Non-small cell Lung Cancer

非小细胞肺癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在全身治疗不足的情况下,可以使用放射疗法(RT)减轻症状并维持非小细胞肺癌患者的开放气道。对一些病人来说,由于辐射抗性,肿瘤控制无法实现。已提出同时抑制表皮生长因子受体作为克服辐射抗性的策略,但可能会增加毒性。我们进行了一项随机试验来评估疗效,容忍度,厄洛替尼和姑息性胸部RT对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的生活质量。
    患者以1:1的比例随机分配至单纯放疗(A组)或与厄洛替尼联合治疗(B组)。使用基线时的计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描和纳入后4-12周的计算机断层扫描来评估治疗反应。在治疗期间和随后的30天记录不良事件。患者在基线时完成与健康相关的生活质量问卷,第2、6和20周。
    共纳入114例患者。对74例患者进行CT扫描以评价治疗效果,两组之间的肿瘤大小减小无显著差异:对照组A组的中位减小14.5%,埃罗替尼组B组的中位减小17.0%(p=0.68).两个治疗组之间的总生存期没有显着差异:A组和B组的7.0和7.8个月。分别(对数秩p=0.32)。实验组的不良事件没有明显增加,除了厄洛替尼单独治疗的预期之外。总的来说,两组患者的生活质量相似.
    对于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,合并埃罗替尼和姑息性胸部放疗的耐受性良好,但并未改善放疗的疗效。
    ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符NCT02714530。
    UNASSIGNED: Radiotherapy (RT) can be used to reduce symptoms and maintain open airways for patients with non-small cell lung cancer when systemic treatment is not sufficient. For some patients, tumor control is not achieved due to radioresistance. Concurrent inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptors has been proposed as a strategy to overcome radioresistance but may increase toxicity. We performed a randomized trial to assess the efficacy, tolerance, and quality of life of concurrent erlotinib and palliative thoracic RT for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients were randomized 1:1 to RT alone (arm A) or in combination with erlotinib (arm B). A computed tomography (CT) scan at baseline and one at 4-12 weeks after inclusion was used to evaluate treatment response. Adverse events were registered during treatment and the subsequent 30 days. Health-related quality-of-life questionnaires were completed by the patients at baseline, weeks 2, 6, and 20.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 114 patients were included. Of the 74 patients with CT scans available for evaluation of treatment effect, there were no significant differences in tumor size reduction between the two groups: median 14.5% reduction in the control arm A and 17.0% in the erlotinib arm B (p = 0.68). Overall survival was not significantly different between the two treatment arms: 7.0 and 7.8 months in arm A and arm B, respectively (log-rank p = 0.32). There was no significant increase in adverse events in the experimental arm, other than what is expected from erlotinib treatment alone. Overall, patients reported similar quality of life in both treatment arms.
    UNASSIGNED: Concurrent erlotinib and palliative thoracic RT for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer was well tolerated but did not improve the efficacy of the RT.
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02714530.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项回顾性研究旨在调查中国携带EGFR20蛋白的非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗模式和结果。EGFR20ins突变与对EGFR-TKIs的不良反应相关,关于各种治疗方式的疗效的现实数据有限。
    方法:在本回顾性研究中,单中心研究,治疗结果,包括PFS和ORR,根据影像学评估对不同治疗方案进行评估。还探讨了突变异质性对治疗效果的影响。
    结果:分析了302例诊断为EGFR20蛋白的NSCLC患者的数据。在一线治疗中,EGFR-TKI单药治疗与铂类化疗相比,PFS欠佳(3.00mvs.6.83米,HR=3.674,95CI=2.48-5.44,p<0.001)。与铂类联合培美曲塞相比,铂类联合培美曲塞联合贝伐单抗治疗可改善PFS和ORR(7.50mvs.5.43米,HR=0.593,95CI=0.383-0.918,p=0.019)。在后期治疗中,EGFR-TKIs或ICIs单药治疗疗效欠佳。特定的EGFR20ins亚型,A763_Y764insFQEA,在现实环境中对EGFR-TKIs表现出良好的反应。
    结论:这项大规模的现实世界研究为中国EGFR20ins突变的NSCLC患者的治疗模式和结果提供了有价值的见解。这些发现有助于理解EGFR20ins治疗,并为未来的临床试验和药物开发提供现实基准。
    BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to investigate treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR20ins in China. EGFR20ins mutations are associated with poor responses to EGFR-TKIs, and limited real-world data exist regarding the efficacy of various treatment modalities.
    METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, treatment outcomes, including PFS and ORR, were evaluated for different treatment regimens based on imaging assessments. The impact of mutation heterogeneity on treatment efficacy was also explored.
    RESULTS: Data from 302 patients diagnosed with NSCLC with EGFR20ins were analyzed. EGFR-TKI monotherapy demonstrated suboptimal PFS compared to platinum-based chemotherapy in the first-line setting (3.00 m vs. 6.83 m, HR = 3.674, 95%CI = 2.48-5.44, p < 0.001). Platinum plus pemetrexed plus bevacizumab combination therapy showed improved PFS and ORR compared to platinum plus pemetrexed (7.50m vs. 5.43 m, HR = 0.593, 95%CI = 0.383-0.918, p = 0.019). In later-line treatments, monotherapy with EGFR-TKIs or ICIs exhibited suboptimal efficacy. The specific EGFR20ins subtype, A763_Y764insFQEA, showed favorable responses to EGFR-TKIs in real-world settings.
    CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale real-world study provides valuable insights into the treatment patterns and outcomes of NSCLC patients with EGFR20ins mutations in China. These findings contribute to the understanding of EGFR20ins treatment and provide real-world benchmark for future clinical trials and drug development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    选择性RET特异性酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(RET-TKIs)治疗RET融合阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),但是对其心血管毒性的研究是有限的。这项研究旨在表征在现实世界中与选择性RET-TKI相关的心血管毒性。
    分析了2020年1月1日至2023年6月30日美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的数据。两种不成比例的方法,使用信息成分和报告比值比(ROR)。
    pralsetinib和selpercatinib均显示高血压阳性信号(pralsetinib:ROR:5.25,95%CI:4.40-6.26;selpercatinib:ROR:2.68,95%CI:1.87-3.82)。此外,普瑞替尼显示缺血性心脏病阳性信号(ROR:3.92,95%CI:2.94-5.23),和selpercatinib用于扭转尖端性室性心动过速/QT延长(ROR:2.65,95%CI:1.74-4.04)。心血管毒性的中位发病时间(TTO)对于普雷替尼是33天(IQR:9-73天),对于selpercatinib是15天(IQR:10-50天)。死亡的比例,危及生命的事件,心血管毒性导致的住院率为8.57%,1.19%,和31.43%,分别,总选择性RET-TKI。
    选择性RET-TKIs与多种心血管毒性有关。Pralsetinib与缺血性心脏病有关,和selpercatinib治疗尖端扭转/QT延长和血栓形成事件。
    UNASSIGNED: Selective RET-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RET-TKIs) treat RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but studies on their cardiovascular toxicities are limited. This study aimed to characterize the cardiovascular toxicities associated with selective RET-TKI in real-world settings.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database from 1 January 2020 to 30 June 2023, were analyzed. Two disproportionality methods, information component and reporting odds ratio (ROR) were used.
    UNASSIGNED: Both pralsetinib and selpercatinib showed positive signals for hypertension (pralsetinib: ROR: 5.25, 95% CI: 4.40-6.26; selpercatinib: ROR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.87-3.82). Additionally, pralsetinib showed a positive signal for ischemic heart disease (ROR: 3.92, 95% CI: 2.94-5.23), and selpercatinib for torsade de pointes/QT prolongation (ROR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.74-4.04). The median time to onset(TTO) of cardiovascular toxicities was 33 days (IQR: 9-73 days) for pralsetinib and 15 days (IQR: 10-50 days) for selpercatinib. The proportion of deaths, life-threatening events, and hospitalizations due to cardiovascular toxicities were 8.57%, 1.19%, and 31.43%, respectively, for total selective RET-TKI.
    UNASSIGNED: Selective RET-TKIs are related to multiple cardiovascular toxicities. Pralsetinib was linked to ischemic heart disease, and selpercatinib to torsade de pointes/QT prolongation and thrombotic events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在开始抗肿瘤治疗之前的静态肿瘤特征不足以区分在免疫疗法的选择压力下的反应与无反应肿瘤。本文研究了外周血炎症指标(dPBI)的纵向动态及其在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)主要病理反应(MPR)预测中的价值。
    对147例接受新辅助免疫化疗的非小细胞肺癌患者进行回顾性分析,作为训练组,来自II期试验的26例NSCLC患者被纳入验证队列.在基线和作为治疗后状态收集外周血炎症指标;它们的动力学计算为它们的治疗后的值减去它们的基线水平。利用最小绝对收缩和选择算子算法筛选出MPR的预测因子,并整合了MPR得分。我们构建了一个包含该MPR评分和临床预测因子的模型,用于预测MPR,并通过受试者工作特征曲线和校准曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)评估其预测能力。此外,我们试图在从训练队列获得的12个配对样本(基线和治疗后)的血浆外泌体微小RNA转录组学分析的背景下解释这一MPR评分.
