UNASSIGNED: The role of platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as independent prognostic markers in different tumors is well established. However, there is a limited review of the potential of NLR and PLR as predictors of treatment outcomes from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
UNASSIGNED: To establish a correlation between NLR and PLR and the potential of clinical benefit from ICIs.
UNASSIGNED: The literature search was performed for studies that reported the association between NLR, PLR, and treatment outcomes among cancer patients treated with ICIs. The outcomes of interest were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progressive disease (PD). ORR was the summation of patients who achieved complete response and partial response. DCR included patients who achieved stable disease. PD was the proportion of patients who progressed, relapsed, or discontinued the treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using the STATA 12.0 package. Heterogeneity was determined by the I2 value. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Egger\'s test was used to establish publication bias and sensitivity analysis.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 40 papers that met the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review. However, only 17 studies were used in the meta-analysis to determine the correlation between NLR, PLR, and treatment response. We found that treatment with ICIs and monitoring of outcomes and adverse events using PLR and NLR parameters have been studied in different tumors. Our analysis showed that low NLR correlated with higher ORR (OR = 0.62 (95% CI 0.47-0.81, p = 0.001) and higher DCR (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.14-0.36, p < 0.001). Higher NLR predicted a higher probability of PD (OR = 3.12, 95% CI 1.44, 6.77, p = 0.004). Similarly, low PLR correlated with higher ORR (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.5, 0.95, p = 0.025). Generally, patients with low NLR and PLR were more likely to achieve clinical benefit and better response (p-value < 0.001). Meanwhile, patients with high ratios were more likely to progress (p-value < 0.005), although there was significant heterogeneity among studies. There was no significant publication bias observed.
UNASSIGNED: The study showed that high NLR and PLR either at baseline or during treatment is associated with poorer treatment outcome. Therefore, these ratios can be utilized in clinical practice with other markers to determine treatment efficacy from immunotherapy.

Whether neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an applicative predictor of poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. In response to the current conflicting data, this meta-analysis was conducted to gain a comprehensive and systematic understanding of prognostic value of NLR in HCC.
Several English databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, with an update date of February 25, 2023, were systematically searched. We set the inclusion criteria to include randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies that reported the prognostic value of serum NLR levels in patients with HCC receiving treatment. Both the combined ratio (OR) and the diagnosis ratio (DOR) were used to assess the prognostic performance of NLR. Additionally, we completed the risk of bias assessment by Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.
This meta-analysis ultimately included 16 studies with a total of 4654 patients with HCC. The results showed that high baseline NLR was significantly associated with poor prognosis or recurrence of HCC. The sensitivity of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]. 0.59-0.73); specificity of 0.723 (95% CI: 0.64-0.78) and DOR of 5.0 (95% CI: 4.0-7.0) were pooled estimated from patient-based analyses. Subsequently, the combined positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLHR) were calculated with the results of 2.4 (95% CI: 1.9-3.0) and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.39-0.56), respectively. In addition, area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) reflecting prognostic accuracy was calculated to be 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.78). The results of subgroup analysis suggested that high NLR was an effective predictive factor of poor prognosis in HCC in mainland China as well as in the northern region.
Our findings suggest that high baseline NLR is an excellent predictor of poor prognosis or relapse in patients with HCC, especially those from high-incidence East Asian populations.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42023440640.

At the level of the genital system, ovarian neoplasm is the most frequent cause of morbidity and mortality. In the specialized literature, the coexistence of an inflammatory process is admitted from the early stages of the evolution of this pathology. Starting from the importance of this process, both in determinism and in the evolution of carcinogenesis and summarizing the field of knowledge, for this study we considered two objectives: the first was the presentation of the pathogenic mechanism, through which chronic +ovarian inflammation is involved in the process of carcinogenesis, and the second is the justification of the clinical utility of the three parameters, accepted as biomarkers of systemic inflammation: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio in the assessment of prognosis. The study highlights the acceptance of these hematological parameters, with practical utility, as prognostic biomarkers in ovarian cancer, based on the intrinsic link with cancer-associated inflammatory mediators. Based on the data from the specialized literature, the conclusion is that in ovarian cancer, the inflammatory process induced by the presence of the tumor, induces changes in the types of circulating leukocytes, with immediate effects on the markers of systemic inflammation.

