BACKGROUND: Cytological screening remains a high-impact practice, particularly in low-resource settings, for preventing cervical cancer. The examination of screening practices over time and the prevalence of epithelial abnormalities have not been investigated in longitudinal studies in one of the largest countries in the Middle East and Africa.
METHODS: Routine healthcare data, between March 1981 and December 2022, were extracted from the database of the Early Cancer Detection Unit in a tertiary referral university hospital in the Greater Cairo Region, Egypt. Cervical smears were obtained using a standardized technique and sent to the cytopathology laboratory for conventional cytology examination by expert pathologists. The anonymous data were analyzed to determine the temporal trend of the number of women screened each year and the prevalence of epithelial abnormalities.
RESULTS: Data included the results of satisfactory smears from 95120 women. The mean age (SD) of the women at the time of screening was 38.5 (10.5). None of the included women received an HPV vaccine. Abnormal epithelial cells were reported in 5174 women (5.44%). Of these epithelial abnormalities, the majority were low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in 4144 women (4.36%). Other abnormalities included atypical squamous cells in 378 women (0.40%), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in 226 women (0.24%), atypical glandular cells not otherwise specified in 184 women (0.19%), adenocarcinoma in 165 women (0.17%), squamous cell carcinoma in 70 women (0.07%), and atypical glandular cells favoring neoplasms in 7 women (0.01%). Women who were at an early age at first intercourse, those who opted for routine cervical cytology screening, and those who were older at screening were more likely to have epithelial abnormalities. The yearly number of screened women was positively associated with the detection of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (correlation coefficient [95% CI] = 0.84 [0.72, 0.91]) and negatively associated with the detection of squamous cell carcinoma (correlation coefficient [95% CI] = -0.55 [-0.73, -0.29]).
CONCLUSIONS: The small number of annually screened Egyptian women and the temporal trend in epithelial abnormalities critically demonstrate the need for establishing and scaling up a structured population-based program to achieve the goal of eliminating cervical cancer.

Background and objective Cervical cancer is the second most common malignancy among Indian women. In 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) called for global action toward the elimination of cervical cancer through the triple-intervention strategy. One of its pillars is ensuring 70% screening coverage of eligible women with a high-performance test at least twice in their lifetime. Various factors contribute to the delayed diagnosis of cervical cancer, increasing the burden of the disease. In this study, we aimed to determine the healthcare provider (HCP)-related factors in the diagnostic delay of advanced cervical cancer. Methods This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted over two months in the cancer clinic of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India. We interviewed 384 women diagnosed with advanced cervical cancer [the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB3-IVB] by using a questionnaire to capture data inputs regarding the various healthcare services they had received in the past 10 years along with details of HCPs. The collected data were analyzed using the software STATA version 17.0. Results Among 384 participants, 185 (48.1%) had interacted with an HCP in the past 10 years; 157 (40.8%) of them had visited a healthcare facility. Among these 185 women, only 22.16% had been advised to undergo screening, and only 15.18% had been tested despite several having access to primary health centers within 10 km of their residence. The lack of screening guidance by HCPs accounted for 78% of delayed diagnoses of cervical cancer. Conclusions Based on our findings, a deficiency in screening guidance in the asymptomatic period by healthcare providers across various levels of our healthcare system contributed significantly to the delayed diagnosis of cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prevention of cervical cancer can be achieved by treating high-grade cervical precancerous lesions. Treatment options for cervical precancer include excisional procedures, and ablation treatments. Despite the long pre-invasive course of the disease, literature addressing sexual function post-treatment for cervical pre-invasive lesions is scarce. This study aims to bridge this gap and assess the sexual function and the acceptability, efficacy, safety, and complications of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) versus thermal ablation.
METHODS: The prospective open-label randomized controlled trial recruited women aged 22-55 with histologically confirmed Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 3 lesions. Participants were randomly allocated to either thermal ablation or LEEP. All cases were followed up with a Pap smear at three- and six-months post treatment. Sexual health assessments were conducted using a questionnaire at baseline and 3 months post-procedure. Secondary outcome measures included comparison of acceptability, pain, and side effects between the two treatment measures.
RESULTS: Out of 1356 screened cases, 60 were included in the study and randomized in two groups. The groups had similar baseline characteristics. Duration of LEEP was longer than thermal ablation (25.33 vs. 20.67 minutes), with higher pain reported 10 minutes post-procedure in the LEEP group. Three months post-procedure, both groups showed comparable acceptability and symptom relief. Sexual function parameters significantly improved in the thermal ablation group compared to LEEP, including satisfaction, desire, lubrication, flexibility, and ability to reach climax.
CONCLUSIONS: LEEP and thermal ablation are effective treatments for CIN with similar efficacy at 6 months. Thermal ablation demonstrated advantages in procedure time and post-procedural pain but exhibited varying effects on sexual function, improving satisfaction and desire. In contrast, LEEP showed a decrease in satisfaction and potential alterations in lubrication and flexibility. Larger-sample, longer-term studies are recommended for further insights.

