Panic Disorder

恐慌症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    恐惧网络模型(FNM)中的异常功能连接(FC)已在惊恐障碍(PD)患者中被识别,但是特定的局部结构和功能特性,以及有效连接(EC),在PD中仍然知之甚少。这项研究的目的是研究PD中FNM的结构和功能模式。从33名PD患者和35名健康对照(HC)收集磁共振成像数据。灰质体积(GMV),度中心性(DC),区域同质性(ReHo),和低频波动幅度(ALFF)用于鉴定PD中FNM内脑区域的结构和功能特征。随后,异常区域的FC和EC,基于局部结构和功能特征,并进一步检查其与临床特征的相关性。PD患者表现出保留的GMV,ReHo,与HC相比,FNM的大脑区域和ALFF。然而,PD患者双侧杏仁核DC增加。杏仁核及其亚核显示出罗兰管壳的EC改变,脑岛,内侧额上回,颈上回,下额回的眼部,和颞上回.此外,汉密尔顿焦虑量表评分与从杏仁核左外侧核(背侧)到右罗兰骨和左颞上回的EC呈正相关。我们的发现揭示了PD中重组的功能网络,涉及调节外感受-感觉信号的大脑区域,心情,和躯体症状。这些结果增强了我们对PD的神经生物学基础的理解,提示诊断的潜在生物标志物和治疗干预的目标。
    Abnormal functional connectivity (FC) within the fear network model (FNM) has been identified in panic disorder (PD) patients, but the specific local structural and functional properties, as well as effective connectivity (EC), remain poorly understood in PD. The purpose of this study was to investigate the structural and functional patterns of the FNM in PD. Magnetic resonance imaging data were collected from 33 PD patients and 35 healthy controls (HCs). Gray matter volume (GMV), degree centrality (DC), regional homogeneity (ReHo), and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) were used to identify the structural and functional characteristics of brain regions within the FNM in PD. Subsequently, FC and EC of abnormal regions, based on local structural and functional features, and their correlation with clinical features were further examined. PD patients exhibited preserved GMV, ReHo, and ALFF in the brain regions of the FNM compared with HCs. However, increased DC in the bilateral amygdala was observed in PD patients. The amygdala and its subnuclei exhibited altered EC with rolandic operculum, insula, medial superior frontal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus, and superior temporal gyrus. Additionally, Hamilton Anxiety Scale score was positively correlated with EC from left lateral nuclei (dorsal portion) of amygdala to right rolandic operculum and left superior temporal gyrus. Our findings revealed a reorganized functional network in PD involving brain regions regulating exteroceptive-interoceptive signals, mood, and somatic symptoms. These results enhance our understanding of the neurobiological underpinnings of PD, suggesting potential biomarkers for diagnosis and targets for therapeutic intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:观察数据表明情绪不适之间存在联系,比如焦虑和抑郁,和子宫肌瘤(UFs)。然而,需要进一步调查以确定它们之间的因果关系。因此,我们利用双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)评估了4种心理障碍与UF之间的相互因果关系.
    方法:评估四种类型的心理困扰(抑郁症状,严重的抑郁症,焦虑或恐慌症发作,情绪波动)和UF,采用双向双样本MR,利用与这些条件相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)。单变量MR(UVMR)和多变量MR(MVMR)都主要应用逆方差加权(IVW)作为估计潜在因果效应的方法。诸如MREgger之类的补充方法,加权中位数,简单模式,和加权模式用于验证研究结果。为了评估我们MR结果的稳健性,我们使用Cochran的Q检验和MREgger截距检验进行了敏感性分析。
    结果:我们的UVMR分析结果表明,抑郁症状的遗传易感性(比率[OR]=1.563,95%置信区间[CI]=1.209-2.021,P=0.001)和重度抑郁症(MDD)(OR=1.176,95%CI=1.044-1.324,P=0.007)与UF的风险增加有关。此外,IVW模型显示,情绪波动(OR:1.578;95%CI:1.062-2.345;P=0.024)与UFs风险之间存在显著正相关.然而,我们的分析未建立UFs与四种心理困扰之间的因果关系.即使在调整了体重指数(BMI)等混杂因素后,吸烟,酒精消费,以及MVMR中的活产数量,MDD和UFs之间的因果关系仍然显著(OR=1.217,95%CI=1.039-1.425,P=0.015).