UNASSIGNED: Postoperative infection is a common but costly complication. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is a promising marker for the identification of postsurgical infectious events. We aimed to perform this meta-analysis to assessed the accuracy of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio for the prediction of postsurgical infection.
UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library without language restriction from their inceptions to April 2022, and checked reference lists of included studies. Studies were included if they assessed predictive accuracy of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio for postsurgical infection. We estimated its predictive value and explored the source of heterogeneity. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess methodological quality and the Deeks\' test to evaluate publication bias. The bivariate model and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve were used for meta-analysis and generated a summary receiver operating characteristic space (ROC) curve.
UNASSIGNED: Our search returned 379 reports, of which 12 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, accounting for 4375 cases. The bivariate analysis yielded a pooled sensitivity of 0.77 (95%C.I.: 0.65-0.85) and specificity of 0.78 (95%C.I.: 0.67-0.86). Pooled positive LR and negative LR were 3.48 (95%C.I.: 2.26-5.36) and 0.30 (95%C.I.: 0.20-0.46), respectively. A negative LR of 0.30 reduces the post-test probability to 2% for a negative test result. The area under of receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.84 (95%C.I.: 0.80-0.87). Subgroups comparisons revealed difference by study design, surgical site, presentence of implant, time of sampling, type of infection event and prevalence of infection. The Deeks\' test showed no publication bias. The sensitivity analysis showed no study affected the robustness of combined results.
UNASSIGNED: Low-certainty evidence suggests that the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is a helpful marker for predicting postoperative infectious complication. The negative predictive value of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio enables for reliable exclusion of postoperative infection.Trial registrationPROSPERO registration number CRD42022321197. Registered on 27 April 2022.

UNASSIGNED: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple and routinely performed hematological parameter; however, studies on NLR as a prognostic tool in traumatic brain injury (TBI) have yielded contradictory results.
UNASSIGNED: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items in the Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines 2020. Electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched. The population consisted of TBI patients in the absence of moderate and severe extracranial injury. Day 1 NLR was taken for the analysis. The outcomes evaluated were mortality and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). No restrictions were placed on the language, year and country of publication, and duration of follow-up. Animal studies were excluded from the study. Studies, where inadequate data were reported for the outcomes, were included in the qualitative synthesis but excluded from the quantitative synthesis. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The risk of bias was estimated using the Cochrane RoBANS risk of bias tool.
UNASSIGNED: We retrieved 7213 citations using the search strategy and 2097 citations were excluded based on the screening of the title and abstract. Full text was retrieved for 40 articles and subjected to the eligibility criteria, of which 28 were excluded from the study. Twelve studies were eligible for the synthesis of the systematic review while seven studies qualified for the meta-analysis. The median score of the articles was 8/9 as per NOS. The risk of selection bias was low in all the studies while the risk of detection bias was high in all except one study. Ten studies were conducted on adult patients, while two studies reported pediatric TBI. A meta-analysis for GOS showed that high NLR predicted unfavorable outcomes at ≥6 months with a mean difference of -5.18 (95% confidence interval: -10.04, -0.32); P = 0.04; heterogeneity (I2), being 98%. The effect estimates for NLR and mortality were a mean difference of -3.22 (95% confidence interval: -7.12, 0.68), P = 0.11, and an I2 of 85%. Meta-analysis for Area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristic of the included studies showed good predictive power of NLR in predicting outcomes following TBI with AUC 0.706 (95% CI: 0.582-0.829).
UNASSIGNED: A higher admission NLR predicts an increased mortality risk and unfavorable outcomes following TBI. However, future research will likely address the existing gaps.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are at significant risk of developing postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a widely available inflammatory biomarker which may be of prognostic value in this setting.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting associations between perioperative NLR with postoperative AKI. We searched Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library, without language restriction, from inception to May 2022 for relevant studies. We meta-analysed the reported odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both elevated preoperative and postoperative NLR with risk of postoperative AKI and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). We conducted a meta-regression to explore inter-study statistical heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Twelve studies involving 10,724 participants undergoing cardiac surgery were included, with eight studies being deemed at high risk of bias using PROBAST modelling. We found statistically significant associations between elevated preoperative NLR and postoperative AKI (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.18-1.77), as well as postoperative need for RRT (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.50-3.72). Postoperative NLR measurements were not of prognostic significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Elevated preoperative NLR is a reliable inflammatory biomarker for predicting AKI following cardiac surgery.

