNED: HCC patients who underwent null-margin or wide-margin (≥1.0 cm) hepatectomy (WH) by our team from January 2008 to March 2016 were recruited and analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into the NH, NH + RT, and WH groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 357 patients were recruited. Of these, 84, 49, and 224 patients were given NH alone, NH plus RT, and WH, respectively. After PSM, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of the NH group were significantly worse than those of the WH group (51.5 % vs. 71.4 %, P = 0.003; 32.2 % vs. 50.9 %, P = 0.005). The OS and DFS rates of the NH + RT group were significantly higher than those of the NH group (75.6 % vs. 56.1 %, P = 0.012; 46.6 % vs. 30.2 %, P = 0.015) and similar to those of the WH group (75.6 % vs. 75.1 %, P = 0.354; 46.6 % vs. 56.6 %, P = 0.717). In addition, patients in the NH + RT group experienced significantly lower early (P = 0.023) and intrahepatic (P = 0.015) recurrences than those in the NH group.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with HCC adhering to the major vessels who underwent NH alone had a poorer prognosis, and the addition of RT to NH provide a significant survival benefit for these patients, which may yield outcomes comparable to the efficacy of WH.

The purpose of this study was to show the safety of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) in hypofractionated radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery in a clinical setting. Twenty-five Japanese women, aged 20-59 years, who were enrolled in this prospective non-inferiority study received VMAT under the condition of DIBH with 42.4 Gy/16 fractions for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) ± boost irradiation for the tumor bed to show the non-inferiority of VMAT with DIBH to conventional fractionated WBI with free breathing. The primary endpoint was the rate of occurrence of radiation dermatitis of Grade 3 or higher or pneumonitis of Grade 2 or higher within 6 months after the start of radiotherapy. This study was registered with UMIN00004321. All of the enrolled patients completed the planned radiotherapy without interruption. The evaluation of adverse events showed that three patients (12.0%) had Grade 2 radiation dermatitis. There was no other Grade 2 adverse event and there was no patient with an adverse event of Grade 3 or higher. Those results confirmed our hypothesis that the experimental treatment method is non-inferior compared with our historical results. There was no patient with locoregional recurrence or metastases. In conclusion, VMAT under the condition of DIBH in hypofractionated radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery can be performed safely in a clinical setting.

Novel radiotherapeutic modalities using carbon ions provide an increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE) compared to photons, delivering a higher biological dose while reducing radiation exposure for adjacent organs. This prospective phase 2 trial investigated bimodal radiotherapy using photons with carbon-ion (C12)-boost in patients with WHO grade 2 meningiomas following subtotal resection (Simpson grade 4 or 5).
A total of 33 patients were enrolled from July 2012 until July 2020. The study treatment comprised a C12-boost (18 Gy [RBE] in 6 fractions) applied to the macroscopic tumor in combination with photon radiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions). The primary endpoint was the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival, safety and treatment toxicities.
With a median follow-up of 42 months, the 3-year estimates of PFS, local PFS and overall survival were 80.3%, 86.7%, and 89.8%, respectively. Radiation-induced contrast enhancement (RICE) was encountered in 45%, particularly in patients with periventricularly located meningiomas. Patients exhibiting RICE were mostly either asymptomatic (40%) or presented immediate neurological and radiological improvement (47%) after the administration of corticosteroids or bevacizumab in case of radiation necrosis (3/33). Treatment-associated complications occurred in 1 patient with radiation necrosis who died due to postoperative complications after resection of radiation necrosis. The study was prematurely terminated after recruiting 33 of the planned 40 patients.
Our study demonstrates a bimodal approach utilizing photons with C12-boost may achieve a superior local PFS to conventional photon RT, but must be balanced against the potential risks of toxicities.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the impact of DIBH for heart sparing effect on left sided breast postoperative whole breast irradiation by comparing the dosimetric characteristics of 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT and pure VMAT treatment planning under DIBH condition.
UNASSIGNED: The primary CT data sets from previously treated left sided early breast cancer were used for pure volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique re-planning for the dosimetric characteristics comparison. A treatment plan of 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT technique was re-planned on the free breath (FB) condition for the investigation of the dosimetric characteristics comparison on DIBH condition. The prescribed dose for all the treatment plans was 42.5Gy in 16 fractions. All plans were optimized to cover 100% of the PTV by 95% of prescribed dose. The dosimetric differences among the 3 treatment plans for the 20 patients were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, with p value<0.05 considered statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT using DIBH technique yielded the best results on the conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI). By comparing this 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT technique using FB and DIBH technique, the mean heart dose (MHD) was reduced from 5.38Gy to 1.65Gy, respectively (p =0.001) and the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD)0.03cc dose was reduced from 27.87Gy to 9.41Gy, respectively (p =0.001). 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT using DIBH technique significantly reduced the V5, V20 and D mean of the ipsilateral lung and D mean of the contralateral lung. The D5 of right breast was significantly reduced by 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT compared with VMAT using DIBH technique.
UNASSIGNED: The incorporation of DIBH into 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT technique provides the best benefits for the heart and the OAR with respect to the radiation dose-sparing effect without compromising the target conformity and homogeneity in the treatment planning.

UNASSIGNED: While the trend towards immediate breast reconstruction is growing, data on the long-term outcomes of patients receiving irradiation afterwards are scarce. We retrospectively reviewed the long-term complication rates in patients who received adjuvant radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction in our institution.
UNASSIGNED: We included 134 patients with breast cancer who underwent single-stage immediate breast reconstruction between January 2008 and December 2018. Sixty-eight patients received adjuvant irradiation and 66 patients did not. Autologous tissue, implant-based, and combined (implant and flap) reconstruction were performed in 40, 55, and 39 patients, respectively. Flap and implant complications data were collected. Baker\'s classification was used to assess capsular contracture.
UNASSIGNED: The average follow-up was 47 months. Both groups had similar baseline clinical characteristics and treatments received. The irradiated-group had a higher incidence of adjuvant chemotherapy (P<0.01) and a significantly higher rate of grade III/IV capsular contracture (42.1% vs. 26.9%; P=0.004) than that of the non-irradiated group. The median time to the development of capsular contracture was 37 vs. 41 months in the irradiated vs. the non-irradiated group, respectively. There were no differences in the incidence of flap complications between both groups. The only significant risk factor associated with grade III/IV capsular contracture was adjuvant post-mastectomy irradiation. The irradiated group had a higher risk of developing grade III/IV capsular contracture [odds ratio (OR), 4.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.55-12.27].
UNASSIGNED: Postmastectomy radiotherapy adversely affects implant-based immediate one-stage reconstruction by increasing the rate of moderate to severe capsular contracture but is not associated with flap complications.