    结论:我们的研究提供了支持MDD遗传易感性与UFs发病率之间因果关系的证据。这些发现强调了解决心理健康问题的重要性,尤其是抑郁症,在UF的预防和治疗中。
    BACKGROUND: Observational data indicates a connection between emotional discomfort, such as anxiety and depression, and uterine fibroids (UFs). However, additional investigation is required to establish the causal relationship between them. Hence, we assessed the reciprocal causality between four psychological disorders and UFs utilizing two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR).
    METHODS: To evaluate the causal relationship between four types of psychological distress (depressive symptoms, severe depression, anxiety or panic attacks, mood swings) and UFs, bidirectional two-sample MR was employed, utilizing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with these conditions. Both univariate MR (UVMR) and multivariate MR (MVMR) primarily applied inverse variance weighted (IVW) as the method for estimating potential causal effects. Complementary approaches such as MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode were utilized to validate the findings. To assess the robustness of our MR results, we conducted sensitivity analyses using Cochran\'s Q-test and the MR Egger intercept test.
    RESULTS: The results of our UVMR analysis suggest that genetic predispositions to depressive symptoms (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.563, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.209-2.021, P = 0.001) and major depressive disorder (MDD) (OR = 1.176, 95% CI = 1.044-1.324, P = 0.007) are associated with an increased risk of UFs. Moreover, the IVW model showed a nominally significant positive correlation between mood swings (OR: 1.578; 95% CI: 1.062-2.345; P = 0.024) and UFs risk. However, our analysis did not establish a causal relationship between UFs and the four types of psychological distress. Even after adjusting for confounders like body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol consumption, and number of live births in the MVMR, the causal link between MDD and UFs remained significant (OR = 1.217, 95% CI = 1.039-1.425, P = 0.015).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study presents evidence supporting the causal relationship between genetic susceptibility to MDD and the incidence of UFs. These findings highlight the significance of addressing psychological health issues, particularly depression, in both the prevention and treatment of UFs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管有治疗强迫症(OCD)的药物治疗和心理治疗,由于治疗耐药性的可能性很高,因此需要探索替代方法。神经导航20Hztheta脉冲串刺激(TBS-20Hz),瞄准双侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC),增强右眶额叶皮质(ROFC),进行了治疗强迫症合并抑郁症和焦虑症的测试。
    方法:对在私人门诊接受中重度强迫症治疗的14例患者进行回顾性分析。12名患者患有共病重度抑郁症(MDD),13例患者患有广泛性焦虑症(GAD)或恐慌症(PD)。患者完成Y-BOCS-SR,BDI-II,每周BAI评定量表,用来测量强迫症的变化,抑郁症,和焦虑症状,分别。
    结果:神经导航TBS-20Hz依次应用于右侧DLPFC(RDLPFC),左侧DLPFC(LDLPFC),ROFC在平均6.1周的治疗中,共有64%(9/14)的患者从OCD(Y-BOCS-SR≤14)中获得缓解(SD=4.0)。总共58%(7/12)的患者在平均4.1周(SD=2.8)内从MDD(BDI<13)缓解,62%(8/13)的患者在平均4.3周(SD=2.5)内从GAD/PD(BAI<8)缓解。
    结论:神经导航TBS-20Hz序贯刺激RDLPFC和LDLPFC,其次是ROFC,显著降低OCD,MDD,和GAD/PD症状。保证随机假对照以验证这些结果。
    BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for treating obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), alternative approaches need to be explored due to the high likelihood of treatment resistance. Neuronavigated 20 Hz theta burst stimulation (TBS-20 Hz), targeting the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) augmented with the right orbitofrontal cortex (ROFC), was tested for treating OCD comorbid with depression and anxiety disorders.
    METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on fourteen patients treated for moderate-to-severe OCD in a private outpatient clinic. Twelve patients had comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD), and thirteen patients had either generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) or panic disorder (PD). Patients completed the Y-BOCS-SR, BDI-II, and BAI rating scales weekly, which were used to measure the changes in OCD, depression, and anxiety symptoms, respectively.
