Non-small cell Lung Cancer

非小细胞肺癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    转染期间重排(RET)基因代表了仅在1%-2%的病例中发生的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中罕见的驱动突变,有针对性的致癌作用。尽管免疫疗法在具有野生型驱动基因的晚期NSCLC中证明了显着疗效,其在RET融合阳性患者中的有效性尚待确定.
    本荟萃分析旨在系统评估RET融合阳性NSCLC患者免疫治疗的有效性。
    和方法:系统地搜索PubMed和WebofScience数据库以进行相关研究。结果包括客观反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCR),无进展生存期(PFS),提取总生存期(OS)进行进一步分析。
    这项荟萃分析纳入了涉及7145名患者的10项真实世界证据(RWE)研究。就肿瘤反应而言,合并的ORR和DCR分别为24.0%和61.0%,分别。关于生存分析,合并的中位PFS和中位OS分别为4.17个月[95%置信区间(CI):3.40-5.02)和17.22个月(95%CI:11.58-23.91)],分别。亚组分析表明,在ORR方面,免疫疗法加化疗优于单一免疫疗法,DCR,和中位数PFS,分别为43%(95%CI:31%-55%)和17%(95%CI:11%-25%),74%(95%CI:60%-84%)与45%(95%CI:31%-59%)和6.69个月(95%CI:4.91-8.93)与2.96个月(95%CI:2.25-3.78),分别。
    到目前为止,RET融合似乎与NSCLC患者对免疫治疗的反应不良有关。免疫疗法联合化疗似乎比单一免疫疗法提供更大的临床益处。
    UNASSIGNED: The Rearranged during Transfection (RET) gene represents a rare driver mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) occurring in only 1 %-2 % of cases, with implications in targeted carcinogenesis. Despite the significant efficacy demonstrated by immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC with wild-type driver genes, its validation in RET fusion-positive patients is yet to be established.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC.
    UNASSIGNED: and Methods: PubMed and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for relevant studies. Outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted for further analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Ten real-world evidence (RWE) studies involving 7145 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR were 24.0 % and 61.0 %, respectively. Regarding survival analysis, the pooled median PFS and median OS were 4.17 months [95 % confidence interval (CI): 3.40-5.02) and 17.22 months (95 % CI: 11.58-23.91)], respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that immunotherapies plus chemotherapy were superior to single-immunotherapy in terms of ORR, DCR, and median PFS, which were 43 % (95 % CI: 31%-55 %) vs. 17 % (95 % CI: 11%-25 %), 74 % (95 % CI: 60%-84 %) vs. 45 % (95 % CI: 31%-59 %) and 6.69 months (95 % CI: 4.91-8.93) vs. 2.96 months (95 % CI: 2.25-3.78), respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: To date, RET fusions appear to be associated with poor response to immunotherapy in NSCLC patients, and immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy seems to offer greater clinical benefits than mono-immunotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在全身治疗不足的情况下,可以使用放射疗法(RT)减轻症状并维持非小细胞肺癌患者的开放气道。对一些病人来说,由于辐射抗性,肿瘤控制无法实现。已提出同时抑制表皮生长因子受体作为克服辐射抗性的策略,但可能会增加毒性。我们进行了一项随机试验来评估疗效,容忍度,厄洛替尼和姑息性胸部RT对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的生活质量。
    患者以1:1的比例随机分配至单纯放疗(A组)或与厄洛替尼联合治疗(B组)。使用基线时的计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描和纳入后4-12周的计算机断层扫描来评估治疗反应。在治疗期间和随后的30天记录不良事件。患者在基线时完成与健康相关的生活质量问卷,第2、6和20周。
    共纳入114例患者。对74例患者进行CT扫描以评价治疗效果,两组之间的肿瘤大小减小无显著差异:对照组A组的中位减小14.5%,埃罗替尼组B组的中位减小17.0%(p=0.68).两个治疗组之间的总生存期没有显着差异:A组和B组的7.0和7.8个月。分别(对数秩p=0.32)。实验组的不良事件没有明显增加,除了厄洛替尼单独治疗的预期之外。总的来说,两组患者的生活质量相似.
