Off-label use

标签外使用
  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    The interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway plays a crucial role in various rheumatic diseases. Tocilizumab, a biologic targeting IL-6 receptor, has been widely used in clinical practice, though it\'s officially approved in China for only three indications. To address clinical challenges associated with the off-label use of tocilizumab in treating rheumatic diseases, the Committee of Chinese Primary Health Care Foundation for Rheumatologists and Immunologists engaged multidisciplinary experts and highlight 12 related clinical issues. We aggregated the drug specifications, the guidelines for clinical management of rheumatic diseases and the evidence from clinical research. Recommendations were formed through voting with the consensus conference method incorporating the Oxford evidence-based medicine criteria to evaluate the strength of evidence and recommendations. We have formulated 10 recommendations for off-label use of tocilizumab related to giant cell arteritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, Takayasu arteritis, systemic sclerosis, adult-onset Still\'s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. This consensus aims to provide references for the rational use of tocilizumab in clinical practice and enhance pharmacovigilance monitoring.
    白细胞介素-6(IL-6)通路参与多种风湿性疾病,靶向IL-6受体的生物制剂托珠单抗临床使用广泛,但在国内仅获批3种适应证。为规范临床托珠单抗超说明书用药治疗风湿性疾病,中国初级卫生保健基金会风湿免疫学专业委员会组织国内相关专业的专家就调研的12个临床问题,检索国内外药品说明书、风湿性疾病指南共识及临床研究等证据,采用牛津大学循证医学中心分级系统进行证据评价和推荐强度分级,并经共识专家组讨论、投票,最终形成10条推荐意见,涉及巨细胞动脉炎、风湿性多肌痛、大动脉炎、系统性硬化病、成人斯蒂尔病、类风湿关节炎和幼年特发性关节炎,旨在为临床医师提供合理用药依据并为药学部门管理提供参考。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Trigeminal neuralgia is characterized by severe, lightning-like attacks of pain, which are mandatory for the diagnosis. The pain typically occurs on one side and is often triggered by simply touching the face, chewing or talking. In acute exacerbations, this can also hinder food and fluid intake, resulting in a life-threatening clinical picture. A distinction is made between classical, secondary and idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. For the diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia, the medical history and imaging procedures are key for classification. The only active substances approved for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia in Germany are carbamazepine and phenytoin, which is why off-label drugs often need to be used if there is no or insufficient effect or inacceptable side effects. Cooperation between research and clinical practice to improve the care of affected patients is therefore essential.
    UNASSIGNED: Die Trigeminusneuralgie ist durch heftige, blitzartige Schmerzattacken gekennzeichnet, die für die Diagnose obligatorisch sind. Typischerweise treten die Schmerzen einseitig auf, oft werden sie durch einfache Berührungen des Gesichts, Kauen oder Sprechen ausgelöst. Dies kann bei akuten Exazerbationen auch die Nahrungs- und Flüssigkeitsaufnahme behindern, sodass es zu einem lebensbedrohlichen Krankheitsbild kommen kann. Es wird zwischen der klassischen, der sekundären und der idiopathischen Trigeminusneuralgie unterschieden. Für die Diagnose der Trigeminusneuralgie ist die Anamnese entscheidend, für die Einteilung sind es bildgebende Verfahren. Die einzigen in Deutschland zugelassenen Wirkstoffe zur Behandlung der Trigeminusneuralgie sind Carbamazepin und Phenytoin, weshalb häufig bei fehlendem oder unzureichendem Wirkeffekt bzw. bei inakzeptablen Nebenwirkungen Off-label-Medikamente eingesetzt werden müssen. Eine Zusammenarbeit von Forschung und klinischer Praxis zur Verbesserung der Versorgung betroffener Patienten ist daher essenziell.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管是全球公共卫生问题,在分析儿童超说明书用药管理的实施策略方面存在研究空白.本研究旨在了解专业健康管理者对医院实施指南的看法,并确定指南的实施促进者和障碍。
    方法:儿科主任,药房主任,并招募了全国二级和三级医院的医疗部门主任进行在线面试。采访时间为2022年6月27日至8月25日。数据收集采用了实施研究综合框架(CFIR),数据分析,和调查结果解释,以实施跨医疗机构的干预措施。
    结果:对来自中国大陆的28名医疗保健专业人员进行了个人访谈。实施《中国儿科非药品标签使用管理指南(2021年)》的主要利益相关者进行了访谈,以确定57个影响因素,包括27名主持人,29个障碍,和一个中性因素,基于CFIR框架。该研究揭示了影响儿童超说明书用药管理因素的复杂性。缺乏政策激励是外部环境中的主要障碍。药剂师和医生之间的沟通障碍是最关键的内部障碍。
    结论:据我们所知,这项研究显著缩小了儿童超说明书用药管理的实施差距.为儿童超说明书用药的规范化管理提供参考。
