OBJECTIVE: Persistent breast cancer disparities, particularly geographic disparities, may be explained by diagnostic practice patterns such as utilization of needle biopsy, a National Quality Forum-endorsed quality metric for breast cancer diagnosis. Our objective was to assess the relationship between patient- and facility-level factors and needle biopsy receipt among women with non-metastatic breast cancer in the United States.
METHODS: We examined characteristics of women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2004 and 2015 in the National Cancer Database. We assessed the relationship between patient- (e.g., race/ethnicity, stage, age, rurality) and facility-level (e.g., facility type, breast cancer case volume) factors with needle biopsy utilization via a mixed effects logistic regression model controlling for clustering by facility.
RESULTS: In our cohort of 992,209 patients, 82.96% received needle biopsy. In adjusted models, the odds of needle biopsy receipt were higher for Hispanic (OR 1.04, Confidence Interval 1.01-1.08) and Medicaid patients (OR 1.04, CI 1.02-1.08), and for patients receiving care at Integrated Network Cancer Programs (OR 1.21, CI 1.02-1.43). Odds of needle biopsy receipt were lower for non-metropolitan patients (OR 0.93, CI 0.90-0.96), patients with cancer stage 0 or I (at least OR 0.89, CI 0.86-0.91), patients with comorbidities (OR 0.93, CI 0.91-0.94), and for patients receiving care at Community Cancer Programs (OR 0.84, CI 0.74-0.96).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a need to account for sociodemographic factors including rurality as predictors of utilization of evidence-based diagnostic testing, such as needle biopsy. Addressing inequities in breast cancer diagnosis quality may help improve breast cancer outcomes in underserved patients.

The relevant content changes for pathologists in the updated interdisciplinary S3 guideline \"Early detection, diagnosis, therapy and aftercare of breast cancer\" are explained and discussed in the context of the most recent evidence. These include recommendations for risk assessment using Ki-67 and the use of multigene tests in the decision for or against adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor(ER)‑/progesterone receptor(PR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative invasive breast cancer. In addition, the assessment of HER2 status is explained. It is described which threshold distance or resection margin status is considered sufficient for resection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast carcinoma. Finally, recommendations concerning the clinical consequences to be drawn from the detection of a risk lesion in a core needle or vacuum biopsy or at the resection margin of a breast surgical specimen are discussed.