    RESULTS: Neuronavigated TBS-20 Hz was sequentially applied to the right DLPFC (RDLPFC), left DLPFC (LDLPFC), and ROFC. A total of 64% (9/14) of patients achieved remission from OCD (Y-BOCS-SR ≤ 14) in an average of 6.1 weeks of treatment (SD = 4.0). A total of 58% (7/12) of patients remitted from MDD (BDI < 13) in an average of 4.1 weeks (SD = 2.8), and 62% (8/13) of patients remitted from GAD/PD (BAI < 8) in an average of 4.3 weeks (SD = 2.5).
    CONCLUSIONS: The neuronavigated TBS-20 Hz sequential stimulation of RDLPFC and LDLPFC, followed by ROFC, significantly reduced OCD, MDD, and GAD/PD symptoms. Randomized sham controls are warranted to validate these results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肌肉骨骼慢性疼痛是导致全球残疾和唇功能丧失的主要原因。然而,缺乏以人群为基础的研究,调查慢性疼痛和精神障碍与对照组之间的关系,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。慢性疼痛是人类痛苦的严重公共卫生问题,以及社会经济影响。经常与不同的精神障碍联系会增加残疾,降低生活质量,并使诊断和治疗具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者中精神障碍的存在,并与无疼痛的对照组进行比较。
    方法:我们在2016年6月至2018年6月在大学医院肌肉骨骼疼痛门诊进行了定期随访,并将其与对照组的100名无痛个体进行了比较。使用的工具是迷你国际神经精神病学访谈(MINI-PLUS)和收集社会人口统计学数据的结构化问卷。统计学分析采用t检验,卡方,费希尔的精确检验,Mann-Whitney,Kolmogorov-Smirnov测试,和多元逻辑回归。
    结果:在评估的样本中,大多数患者是女性(83%),棕色(54%),教育水平较低(51%),较低的工资范围(73%)和高缺勤率(60,7%)。慢性疼痛患者有更多的精神疾病(88%vs.对照组为48%;p<0.001)。最常见的诊断是伴有惊恐发作的焦虑症(44%),广泛性焦虑(36%),混合性焦虑和抑郁障碍(33%),社交恐惧症(30%)广场恐惧症(29%),自杀风险(28%),抑郁症(27%)。
    结论:已证明精神障碍与慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛呈正相关。这表明在治疗慢性疼痛综合征时必须考虑精神病成分。使用MiniPlus作为精神疾病的诊断工具有助于优化慢性疼痛患者的诊断和治疗,并鼓励制定具有快速获取多专业服务的策略和标准的政策。
    Musculoskeletal chronic pain is a leading cause of global disability and laboral incapacity. However, there is a lack of population-based studies that investigate the relationship between chronic pain and mental disorders with a control group, particularly among low- and middle-income countries. Chronic pain is a serious public health problem in terms of human suffering, and in terms of socioeconomic implications. Frequent association with different mental disorders increases disability, decreases quality of life, and makes diagnosis and treatment challenging. The present study aimed to evaluate the presence of mental disorders in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and compare with a control group without pain.
    We selected 100 patients in a regular follow-up at the Musculoskeletal Pain Outpatient Clinic of the University Hospital and compared them with 100 painless individuals from the control group from June 2016 to June 2018. The instruments used were the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI-PLUS) and a structured questionnaire to collect sociodemographic data. Statistical analysis used t-test, chi-square, Fisher\'s exact test, Mann-Whitney, Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, and multiple logistic regression.
    In the sample evaluated, the majority of patients were women (83%), of brown color (54%), with lower-level education (51%), lower salary range (73%) and high absenteeism rate at work (60,7%). Patients with chronic pain had more psychiatric disorders (88% vs. 48% in the control group; p < 0.001). The most frequent diagnoses were anxiety disorders with panic attacks (44%), generalized anxiety (36%), mixed anxiety and depression disorder (33%), social phobia (30%), agoraphobia (29%), suicide risk (28%), and major depression (27%).
    Positive correlations of mental disorders and chronic musculoskeletal pain have been documented. This suggests that psychiatric components must be taken into account in the management of chronic pain syndromes. The use of Mini Plus as a diagnostic tool for psychiatric disorders can contribute to optimizing the diagnosis and treatment of patients with chronic pain and encourage the creation of policies with strategies and criteria for quick access to Multi-professional Services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:恐慌症是临床实践中常见且重要的疾病,会降低个体生产力并增加医疗保健使用。治疗包括药物治疗和认知行为治疗。然而,不良的药物作用和不良的治疗依从性意味着需要新的治疗模式.
