Ovotestis is a rare cause of sexual ambiguity characterized by the presence in a patient of both testicular and ovarian tissue, leading to the development of both male and female structures. We report a case of ovotestis diagnosed in an adolescent, with a review of the literature.
A 15-year-old patient presented with a right scrotal swelling associated with gynecomastia. Histology showed a juxtaposition of ovarian stroma with ovarian follicle and seminiferous tubules. Karyotype revealed a male subject (XY). We have therefore retained the diagnosis of ovotesticular disorders of sex development.
Ovotestis is a rare finding, heterogeneous in its genetic etiology and clinical presentation. While many patients are diagnosed during infancy or childhood, we presented a case diagnosed in a 15-year-old adolescent.

Ovotesticular disorder represents 10% of cases of disorder of sex development characterized by the presence of both ovarian and testicular tissue in the same individual, with karyotype 46 XY being a rare sex chromosomal abnormality. We report the case of a 16-year-old person, who is reared as female, with a complaint of primary amenorrhea along with lack of secondary sexual characteristics, karyotype 46 XY. Prophylactic bilateral gonadectomy was done, and histopathological examination of bilateral gonads revealed ovarian stroma with a few Sertoli cell line tubules suggestive of bilateral ovotestis; hence, we concluded and framed our diagnosis of ovotesticular disorder.

Background: Very few reports are available on human XX ovotesticular disorder of sex development involving SOX3 gene duplication. Here we aim to present a rare case of SOX3 gene duplication in a person from the Chinese population who exhibits XX ovotesticular disorder of sex development. Case Presentation: A 7-year-old Chinese individual from Fujian province in Southeast China was recruited. The patient presented 46, XX karyotype, absence of sex-determining region Y, and was diagnosed with XX ovotesticular disorder of sex development. Furthermore, SNP array analysis demonstrated that the patient had a 2.2-Mb duplication in the Xq27.1q27.2 region (arr[hg19]Xq27.1q27.2:139,499,778-141,777,782) involving the SOX3 gene. Additionally, no SOX3 duplication was observed in the parents or the sibling, who displayed none of the clinical features. Conclusion: We identified the first case of SOX3 duplication in a Chinese individual who exhibits ovotesticular disorder of sex development. Our study strengthens the link between the SOX3 duplication and XX ovotesticular disorder of sex development and indicates that SOX3 is the evolutionary antecedent of sex-determining region Y.

BACKGROUND: Ovotesticular Difference of Sex Development (OT DSD) is a rare condition characterized by histologic demonstration of ovarian and testicular tissue in the same individual. Descriptions in literature usually do not include long term follow-up data.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe clinical, biochemical and histological findings, as well as long term outcomes (including onset and progression of puberty) in patients with OT DSD.
RESULTS: In a retrospective study of 31 patients, findings include predominantly male gender assignment at the time of referral (54.8%) and subsequent female gender of rearing (54.8%). The most frequent karyotype was 46,XX (58.1%). Ovotestis was the most frequent gonad (48.4%) Puberty could be evaluated in 20 patients, being spontaneous in 12 of them. Four patients with partial gonadectomy in infancy were able to enter female puberty spontaneously.
CONCLUSIONS: It was observed that patients who preserved gonadal tissues were able to enter puberty spontaneously.

Ovotesticular Differences in Sexual Development (OT-DSD) is a rare subset of DSD with great phenotypic variability characterized by the presence of both testicular and ovarian tissue in the same individual. Here, we describe the case of 46,XX, SRY-negative baby with ambiguous genitalia and ovotestis discovered during laparoscopy. As the family decided on female gender of rearing, the testicular component of the ovotestis was removed while the ovarian component was preserved. Stemming from this case, we review the clinical presentation of OT-DSD throughout ages, the role of genetics and risk for gonadal tumors when making decisions about prophylactic gonadectomy. Finally, we summarize the most recent information of the spontaneous endocrine function, with or without conservative therapy, and fertility potential of people with OT-DSD.