目的:计划行为理论(TPB)的应用是否可以帮助预测异性恋父母对子女的供养受孕?
结论:具有较强意愿的父母按照有利于披露的社会规范行事的父母更有可能在未来5-9年内开始披露过程。
背景:与选择单身母亲和同性伴侣相比,异性恋夫妇需要做出积极的决定,向他们的孩子披露他们对捐赠者受孕的使用。虽然国际准则鼓励早期披露,许多异性恋夫妇的父母为此而苦苦挣扎。先前的一项研究发现,父母对TPB因素的得分与披露意图之间存在关联,但到目前为止,没有研究应用TPB来预测父母的披露行为。
方法:本研究基于全国纵向研究的第四波和第五波数据收集(T4和T5)。参与父母通过身份释放卵母细胞捐赠(n=68,应答率65%)和精子捐赠(n=62,应答率56%)作为异性恋夫妇的一部分而受孕。
方法:本研究是瑞典配子捐赠前瞻性纵向研究(SSGD)的一部分。在3年期间(2005-2008年),在瑞典提供配子捐赠的所有七个生育诊所连续招募开始卵母细胞或精子捐赠治疗的夫妇。与会者被要求在五个时间点完成邮政调查。本研究包括在7-8岁(T4)的孩子参加的两个最新时间点的卵母细胞或精子捐赠后的异性恋夫妇父母,13-17岁(T5)。在T4时,参与者完成了针对特定研究的TPB披露问卷(TPB-DQ),以测量态度和意图向儿童披露捐赠者的概念,并在T4和T5评估披露行为。来自那些尚未在T4时披露的参与者的数据使用Cox回归的生存分析进行分析。
结果:40名参与者在T4时没有向他们的孩子透露供体受孕,从这些中,13在T5仍未披露。我们发现T4时的TPB因子主观规范得分与T5时的后续披露行为之间存在显着关联(HR=2.019;95%CI:1.36-3.01)。其他因素均与披露行为无显著关联。
结论:本研究涉及异性恋夫妇的父母,他们的孩子在接受开放身份捐赠者的配子治疗后受孕,这限制了我们的研究结果在其他群体和背景下的普遍性。其他限制包括由于纵向研究设计而导致系统流失的风险以及由于参与者很少而导致的统计能力下降。
结论:我们的发现强调了感知主观规范对父母披露行为的重要性,并表明共同父母对披露行为的意见在这方面特别相关。辅导员应专注于支持准父母发起并保持健康和公开的对话,以解决有关建立具有捐助者观念的家庭的问题。
背景:该研究由瑞典研究委员会资助。作者没有竞争利益可声明。
背景:不适用。
OBJECTIVE: Can the application of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) help predict heterosexual parents\' disclosure of donor conception to their children?
CONCLUSIONS: Parents with a stronger will to act in accordance with social norms favoring disclosure were more likely to start the disclosure process within the next 5-9 years.
BACKGROUND: In contrast to single mothers by choice and same-sex couples, heterosexual couples need to make an active decision to disclose their use of donor conception to their child. While disclosure at an early age is encouraged by international guidelines, many heterosexual-couple parents struggle with this. A previous study has found an association between parental scores of TPB factors and disclosure intention, but so far, no
study has applied the TPB to predict parents\' disclosure behavior.
METHODS: The present
study is based on the fourth and fifth waves of data collection (T4 and T5) in a nation-wide longitudinal
study. Participating parents had conceived through identity-release oocyte donation (n = 68, response rate 65%) and sperm donation (n = 62, response rate 56%) as part of a heterosexual couple.
METHODS: The present
study is part of the prospective longitudinal Swedish
Study on Gamete Donation (SSGD). Consecutive recruitment of couples starting oocyte or sperm donation treatment was conducted at all seven fertility clinics providing gamete donation in Sweden during a 3-year period (2005-2008). Participants were requested to complete postal surveys at five time points. The present study includes heterosexual-couple parents following oocyte or sperm donation who participated at the two latest time points when their children were 7-8 years old (T4), and 13-17 years old (T5). At T4, participants completed the study-specific TPB Disclosure Questionnaire (TPB-DQ) measuring attitudes and intentions to disclose the donor conception to the child, and disclosure behavior was assessed at both T4 and T5. Data from those participants who had not yet disclosed at T4 were analyzed using survival analysis with Cox regressions.
RESULTS: Forty participants had not disclosed the donor conception to their children at T4 and, out of these, 13 had still not disclosed at T5. We found a significant association between scores of the TPB factor Subjective norms at T4 and their subsequent disclosure behavior at T5 (HR = 2.019; 95% CI: 1.36-3.01). None of the other factors were significantly associated with disclosure behavior.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study concerns heterosexual-couple parents with children conceived following treatment with gametes from open-identity donors, which limits the generalizability of our findings to other groups and contexts. Other limitations include the risk of systematic attrition due to the longitudinal study design and decreased statistical power due to few participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the importance of perceived subjective norms for parents\' disclosure behavior and indicate that the co-parent\'s opinion about disclosure is of particular relevance in this regard. Counselors should focus on supporting prospective parents to initiate and maintain a healthy and open dialogue about concerns around building a family with donor conception.
BACKGROUND: The
study was funded by the Swedish Research Council. The authors have no competing interests to declare.
BACKGROUND: N/A.