    目的:我们假设恐慌症的数字化治疗可以改善恐慌症的症状,并且治疗反应与功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)评估的大脑活动变化有关。
    方法:招募有惊恐发作史的个体(n=50)。在使用惊恐障碍的应用程序之前和之后评估症状,在这项研究中,这是一个基于智能手机的应用程序,用于治疗恐慌症的临床症状,恐慌症状,抑郁症状,和焦虑。通过fNIRS测量静息状态下额叶皮质的血液动力学。该应用程序有四个部分:日记,教育,quest,严肃的游戏。研究试验获得中安大学医院机构审查委员会的批准(1041078-202112-HR-349-01),并获得所有参与者的书面知情同意书。
    结果:应用组恐慌症状改善的参与者人数(20/25,80%)大于对照组(6/21,29%;χ21=12.3;P=0.005)。治疗期间,应用组的惊恐障碍严重程度量表(PDSS)评分改善大于对照组(F1,44=7.03;P=0.01).在应用程序使用组中,总PDSS评分下降了42.5%(基线时平均评分14.3,SD6.5,干预后平均评分7.2,SD3.6),而对照组的PDSS评分下降了14.6%(基线时平均评分12.4,SD5.2,干预后平均评分9.8,SD7.9).在应用和对照组之间,基线时累积的氧合血红蛋白(accHbO2)没有显着差异。治疗期间,在应用中,右腹外侧前额叶皮质(VLPFC;F1,44=8.22;P=.006)和右眶前额叶皮质(OFC;F1,44=8.88;P=.005)的accHbO2降低幅度大于对照组.
    结论:应用惊恐障碍可以有效减轻惊恐障碍患者的症状和VLPFC和OFC脑活动。惊恐障碍症状的改善与静息状态下VLPFC和OFC脑活动的降低呈正相关。
    背景:临床研究信息服务KCT0007280;https://cris。nih.走吧。kr/cris/search/detailSearch.做?seq=21448。
    BACKGROUND: Panic disorder is a common and important disease in clinical practice that decreases individual productivity and increases health care use. Treatments comprise medication and cognitive behavioral therapy. However, adverse medication effects and poor treatment compliance mean new therapeutic models are needed.
    OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that digital therapy for panic disorder may improve panic disorder symptoms and that treatment response would be associated with brain activity changes assessed with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).
    METHODS: Individuals (n=50) with a history of panic attacks were recruited. Symptoms were assessed before and after the use of an app for panic disorder, which in this study was a smartphone-based app for treating the clinical symptoms of panic disorder, panic symptoms, depressive symptoms, and anxiety. The hemodynamics in the frontal cortex during the resting state were measured via fNIRS. The app had 4 parts: diary, education, quest, and serious games. The study trial was approved by the institutional review board of Chung-Ang University Hospital (1041078-202112-HR-349-01) and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
    RESULTS: The number of participants with improved panic symptoms in the app use group (20/25, 80%) was greater than that in the control group (6/21, 29%; χ21=12.3; P=.005). During treatment, the improvement in the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) score in the app use group was greater than that in the control group (F1,44=7.03; P=.01). In the app use group, the total PDSS score declined by 42.5% (mean score 14.3, SD 6.5 at baseline and mean score 7.2, SD 3.6 after the intervention), whereas the PDSS score declined by 14.6% in the control group (mean score 12.4, SD 5.2 at baseline and mean score 9.8, SD 7.9 after the intervention). There were no significant differences in accumulated oxygenated hemoglobin (accHbO2) at baseline between the app use and control groups. During treatment, the reduction in accHbO2 in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC; F1,44=8.22; P=.006) and the right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC; F1,44=8.88; P=.005) was greater in the app use than the control group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Apps for panic disorder should effectively reduce symptoms and VLPFC and OFC brain activity in patients with panic disorder. The improvement of panic disorder symptoms was positively correlated with decreased VLPFC and OFC brain activity in the resting state.
