Peeling

剥皮
  • 文章类型: Review
    传统的食品加工技术由于其加工效率低,已经不能满足全球对高质量食品日益增长的需求。能耗高,产品收率低。本文综述了红外(IR)和超声(US)技术在食品物理加工中的作用机理和应用。我们在此介绍了IR和US(单频和多频水平)以及IR和US与其他热和非热技术支持的单独使用,以改善其食品加工性能。IR和US是最近的热和非热技术,现已成功用于食品工业,以解决传统加工技术的缺点。这些环保技术的特点是能耗低,减少处理时间,高传质速率,更好的营养保留,更好的产品质量,更少的机械损伤和提高保质期。这项工作可能是,毫无疑问,通过提供有关美国和IR技术使用最新进展的见解,对科学界和食品工业有用,可用于改进食品加工技术,以获得更好的质量和更安全的产品。
    Traditional food processing techniques can no longer meet the ever increasing demand for high quality food across the globe due to its low process efficiency, high energy consumption and low product yield. This review article is focused on the mechanism and application of Infrared (IR) and ultrasound (US) technologies in physical processing of food. We herein present the individual use of IR and US (both mono-frequency and multi-frequency levels) as well as IR and US supported with other thermal and non-thermal technologies to improve their food processing performance. IR and US are recent thermal and non-thermal technologies which have now been successfully used in food industries to solve the demerits of conventional processing technologies. These environmentally-friendly technologies are characterized by low energy consumption, reduced processing time, high mass-transfer rates, better nutrient retention, better product quality, less mechanical damage and improved shelf life. This work could be, with no doubt, useful to the scientific world and food industries by providing insights on recent advances in the use of US and IR technology, which can be applied to improve food processing technologies for better quality and safer products.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Melasma is a common chronic refractory disorder of pigmentation affecting people with darker skin types. Overall prevalence varies between 8.8% and 40%, depending on the ethnicity of the population and the geographical area. Therapeutic management of melasma is challenging, with high recurrence rates which significant impacts on the quality of life. No single treatment is universally efficacious. Systemic treatments with tranexamic acid and polypodium leucotmatous had promising results, although the former was related to systemic side effects. Microneedling and peeling were also efficacious, although their superiority to topical hydroquinone, the gold standard in melasma treatment, remains to be established. Similarly, laser and light devices have been beneficial. However, recurrence rates remain high in all treatment groups. Combination therapies, either in double or triple combinations yielded the best results when compared to single terapies. Treatment choice should be made after Wood\'s lamp examination, as well as dermatoscopic evaluation, in order to select the best treatment option, targeted at each melasma subtype.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article

    背景:痤疮是一种常见的疾病,可导致永久性疤痕。痤疮疤痕可以分为三类:萎缩性;肥厚性;和瘢痕疙瘩。萎缩性疤痕可以进一步细分为:冰锥;滚动;和棚车。
    目的:我们对过去十年进行了全面的文献检索,以确定常用治疗痤疮后瘢痕形成的疗效和不良反应。
    结果:共确定了36篇有关以下干预措施的相关文章:细分(n=10),磨皮术(n=1),微针(n=8),真皮填充剂(n=5),和化学剥离(n=12)。
    结论:切除术后痤疮后瘢痕外观的改善在10-100%的范围内。微晶磨皮取得了最不重要的结果。总共有27.3%的患者尽管进行了8次治疗,但没有获得任何益处。只有9.1%取得了良好的效果。用微针治疗的所有患者在31-62%的范围内实现了疤痕外观的一些改善。真皮填充剂也带来了有利的结果。特别是,用PPMA治疗导致84%的患者改善.利用化学果皮,三氯乙酸(TCA)CROSS在73.3%的患者中实现了>70%的改善,而20%的乙醇酸没有导致25%的任何改善。
    结论:痤疮后瘢痕形成是一种常见且具有挑战性的疾病,没有简单而明确的解决方案。上述干预措施均有不同程度的疗效,每个人都有优点和缺点。所有这些都被认为是安全的,很少和短暂的不良反应。然而,有必要对更多患者进行进一步试验,以便就其疗效得出更具体的结论.

    BACKGROUND: Acne is a common condition that can result in permanent scarring. Acne scars can be broken down into three categories: atrophic; hypertrophic; and keloidal. Atrophic scars can be further sub-classified into: ice pick; rolling; and boxcar.
    OBJECTIVE: We have performed a comprehensive literature search of the last ten years in order to determine the efficacy and adverse reactions of commonly used treatments against post-acne scarring.
    RESULTS: A total of 36 relevant articles were identified on the following interventions: subcision (n = 10), dermabrasion (n = 1), microneedling (n = 8), dermal fillers (n = 5), and chemical peeling (n = 12).
    CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in the appearance of post-acne scarring following subcision is in the range of 10-100%. Microdermabrasion achieved the least significant results. A total of 27.3% patients did not achieve any benefit despite eight treatment sessions, and only 9.1% achieved good results. All patients treated with microneedling achieved some improvement in scar appearance in the range of 31-62%. Dermal fillers also led to favourable outcomes. In particular, treatment with PPMA led to improvement in 84% of patients. Utilising chemical peels, trichloroacetic acid (TCA) CROSS achieved >70% improvement in 73.3% of patients, whereas 20% glycolic acid did not lead to any improvement in 25%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Post-acne scarring is a common and challenging condition with no easy and definitive solution. The above interventions have been used with varying degrees of efficacy, each having both pros and cons. All have been deemed to be safe with few and transient adverse reactions. However, further trials with a larger number of patients are necessary in order to reach more concrete conclusions regarding their efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号