Off-label use

标签外使用
  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    心率(HR)是心血管疾病的预后指标,也是心力衰竭(HF)的可改变的危险因素。药物不耐受可减少常规降低HR的β受体阻滞剂的应用至最佳目标剂量。伊伐布雷定(IVA),一种特定的负性变时药,选择性抑制窦房结起搏细胞中的If电流,而不抑制心肌收缩力或包含血液动力学。本文综述了伊伐布雷定的临床标记和非标记用途。和作用机制侧重于临床结果。截至2024年1月,PubMed使用IVA的主要关键词进行了搜索,冠状动脉疾病(CAD),HF,体位性心动过速综合征(POTS)和快速性心律失常。全面回顾IVA的临床适应症,机制,和治疗效果,所有研究在人类中使用IVA治疗的研究都包括在内,包括不同类型的研究,如随机对照试验(RCT)和纵向前瞻性观察性研究。筛选后,141项研究纳入我们的综述。大量综述的文章被分配给HFrEF和CAD,建议在禁忌症或不耐受的情况下,IVA可替代β受体阻滞剂。IVA作为冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术前用药的有益效果,在POTS中降低HR,和不适当的窦性心动过速构成了标签外使用中的大多数研究。关于IVA在控制HR方面的功效,已经报道了有希望的结果,尤其是不适当的窦性心动过速或POTS患者。由于独特的作用机制,IVA有可能在未来的临床实践中更频繁地使用。
    UNASSIGNED: Heart rate (HR) stands as a prognostic indicator of cardiovascular disease and a modifiable risk factor in heart failure (HF). Medication intolerance can curtail the application of conventional HR-lowering β-blockers to the optimum target dose. Ivabradine (IVA), a specific negative-chronotropic agent, selectively inhibits I f current in pacemaker cells of the sinoatrial node without depressing myocardial contractility or comprising hemodynamics. This review summarized ivabradine\'s clinical labeled and off-label uses and mechanism of action focusing on the clinical outcomes. PubMed was searched up to January 2024 using the main keywords of IVA, coronary artery disease (CAD), HF, postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), and tachyarrhythmia. To comprehensively review IVA\'s clinical indications, mechanisms, and therapeutic effects, all studies investigating treatment with IVA in humans were included, comprising different types of studies such as randomized controlled trials and longitudinal prospective observational studies. After screening, 141 studies were included in our review. A large number of reviewed articles were allocated to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and CAD, suggesting IVA as an alternative to β-blockers in case of contraindications or intolerance. The beneficial effects of IVA as premedication for coronary computed tomography angiography, HR lowering in POTS, and inappropriate sinus tachycardia constituted most studies among off-label uses. The promising results have been reported on the efficacy of IVA in controlling HR, especially in patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia or POTS. Owing to the unique mechanism of action, IVA has the potential to be used more frequently in future clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Case Reports
    外分泌胰腺癌的分子发病机制涉及突变K-RAS,TP53,CDKN2A,SMAD4KRAS癌基因导致组成型活跃的肿瘤细胞增殖,并存在于90%的不可切除或转移性胰腺腺癌中。其中,K-RAS基因的G12C变异占突变的1-2%.一名65岁的女性最初被诊断为T3N0M0胰腺腺癌,接受6个周期的mFOLFIRINOX新辅助化疗,然后进行Whipple手术。病理分期为T4N2。然后,她接受了辅助mFOLFIRINOX,但不幸的是,她的疾病通过多行化疗进展。通过下一代序列(NGS)组的分子分析揭示了KRASG12C突变。基于这种突变状态,她开始服用Sotorasib,在疾病进展前,她的临床反应持续约11个月.在我们的KRASG12C突变的胰腺癌患者中,使用Sotorasib作为第四线治疗是有效的,并且耐受性相对良好。
    The molecular pathogenesis of exocrine pancreatic cancer involves mutations K-RAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4. The KRAS oncogene leads to constitutively active tumor cell proliferation and is present in 90% of unresectable or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Of these, the G12C variant of K-RAS genes accounts for 1-2% of mutations. A 65-year-old woman initially diagnosed with T3N0M0 pancreatic adenocarcinoma, underwent six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX followed by Whipple procedure. Her pathological stage was T4N2. She then received adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX but unfortunately her disease progressed through multiple lines of chemotherapy. Molecular analysis by Next Generation Sequence(NGS) panel revealed KRAS G12C mutation. Based on this mutational status, she was started on Sotorasib to which she had clinical response lasting for about 11 months prior to disease progression. Off-label use of Sotorasib as fourth-line treatment in our patient with KRAS G12C mutated pancreatic cancer was efficacious and relatively well tolerated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    将肉毒杆菌毒素用于标示外适应症已变得更加普遍,但Mohs显微手术(MMS)的具体益处尚未完全阐明.