    BACKGROUND: Clinical Research Information Service KCT0007280; https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=21448.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    简介:由于缺乏证据,我们研究了短期强化CBT对惊恐障碍(PD)患者症状严重程度和灾难性认知的影响.材料和方法:在这项随机对照试验中,155名患者被分配到实验组(每天2天的短期强化CBT-3小时)或对照组(仅常规药物治疗)。排除不合格的参与者后,短暂强化CBT组的20例患者和对照组的18例患者完成了研究,并纳入最终分析。主要结果是症状严重程度,次要结果是灾难性的认知,通过恐慌症严重程度量表(PDSS)评估症状严重程度,并通过恐惧认知量表(ACS)评估认知评估,分别。结果:研究表明,经过一个月的治疗,PDSS(1.70vs.4.78;p=0.0172)与ACS相比,短暂密集CBT组明显低于对照组(5.10vs.5.44;p=0.8533)。在简短的CBT组中,PDSS和ACS的平均评分从21.60降至1.7(p<0.0001),从22.55降至5.10(p<0.0001),从19.44降至4.78(p<0.0001),从20.00降至5.44(p<0.0001)。分别。治疗后,在短暂强化CBT组和对照组中,PDSS和ACS的平均评分显著降低.在短暂的密集CBT组中,较高的ACS和较低的教育水平都导致较高的PDSS。然而,对照组仅PDSS与ACS相关。结论:研究表明,短期强化CBT是减轻PD患者症状严重程度的有效技术。但是,在1个月时改善PD患者的认知水平并不有效。试验注册:该研究于2021年8月18日获得了Duhok卫生总局的伦理批准,编号为1808202l-8-5。
    Due to a dearth of evidence, we examined the effectiveness of brief-intensive CBT on symptom severity and catastrophic cognition in patients with panic disorder (PD).
    In this randomized controlled trial, 155 patients were assigned to either the experimental group (2 successive days of brief-intensive CBT-3 h per day) or the control group (regular pharmacotherapy only). After excluding ineligible participants, 20 patients in the brief intensive CBT group and 18 patients in the control group completed the study and were included in the final analysis. The primary outcome was symptom severity, and the secondary outcome was catastrophic cognition, assessed by the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) for symptoms severity and the Agoraphobic Cognition Scale (ACS) for cognitive assessment, respectively.
    The study showed that after one month of treatment, the PDSS (1.70 vs. 4.78; p = 0.0172) in the brief-intensive CBT group was significantly lower compared to the control group in contrast with the ACS (5.10 vs. 5.44; p = 0.8533). The mean score of PDSS and ACS significantly decreased from 21.60 to 1.7 (p < 0.0001) and from 22.55 to 5.10 (p < 0.0001) in the brief CBT group and from 19.44 to 4.78 (p < 0.0001) and 20.00 to 5.44 (p < 0.0001) in the control group, respectively. After treatment, the mean scores of PDSS and ACS significantly decreased in the brief intensive CBT and control groups. Both higher ACS and lower education levels contributed to higher PDSS in the brief intensive CBT group. However, only the PDSS correlated to the ACS in the control group.
    The study showed that brief-intensive CBT is an effective technique for reducing the severity of symptoms among PD patients. But, it was not effective to improve the cognitive level in PD patients at one month.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:恐慌症(PD)涉及情绪失调,但其潜在机制仍然知之甚少。先前的研究表明,内隐情绪调节可能在PD相关的情绪失调和症状维持中起着核心作用。然而,缺乏利用神经生理学指标探索PD内隐情绪调节的神经机制的研究。
    目的:研究具有事件相关电位(ERP)的PD内隐情绪调节的神经机制。
    方法:共有25名PD患者和20名健康对照(HC)接受了临床治疗。这项研究采用了随机抽样的病例对照设计,从2018年3月至12月为病例组选择参与者.参与者执行了影响标签任务,以情感标记为实验条件,以性别标记为对照条件。记录ERP和行为数据,以比较组内和组间的晚期阳性电位(LPP)。
    结果:在情感标记下,PD和HC组均显示出更长的反应时间和降低的准确性。在HC组中,晚期LPP振幅呈现先升高后降低的动态规律.重要的是,观察到显著的组×条件交互作用效应。简单效应分析显示,与HC组相比,PD组中的影响标记和性别标记条件之间的晚期LPP振幅的差异减少。此外,在受影响标记的PD患者中,晚期LPP与疾病严重程度呈负相关,症状频率,和强度。
    结论:PD患者表现出内隐情绪调节异常,阻碍他们调动认知资源下调负面情绪的能力。响应于影响标记的晚期LPP振幅可以作为PD严重程度的潜在有价值的临床指标。
    BACKGROUND: Panic disorder (PD) involves emotion dysregulation, but its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Previous research suggests that implicit emotion regulation may play a central role in PD-related emotion dysregulation and symptom maintenance. However, there is a lack of studies exploring the neural mechanisms of implicit emotion regulation in PD using neurophysiological indicators.