    单核细胞-淋巴细胞比率的纵向动力学,血小板与淋巴细胞比率,血小板与白蛋白的比率,并筛选出预后营养指数作为MPR的重要指标,并整合MPR评分,进一步确定为MPR的独立预测因子。然后,我们构建了一个包含MPR得分的预测模型,组织学,和分化程度,在训练和验证队列中,MPR和非MPR患者的AUC值分别为0.803和0.817。此外,micro-RNA转录组分析揭示了我们的MPR评分与免疫调节途径之间的关联。在具有高MPR评分的亚群中观察到显著更好的无事件存活率。
    我们的研究结果表明,dPBI反映了NSCLC对新辅助免疫化疗的反应。MPR得分,一种非侵入性生物标志物,整合了它们的动力学,捕获了肿瘤微环境中的miRNA转录组模式,并区分了新辅助免疫化疗的MPR和非MPR,这可以支持NSCLC患者使用基于免疫检查点抑制剂的治疗的临床决策。
    UNASSIGNED: Static tumor features before initiating anti-tumor treatment were insufficient to distinguish responding from non-responding tumors under the selective pressure of immuno-therapy. Herein we investigated the longitudinal dynamics of peripheral blood inflammatory indexes (dPBI) and its value in predicting major pathological response (MPR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 147 patients with NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed as training cohort, and 26 NSCLC patients from a phase II trial were included as validation cohort. Peripheral blood inflammatory indexes were collected at baseline and as posttreatment status; their dynamics were calculated as their posttreatment values minus their baseline level. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm was utilized to screen out predictors for MPR, and a MPR score was integrated. We constructed a model incorporating this MPR score and clinical predictors for predicting MPR and evaluated its predictive capacity via the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic and calibration curves. Furthermore, we sought to interpret this MPR score in the context of micro-RNA transcriptomic analysis in plasma exosomes for 12 paired samples (baseline and posttreatment) obtained from the training cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: Longitudinal dynamics of monocyte-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-albumin ratio, and prognostic nutritional index were screened out as significant indicators for MPR and a MPR score was integrated, which was further identified as an independent predictor of MPR. Then, we constructed a predictive model incorporating MPR score, histology, and differentiated degree, which discriminated MPR and non-MPR patients well in both the training and validation cohorts with an AUC value of 0.803 and 0.817, respectively. Furthermore, micro-RNA transcriptomic analysis revealed the association between our MPR score and immune regulation pathways. A significantly better event-free survival was seen in subpopulations with a high MPR score.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggested that dPBI reflected responses to neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy for NSCLC. The MPR score, a non-invasive biomarker integrating their dynamics, captured the miRNA transcriptomic pattern in the tumor microenvironment and distinguished MPR from non-MPR for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, which could support the clinical decisions on the utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatments in NSCLC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺癌,尤其是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),由于其高死亡率,在全球范围内构成了重大的健康挑战。阿法替尼,第二代表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI),在NSCLC治疗中显示出比传统化疗更好的疗效。然而,诸如继发性抵抗和不良反应等问题需要替代疗法。HAD-B1,包括4种草药,在临床前和临床环境中的肺癌治疗中都显示出了希望。这项研究评估了HAD-B1和阿法替尼在晚期NSCLC患者中的组合,以通过解决当前EGFR-TKI疗法的局限性来潜在改善预后。
    随机,开放标签试验评估了HAD-B1联合阿法替尼在90例EGFR突变阳性NSCLC患者中的疗效和安全性.参与者分为治疗组和对照组,接受阿法替尼伴或不伴HAD-B1。该研究集中于阿法替尼的初始剂量维持率和疾病控制率(DCR),除了生存率和生活质量等次要结果,在持续的安全监控下。
    在90名参与者中,在初始剂量维持方面没有发现显着差异(治疗组为60.98%,对照组为52.50%,P=.4414)或DCR(80.49%vs90.00%,P=.2283)。次要结果如PFS,TTP,和OS没有显着差异。然而,治疗组的身体功能显着改善(P=.0475,PPS组)。对照组的特殊不良事件和药物不良反应发生率较高(P=0.01),提示HAD-B1联合阿法替尼可能增强身体功能而不增加不良反应.
