■剥离经受住了时间的考验,微创方法来更新皮肤,尽管引入了更先进的程序,如激光。
■30名年龄在15至45岁之间的轻度至中度寻常痤疮患者(或60个部位)被纳入研究。基线评估是通过包括轻度和中度痤疮患者的总体痤疮分级系统评分进行的。
■关于根据5点全球评估量表(GAS)对改进进行评分,发现在A区(黑皮),6.7%的患者表现出极好的改善,86.7%的患者表现出良好的改善,6.7%的患者表现出相当的改善。在区域B(25%TCA剥离),6.7%的患者表现出极好的改善,80%的患者表现出良好的改善,13.3%的患者表现出相当的改善。
■没有患者在任何方面表现出不良或更差的结果。组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.688)。
■文献中关于黑色果皮与其他常规果皮在治疗寻常痤疮中的比较的数据很少。据我们所知,这是第一个比较黑皮和TCA皮治疗寻常痤疮的研究。
UNASSIGNED: Peeling has withstood the test of time as a simple, minimally invasive method to renew the skin, despite the introduction of more advanced procedures like lasers.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty patients (or 60 sites) with age ranging from 15 to 45 years with mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris were included in the
study. Assessment at baseline was done by the global acne grading system score for including mild and moderate acne patients.
UNASSIGNED: On grading the improvement according to the 5-point Global Assessment Scale (GAS), it was found that in area A (black
peel), 6.7% of patients showed excellent improvement, 86.7% of patients showed good improvement, and 6.7% of patients showed fair improvement. In area B (25%TCA
peel), 6.7% of patients showed excellent improvement, 80% of patients showed good improvement, and 13.3% of patients showed fair improvement.
UNASSIGNED: None of the patients showed poor or worse outcomes in any of the areas. The difference between the groups was not significant (P = 0.688).
UNASSIGNED: There is a paucity of data in the literature regarding the comparison of black
peel with other conventional peels in the treatment of acne vulgaris. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first
study comparing black
peel with TCA
peel in the treatment of acne vulgaris.