    BACKGROUND: Despite being a global public health concern, there is a research gap in analyzing implementation strategies for managing off-label drug use in children. This study aims to understand professional health managers\' perspectives on implementing the Guideline in hospitals and determine the Guideline\'s implementation facilitators and barriers.
    METHODS: Pediatric directors, pharmacy directors, and medical department directors from secondary and tertiary hospitals across the country were recruited for online interviews. The interviews were performed between June 27 and August 25, 2022. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was adopted for data collection, data analysis, and findings interpretation to implement interventions across healthcare settings.
    RESULTS: Individual interviews were conducted with 28 healthcare professionals from all over the Chinese mainland. Key stakeholders in implementing the Guideline for the Management of Pediatric Off-Label Use of Drugs in China (2021) were interviewed to identify 57 influencing factors, including 27 facilitators, 29 barriers, and one neutral factor, based on the CFIR framework. The study revealed the complexity of the factors influencing managing children\'s off-label medication use. A lack of policy incentives was the key obstacle in external settings. The communication barrier between pharmacists and physicians was the most critical internal barrier.
    CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study significantly reduces the implementation gap in managing children\'s off-label drug use. We provided a reference for the standardized management of children\'s off-label use of drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有癌症的患者可以被给予未被正式批准的治疗(标签外)或指南推荐的治疗(指南外)。在这里,我们提出了一个数据科学框架,以使用来自去识别电子健康记录(EHR)的真实世界数据来系统地表征标签外和指南外的用法。我们分析了165,912名美国患者的14种常见癌症类型的治疗模式。我们发现,18.6%和4.4%的患者至少接受过一系列标签外和指南外的癌症药物,分别。表现状况较差的患者,在后面的行中,或在学术医院接受治疗的患者更有可能接受非标签和非指南药物.为了量化离线使用的可预测性,我们开发了机器学习模型,以根据患者的临床特征和以前的治疗方法来预测患者可能接受哪种药物。最后,我们证明了我们的系统分析产生了关于患者对治疗反应的假设。
    Patients with cancer may be given treatments that are not officially approved (off-label) or recommended by guidelines (off-guideline). Here we present a data science framework to systematically characterize off-label and off-guideline usages using real-world data from de-identified electronic health records (EHR). We analyze treatment patterns in 165,912 US patients with 14 common cancer types. We find that 18.6% and 4.4% of patients have received at least one line of off-label and off-guideline cancer drugs, respectively. Patients with worse performance status, in later lines, or treated at academic hospitals are significantly more likely to receive off-label and off-guideline drugs. To quantify how predictable off-guideline usage is, we developed machine learning models to predict which drug a patient is likely to receive based on their clinical characteristics and previous treatments. Finally, we demonstrate that our systematic analyses generate hypotheses about patients\' response to treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Sjögren\'s syndrome (SjS) is one of the most prevalent rheumatic diseases. Off-label drug use is very common in the clinical practice of the treatment of SjS. In order to establish evidence-based justifications and systematically evaluate the off-label drug use in SjS treatment, the Committee of Chinese Primary Health Care Foundation for Rheumatologists and Immunologists referred to published guidelines, consensus statements, and case series, and reevaluated the outcomes of the randomized controlled trials about the marketed immunosuppressive drugs treating SjS. The single-item breakdown of the Sjögren\'s tool for assessing response (STAR) which was proposed in 2022 was employed as the outcome. The committee established the corresponding clinical questions based on the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) principle, and then carried out evidence retrieval, and synthesized meta-analysis using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Finally, 21 recommendations addressing twelve clinical questions were formed which included two strong recommendations, fourteen weak recommendations, and five consensus-based recommendations. The overarching objective of the guideline is to provide clinicians with a rational basis for medication selection and to offer guidance to pharmacy departments for management purposes.