UNASSIGNED: Since today cervical cancers are growing, there is an increasing need to use screening and examination methods. Meanwhile, liquid-based Pap smear test is a common screening method for women, which is widely applied today. Studies have found that use of lubricant gel in this test can affect the pathology and cytology results. Accordingly, the authors intended to evaluate the effect of use of lubricant gel on the Pap smear test results.
UNASSIGNED: This study was of single-blind clinical trial, the study population consisted of candidate patients for screening in terms of cervical pathology, for whom liquid-based Pap smear was done. In this study, 506 patients participated, divided into two groups of 253. One group used lubricant gel during the Pap smear, while the other group underwent this test without lubricant. The data were analyzed by SPSS 21.
UNASSIGNED: The study results indicated that once the two groups were compared in terms of age, interval of menstruation time and intercourse time from the sampling, no significant relationship was found between the two groups (P>0.05). It was also found that use of lubricant did not affect the cytology and pathology results of patients (P>0.05).
UNASSIGNED: The use of lubricant gel in patients can reduce pain in patients during examination and testing, but does not affect the cytological and pathological results of patients.

UNASSIGNED: Cervical cancer in Iran ranks as the fourth most frequent cancer among women. Pap smear (PS) is the best standard for detecting cervical cancer, but many people, even healthcare providers (HCPs), do not maintain it. HCPs play a critical role in promoting PS uptake. The purpose of the study was to explore barriers to cervical cancer PS screening compliance from the HCPs\' perspective.
UNASSIGNED: The present qualitative content analysis was conducted through semi-structured in-depth interviews. A total of 28 HCPs were interviewed between July and August 2020. A diverse sample of HCPs was selected using purposive sampling. Data analysis was based on the five steps proposed by Graneheim and Lundman. MAXQDA (2020) was used for data analyzing.
UNASSIGNED: Ten key sub-categories were identified and organized into three categories: individual, environmental, and socio-cultural factors. The sub-categories included inadequate risk perception, inappropriate attitude, low commitment, emotional factors, low priority over health, requirements and consequences of the test, deficiencies of health centers, organizational factors, traditions and religious believes.
UNASSIGNED: HCPs face multiple barriers for PS. Exploring and decreasing barriers of PS in HCPs may increase compliance in them and their clients because they play an influential role in instructing and persuading women to take the PS. There is need to explore these barriers and identify possible interventions to change them. Insights from this study are useful for developing policies around national PS programs, too.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women worldwide and a cause of high mortality among people. Pap smear screening is an appropriate method to prevent cervical cancer and reduce its mortality.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effect of web-based education based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) on cervical cancer screening behavior in middle-aged women.
RESULTS: This study is a quasi-experimental interventional research that was conducted on 240 middle-aged women aged 40-59 years in Isfahan, Iran, in 2022. An online educational intervention based on the constructs of the Health Belief Model was conducted for the intervention group using the Triple-B platform. The information on the intervention and control groups was collected before, immediately after the intervention, and 2 months later using a valid questionnaire. The gathered Data was analyzed using ANOVA and LSD post-hoc, independent samples t test, chi-square, and MANCOVA statistical tests in SPSS 26 software. After the intervention, the mean scores of knowledge, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, self-efficacy, and internal cues to action in the intervention group increased and the mean score of perceived barriers decreased (p < .001). The mean score of the external cues to action did not show a significant difference between the intervention and control groups before, immediately, and 2 months after the intervention. Two months after the intervention, 32 women (26.2%) in the intervention group and two women (1.7%) in the control group performed the Pap smear test.
CONCLUSIONS: Web-based educational intervention based on HBM using different strategies such as question and answer, presentation of infographics, lectures, brainstorming, showing videos and numerous educational images can be an effective way for increasing knowledge and cognitive variables of women and doing Pap smear test.