    OBJECTIVE: To study the neural mechanisms of implicit emotion regulation in PD with event-related potentials (ERP).
    METHODS: A total of 25 PD patients and 20 healthy controls (HC) underwent clinical eva-luations. The study utilized a case-control design with random sampling, selecting participants for the case group from March to December 2018. Participants performed an affect labeling task, using affect labeling as the experimental condition and gender labeling as the control condition. ERP and behavioral data were recorded to compare the late positive potential (LPP) within and between the groups.
    RESULTS: Both PD and HC groups showed longer reaction times and decreased accuracy under the affect labeling. In the HC group, late LPP amplitudes exhibited a dynamic pattern of initial increase followed by decrease. Importantly, a significant group × condition interaction effect was observed. Simple effect analysis revealed a reduction in the differences of late LPP amplitudes between the affect labeling and gender labeling conditions in the PD group compared to the HC group. Furthermore, among PD patients under the affect labeling, the late LPP was negatively correlated with disease severity, symptom frequency, and intensity.
    CONCLUSIONS: PD patients demonstrate abnormalities in implicit emotion regulation, hampering their ability to mobilize cognitive resources for downregulating negative emotions. The late LPP amplitude in response to affect labeling may serve as a potentially valuable clinical indicator of PD severity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与恐慌症(PD)搏斗的人非常清楚其衰弱的影响。突然,强烈的恐惧事件扰乱了生活,侵蚀了幸福。幸运的是,将瑜伽等补充疗法与标准治疗相结合,为改善结果提供了一线希望。瑜伽独特的身体姿势混合(体式),呼吸练习(调息),冥想练习有望减轻焦虑和培养内心的平静感,可能使其成为对抗恐慌症的有价值的工具。
    方法:本研究调查了瑜伽作为惊恐障碍标准护理的佐剂的效果。根据精神障碍诊断和统计手册(DSM-5)标准,先前被诊断为恐慌症的64名两种性别的恐慌症患者被随机分配到瑜伽组(n=32)和对照组。瑜伽小组参加了长达60分钟的综合瑜伽课程,一周五天,12周。两组均接受标准护理。收集HAM-A和WHOQOL-BREF的干预前后数据。
    结果:瑜伽组HAM-A评分显著降低(Pre:49.13±4.55,Post:13.53±5.54,p<0.001),显著效应大小为7.02。生活质量在所有领域(物理,心理,社会,和环境)在瑜伽组中(p<0.001),演示效果大小范围从4.11到4.57。对照组参与者也经历了改善,虽然不太明显。组间比较显示,在焦虑减轻(p=0.042)和生活质量提高(p<0.001)方面存在显着差异。喜欢瑜伽组。
    结论:结果表明,瑜伽可以成为焦虑症传统治疗方法的一种有价值的补充或替代方法。
    BACKGROUND: Individuals wrestling with panic disorder (PD) know all too well its debilitating impact. Sudden, intense fear episodes disrupt lives and erode well-being. Fortunately, integrating complementary therapies like yoga with standard treatment offers a glimmer of hope for improved outcomes. Yoga\'s unique blend of physical postures (asanas), breathing exercises (pranayama), and meditative practices holds promise for mitigating anxiety and fostering a sense of inner peace, potentially making it a valuable tool in the fight against panic disorder.
    METHODS: This study investigated the effect of yoga as an adjuvant to standard care for panic disorder. Sixty-four panic disorder patients of both genders previously diagnosed with panic disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria were randomly assigned to the yoga group (n = 32) and the control group. The yoga group participated in integrated yoga sessions lasting 60 minutes, five days a week, for 12 weeks. Both groups received standard care. Pre- and post-intervention data were collected for HAM-A and WHOQOL-BREF.