    联合使用HAD-B1和阿法替尼可能改善晚期NSCLC患者的生活质量并减少不良事件。需要进一步的研究来确认这种联合疗法的长期益处,旨在提高NSCLC治疗结果。
    大韩民国临床研究信息服务(CRIS),https://cris.nih.走吧。kr/(ID:KCT0005414)。
    UNASSIGNED: Lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), poses a significant health challenge globally due to its high mortality. Afatinib, a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has shown superior efficacy over traditional chemotherapy in NSCLC treatment. However, issues like secondary resistance and adverse effects call for alternative therapies. HAD-B1, comprising 4 herbal medicines, has shown promise in lung cancer treatment in both preclinical and clinical settings. This study assesses the combination of HAD-B1 and Afatinib in advanced NSCLC patients to potentially improve outcomes by addressing the limitations of current EGFR-TKI therapies.
    UNASSIGNED: A randomized, open-label trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of HAD-B1 with Afatinib in 90 EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC patients. Participants were divided into treatment and control groups, receiving Afatinib with or without HAD-B1. The study focused on the initial dose maintenance rate and disease control rate (DCR) of Afatinib, alongside secondary outcomes like survival rates and quality of life, under continuous safety monitoring.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 90 participants, no significant difference was found in initial dose maintenance (60.98% in the treatment group vs 52.50% in the control, P = .4414) or DCR (80.49% vs 90.00%, P = .2283). Secondary outcomes like PFS, TTP, and OS showed no notable differences. However, physical functioning significantly improved in the treatment group (P = .0475, PPS group). The control group experienced higher rates of adverse events of special interest and adverse drug reactions (P = .01), suggesting HAD-B1 with Afatinib might enhance physical function without increasing adverse effects.
    UNASSIGNED: Combining HAD-B1 with Afatinib potentially improves quality of life and reduces adverse events in advanced NSCLC patients. Further research is necessary to confirm the long-term benefits of this combination therapy, aiming to advance NSCLC treatment outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) of the Republic of Korea, https://cris.nih.go.kr/ (ID: KCT0005414).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    推荐诱导治疗后手术作为局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的替代治疗策略。诱导治疗后达到病理反应的患者比无反应者有更好的结果;因此,必须评估治疗反应。最近,监测治疗反应的新方法,基于18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET),已经开发了。在这项研究中,我们评估了正电子发射断层扫描反应标准在实体肿瘤中的预测价值(PERCIST),使用针对瘦体重(SUL)和总病变糖酵解(TLG)校正的标准化摄取值。
    在2007年至2016年期间,Setouchi肺癌组共130例患者在计划的NSCLC手术切除前的诱导治疗前后接受了FDG-PET成像。根据使用PERCIST的评估,将原发性肺肿瘤和转移性淋巴结的病理反应与其反应进行比较。
    术后病理研究显示42例(32.3%)患者出现病理完全缓解(pCR)。PERCIST与病理反应显著相关(p<0.001)。敏感性,特异性,PERCIST预测pCR的准确率为16.7%(7/42),88.6%(78/88),和65.4%(85/130),分别。对于原发性肺肿瘤和转移性淋巴结,pCR患者的SULpeak降低率明显高于无反应者。在多元Cox回归分析中,上叶肿瘤部位,TLG在原发性肿瘤中的降低率,和病理N0是有利的无复发生存率(RFS)的独立预测因子。
    我们的研究表明,特别是TLG减少率,有助于预测诱导治疗后的病理反应和预后。虽然改进是必要的,PERCIST可能是肺癌诱导后状态的一种有希望的方法。需要进一步的研究来证实我们的发现。
    UNASSIGNED: Induction therapy followed by surgery is recommended as an alternative treatment strategy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients who achieve pathologic response after induction therapy have better outcomes than non-responders; therefore, therapeutic response must be evaluated. Recently, new approaches for monitoring therapeutic responses, which are based on 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), have been developed. In this study, we evaluated the predictive value of Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), which uses standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SUL) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 130 patients in the Setouchi Lung Cancer Group who underwent FDG-PET imaging before and after induction therapy prior to a planned surgical resection for NSCLC between 2007 and 2016 were studied retrospectively. The pathologic responses of the primary lung tumors and metastatic lymph nodes were compared with their responses based on evaluation using PERCIST.