    干燥综合征(SjS)是最常见的风湿免疫病之一,临床实践中普遍存在超说明书用药现象。为此,中国初级卫生保健基金会风湿免疫学专业委员会组织专家通过循证查证及系统评价超药品说明书用药治疗SjS的依据,除参考已公开发布的指南、共识、诊疗规范等外,还对已上市的免疫抑制药物治疗SjS的随机对照试验进行再评估,采用2022年提出的评价SjS治疗应答新工具(STAR)的单项分解条目作为结局,设计相应的临床问题,依据人群、干预、对照和结局(PICO)原则完成证据检索、荟萃分析及推荐意见分级的评估、制订及评价(GRADE)分级与推荐,最终形成针对12个临床问题的21条推荐意见,包括2条强推荐、14条弱推荐和5条基于共识的推荐,旨在为临床医师提供合理用药依据并为药学部门管理提供参考。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:该研究旨在就安全使用管腔贴壁金属支架(LAMSs)进行标签内外适应症的国际共识建议。
    方法:根据现有文献,声明被制定并分为以下类别:一般安全措施,胰周积液,内镜超声(EUS)-胆道引流,EUS-胆囊引流,EUS-胃肠造口术,和胃镜检查的临时通道。每个陈述的证据水平是使用建议等级评估确定的,发展,和评价方法。国际LAMS专家应邀参加了修改后的Delphi流程。当没有达成80%的共识时,该声明是根据专家反馈修改的。如果在第三轮德尔福回合之后没有达成共识,则声明被拒绝。
    结果:60份陈述中的56份(93.3%)被接受,其中第一轮35人(58.3%)。在最佳学习路径上达成共识,术前成像,在手术过程中需要气道保护和必要的安全措施,比如多普勒的使用,和测量胃肠腔和目标结构之间的距离。针对不同的LAMS适应症提出了具体的共识建议,覆盖,其中,精心挑选病人,LAMS的首选尺寸,需要抗生素,LAMS的首选解剖位置,需要同轴尾纤放置,以及LAMS相关不良事件的适当管理。
    结论:通过修改后的国际德尔菲流程,我们提出了关于LAMS安全使用的一般和适应症特异性经验和循证建议.
    The study aimed to develop international consensus recommendations on the safe use of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) for on- and off-label indications.
    Based on the available literature, statements were formulated and grouped into the following categories: general safety measures, peripancreatic fluid collections, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-biliary drainage, EUS-gallbladder drainage, EUS-gastroenterostomy, and gastric access temporary for endoscopy. The evidence level of each statement was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology.International LAMS experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi process. When no 80% consensus was reached, the statement was modified based on expert feedback. Statements were rejected if no consensus was reached after the third Delphi round.
    Fifty-six (93.3%) of 60 formulated statements were accepted, of which 35 (58.3%) in the first round. Consensus was reached on the optimal learning path, preprocedural imaging, the need for airway protection and essential safety measures during the procedure, such as the use of Doppler, and measurement of the distance between the gastrointestinal lumen and the target structure. Specific consensus recommendations were generated for the different LAMS indications, covering, among others, careful patient selection, the preferred size of the LAMS, the need for antibiotics, the preferred anatomic location of the LAMS, the need for coaxial pigtail placement, and the appropriate management of LAMS-related adverse events.