对PubMed进行了系统评价,科克伦,EMBASE,和Scopus数据库来识别所有描述在MMS中使用肉毒杆菌毒素的文章。分析被细分为疤痕最小化,腮腺损伤,和疼痛管理。共包括9篇文章。疤痕最小化和腮腺损伤的治疗是报道最多的用途。1例报告使用肉毒杆菌毒素进行疼痛管理。正在探索肉毒杆菌毒素的标签外用途。需要额外的研究来确定肉毒杆菌毒素在MMS中的功效和实用性。
    The use of botulinum toxin for off-label indications has become more prevalent, but the specific benefits in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) have not yet been fully elucidated. A systematic review was performed of PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Scopus databases to identify all articles describing the use of botulinum toxin in MMS. Analysis was subdivided into scar minimization, parotid injury, and pain management. A total of nine articles were included. Scar minimization and treatment of parotid injury were the most reported uses. One case reported the use of botulinum toxin for pain management. Off label uses of botulinum toxin are being explored. Additional research is warranted to determine the efficacy and utility of botulinum toxin in MMS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:在临床实践中使用非批准的用于玻璃体腔给药的注射器,导致某些患者的玻璃体中检测到硅油滴。这种情况源于西班牙市场上缺乏批准的眼内使用的注射器。这项工作的目的是回顾使用注射器的眼内给药,以及寻找符合这些未满足需求的法律要求的替代品。
    方法:根据PRISMA2020指南,通过搜索PubMed的描述符:(硅胶)和(注射器)和((眼内)或(玻璃体内))并过滤所有现有出版物从2006年1月至2023年12月,包括所有有关玻璃体内注射中硅油释放的文章,并分析可能的后果。
    结果:共发现68个结果,其中23人被排除在外,因为他们没有处理正在研究的主题,共留下45篇文章供系统回顾。根据4组获得的结论将这些分类:有机硅产生的不良反应;给药技术;有机硅释放的物理化学方面;以及医疗器械的特性。在审查了目前商业化注射器的制造商和技术数据表后,已经收集了用于这种用途的现有注射器,发现2可能会在2024年初在西班牙商业化:零残留™0.2ml不含SiO和VitreJect®眼科。
    结论:从获得的结果来看,可以解释,由于患者可能产生的影响和后果,使用带有硅胶的注射器和针头进行玻璃体内使用是卫生专业人员关注的问题,最重要的是不良反应,因此,有必要在市场上有专门用于眼内使用的无硅胶注射器。使用眼内注射器和针头的安全性和合法性对于保证眼部完整性和患者健康至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: The off-label use in clinical practice of non-approved syringes for intravitreal drug administration has resulted in the detection of silicone oil drops in the vitreous of some patients. This situation derives from the lack of approved syringes for intraocular use in the Spanish market. The aim of this work is to review the use of syringes for intraocular administration, as well as to search for alternatives that meet the legal requirements for these unmet needs.
    METHODS: A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines by searching PubMed with the descriptors: (silicone) AND (syringes) AND ((intraocular) OR (intravitreal)) and filtering all existing publications from January 2006 to December 2023, including all those articles dealing with silicone oil release in intravitreal injections and analysing the possible consequences.
    RESULTS: Sixty-eight results were found, 23 of which were excluded because they did not deal with the subject under study, leaving a total of 45 articles for the systematic review. These were classified according to the conclusions obtained in 4 groups: the adverse reactions produced by silicone; the administration technique; the physicochemical aspects of silicone release; and the characteristics of the medical device. After reviewing the current manufacturers and technical data sheets of commercialised syringes, the existing syringes for this use have been collected, finding 2 that will probably be commercialised in Spain at the beginning of 2024: Zero Residual™ 0.2 ml SiO-free and VitreJect® Ophthalmic.