    RESULTS: The yoga group exhibited a significant reduction in HAM-A scores (Pre: 49.13 ± 4.55, Post: 13.53 ± 5.54, p < 0.001) with a substantial effect size of 7.02. Quality of life significantly improved across all domains (physical, psychological, social, and environmental) in the yoga group (p < 0.001), demonstrating effect sizes ranging from 4.11 to 4.57. Control group participants also experienced improvements, though less pronounced. Between-group comparisons revealed significant differences in anxiety reduction (p = 0.042) and quality of life enhancement (p < 0.001), favouring the yoga group.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that yoga can be a valuable complementary or alternative approach to traditional treatments for anxiety disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:认知行为疗法(CBT)可有效治疗焦虑症。由于治疗师的短缺,日本对CBT的可及性受到限制。虽然开源的电子学习系统可以用来创建一个简单的基于互联网的认知行为治疗(ICBT)计划,日本尚未探索这种治疗方法的安全性和门诊接受度.
    目的:本研究的目的是调查门诊患者在实施治疗模块和CBT任务时,在CBT治疗师的指导下,是否可以接受并成功完成ICBT计划。由于在日本处于新疗法的初始阶段,本研究旨在以小样本量进行验证.
    方法:总共,6成人,包括4名男性参与者和2名女性参与者,参加了一项单臂试验。干预涉及指导ICBT,包括12届会议,包括CBT文本,理解确认测试,和关于认知行为模型的解释性视频,可通过网站访问。治疗师指导参与者访问ICBT计划并使用聊天工具回答他们的问题。主要结果是使用状态特质焦虑量表-特质评估焦虑严重程度。次要结果包括恐慌症严重程度量表,利博维茨社交焦虑量表(LSAS),贝克焦虑量表(BAI),患者健康问卷-9,广泛性焦虑症-7和工作联盟量表-简表(WAI-SF)。使用配对双尾t检验进行统计分析以评估临床症状的变化。最后阶段的WAI-SF总评分用于评估治疗联盟。对于统计分析,总状态特质焦虑量表-特质特征的平均变化,BAI,惊恐障碍严重程度量表,LSAS,使用配对双尾t检验分析患者健康问卷-9和广泛性焦虑症-7评分。假设检验的双侧显著性水平设置为5%,并计算双侧95%CI。
    结果:大多数参与者努力参与ICBT项目。未报告不良事件。主要结局的平均总分下降了11.0(SD9.6)分(95%CI-22.2至0.20;对冲g=0.95),但没有统计学意义。评估临床症状的次要结局的平均总分下降,在15.7(SD12.1)点的BAI中观察到显着降低(95%CI-28.4至-3.0;P=0.03;对冲g=1.24)。PDSS和LSAS的平均总分显着下降,由12.0(SD4.24)点(95%CI-50.1至26.1;P=.16;对冲g=1.79)和32.4(SD11.1)点(95%CI-59.7至-4.3;P=.04;对冲g=1.38),分别。在参与者中,67%(n=4)显示治疗反应,50%(n=3)在干预后获得缓解。治疗联盟,使用WAI-SF测量,是温和的。
    结论:在日本,指导ICBT治疗惊恐障碍和社交焦虑障碍患者可能是可行的。
    背景:大学医院医疗信息网络临床试验注册UMIN0000038118;https://cente6。乌明。AC.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view。cgi?recptno=R000043439。
    BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective in treating anxiety disorders. Accessibility to CBT has been limited in Japan due to the shortage of therapists. While an open-source e-learning system can be used to create a simple internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) program, the safety and outpatient acceptance of this treatment approach have not been explored in Japan.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether outpatients with anxiety disorders could accept and successfully complete the ICBT program with guidance by CBT therapists when implementing therapeutic modules and CBT tasks. Due to being in the initial phase of a novel treatment in Japan, this study was intended for verification with a small sample size.