    Through a modified international Delphi process, we developed general and indication-specific experience- and evidence-based recommendations on the safe use of LAMS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    In 2018, Chinese Society of Tuberculosis, Chinese Medical Association organized and wrote the Expert consensus on off-label use of antituberculosis drugs, which covered more comprehensively the contents related to off-label use of antituberculosis drugs, and was the basis for clinical workers to exceed the drug instructions for the use of antituberculosis treatment in irreplaceable cases, and was also a good regulation for off-label use, which had a great guiding effect on clinical work. In the last four years, with the reported national and international research results, the anti-tuberculosis treatment drugs have been adjusted and there are more new advances in the use of some drugs. For this reason, Chinese Society for Tuberculosis, Chinese Medical Association has updated the expert consensus on off-label use of antituberculosis drugs. This consensus included isoniazid, rifamycins (rifampicin, rifapentine), fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin), linezolid, clofazimine, bedaquiline, delamanid, aminoglycosides (streptomycin, amikacin), and β-lactam antibacterial (imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem), and a total of 13 drugs in 9 categories were reviewed for off-label use, overdose, route of administration and patient populations. The GRADE evidence classification method was used to conduct a systematic evaluation of evidence quality and recommended strength. The revised consensus provides a reference for tuberculosis prevention and control workers in China for standardized drug use and rationalized treatment, and therefore for improved effectiveness and better patient benefits.
    2018年中华医学会结核病学分会组织撰写了《抗结核药物超说明书用法专家共识》,较为全面地涵盖了抗结核药物超说明书使用的相关内容,是临床工作者在无可替代情况下超出药物说明书抗结核治疗用药的依据,也是对超说明书用药情况的良好规范,对临床工作具有良好的指导作用。4年来,随着国内外研究成果的不断报道,抗结核治疗药物有所调整,多种药物的使用方法也已有所改进。为此,中华医学会结核病学分会对《抗结核药物超说明书用法专家共识》进行了更新。本共识对异烟肼、利福霉素类药物(利福平、利福喷丁)、氟喹诺酮类药物(左氧氟沙星、莫西沙星)、利奈唑胺、氯法齐明、贝达喹啉、德拉马尼、氨基糖苷类药物(链霉素、阿米卡星)、β-内酰胺类药物(亚胺培南/西司他丁、美罗培南)共9类13种药物的超适应证、超剂量用法、超用药途径、超适用人群等的内容进行了整理与修订,并按照GRADE证据分级方法进行了证据质量分级和推荐强度的系统评价,供我国结核病防治工作者借鉴与参考,以规范用药、合理治疗、提升疗效,更好地实现患者获益。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    In recent years, the emergence of newly detected pathogens and the increase of drug resistant bacterial bring serious challenges for the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Tetracycline drugs are widely used in clinical practice, and the varieties of these drugs are constantly being updated. However, there is still a lack of guidance documents for the rational clinical application of tetracycline drugs in China. Meanwhile, some healthcare workers have doubts about their pharmaceutical characteristics, timing and methods of clinical application. In order to further standardize the clinical application of tetracycline drugs and provide professional evidence-based medicine suggestions for medical personnel in medical institutions, under the leadership of Hospital Infection Control Branch of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association and Clinical Pharmacology Branch of Chinese Pharmacological Society, experts from areas of infection, respiratory medicine, critical care medicine, emergency, infection control, pharmacy and other disciplines organized a consensus meeting and formulated multidisciplinary expert consensus on the rational use of tetracyclines commonly used in clinical practice. This expert consensus is based on the pharmaceutical characteristics of tetracyclines commonly used in China, the mechanism of action and drug resistance status of tetracyclines, combined with the infection site, pathogen characteristics and bacterial drug resistance. This expert consensus also pays attention to special populations and off-label drug use, and integrates domestic and foreign recommendations and the latest evidence-based medicine evidence, and 17 expert consensus opinions for clinical physicians, pharmacists, and other professionals in medical institutions to refer to were formed. In view of the particularity and complexity of infectious diseases and the individual differences of patients, in order to benefit patients, individualized anti-infection strategies should be implemented.