    对于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,合并埃罗替尼和姑息性胸部放疗的耐受性良好,但并未改善放疗的疗效。
    ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符NCT02714530。
    UNASSIGNED: Radiotherapy (RT) can be used to reduce symptoms and maintain open airways for patients with non-small cell lung cancer when systemic treatment is not sufficient. For some patients, tumor control is not achieved due to radioresistance. Concurrent inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptors has been proposed as a strategy to overcome radioresistance but may increase toxicity. We performed a randomized trial to assess the efficacy, tolerance, and quality of life of concurrent erlotinib and palliative thoracic RT for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients were randomized 1:1 to RT alone (arm A) or in combination with erlotinib (arm B). A computed tomography (CT) scan at baseline and one at 4-12 weeks after inclusion was used to evaluate treatment response. Adverse events were registered during treatment and the subsequent 30 days. Health-related quality-of-life questionnaires were completed by the patients at baseline, weeks 2, 6, and 20.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 114 patients were included. Of the 74 patients with CT scans available for evaluation of treatment effect, there were no significant differences in tumor size reduction between the two groups: median 14.5% reduction in the control arm A and 17.0% in the erlotinib arm B (p = 0.68). Overall survival was not significantly different between the two treatment arms: 7.0 and 7.8 months in arm A and arm B, respectively (log-rank p = 0.32). There was no significant increase in adverse events in the experimental arm, other than what is expected from erlotinib treatment alone. Overall, patients reported similar quality of life in both treatment arms.
    UNASSIGNED: Concurrent erlotinib and palliative thoracic RT for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer was well tolerated but did not improve the efficacy of the RT.
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02714530.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    同源细胞在细胞结构(hoCIC)与肿瘤增殖有关,入侵,和转移,被认为是各种癌症的有希望的预后标志物。然而,hoCIC在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的作用尚不清楚.肿瘤组织切片取自411名NSCLC患者。我们分析了临床病理变量与hoCIC数量之间的关系。采用LASSO和多变量Cox回归分析确定NSCLC的预后因素。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线和对数秩检验评估hoCIC对总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的影响。使用C索引开发并验证了OS和DFS的预后模型,时间依赖性曲线下面积(AUC),净重新分类改进(NRI),综合歧视改进(IDI),校准曲线和判定曲线分析(DCA)。在队列中,56%的患者有hoCIC,而44%的患者没有。值得注意的是,hoCIC主要发现于肿瘤浸润前沿。男性,吸烟,鳞状细胞癌,低分化,肿瘤大小≥3厘米,高级TNM阶段,淋巴结转移,胸膜侵犯,血管浸润,坏死,P53突变,和Ki-67的高表达被确定为hoCIC的相对危险因素。此外,HOCIC被发现是OS和DFS的重要预后因素,更高的HOCIC频率与较差的结果相关。我们构建了用于预测1-,3-,以及基于hoCIC的5年OS和DFS,校准曲线显示预测和实际结果之间的良好一致性。C指数的结果,时间依赖性AUC,NRI,IDI,和DCA分析表明,将hoCIC纳入预后模型可显着增强其预测能力和临床适用性。HoCIC显示了NSCLC患者OS和DFS的独立指示值。此外,hoCIC在肿瘤浸润前沿的频繁定位表明,hoCIC与肿瘤浸润和转移之间存在很强的相关性.
