背景:很少有儿童符合体育锻炼(PA)的建议,因此,超重/肥胖和不良健康结局的风险增加。为了增加儿童获得PA的机会,加拿大的几个省份采用了基于学校的每日PA(DPA)政策。尚不清楚为什么某些司法管辖区采用了DPA政策,其他人没有,以及这些政策是否已经实施并实现了预期的结果。这项研究的目的是了解加拿大DPA政策采用和传播的潜在过程,并审查有关其实施和影响的证据。
方法:我们采用了多案例历史方法,在该方法中,我们通过编制时间表来详细说明政策采用之前的关键历史事件,从而追踪加拿大各省之间DPA政策的时间轨迹。审查了发布在互联网上的公开文件,以描述采用者的创新性,描述他们的DPA政策的内容,并探索政策采纳的背景。创新扩散理论为分析提供了一个概念框架。系统的文献检索确定了调查收养的研究,扩散,加拿大DPA政策的实施或影响。
结果:加拿大13个省和地区中有5个(38.5%)有DPA政策。尽管政策的基本目标相似,他们之间以及他们的各种政策轨迹存在明显差异。DPA政策的通过和推广是根据采用者的特点和能力制定的,他们政策的性质,和上下文因素。有限的数据表明DPA政策的实施是温和的,但不一致,加拿大DPA政策对学龄儿童的PA水平或BMI几乎没有影响。
结论:本研究详细介绍了加拿大DPA政策的历史和现状,强调政策通过和传播的条件性质,并描述政策和采用者的特征以及塑造政策轨迹的政治背景。了解与成功采用和传播政策相关的条件可以帮助确定接受的环境,在这些环境中开创新的立法举措,以增加儿童中的PA。通过审查有关政策执行和影响的证据,这项研究还可以为现有的修正案提供信息,以及未来PA政策的发展。
BACKGROUND: Few children meet physical activity (PA) recommendations, and are therefore at increased risk for overweight/obesity and adverse health outcomes. To increase children\'s opportunities for PA, several Canadian provinces have adopted school-based daily PA (DPA) policies. It is not clear why some jurisdictions have adopted DPA policies, and others have not, nor whether these policies have been implemented and have achieved their intended outcomes. The purpose of this study was to understand the processes underlying adoption and diffusion of Canadian DPA policies, and to review evidence regarding their implementation and impact.
METHODS: We adopted a multiple
case history methodology in which we traced the chronological trajectory of DPA policies among Canadian provinces by compiling timelines detailing key historical events that preceded policy adoption. Publicly available documents posted on the internet were reviewed to characterize adopter innovativeness, describe the content of their DPA policies, and explore the context surrounding policy adoption. Diffusion of Innovations theory provided a conceptual framework for the analyses. A systematic literature search identified studies that had investigated adoption, diffusion, implementation or impact of Canadian DPA policies.
RESULTS: Five of Canada\'s 13 provinces and territories (38.5%) have DPA policies. Although the underlying objectives of the policies are similar, there are clear differences among them and in their various policy trajectories. Adoption and diffusion of DPA policies were structured by the characteristics and capacities of adopters, the nature of their policies, and contextual factors. Limited data suggests implementation of DPA policies was moderate but inconsistent and that Canadian DPA policies have had little to no impact on school-aged children\'s PA levels or BMI.
CONCLUSIONS: This study detailed the history and current status of Canadian DPA policies, highlighting the conditional nature of policy adoption and diffusion, and describing policy and adopter characteristics and political contexts that shaped policy trajectories. An understanding of the conditions associated with successful policy adoption and diffusion can help identify receptive contexts in which to pioneer novel legislative initiatives to increase PA among children. By reviewing evidence regarding policy implementation and impact, this study can also inform amendments to existing, and development of future PA policies.