    近年来随着新检出病原体的出现和细菌耐药性的增加,感染性疾病的诊断和治疗面临着严峻挑战。四环素类药物在临床应用广泛,药物品种也在不断更新,我国尚缺乏四环素类药物临床合理应用的指导性文件,部分医务人员对其药学特点和临床应用时机及用法存在疑惑。为进一步规范四环素类药物的临床应用,为各级医疗机构医务人员提供专业的循证医学建议,中华预防医学会医院感染控制分会和中国药理学会临床药理分会牵头,组织感染科、呼吸科、重症医学科、急诊科、感染控制中心、药学部等多个学科领域专家经过共识会议制订了临床常用四环素类药物合理应用多学科专家共识。本专家共识以国内常用的四环素类药物的药学特性为基础,以四环素类药物作用机制和耐药现状为依据,结合感染部位、病原体特点及细菌耐药性,关注特殊人群和超说明书用药,整合国内外指南推荐意见和最新循证医学证据,形成可供医疗机构临床医师、临床药师等专业人员参考的17条专家共识意见。鉴于感染性疾病的特殊性、复杂性及患者的个体差异性,为使患者获益,本专家共识形成的意见需实施个体化的抗感染策略。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有智力障碍的成年人对心理健康问题和挑战性行为的脆弱性增加。除了心理治疗或心理教育方法,标签外药物治疗,是一种常用的治疗方式。
    这项研究的目的是建立基于证据的指导建议,以负责任地处方标签外的精神药物,与生活质量(QoL)相关。
    选择了指南列表,和原则是根据国际文献建立的,指南审查和专家评估。使用Delphi方法在由58名成员组成的国际多学科专家Delphi小组中就指南建议达成共识。三十三份陈述以5分利克特量表进行了评级,从完全不同意到完全同意,在连续的德尔福回合中。当至少70%的参与者同意(得分等于或高于4)时,一份声明被接受。根据Delphi小组的反馈,在连续的Delphi轮之间调整了未达成共识的陈述。
    就4个一般性问题达成共识:非药物治疗的重要性,综合诊断和多学科治疗。就29项声明分4轮达成了共识。关于限制自由措施、治疗计划,治疗计划的评估,和知情同意。
    该研究提出了与QoL观点相一致的负责任处方的建议和原则,用于智障和具有挑战性行为的成年人的标签外精神药物。需要就尚未达成共识的问题进行广泛讨论,以促进该准则的持续发展。
    UNASSIGNED: Adults with intellectual disabilities have an increased vulnerability to mental health problems and challenging behaviour. In addition to psychotherapeutic or psychoeducational methods, off-label pharmacotherapy, is a commonly used treatment modality.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to establish evidence-based guideline recommendations for the responsible prescription of off-label psychotropic drugs, in relation to Quality of Life (QoL).
    UNASSIGNED: A list of guidelines was selected, and principles were established based on international literature, guideline review and expert evaluation. The Delphi method was used to achieve consensus about guideline recommendations among a 58-member international multidisciplinary expert Delphi panel. Thirty-three statements were rated on a 5-point Likert-scale, ranging from totally disagree to totally agree, in consecutive Delphi rounds. When at least 70% of the participants agreed (score equal or higher than 4), a statement was accepted . Statements without a consensus were adjusted between consecutive Delphi rounds based on feedback from the Delphi panel.
    UNASSIGNED: Consensus was reached on 4 general:the importance of non-pharmaceutical treatments, comprehensive diagnostics and multidisciplinary treatment. Consensus was reached in 4 rounds on 29 statements. No consensus was reached on 4 statements concerning: freedom-restricting measures, the treatment plan, the evaluation of the treatment plan, and the informed consent.