    Homotypic cell-in-cell structures (hoCICs) are associated with tumor proliferation, invasion, and metastasis and is considered a promising prognostic marker in various cancers. However, the role of hoCICs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Tumor tissue sections were obtained from 411 NSCLC patients. We analyzed the relationship between clinicopathological variables and the number of hoCICs. LASSO and multivariate Cox regression analysis were employed to identify prognostic factors for NSCLC. The impact of hoCICs on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Prognostic models for OS and DFS were developed and validated using the C-index, time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Among the cohort, 56% of patients had hoCICs while 44% did not. Notably, hoCICs were primarily found at the tumor invasion front. Male gender, smoking, squamous cell carcinoma, low differentiation, tumor size ≥ 3 cm, advanced TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, pleural invasion, vascular invasion, necrosis, P53 mutation, and high expression of Ki-67 were identified as relative risk factors for hoCICs. Furthermore, hoCICs was found to be a significant prognostic factor for both OS and DFS, with higher frequencies of hoCICs correlating with poorer outcomes. We constructed nomograms for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and DFS based on hoCICs, and the calibration curves showed good agreement between the predicted and actual outcomes. The results of the C-index, time-dependent AUC, NRI, IDI, and DCA analyses demonstrated that incorporating hoCICs into the prognostic model significantly enhanced its predictive power and clinical applicability. HoCICs indicated independent perdictive value for OS and DFS in patients with NSCLC. Furthermore, the frequent localization of hoCICs at the tumor invasion front suggested a strong association between hoCICs and tumor invasion as well as metastasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:据报道,年龄对晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者新兴免疫疗法有效性的影响在临床试验中一直不一致,主要是由于老年人的代表性不足。这项荟萃分析旨在评估免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)在老年NSCLC患者中的疗效。
    方法:回顾了截至2024年4月的文献,以确定符合入选标准的文章。检查了各个年龄组的总生存期(OS)的危险比(HR)。计算每个研究的HR比率(RHR)并组合。
    结果:初步搜索确定了118篇文章,其中13项是比较纳武单抗疗效的II期或III期随机临床试验,阿维鲁单抗,ipilimumab,pembrolizumab,阿替珠单抗,以及有或没有抗血管生成疗法的化疗。分析显示,75岁以下患者的OSHR为0.75(95%CI:0.70-0.80,P=0.080),75岁以上患者为0.87(95%CI:0.74-1.01,P=0.913)。75岁及以上患者与75岁以下患者的综合RHR为1.14(95%CI:0.97-1.34,P=0.697)。75岁以上患者和年轻患者的OS获益无显著差异(P=0.105)。亚组分析表明,OS的益处在所有亚组和年龄组中是一致的。
    结论:我们的调查发现,与75岁以下的患者相比,75岁及以上的NSCLC患者的免疫治疗疗效没有显着差异。这表明针对NSCLC的免疫疗法的功效在各年龄组中是一致的。
    OBJECTIVE: The reported impact of age on the effectiveness of emerging immunotherapies in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been inconsistent in clinical trials, largely due to an underrepresentation of older individuals. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in older patients with NSCLC.
    METHODS: The literature up to April 2024 was reviewed to identify articles meeting the criteria for inclusion. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) across various age groups were examined. The ratio of HR (RHR) was computed and combined for each study.
    RESULTS: A preliminary search identified 118 articles, with 13 being phase II or III randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy of nivolumab, avelumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and chemotherapy with or without antiangiogenic therapy. The analysis revealed that the HR for OS was 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.70-0.80, P=0.080) in patients aged under 75 years and 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.74-1.01, P=0.913) in patients aged 75 years and older. The combined RHR for patients aged 75 years and above versus those aged under 75 years was 1.14 (95 % CI: 0.97-1.34, P=0.697). There was no significant difference in OS benefit between patients over 75 years and younger patients (P=0.105). Subgroup analyses indicated that the benefit of OS was consistent across all subgroups and age groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation found no significant differences in the efficacy of immunotherapy for patients with NSCLC aged 75 years and older compared to those under 75 years old. This suggests that the efficacy of immunotherapy against NSCLC is consistent across age groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Almonertinib是重要的第三代表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI),对EGFR致敏和T790M抗性突变具有高选择性。Almonertinib耐药是临床使用的主要障碍。黄芩素具有抗肿瘤特性,但其对阿莫替尼耐药的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的抗肿瘤作用机制仍未阐明.
    CCK-8测定用于检查H1975/AR和HCC827/AR细胞在用不同浓度的黄芩素处理24小时后的存活率,almonertinib或其组合。集落形成能力的变化,凋亡,使用集落形成测定和流式细胞术分析处理的细胞的细胞内活性氧(ROS)水平。进行蛋白质印迹以检测细胞中蛋白质表达的变化。用NAC预处理对增殖的影响,凋亡,和PI3K/Akt信号通路在黄芩苷和/或阿莫莫替尼处理的细胞中观察到。用黄芩素(20mg/kg)或阿莫替尼(15mg/kg)处理皮下HCC827/AR细胞异种移植的裸鼠模型,并测量肿瘤体积和体重变化。
    黄芩素和阿蒙替尼均以浓度依赖性方式抑制HCC827/AR和H1975/AR细胞的活力。与单独使用黄芩素或阿莫替尼相比,两种药物的联合应用显着减弱细胞增殖;触发细胞凋亡;导致Caspase-3,PARP,和Caspase-9;下调p-PI3K和p-Akt的蛋白表达;并显着抑制裸鼠肿瘤的生长。此外,黄芩素与阿莫替尼联合导致活性氧(ROS)的大量积累,与N-乙酰-L-半胱氨酸(ROS去除剂)预孵育可防止增殖并抑制凋亡诱导,p-PI3K和p-Akt的部分恢复下降。
    黄芩素与阿莫替尼联合应用可通过ROS介导的PI3K/Akt通路提高阿莫替尼耐药NSCLC的抗肿瘤活性。
    UNASSIGNED: Almonertinib is an important third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) exhibiting high selectivity to EGFR-sensitizing and T790M-resistant mutations. Almonertinib resistance is a major obstacle in clinical use. Baicalein possesses antitumor properties, but its mechanism of antitumor action against almonertinib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unelucidated.