    CONCLUSIONS: From the results obtained, it can be interpreted that the use of syringes and needles with silicone for intravitreal use is a concern for health professionals due to the implications and consequences that may arise in patients, the most important being adverse reactions, so it is necessary to have silicone-free syringes on the market that are specific for intraocular use. Safety and legality in the use of intraocular syringes and needles is essential to guarantee ocular integrity and patient health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    利妥昔单抗(RTX)是一种抗CD20单克隆抗体,用于治疗癌症中的各种疾病,类风湿性关节炎(RA),和多发性硬化症(MS)。尽管RTX在美国已经使用了近30年,关于其在现实世界中的利用率和有效性的问题仍然存在。
    为了描述观察性研究和真实世界证据评估RTX在肿瘤学中的状况,RA,和MS中的标签外使用
    在MEDLINE进行了广泛的搜索,Embase,和CINAHL涵盖2010年1月至2022年6月期间。两名评审员独立筛选了每个疾病类别(癌症,RA,MS)从标题评论开始,其次是抽象,和全文审查,以确定最终要包括的相关出版物。根据总体趋势提取和总结每种疾病的数据,相似性,以及纳入研究之间的差异,并按疾病状态分层。
    共有260项研究符合资格标准,RA队列有79项研究,144癌症,37女士在所有疾病队列中,大多数研究(n=189;72.7%)为回顾性研究.171(65.8%)研究使用医院或电子健康记录数据作为数据源,65(23.2%)使用注册数据库。大多数研究(n=153;58.8%)通过疾病特异性终点评估RTX的有效性,其次是安全性(n=60;23.1%),治疗模式(n=32;12.3%),和评估治疗依从性和疾病经济负担的描述性分析(n=16;6.2%)。虽然安全性不是大多数研究的主要结果,所有疾病状态的大多数研究仍报告了某种形式的安全措施.关于RTX的益处的结论性陈述因疾病状态而异,MS最多(n=30;81.1%)的研究表明该药物的积极益处。评估RTX使用的研究有限,相关的经济负担,和生物相似物转换。
    这些发现强调了医疗保健提供者需要更好地了解RTX的治疗前景和利用情况,特别是在患者选择方面,启动时间,和长期结果。现实世界的证据可以帮助支持使用利妥昔单抗的医疗保健决策和治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Rituximab (RTX) is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that is used to treat various conditions in cancer, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and multiple sclerosis (MS). Although RTX has been used in the United States for almost 3 decades, questions remain regarding its real-world utilization and effectiveness.
    UNASSIGNED: To describe the state of observational research and real-world evidence evaluating RTX in oncology, RA, and off-label use in MS.
    UNASSIGNED: A broad search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL covering the period of January 2010 to June 2022. Two reviewers independently screened all identified records for each disease category (cancer, RA, MS) beginning with title review, followed by abstract, and full-text review to identify relevant publications to include in the final analysis. Data were extracted and summarized for each disease based on overall trends, similarities, and differences across included studies and stratified by disease state.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 260 studies met eligibility criteria, with 79 studies for the RA cohort, 144 for cancer, and 37 for MS. Across all disease cohorts, most studies (n = 189; 72.7%) were retrospective. 171 (65.8%) studies used hospital or electronic health record data as their data source and 65 (23.2%) used registry databases. Most studies (n = 153; 58.8%) assessed the effectiveness of RTX measured by disease-specific endpoints, followed by safety (n = 60; 23.1%), treatment patterns (n = 32; 12.3%), and descriptive analyses assessing treatment adherence and economic burden of disease (n = 16; 6.2%). Although safety was not the primary outcome for most studies, the majority of studies across all disease states still reported some form of safety measure. Conclusive statements on RTX\'s benefit varied across disease states, with MS having the most (n = 30; 81.1%) studies suggesting the drug\'s positive benefit. There were limited studies assessing RTX use, associated economic burden, and biosimilar switching.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings underscore the need for health care providers to better understand the treatment landscape and utilization of RTX, particularly in terms of patient selection, timing of initiation, and long-term outcomes. Real-world evidence can help support health care decisions and treatment using rituximab.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:右侧迷走神经刺激(RS-VNS)被认为在技术上不可行或在指示的左侧太危险。