    UNASSIGNED: Postoperative pathologic studies revealed pathologic complete response (pCR) in 42 (32.3%) patients. PERCIST was significantly correlated with pathologic response (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PERCIST for predicting pCR were 16.7% (7/42), 88.6% (78/88), and 65.4% (85/130), respectively. Patients with pCR had significantly higher reduction rates in SULpeak for both primary lung tumors and metastatic lymph nodes and TLG for primary tumors than non-responders. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, tumor site in upper lobes, reduction rate of TLG in primary tumor, and pathologic N0 were independent predictors of favorable recurrence-free survival (RFS).
    UNASSIGNED: Our study suggested that PERCIST, especially the rate of TLG reduction rate, are useful to predict the pathological response and prognosis after induction therapy. Although improvement is necessary, PERCIST can be a promising method of the post-induction status in lung cancer. Further research is needed to confirm our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:MET酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗与MET改变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者预后改善相关,包括MET外显子14(METex14)跳跃突变,MET扩增,或MET融合。然而,对TKI治疗的原发性或获得性耐药性最终发展。在临床前模型中,MAPK信号的过度激活被证明可以促进对METTKI的抵抗;通过与MET抑制剂和MEK抑制剂共同治疗克服了抵抗.这项I/Ib期研究提供了一种同时靶向MET(与卡马替尼)和MEK信号(与曲美替尼)的潜在组合策略,以克服METex14NSCLC对MET抑制剂单一疗法的耐药性。
    方法:在剂量递增阶段,采用常规3+3设计,纳入最少6例,最多18例患者,主要终点为确定卡马替尼联合曲美替尼的推荐2期剂量(RP2D).一旦RP2D被识别,患者将继续纳入剂量扩大阶段,共15名患者.剂量扩展阶段的主要终点是进一步表征组合的安全性。
    结论:本I/Ib期临床试验将评估卡马替尼和曲美替尼联合治疗肿瘤携带METex14跳跃突变的NSCLC患者的安全性和有效性,MET扩增,或MET融合,并在单药MET抑制剂治疗中发展为进行性疾病。
    BACKGROUND: MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is associated with improved outcomes in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a MET alteration, including MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutation, MET amplification, or MET fusion. However, primary or acquired resistance to TKI therapy ultimately develops. In preclinical models, hyperactivation of MAPK signaling was shown to promote resistance to MET TKI; resistance was overcome by co-treatment with a MET inhibitor and a MEK inhibitor. This phase I/Ib study offers a potential combination strategy simultaneously targeting MET (with capmatinib) and MEK signaling (with trametinib) to overcome resistance to MET inhibitor monotherapy in METex14 NSCLC.
    METHODS: In the dose escalation phase, a minimum of 6 and maximum of 18 patients will be enrolled using a conventional 3+3 design with the primary endpoint of identifying a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of capmatinib in combination with trametinib. Once the RP2D is identified, patients will continue to enroll in a dose expansion phase to a total of 15 patients. The primary endpoint of the dose expansion phase is to further characterize the safety profile of the combination.
    CONCLUSIONS: This phase I/Ib clinical trial will assess the safety and efficacy of combination capmatinib and trametinib in NSCLC patients whose tumors harbor METex14 skipping mutations, MET amplification, or MET fusion and had developed progressive disease on single agent MET inhibitor therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已经彻底改变了非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗,而程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)是一种伴随生物标志物。本研究旨在使用基线动脉期增强CT(APECT)构建有效的影像组学模型,以预测NSCLC中PD-L1的表达和免疫治疗的预后。
    方法:我们从已发表的多中心临床试验中纳入的204名患者的基线APECT图像中提取了影像组学特征,该临床试验于2018年8月23日开始,并于2019年11月15日结束(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03607539)。在这些病人中,来自选定中心的146名患者被分配到训练队列。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)方法来减少影像组学特征的维度并计算肿瘤评分。模型是使用朴素贝叶斯创建的,决策树,XGBoost,和根据肿瘤评分的随机森林算法。然后在包括来自其余中心的58名患者的独立验证队列中验证这些模型。
    结果:随机森林算法优于其他方法。在三分类方案中,随机森林模型在训练和验证队列中实现曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.98和0.94,分别。在双分类方案中,在训练和验证队列中,随机森林模型的AUC分别为0.99(95CI:0.97-1.0,P<0.0001)和0.93(95CI:0.83-0.98,P<0.0001),分别。此外,通过该模型分类为PD-L1高表达的患者仅在验证性sintilimab组中可以预测治疗反应(AUC=0.859,95CI:0.7~0.96,P<0.001)和提高生存率(HR=0.2,95CI:0.08~0.53,P=0.001).