    METHODS: In total, 6 adults, including 4 male participants and 2 female participants, were enrolled in a single-arm trial. The intervention involved guided ICBT comprising 12 sessions, including CBT text, comprehension confirmation tests, and explanatory videos about cognitive behavioral models, accessible through a website. The therapist guided the participants in accessing the ICBT program and answering their questions using a chat tool. The primary outcome was anxiety severity assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait. Secondary outcomes included the Panic Disorder Severity Scale, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form (WAI-SF). Statistical analyses were performed using paired 2-tailed t tests to assess the changes in clinical symptoms. The total WAI-SF score at the final session was used to evaluate the therapeutic alliance. For statistical analyses, mean changes for total State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait, BAI, Panic Disorder Severity Scale, LSAS, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scores were analyzed using the paired 2-tailed t test. The 2-sided significance level for hypothesis testing was set at 5%, and 2-sided 95% CIs were calculated.
    RESULTS: Most participants diligently engaged with the ICBT program. No adverse events were reported. The mean total scores for the primary outcome decreased by 11.0 (SD 9.6) points (95% CI -22.2 to 0.20; Hedges g=0.95), but it was not statistically significant. The mean total scores for the secondary outcomes that assess clinical symptoms decreased, with a significant reduction observed in the BAI of 15.7 (SD 12.1) points (95% CI -28.4 to -3.0; P=.03; Hedges g=1.24). The mean total scores for PDSS and LSAS decreased significantly, by 12.0 (SD 4.24) points (95% CI -50.1 to 26.1; P=.16; Hedges g=1.79) and 32.4 (SD 11.1) points (95% CI -59.7 to -4.3; P=.04; Hedges g=1.38), respectively. Of the participants, 67% (n=4) showed treatment response, and 50% (n=3) achieved remission after the intervention. The therapeutic alliance, measured using the WAI-SF, was moderate.
    CONCLUSIONS: Guided ICBT may be feasible for the treatment of outpatients with panic disorder and social anxiety disorder in Japan.
    BACKGROUND: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry UMIN0000038118; https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000043439.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    恐慌症(PD)是一种严重的焦虑症,其特征是反复发作和意外的惊恐发作引起强烈的痛苦。尽管恐慌症的患病率很高,对生活有重大影响,在沙特阿拉伯,对其患病率及其相关因素进行了有限的研究。这项研究旨在通过检查其患病率和相关因素,为沙特阿拉伯成年人对PD的理解做出贡献。使用在线调查方法。一项经过验证的基于问卷的横断面研究针对1276名沙特成年人进行。数据是通过GoogleForms从符合条件的参与者那里收集的。问卷包括三个部分:社会人口统计信息,病史,以及经过验证的PD诊断工具。沙特成年人中PD的患病率为13.1%。大多数患有PD的人在18岁之前经历了第一次恐慌发作。只有38.3%的PD患者寻求医疗救助,大约三分之一寻求帮助的人没有得到诊断。多因素logistic回归分析显示,PD的重要危险因素包括女性;有慢性健康问题,患有精神疾病,高体重指数;并有自杀意念(P<0.05)。最高的风险与慢性疾病相关(调整比值比=3.1,95%置信区间:2.1-4.6)。这项研究表明,PD是沙特阿拉伯成年人中普遍存在且使人衰弱的心理健康状况。非心理健康医生应该意识到PD,因为许多病例仍未确诊。
    Panic disorder (PD) is a severe anxiety disorder characterized by recurrent and unexpected panic attacks that cause intense distress. Despite the high prevalence of panic disorder and its significant impact on life, limited research has been conducted on its prevalence and their associated factors in Saudi Arabia. This study seeks to contribute to the understanding of PD among adults in Saudi Arabia by examining its prevalence and associated factors, using an online survey method. A validated questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted targeting 1276 Saudi adults. Data were collected electronically via Google Forms from the eligible participants. The questionnaire comprised three sections: sociodemographic information, medical history, and a validated diagnostic tool for PD. The prevalence of PD among Saudi adults was 13.1%. Most individuals with PD experienced their first panic attack before the age of 18. Only 38.3% individuals with PD sought medical attention, and approximately one-third of those who sought help did not receive a diagnosis. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that significant risk factors for PD included being female; having chronic health problems, a comorbid psychiatric disorder, a high body mass index; and experiencing suicidal ideation (P < 0.05). The highest risk was associated with chronic diseases (adjusted odds ratio = 3.1, 95% confidence interval: 2.1-4.6). This study demonstrates that PD is a prevalent and debilitating mental health condition among Saudi Arabian adults. Non-mental health physicians should be aware of PD, as many cases remain undiagnosed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号