UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to compare open abdominal management (OAM) between visible negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and commercial NPWT to determine whether NPWT can detect intestinal ischemia in its early stages without causing complications or worsening prognosis, and to determine whether the actual visualization results in early detection.
UNASSIGNED: Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent OAM with visible NPWT (A: 32 patients) and those who underwent OAM with commercial NPWT (B: 12 patients). We compared background factors, disease severity, vital signs, blood test values, and 28-day outcomes between the two groups. We also checked the records to determine how many visualized cases were detected early and operated on. We then examined the weaknesses of this method.
UNASSIGNED: No differences were observed in the background factors or disease severity between the two groups. The duration of the open abdomen and intensive care unit stay were significantly shorter for group A than for group B. The groups showed no significant differences in lactate levels, 28-day outcomes, complications during OAM, or other factors. After a review of the medical records, ischemic progression was detected early, and surgery could be performed in seven cases in the visible NPWT group. The progression of ischemia was confirmed at the time of the second-look operation in two cases in the ascending colon.
UNASSIGNED: The visualization device allowed us to gain insights into the intra-abdominal cavity and determine the appropriate time for closing the abdomen without worsening the prognosis.

Colorectal perforation with systemic peritonitis requires prompt surgical attention, and damage control surgery (DCS) is performed in patients with severe injuries. This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the efficacy of DCS in patients with colonic perforation.
UNASSIGNED: From January 2013 to December 2019, 131 patients with colorectal perforation underwent emergency surgery at our hospital. Among these, 95 patients required postoperative intensive care unit management and were included in this study; of these patients, 29 (31%) underwent DCS, and 66 (69%) underwent primary abdominal closure (PC).
UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent DCS had significantly higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (23.9 [19.5-29.5] vs. 17.6 [13.7-22]; P<0.0001) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (9 [7-11] vs. 6 [3-8]; P<0.0001) scores than did those who underwent PC. The initial operation time was significantly shorter for DCS than for PC (99 [68-112] vs. 146 [118-171]; P<0.0001). The 30-day mortality and colostomy rates were not significantly different between the two groups.
UNASSIGNED: The results suggest that DCS is useful in the management of acute generalized peritonitis caused by colorectal perforation.

BACKGROUND: Damage control strategy (DCS) has been introduced not only for trauma but also for acute abdomen, but its indications and usefulness have not been clarified. We examined clinical characteristics of patients who underwent DCS and compared clinical characteristics and results with and without DCS in patients with septic shock.
METHODS: We targeted a series of endogenous abdominal diseases in Kansai Medical University Hospital from April 2013 to March 2019. Clinical characteristics of 26 patients who underwent DCS were examined. Then, clinical characteristics and results were compared between the DCS group (n = 26) and non-DCS group (n = 31) in 57 patients with septic shock during the same period.
RESULTS: All 26 patients who underwent DCS had septic shock, low mean arterial pressure (MAP) before the start of surgery, and required high-dose norepinephrine administration intraoperatively. Their discharge mortality rate was 12%. Among the patients with septic shock, the DCS group had a higher SOFA score (P = 0.008) and MAP was lower preoperatively, but it did not increase even with intraoperative administration of large amounts of fluid replacement and vasoconstrictor. There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality and discharge mortality between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: DCS may be useful in patients with severe septic shock.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the utility of the open abdominal management (OA) technique for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA).
METHODS: Between January 2016 and August 2021, 33 patients underwent open surgery for rAAA at our institution. The patients were divided into OA (n = 12) and non-OA (n = 21) groups. We compared preoperative characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes between the two groups. The intensive care unit management and abdominal wall closure statuses of the OA group were evaluated.
RESULTS: The OA group included significantly more cases of a preoperative shock than the non-OA group. The operation time was also significantly longer in the OA group than in the non-OA group. The need for intraoperative fluids, amount of bleeding, and need for blood transfusion were significantly higher in the OA group than in the non-OA group. Negative pressure therapy (NPT) systems are useful in OA. In five of the six survivors in the OA group, abdominal closure was able to be achieved using components separation (CS) technique.
CONCLUSIONS: NPT and the CS technique may increase the abdominal wall closure rate in rAAA surgery using OA and are expected to improve outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Open abdominal management (OAM) is being adopted increasingly frequently in nontrauma patients. This study assessed the effectiveness of OAM in nontrauma older adults.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all adults who underwent nontrauma emergency laparotomy requiring postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) management between September 2012 and August 2017 at our hospital. Patients ≥ 80 years old, who underwent OAM, were compared with those < 80 years old. The primary outcome was the 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were the 30-day mortality, unplanned relaparotomy, and the ICU length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS: The OAM group comprised 58 patients, including 27 who were ≥ 80 years old. The patients ≥ 80 years old in the OAM group had a significantly higher 90-day mortality rate (33% vs. 10%; p = 0.027) than those < 80 years old. There were no significant differences in the 30-day mortality rate, patients\' unplanned relaparotomy rate, or ICU LOS between the patients ≥ 80 years old and those < 80 in the OAM group.
CONCLUSIONS: Older adults who underwent OAM had a significantly higher mortality rate than younger patients. However, the OAM strategy for older nontrauma patients may still be useful and reasonable considering the severe condition of these patients.

UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic factors of non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) and to examine treatment strategies that could improve its prognosis.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively identified 30 patients who underwent emergency laparotomy for NOMI in Kansai Medical University Hospital (Hirakata, Japan) from April 2013 to December 2017. We examined prognostic factors related to discharge outcome and also examined the prognostic impact of open abdominal management and second look operation strategy (OSS) by dividing the patients into the non-OSS group and the OSS group.
UNASSIGNED: The primary end-point was a prognostic factor for outcome at discharge of the 30 patients. The outcome at discharge was compared between the survival group and the death group. Multivariate analysis was undertaken on two items from the univariate analysis that showed a significant difference (computed tomography findings of intestinal pneumatosis and acute disseminated intravascular coagulation [DIC] score). As a result, there was a significant difference in the factors of intestinal pneumatosis (odds ratio = 0.054; 95% confidence interval, 0.005-0.607; P = 0.018) and DIC score (odds ratio = 1.892; 95% confidence interval, 1.077-3.323; P = 0.027). The secondary end-point was the treatment outcome before and after the application of OSS. Operation time was significantly shorter and the amount of bleeding was also significantly less in the OSS group.
UNASSIGNED: Computed tomography findings of intestinal pneumatosis and the acute disseminated intravascular coagulation score were found to be prognostic factors for survival in patients with NOMI. Aggressive laparotomy to determine the definitive diagnosis is needed and OSS could be useful to improve patient prognosis for survival from NOMI.