BACKGROUND: Colposcopy has a key role to play in see-and-treat programs for premalignant cervical lesions. The aim of the study/was to observe cervical changes with a colposcope using the Swede scoring system in fertile age group women using various contraceptives: conventional methods (barrier methods, coitus interruptus), oral contraceptives (OCPs), copper-T and bilateral tubectomy. The aim of the study was to observe and evaluate the colposcopic findings using the Swede scoring system for the diagnosis of premalignant/malignant lesions in reproductive age group women using various contraceptives.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study, conducted among 200 women of reproductive age group using various contraceptives in a tertiary care institute in North India. PAP smear, direct visual examination, VIA (Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid) examination, colposcopic examination, and (biopsy if indicated) were done. The data were collected, and analysis was done using Microsoft Excel Office Software 2019 version 19.11 and epi info (CDC Atlanta) 7.23.1. Statistical analysis was done using percentages, mean, mode, median, standard deviation, Chi-square, Fisher\'s Test, and Anova Test.
RESULTS: We found positive PAP (Papanicolaou test) smears in 61.50%, positive VIA examination in 9%, and positive findings in colposcopic examination in 28.50%, Swede score of 0-3 in 100% (0-91%, 1-2%, 2-6%, and 3-1%) and positive biopsy in 9% subjects. Malignant findings were observed in 1.00% of PAP smears. Colposcopic findings were CIN 1 (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1) in 8.5% and CIN 2 in 0.5% subjects. Swede score was zero in 91%, 1 in 2%, 2 in 6%, and 3 in 1% of subjects. HPE (histopathological examination) was chronic cervicitis in 8.50% and mild dysplasia/CIN 1 in 0.5%. No significant statistical associations between contraceptive choice and false-positive test results or disease prevalence was found in any group except Cu-T users p = 0.0184 (especially for CIN 2; p = 0.0109 and CIN 1 more in all groups than Cu-T users). Colposcopy had sensitivity 100%, specificity 91.46% (0/0 = 0%) PPV = 5.56%, NPV = 100%, Accuracy = 91.5% for detecting mild dysplasia/CIN-non-significant (p = 0.055). Our study had mainly low-grade lesions with 100% NPV. With increase in Swede Score, sensitivity increases but at the expense of specificity but it was statistically non-significant (p = 0.055).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study may guide the rational use of colposcopy with Swede scoring for see-and-treat lesions, which is easy and with a low learning curve, as a tool for diagnosis but only in cases where indicated like unhealthy cervix because of the high rate of false-positive results. In low-grade lesions, it is highly useful to rule out the disease.

OBJECTIVE: There is evidence in Germany that half of the cervical cancer (CC) cases had undergone screening frequently in the decade preceding their diagnosis, signaling cytology quality issues. This study investigates routine smear assessment accuracy in Germany.
METHODS: Within a population-based case-control study in 9 German states, we recruited cases (women with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of CC) and population controls (women with no history of CC or hysterectomy). Two independent expert cytologists audited Pap smears taken within the 10 years preceding CC diagnosis (cases)/study entry (controls). We report the prevalence of positive results, as well as routine assessment\'s accuracy, as sensitivity, specificity, false-positive and false-negative rates along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). We also examined cases\' smear history, to investigate possible false-positive recurrence.
RESULTS: We audited 1632 smears of 392 women (18.9% cases, 81.1% controls). In the routine assessment, the overall prevalence of positive results was 4.5% (29.0% among cases). According to the expert audit, the overall prevalence of positive results was 7.7% (40.8% among cases). When restricting analyses to the 3 years preceding diagnosis/study entry, this prevalence increased to 11.9% overall (61.4% among cases). The overall sensitivity of the routine assessment was 54.9% (66.8% for cases).
CONCLUSIONS: As cytology remains an important part of CC screening, quality issues must be urgently addressed in Germany. Shifting to objective methods such as primary high-risk HPV screening followed by triaging may help CC elimination in Germany.