    结论:基于APECT的放射组学模型代表了一种潜在的非侵入性方法,可以可靠地预测NSCLC患者的PD-L1表达和ICI治疗结果。这可以显着改善精确的癌症免疫疗法。
    OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a companion biomarker. This study aims to use baseline arterial-phase enhanced CT (APECT) to construct efficient radiomic models for predicting PD-L1 expression and immunotherapy prognosis in NSCLC.
    METHODS: We extracted radiomics features from the baseline APECT images of 204 patients enrolled in a published multicenter clinical trial that commenced on August 23, 2018, and concluded on November 15, 2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03607539). Of these patients, 146 patients from selected centers were assigned to the training cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to reduce dimensionality of radiomics features and calculate tumor scores. Models were created using naive bayes, decision trees, XGBoost, and random forest algorithms according to tumor scores. These models were then validated in an independent validation cohort comprising 58 patients from the remaining centers.
    RESULTS: The random forest algorithm outperformed the other methods. In the three-classification scenario, the random forest model achieving the area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.98 and 0.94 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. In the two-classification scenario, the random forest model achieved AUCs of 0.99 (95%CI: 0.97-1.0, P < 0.0001) and 0.93 (95%CI: 0.83-0.98, P < 0.0001) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, patients classified as PD-L1 high-expression by this model can predict treatment response (AUC=0.859, 95%CI: 0.7-0.96, P < 0.001) and improved survival (HR=0.2, 95%CI: 0.08-0.53, P = 0.001) only in validation sintilimab arm.
    CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics models based on APECT represent a potential non-invasive approach to robustly predict PD-L1 expression and ICI treatment outcomes in patients with NSCLC, which could significantly improve precision cancer immunotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    需要强有力的辅助策略来改善具有完全切除的ΙΙΙΙΑ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的患者的存活。我们旨在比较这些患者的中医(TCM)治疗与辅助化疗后观察的疗效。
    符合条件的患者按1:1随机分组,分别接受气阴辨证口服汤剂(中医组)或观察组(观察组)。干预持续了12个月。主要终点是1年无病生存期(DFS)。次要终点是DFS,生活质量,调节性T细胞(Tregs),和外周血Tregs表面的细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原-4(CTLA-4)。我们使用EORTCQLQ-LC43评估生活质量。
    在2019年4月29日至2021年11月11日之间,根据气阴辨证(n=38)或观察(n=37),将75例患者随机分配到口服汤剂。全分析集包括中医组35例,观察组35例。在中位随访24.2个月后,与观察相比,基于气阴辨证的口服汤剂改善了DFS(HR0.378,95%CI:0.157-0.912;P=0.03)。中医组1年DFS为82.1%,观察组为61.9%(P=.06)。随机化后三个月,总体健康评分,角色功能,情感功能,中医组的社会功能高于观察组(P<0.01),分数的疲劳,疼痛,失眠,食欲减退,便秘,咳嗽,而胸痛低于观察组(均P<.05);中医组Tregs比例与观察组比较差异无统计学意义(P=.58);中医组CTLA-4+Tregs比例低于观察组(P=.046)。两组均未发生不良事件。
    辅助化疗后基于气阴辨证的口服汤剂延长DFS,降低疾病复发和转移的风险,提高生活质量,并下调完全切除的III期NSCLC患者中CTLA-4+Treg的比例。
    中国临床试验注册,不。ChiCTR1800019396。注册日期:2018年11月9日。
    UNASSIGNED: Powerful adjuvant strategies are required to improve the survival of patients with completely resected stage ΙΙΙA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to compare the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) treatment versus observation after adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either oral decoctions based on Qi-Yin syndrome differentiation (TCM group) or observation (observation group). The intervention lasted for 12 months. The primary endpoint was 1-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints were DFS, quality of life, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) on the surface of Tregs in peripheral blood. We used EORTC QLQ-LC43 to evaluate quality of life.