    UNASSIGNED: The study led to recommendations and principles for the responsible prescription - aligned with the QoL perspective - of off-label psychotropic drugs for adults with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour. Extensive discussion is needed regarding the issues on which there was no consensus to furthering the ongoing development of this guideline.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    目的:在许多人群中,使用标示外药物是一种常见的,有时是必要的做法,重要的临床,道德和财务后果,包括潜在的意外伤害或缺乏有效性。没有国际公认的准则来帮助决策者应用研究证据来告知标签外药物的使用。我们旨在批判性地评估当前证据,为标签外使用决策提供信息,并制定共识建议,以改善未来的实践和研究。
    方法:我们进行了范围审查,以总结有关可用的标签外使用指南的文献,包括类型,纳入证据的范围和科学严谨。调查结果为国际多学科专家小组使用修改后的德尔菲程序制定共识建议提供了信息。我们的目标受众包括临床医生,患者和护理人员,研究人员,监管者,赞助商,卫生技术评估机构,付款人和政策制定者。
    结果:我们发现了31个已发表的关于超说明书使用的治疗决策的指导文件。在20条带有一般性建议的指南中,只有35%的人详细说明了所需证据的类型和质量,以及其评估达到合理的过程,关于适当使用的道德决定。没有全球公认的指导。为了优化未来的治疗决策,我们建议:1)寻求严格的科学证据;2)在证据评估和综合方面利用不同的专业知识;3)使用严格的流程制定适当使用的建议;4)将标签外使用与及时进行有临床意义的研究(包括现实世界的证据)联系起来,以迅速解决知识差距;5)促进临床决策者之间的伙伴关系,研究人员,监管者,政策制定者,和赞助商,以促进这些建议的协调一致的执行和评估。
    结论:我们提供全面的共识建议,以优化超说明书用药的治疗决策,同时推动临床相关研究。成功实施需要适当的资金和基础设施支持,以吸引必要的利益攸关方参与并促进相关伙伴关系,代表了决策者必须紧急应对的重大挑战。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    Off-label medicines use is a common and sometimes necessary practice in many populations, with important clinical, ethical and financial consequences, including potential unintended harm or lack of effectiveness. No internationally recognized guidelines exist to aid decision-makers in applying research evidence to inform off-label medicines use. We aimed to critically evaluate current evidence informing decision-making for off-label use and to develop consensus recommendations to improve future practice and research.
    We conducted a scoping review to summarize the literature on available off-label use guidance, including types, extent and scientific rigor of evidence incorporated. Findings informed the development of consensus recommendations by an international multidisciplinary Expert Panel using a modified Delphi process. Our target audience includes clinicians, patients and caregivers, researchers, regulators, sponsors, health technology assessment bodies, payers and policy makers.
    We found 31 published guidance documents on therapeutic decision-making for off-label use. Of 20 guidances with general recommendations, only 35% detailed the types and quality of evidence needed and the processes for its evaluation to reach sound, ethical decisions about appropriate use. There was no globally recognized guidance. To optimize future therapeutic decision-making, we recommend: (1) seeking rigorous scientific evidence; (2) utilizing diverse expertise in evidence evaluation and synthesis; (3) using rigorous processes to formulate recommendations for appropriate use; (4) linking off-label use with timely conduct of clinically meaningful research (including real-world evidence) to address knowledge gaps quickly; and (5) fostering partnerships between clinical decision-makers, researchers, regulators, policy makers, and sponsors to facilitate cohesive implementation and evaluation of these recommendations.
    We provide comprehensive consensus recommendations to optimize therapeutic decision-making for off-label medicines use and concurrently drive clinically relevant research. Successful implementation requires appropriate funding and infrastructure support to engage necessary stakeholders and foster relevant partnerships, representing significant challenges that policy makers must urgently address.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号