    UNASSIGNED: CCK-8 assay was used to examine the survival rate of H1975/AR and HCC827/AR cells following treatment for 24 h with different concentrations of baicalein, almonertinib or their combination. The changes in colony formation ability, apoptosis, and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels of the treated cells were analyzed using colony formation assay and flow cytometry. Western blotting was performed to detect the changes in protein expressions in the cells. The effects of pre-treatment with NAC on proliferation, apoptosis, and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway were observed in baicalein- and/or almonertinib-treated cells. A nude mouse model bearing subcutaneous HCC827/AR cell xenograft were treated with baicalein (20 mg/kg) or almonertinib (15 mg/kg), and the tumor volume and body mass changes was measured.
    UNASSIGNED: Both baicalein and almonertinib represses the viability of HCC827/AR and H1975/AR cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Compared with baicalein or almonertinib alone, the combined application of the two drugs dramatically attenuates cell proliferation; triggers apoptosis; causes cleavage of Caspase-3, PARP, and Caspase-9; downregulates the protein expressions of p-PI3K and p-Akt; and significantly inhibits tumor growth in nude mice. Furthermore, baicalein combined with almonertinib results in massive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and preincubation with N-acetyl-L-cysteine (ROS remover) prevents proliferation as well as inhibits apoptosis induction, with partial recovery of the decline of p-PI3K and p-Akt.
    UNASSIGNED: The combination of baicalein and almonertinib can improve the antitumor activity in almonertinib-resistant NSCLC through the ROS-mediated PI3K/Akt pathway.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    单核细胞与淋巴细胞之比(MLR),全身性炎症生物标志物,已被证明可以预测几种癌症患者的预后。这项研究旨在确定接受立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)治疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的MLR与局部控制(LC)和原因特异性生存率(CSS)之间的关系。
    194名参与者的平均年龄(144名男性,50名妇女)为80(范围,50-96)年。中位随访期为19(范围,1-108)个月。使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算LC和CSS速率。使用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险回归模型来估计LC和CSS率。
    25例患者在随访期间观察到局部复发。单变量Cox比例风险回归分析显示,性能状态,和肿瘤直径是LC的重要因素。多因素分析显示MLR和肿瘤直径是显著因素(分别为p=0.041和0.031)。较低和较高MLR组的1年和2年LC率为97.5%和97.5%,89.7%和81.2%,分别。在后续期间,14例患者死于非小细胞肺癌。尽管MLR倾向于在单变量分析中预测CSS(p=0.086),这些参数在预测CSS时都没有意义。然而,在单变量分析中,作为连续变量的MLR是CSS的重要因素(p=0.004)。
    我们的数据表明,在接受SBRT治疗的NSCLC患者中,MLR与LC和CSS率相关。
    UNASSIGNED: The monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), a systemic inflammation biomarker, has been shown to predict patient outcomes in several types of cancer. This study aimed to determine the association between MLR and local control (LC) and cause-specific survival (CSS) rates in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
    UNASSIGNED: The median age of the 194 included participants (144 men, 50 women) was 80 (range, 50-96) years. The median follow-up period was 19 (range, 1-108) months. The LC and CSS rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the LC and CSS rates.
    UNASSIGNED: Local recurrence was observed in 25 patients during the follow-up. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that MLR, performance status, and tumor diameter were significant factors for LC. Multivariate analysis showed MLR and tumor diameter as significant factors (p = 0.041 and 0.031, respectively). The 1- and 2-year LC rates for the lower and higher MLR groups were 97.5% and 97.5%, and 89.7% and 81.2%, respectively. During the follow-up period, 14 patients died due to NSCLC. Although MLR tended to predict CSS in univariate analysis (p = 0.086), none of the parameters was significant in predicting CSS. However, MLR as a continuous variable was a significant factor for CSS in the univariate analysis (p = 0.004).