    UNASSIGNED: Between Apr 29, 2019, and Nov 11, 2021, 75 patients were randomly assigned to oral decoctions based on Qi-Yin syndrome differentiation (n = 38) or observation (n = 37). The full analysis set included 35 patients in the TCM group and 35 in the observation group. After a median follow-up of 24.2 months, oral decoctions based on Qi-Yin syndrome differentiation improved DFS compared with observation (HR 0.378, 95% CI: 0.157-0.912; P = .03). One-year DFS was 82.1% in the TCM group and 61.9% in the observation group (P = .06). Three months after randomization, scores of total health, role function, emotional function, and social function in the TCM group were higher than those in the observation group (P < .01 for all), scores of fatigue, pain, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, cough, and chest pain were lower than those in the observation group (P < .05 for all); there was no significant difference in the proportion of Tregs between the TCM group and the observation group (P = .58); the proportion of CTLA-4+Tregs in the TCM group was lower than that in the observation group (P = .046). There were no adverse events that occurred in both groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Oral decoctions based on Qi-Yin syndrome differentiation after adjuvant chemotherapy prolonged DFS, reduced the risk of disease recurrence and metastasis, improved quality of life, and down-regulated the proportion of CTLA-4+Tregs in completely resected stage ΙΙΙA NSCLC patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Chinese Clinical Trial Register, No. ChiCTR1800019396. Date of registration: 9 November 2018.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:KRAS突变,特别是KRASG12C,在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中普遍存在。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)一直是一线治疗,但最近开发了KRASG12C选择性抑制剂,比如索托拉斯,提出新的治疗选择。我们进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,以深入了解在ICI治疗后接受系统治疗的KRASG12C阳性晚期NSCLC患者的真实世界治疗模式和结果。
    方法:来自具有罕见分子改变的CAnadianCAncers-basket现实世界观察研究(CARMA-BROS),我们分析了在2015年至2021年间在加拿大9个中心确诊的102例KRASG12C阳性晚期NSCLC患者的队列.临床人口统计学和治疗数据来自电子健康记录。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox比例风险模型评估生存结果。
    结果:患者(中位年龄66岁;58%女性;99%当前/以前的烟草暴露;59%PD-L1≥50%),ICI后表现出异质治疗模式。大多数患者接受ICIs作为一线治疗,与不同的后续线路,包括化疗和靶向治疗。在ICI后接受全身治疗的患者中,中位总生存期为12.6个月,真实世界无进展生存期为4.7个月.与单药化疗相比,ICI后KRASG12C选择性靶向治疗(n=20)显示出更长的真实世界无进展生存期(aHR=0.39,p=0.012)。
    结论:这项研究为ICI治疗后KRASG12C阳性晚期NSCLC提供了有价值的真实数据。ICI后缺乏标准治疗测序强调了在KRASG12C靶向治疗的不断发展的格局中需要进一步调查和建立共识。
    OBJECTIVE: KRAS mutations, particularly KRASG12C, are prevalent in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been a frontline treatment, but recently developed KRASG12C-selective inhibitors, such as sotorasib, present new therapeutic options. We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study to gain insights into real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with KRASG12C-positive advanced NSCLC receiving systemic therapy post-ICI treatment.
    METHODS: From the CAnadian CAncers With Rare Molecular Alterations-Basket Real-world Observational Study (CARMA-BROS), a cohort of 102 patients with KRASG12C-positive advanced NSCLC across 9 Canadian centers diagnosed between 2015 and 2021 was analyzed. Clinico-demographic and treatment data were obtained from electronic health records. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models.
    RESULTS: The patients (median age 66 years; 58 % female; 99 % current/former tobacco exposure; 59 % PD-L1 ≥ 50 %), exhibited heterogeneous treatment patterns post-ICI. Most patients received ICIs as a first-line therapy, with varying subsequent lines including chemotherapy and targeted therapy. In patients receiving systemic therapy post-ICI, median overall survival was 12.6 months, and real-world progression-free survival was 4.7 months. KRASG12C-selective targeted therapy post-ICI (n = 20) showed longer real-world progression-free survival compared to single-agent chemotherapy (aHR = 0.39, p = 0.012).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes valuable real-world data on KRASG12C-positive advanced NSCLC post-ICI treatment. The absence of a standard treatment sequencing post-ICI underscores the need for further investigation and consensus-building in the evolving landscape of KRASG12C-targeted therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号