UNASSIGNED: Previous studies have assessed the diagnostic accuracy of blood inflammatory markers like neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP), and CRP to albumin ratio (CAR) to predict the resistant Kawasaki disease (KD). The aim of the current meta-analysis and systematic review is to compare the prognostic ability of these inflammatory markers to predict the resistance to IVIG in patients with Kawasaki disease.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic search of online academic databases and search engines such as EMBASE, PubMed Central, MEDLINE, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect was conducted for papers that report the diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers for resistant KD. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA software.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of NLR as a predictor of resistant Kawasaki disease was 72% (95% CI: 62%, 80%) and 71% (95% CI: 63%, 78%), with AUC of 0.77 for PLR was 60% (95% CI: 50%, 69%) and 68% (95% CI: 61%, 75%), with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.69. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of CRP was 75% (95% CI: 68%, 81%) and 66% (95% CI: 55%, 76%), respectively, with an AUC value of 0.78. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of combined NLR and PLR was 58% (95% CI: 46%, 69%) and 73% (95% CI: 65%, 79%), respectively, with an AUC value of 0.72.
UNASSIGNED: Our study found that NLR, CRP, PLR, and combined NLR/PLR have a good prognostic value in patients with resistant Kawasaki disease, with moderate to high sensitivity and specificity. More research on the accuracy of these indexes in multiple combinations is needed.
UNASSIGNED: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42022322165].

The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are emerging haematological inflammatory biomarkers. However, their significance in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and its subtypes, branch and central RVO (BRVO and CRVO, respectively), is uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify the association of NLR and PLR with RVO. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid) and the Cochrane Library for studies investigating the association of NLR and PLR with RVO from inception to 2 December 2020. We used random-effects inverse-variance modelling to generate pooled effect measures. We used bivariate Bayesian modelling to meta-analyse the ability of NLR and PLR to differ between individuals with and without RVO and performed meta-regression and sensitivity analyses to explore inter-study heterogeneity. Eight studies published encompassing 1059 patients were included for analysis. Both NLR and PLR were significantly elevated in RVO, with pooled mean differences of 0.63 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.95) and 21.49 (95% CI 10.03-32.95), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the Bayesian summary receiver operating characteristic curve were, respectively, 0.629 (95% credible interval (CrI) 0.284-0.872), 0.731 (95% CrI 0.373-0.934) and 0.688 (95% CrI 0.358-0.872) for NLR; and 0.645 (95% CrI 0.456-0.779), 0.616 (95% CrI 0.428-0.761) and 0.621 (95% CrI 0.452-0.741) for PLR. Mean and variability of age and diabetes mellitus prevalence partially explained between-study heterogeneity. NLR and PLR are significantly elevated in RVO. Future research is needed to investigate the potential prognostic value and independence of these findings.

A growing body of evidence shows that the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a surrogate index of systemic inflammation in several chronic diseases. Conflicting associations between NLR and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been reported in individual studies. This meta-analysis sought to investigate the association between NLR and GDM. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify relevant articles. The pooled standardized mean difference with 95% CI was calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup and meta-regression analysis were carried out to control for the effects of GDM diagnostic criteria, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), and age. Eleven eligible articles were included, containing 1271 participants with GDM and 1504 controls. Pooled outcomes indicated a higher NLR in GDM pregnancies than in normoglycemic controls (SMD = 0.584; 95% CI, 0.339-0.830; P < .001), although extensive heterogeneity between studies was noted. Subgroup analysis revealed that the higher pooled estimate in GDM was not affected by diagnostic criteria, ethnicity, or BMI, although matching for BMI reduced heterogeneity between studies. This meta-analysis supports the higher NLR in GDM described by some individual studies.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies show that the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with the prognosis of patients with RCC. However, their findings are inconsistent, urging us to explore the prognostic value of NLR in RCC patients.
METHODS: This study was pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020167131). Two reviewers independently performed a systematical search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for prospective or retrospective cohort studies investigating the prognostic value of pretreatment NLR. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and other useful clinicopathological features were extracted and analyzed with fixed or random-effect models by using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software. Heterogeneity was estimated on the basis of Cochran\'s Q test and I2 value. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were also performed to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots and precisely assessed by Egger\'s tests. The quality of the evidence was evaluated in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).
RESULTS: Overall, 6461 RCC patients from 24 retrospective studies and 1 prospective study were included. In overall population, elevated pretreatment NLR was associated with poorer OS (pooled HR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.56-2.30, p < 0.001; I2 = 87%), DFS/PFS (pooled HR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.49-2.94, p < 0.001; I2 = 99%), and CSS (pooled HR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.61-3.33, p < 0.001; I2 = 14%). Furthermore, this negative association was further confirmed in patients with nonmetastatic and metastatic RCC patients, respectively. We also investigated the predictive role of NLR in metastatic RCC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The results indicated that the level of NLR was significantly associated with OS (pooled HR = 3.92, 95% CI: 2.00-7.69, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%) and PFS (pooled HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 95% CI: 1.61-3.01, p < 0.001; I2 = 20%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that elevated pretreatment NLR was significantly associated with poor prognosis of RCC patients. NLR could be helpful as a potential prognostic biomarker to guide clinical decision-making and select individualized treatment strategies for RCC patients.