    目的:本研究旨在系统回顾有关RS-VNS的文献,评估其有效性和安全性。
    方法:遵循PRISMA指南进行了系统评价:Pubmed/MEDLINE,科克伦图书馆,Scopus,Embase和Webofscience数据库从开始到8月13日被搜索,2023年。在两个图书馆中搜索了灰色文献。符合条件的研究包括所有研究报告,至少,1例RS-VNS治疗耐药癫痫患者。
    结果:在2333个初步结果中,通过摘要筛选了415项研究。最终分析中只包括4名,包括7名耐药癫痫的RS-VNS患者。一名患者出现夜间无症状性心动过缓,而其他六名患者则没有任何心脏症状。1例因运动性气道疾病加重而停用RS-VNS。6例RS-VNS后癫痫发作频率降低25%至100%。在剩下的情况下,VNS的有效性尚不清楚。在一个案例中,RS-VNS比左侧VNS更有效(69%对50%,分别),而在另一种情况下,RS-VNS效率较低(50%对95%,分别)。
    结论:关于本主题的文献有限。在七个病人中有六个,RS-VNS治疗耐药性癫痫疗效合理,并发症发生率低。进一步研究,包括前瞻性研究,评估RS-VNS对耐药癫痫患者的安全性和有效性是必要的。
    BACKGROUND: Right-sided vagus nerve stimulation (RS-VNS) is indicated when the procedure was deemed not technically feasible or too risky on the indicated left side.
    OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to systematically review the literature on RS-VNS, assessing its effectiveness and safety.
    METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted: Pubmed/MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase and Web of science databases were searched from inception to August 13th,2023. Gray literature was searched in two libraries. Eligible studies included all studies reporting, at least, one single case of RS-VNS in patients for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy.
    RESULTS: Out of 2333 initial results, 415 studies were screened by abstract. Only four were included in the final analysis comprising seven patients with RS-VNS for a drug-resistant epilepsy. One patient experienced nocturnal asymptomatic bradycardia whereas the other six patients did not display any cardiac symptom. RS-VNS was discontinued in one case due to exercise-induced airway disease exacerbation. Decrease of epileptic seizure frequency after RS-VNS ranged from 25 % to 100 % in six cases. In the remaining case, VNS effectiveness was unclear. In one case, RS-VNS was more efficient than left-sided VNS (69 % vs 50 %, respectively) whereas in another case, RS-VNS was less efficient (50 % vs 95 %, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: Literature on the present topic is limited. In six out of seven patients, RS-VNS for drug-resistant epilepsy displayed reasonable effectiveness with a low complication rate. Further research, including prospective studies, is necessary to assess safety and effectiveness of RS-VNS for drug-resistant epilepsy patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    19名感染艾滋病毒的青年(YLWH)选择了可注射的cabotegravir和利匹韦林,而没有口服铅,并且在开始之前的3个月内没有达到检测不到的艾滋病毒病毒载量(VL)。所有患者均在3个月(3次注射)内达到检测不到的状态,并在治疗6-12个月内保持检测不到的状态。
    Nineteen youth living with HIV (YLWH) opted for injectable cabotegravir and rilpivirine without oral lead in and without achieving an undetectable HIV viral load (VL) for the 3 months prior to initiation. All achieved undetectable status within 3 months (3 injections) and maintained an undetectable status through 6-12 months of therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Letermovir,最初批准用于造血干细胞移植中巨细胞病毒(CMV)预防,在肺移植(LTx)接受者的标签外使用已引起关注。鉴于LTx受者对CMV感染的高易感性,本研究探讨了letermovir预防的有效性和安全性。在东北大学医院(2000年1月至2023年11月)对LTx接受者使用letermovir进行了回顾性分析。包括其他日本移植中心的病例摘要和文献综述。确认了东北大学医院的6例病例和京都大学医院的1例病例。预防性使用Letermovir在治疗骨髓抑制和预防CMV复制方面显示出积极的结果。文献综述支持Letermovir在高风险LTx接受者中的安全性。尽管报道有限,我们的研究结果表明,letermovir有可能预防不耐受伐更昔洛韦的LTx受者.安全,尤其是在治疗骨髓抑制方面,将letermovir定位为一个有前途的选择。然而,仔细考虑对于明智地将letermovir纳入治疗方案很重要.