Background Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women globally. It is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths in females in India. Cervical cancer has a long latent precancerous period from index human papillomavirus (HPV) infection to potential cancer development, making screening one of the most effective methods of cancer prevention. Despite the national cancer prevention programme for cancer cervix, with defined guidelines for cervical cancer screening by the auxiliary nurse midwives (ANM) and nurses, cervical cancer screening is very limited in India. In this study, we aim to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices related to cervical cancer and screening methods among the nursing staff in a tertiary care hospital attached to a medical teaching institute. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted by a semi-structured questionnaire in a tertiary care hospital in Morbi, situated in the western region of India, between November and December 2023. Female nursing staff of the hospital in the age of 20 to 60 years were included as study participants. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee. Results In the study, 64.9% of participants were in the age group of 20-29 years, and 52.6% were unmarried, forming a major portion of the study group being of young age. Of the participants, 70.1% identified cancer of the cervix as a major public health problem. Only 28.8% of the participants had adequate and comprehensive knowledge of cervical cancer screening. Though 92.8% of the participants knew of Pap smear as a cervical cancer screening method, only 12.4% of participants were aware of the visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and 2% were aware of HPV testing as a tool for cervical cancer screening. Only 5.2% of the study participants had themselves been screened for cervical cancer. Of the participants, 87.6% had never taken a Pap smear, and 95.8% of participants had never taken VIA of any woman. A total of 32.3% of participants gave the reason of not having adequate skills to perform VIA as the reason for not ever having screened the patient with VIA. A total of 6.2% of participants had been trained in cervical screening methods formally. Conclusion The limited knowledge of the nursing staff of cervical cancer and its screening and low self-screening prevalence among healthcare professionals highlight the need to increase awareness of cervical cancer and screening to bring the impetus to training and result-driven implementation of screening programmes for cervical cancer in India.

Despite breakthroughs in cervical cancer detection, resource-constrained countries continue to have a disproportionately high incidence and death rate. Mhealth has been identified as an important tool for increasing cervical cancer screening rates in Sub-Saharan Africa. We determined whether sending Ghanaian women culturally tailored one-way mobile phone SMS text messages about cervical cancer would encourage the uptake of the human papillomavirus (HPV) test.
From August to November 2016, 88 women aged 18 to 39 living or working in an urban community (Accra, Ghana) participated in a quasi-experimental study. For 8 weeks, 32 SMS messages regarding cervical cancer were developed and sent to the personal phones of intervention arm participants (n = 42). Women in the control group (n = 46) received SMS texts with general health and lifestyle advice. Fischer\'s exact tests were performed to assess cervical cancer screening uptake and associated reasons for non-uptake between the intervention and control groups (p < 0.05).
At the baseline, women differed in terms of ethnicity and wealth. After the intervention, participants\' self-reported risk factors for cervical cancer, such as early menarche, usual source of medical treatment, family history of cancer, smoking, and alcohol history, changed. None of the women in the intervention group sought cervical cancer screening after the intervention, but only one (2.2%) of the control arm participants did. Almost all the women (> 95%) agreed that an HPV test was essential and that regular healthcare check-ups could help prevent cervical cancer. Some women believed that avoiding particular foods could help prevent cervical cancer (23.8% intervention vs. 58.7% control, p < 0.001). Time constraints and out-of-pocket expenses were significant barriers to cervical cancer screening.
A one-way SMS delivered to urban women did not increase cervical cancer screening attendance. The time spent in screening facilities and the lack of coverage by the National Health Insurance Scheme limited screening uptake. We urge for the establishment of screening centers in all healthcare facilities, as well as the inclusion of cervical cancer screening in healthcare programs through cost-sharing.