    UNASSIGNED: Our data suggest that MLR is correlated with LC and CSS rates in NSCLC patients treated with SBRT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项回顾性研究旨在调查中国携带EGFR20蛋白的非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗模式和结果。EGFR20ins突变与对EGFR-TKIs的不良反应相关,关于各种治疗方式的疗效的现实数据有限。
    方法:在本回顾性研究中,单中心研究,治疗结果,包括PFS和ORR,根据影像学评估对不同治疗方案进行评估。还探讨了突变异质性对治疗效果的影响。
    结果:分析了302例诊断为EGFR20蛋白的NSCLC患者的数据。在一线治疗中,EGFR-TKI单药治疗与铂类化疗相比,PFS欠佳(3.00mvs.6.83米,HR=3.674,95CI=2.48-5.44,p<0.001)。与铂类联合培美曲塞相比,铂类联合培美曲塞联合贝伐单抗治疗可改善PFS和ORR(7.50mvs.5.43米,HR=0.593,95CI=0.383-0.918,p=0.019)。在后期治疗中,EGFR-TKIs或ICIs单药治疗疗效欠佳。特定的EGFR20ins亚型,A763_Y764insFQEA,在现实环境中对EGFR-TKIs表现出良好的反应。
    结论:这项大规模的现实世界研究为中国EGFR20ins突变的NSCLC患者的治疗模式和结果提供了有价值的见解。这些发现有助于理解EGFR20ins治疗,并为未来的临床试验和药物开发提供现实基准。
    BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to investigate treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR20ins in China. EGFR20ins mutations are associated with poor responses to EGFR-TKIs, and limited real-world data exist regarding the efficacy of various treatment modalities.
    METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, treatment outcomes, including PFS and ORR, were evaluated for different treatment regimens based on imaging assessments. The impact of mutation heterogeneity on treatment efficacy was also explored.
    RESULTS: Data from 302 patients diagnosed with NSCLC with EGFR20ins were analyzed. EGFR-TKI monotherapy demonstrated suboptimal PFS compared to platinum-based chemotherapy in the first-line setting (3.00 m vs. 6.83 m, HR = 3.674, 95%CI = 2.48-5.44, p < 0.001). Platinum plus pemetrexed plus bevacizumab combination therapy showed improved PFS and ORR compared to platinum plus pemetrexed (7.50m vs. 5.43 m, HR = 0.593, 95%CI = 0.383-0.918, p = 0.019). In later-line treatments, monotherapy with EGFR-TKIs or ICIs exhibited suboptimal efficacy. The specific EGFR20ins subtype, A763_Y764insFQEA, showed favorable responses to EGFR-TKIs in real-world settings.
    CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale real-world study provides valuable insights into the treatment patterns and outcomes of NSCLC patients with EGFR20ins mutations in China. These findings contribute to the understanding of EGFR20ins treatment and provide real-world benchmark for future clinical trials and drug development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗,靶向程序性细胞死亡蛋白1,已证明在许多癌症患者中提高了生存结局.历史上,由于担心自身免疫疾病潜在恶化,自身免疫疾病患者已被排除在涉及癌症免疫疗法的临床试验之外.在本案例报告中,本研究描述了1例非小细胞肺癌合并大疱性类天疱疮(BP)患者接受ICI派姆单抗治疗.在这个特定的临床病例中,未观察到基础自身免疫性疾病的严重恶化.相反,患者不仅对pembrolizumab耐受良好,而且治疗后BP病变也得到改善.该病例对自身免疫性疾病患者ICI治疗的常规排除标准提出了挑战,提示此类治疗在该特定人群中的潜在安全性和有效性。然而,需要进一步的调查和更大规模的研究来验证这些发现,并更全面地了解ICI治疗对自身免疫性合并症患者的影响.
    Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, which targets programmed cell death protein 1, has demonstrated enhanced survival outcomes in numerous patients with cancer. Historically, individuals with autoimmune diseases have been excluded from clinical trials involving cancer immunotherapies due to concerns about the potential worsening of their underlying autoimmune conditions. In the present case report, a patient with non-small cell lung cancer and bullous pemphigoid (BP) who underwent treatment with the ICI pembrolizumab is described. In this specific clinical case, no severe exacerbation of the underlying autoimmune disease was observed. Contrarily, the patient not only tolerated pembrolizumab well but also experienced amelioration of the BP lesions after the treatment. This case challenges the conventional exclusion criteria for ICI therapy in patients with autoimmune diseases, suggesting the potential safety and efficacy of such treatments in this specific population. However, further investigations and larger-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of ICI therapy in patients with autoimmune comorbidities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    细胞外囊泡(EV)是细胞活化过程中释放的纳米级脂质双层囊泡,细胞损伤,或凋亡。它们携带核酸,蛋白质,和脂质促进细胞间通讯并激活靶细胞中的信号通路。在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,EV可能通过调节免疫反应来促进肿瘤生长和转移,促进上皮-间质转化,促进血管生成,同时可能导致对化疗药物的耐药性。液体活检中的EV作为早期癌症检测和诊断的非侵入性生物标志物。由于尺寸小,固有的分子输运性质,和优异的生物相容性,EV还在NSCLC治疗中充当天然药物递送载体。
    Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoscale lipid bilayer vesicles released during cell activation, cellular damage, or apoptosis. They carry nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids facilitating intercellular communication and activate signaling pathways in target cells. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), EVs may contribute to tumor growth and metastasis by modulating immune responses, facilitating epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and promoting angiogenesis, while potentially contributing to resistance to chemotherapy drugs. EVs in liquid biopsies serve as non-invasive biomarkers for early cancer detection and diagnosis. Due to their small size, inherent molecular transport properties, and excellent biocompatibility, EVs also act as natural drug delivery vehicles in NSCLC therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管在日本,肺叶下切除术(楔形切除术[Wed]或节段切除术[Seg])已成为临床分期IA1和IA2非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准手术方法,在现实临床实践中,该手术对预后和术后并发症的影响尚不清楚.
    方法:本研究回顾性分析了2012年至2021年接受手术治疗的470例临床分期≤IA2NSCLC患者预后不良和术后并发症的危险因素。
    结果:在实变与肿瘤比率(CTR)高于0.5的患者中,Wed组(72.1%)的5年无复发生存率(RFS)明显低于Seg(85.8%)和Lob(86.8%)组(p<0.01),但Seg组和Lob组之间差异不显著。在CTR为0.5或更低的患者中,三组的5年RFS率无显著差异.RFS的多变量分析表明,Wed组的预后明显差于Lob组(风险比,2.83;p<0.01),但是Wed和Seg组之间或Seg和Lob组之间的差异不显著。术后并发症的多变量分析表明,Wed组的风险明显低于Seg组(比值比,0.31;p<0.01)。
    结论:Seg可以成为临床分期IA1和IA2NSCLC患者的标准手术程序。建议将Wed作为CTR为0.5或更低的患者的选择,并且具有避免术后并发症的优势。
    BACKGROUND: Although sublobar resection (wedge resection [Wed] or segmentectomy [Seg]) has become a standard operative procedure for clinical stages IA1 and IA2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan, the impact of this procedure on the prognosis and postoperative complications in real-world clinical practice is unknown.
    METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed risk factors for a poor prognosis and postoperative complications of 470 patients with clinical stage ≤ IA2 NSCLC who underwent surgery from 2012 to 2021.
    RESULTS: Among the patients with a consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) higher than 0.5, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was significantly lower in the Wed group (72.1%) than in the Seg (85.8%) and Lob (86.8%) groups (p < 0.01), but the difference between the Seg and Lob groups was not significant. Among patients with a CTR of 0.5 or lower, the 5-year RFS rate did not differ significantly among the three groups. Multivariable analysis of RFS showed that the prognosis was significantly worse in the Wed group than in the Lob group (hazard ratio, 2.83; p < 0.01), but the difference between the Wed and Seg groups or the between Seg and Lob groups was not significant. Multivariable analysis of postoperative complications showed a significantly lower risk in the Wed group than in the Seg group (odds ratio, 0.31; p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Seg could become the standard operative procedure for clinical stages IA1 and IA2 NSCLC patients. Wed is suggested to be an option for patients with a CTR of 0.5 or lower and has the advantage of avoiding postoperative complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号