    Letermovir, initially approved for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, has gained attention for off-label use in lung-transplant (LTx) recipients. Given the high susceptibility of LTx recipients to CMV infection, this study explores the effectiveness and safety of letermovir prophylaxis. A retrospective analysis of using letermovir for LTx recipients at Tohoku University Hospital (January 2000 to November 2023) was conducted. Case summaries from other Japanese transplant centers and a literature review were included. Six cases at Tohoku University Hospital and one at Kyoto University Hospital were identified. Prophylactic letermovir use showed positive outcomes in managing myelosuppression and preventing CMV replication. The literature review supported the safety of letermovir in high-risk LTx recipients. Despite limited reports, our findings suggest letermovir\'s potential as prophylaxis for LTx recipients intolerant to valganciclovir. Safety, especially in managing myelosuppression, positions letermovir as a promising option. However, careful consideration is important in judiciously integrating letermovir into the treatment protocol.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    本研究的目的是确定在标签外使用局部噻吗洛尔作为难以愈合(慢性)伤口的辅助治疗的有效性和安全性。此外,回顾和分析现有文献中关于不同病因的伤口局部使用噻吗洛尔。
    对1961年5月至2021年5月之间发表的关于局部噻吗洛尔在成人难以愈合伤口中的应用的英语文献进行了系统的回顾。每个研究研究由两名评审员独立评估。符合纳入审查条件的研究是随机对照试验(RCT),临床试验,持续至少4周的观察性研究,案例系列和案例研究。根据PRISMA指南执行搜索策略,包括MeSH术语和关键词搜索。
    从PubMed的搜索中确定了最初的878篇文章,OvidMedline,Embase,科克伦,和SCOPUS。其中,699人接受了资格审查,19人全文阅读,12人入选纳入审查.总的来说,两项随机对照试验和10项观察性研究,包括五个案例研究,进行了分析。所有研究都证明了局部噻吗洛尔的有效性和安全性;然而,统计分析仍然受到缺乏盲法和小样本量的限制.
    本综述总结了目前所有可用的证据,表明局部噻吗洛尔可以被认为是难治性伤口的有效和安全的辅助治疗方法,主要是静脉腿部溃疡和糖尿病足部溃疡。考虑到整体的安全性,低成本和易于应用的局部噻吗洛尔,这项审查提供了支持标签外使用的证据,并应进一步促进,更严格的研究。
    UNASSIGNED: The aims of this study were to ascertain the effectiveness and safety of the off-label use of topical timolol as an adjunct treatment for hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds. Furthermore, to review and analyse the existing literature regarding the use of topical timolol on wounds of varying aetiologies.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review of literature in the English language published between May 1961-May 2021 on the application of topical timolol for hard-to-heal wounds in adults was performed. Each research study was evaluated by two reviewers independently. Studies eligible for inclusion in the review were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), clinical trials, observational studies of at least 4 weeks\' duration, case series and case studies. Search strategies were performed according to PRISMA guidelines and included MeSH terms and keyword searches.
    UNASSIGNED: An initial 878 articles were identified from a search of PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and SCOPUS. Of these, 699 were reviewed for eligibility, 19 were read in full-text, and 12 were selected for inclusion in the review. In total, two RCTs and 10 observational studies, including five case studies, were analysed. All studies demonstrated efficacy and safety of topical timolol; however, statistical analysis remained limited by lack of blinding and small sample sizes.
    UNASSIGNED: This review concludes with all currently available evidence that topical timolol may be considered as an effective and safe adjunct treatment for refractory wounds, primarily venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers. Given the overall safety, low cost and ease of application of topical timolol, this review provides evidence in favour of off-label use and should prompt further, more rigorous studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号