BACKGROUND: Endoscopic endonasal surgical resection is an effective therapeutic approach for olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB). Unilateral excision of ONBs with limited extension has been reported with the purpose of preserving olfactory function. We aimed to review implications of surgical management, olfactory preservation feasibility, and survival outcomes in patients who underwent endoscopic unilateral resection of olfactory neuroblastoma.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using the search terms [(\"Olfactory neuroblastoma\") OR (\"Esthesioneuroblastoma\")] AND [(\"Unilateral resection\") OR (\"Olfaction preservation\")]. Studies reporting cases of unilateral olfactory neuroblastoma endoscopic resection with postoperative olfaction assessment were included. Concurrently, records of patients who met inclusion criteria at our institution were reviewed retrospectively. The survival and olfactory outcomes were analyzed in both cohorts.
RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were identified in the published literature. Twenty-three (69.7%) reported postoperative olfaction preservation. Olfactory function after surgery did not show an association with Kadish stage (p=0.128). No evidence of disease was observed at the latest follow-up in this group of patients. Nine patients who met inclusion criteria were identified at our institution. The extent of resection influenced the level of olfaction preservation when cribriform plate and nasal septum resection coexisted (p=0.05). A single patient at our institution developed recurrence after being lost to follow-up for 22 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Olfaction preservation can be achieved in patients who undergo endoscopic unilateral resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. The extent of resection should aim for negative margins, particularly in the midline. Larger studies are required to assess the risk of contralateral microscopic disease, and, hence, close follow-up is advised.

Pleomorphic adenoma (PA) represents the most frequently occurring benign tumor within both major and minor salivary glands. However, in rare instances, nasal PA is an epithelial-derived borderline tumor, often originating from the nasal septum. Diagnosis usually relies on histopathological analysis. Under general anesthesia, these rare nasal tumors can be completely resected via endoscopic surgery. This article reports a case of PA originating from the nasal septum in a 49-year-old patient presenting with nasal congestion, along with a brief review of the current literature. The diagnostic nasal endoscopic examination showed a pink neoplastic mass in the left nasal cavity. Subsequent radiologic examination demonstrated a soft tissue mass in the anterior part of the nasal septum. After complete resection under nasal endoscopy, histopathological examination confirmed it as PA. Fortunately, no related complications occurred perioperatively and postoperatively. After surgery, performing a thorough examination with nasal endoscopy and scheduling regular follow-ups are crucial steps to prevent local recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: Septoplasty and rhinoplasty are common otolaryngological procedures, often combined as septorhinoplasty (SRP), offering aesthetic and functional benefits. These surgeries are believed to potentially risk postoperative infections due to natural bacterial flora in the nares. This study evaluates the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in reducing post-surgical infection complications.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, focusing on antibiotic use in septoplasty, rhinoplasty, and SRP. The study included randomized control trials, single/double-blind studies, retrospective chart reviews, and prospective cohort studies, excluding pediatric, non-human research, or studies with inaccessible data. Postoperative infection rates were analyzed utilizing R software as a form of Statistic.
RESULTS: From 697 articles, 15 studies were chosen for meta-analysis, involving 2225 patients, with 1274 receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 951 as controls. The meta-analysis indicated an odds ratio of 0.65 (95 % CI: [0.23, 1.89]), showing no significant protective effect of prophylactic antibiotics.
CONCLUSIONS: The study found no significant infection rate reduction with prophylactic antibiotic use. Notable were inconsistencies in study designs, antibiotic administration timing, and varied surgical practices. Antibiotic use risks were considered. Study limitations include potential biases and the retrospective nature of many studies.
CONCLUSIONS: This review and meta-analysis found no substantial evidence supporting prophylactic antibiotics\' effectiveness in reducing postoperative infection rates in septoplasty, rhinoplasty, and SRP, indicating a need to reevaluate practices and develop evidence-based guidelines. Future research should focus on comprehensive, randomized control studies, covering both preoperative and postoperative stages.

Objective: To compare subdorsal strip excisions in patients undergoing dorsal preservation (DP) rhinoplasty using patient-related outcome measures (PROMS). Methods: Patients were treated from 2020 to 2022 using the modified subdorsal strip method (MSSM) or Z flap approach. A two-sample t-test determined whether there was a difference in functional and aesthetic scores using the NOSE, Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), SCHNOS, and ESS scales. Results: Seventy-one primary rhinoplasty patients met inclusion criteria at 12 months with an average age of 23 years (62 female, 9 male), with 35 (49%) undergoing the MSSM technique, while 36 (51%) receiving the Z flap. PROMS at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were compared. The average preoperative and postoperative NOSE score was 9.36 and -4.4 (standard deviation [SD] 3.1, p < 0.001). The average preoperative SNOT-22 score was 23.9 and -16.4 (SD 10.2, p < 0.001). ESS scores was average was 6.2 and -1.6 (SD 3.2, p = 0.01). The average SCHNOS total, functional, and cosmetic scores were 27.6 (6-47), 8.2 (0-20) and 18.7 (0-37), respectively, and -5.7 (SD 8.2, p < 0.001), -5.73 (SD 6.24, p < 0.001), -18.1 (SD 9.7, p < 0.001). No significant complications were found and no difference in PROMs among groups. Conclusion: There was no difference in septal strip techniques as evaluated by PROMS.

Rhinoplasty, a common surgical procedure for nose reshaping, demands meticulous preoperative evaluation and precise execution. When coupled with septoplasty to address medical issues stemming from a deviated nasal septum, these procedures can lead to noteworthy postoperative complications. These encompass early issues like epistaxis and hematoma, as well as long-term challenges such as scarring and aesthetic deformities. Strategies like steroids and tranexamic acid are employed to prevent and manage these complications. A contentious aspect in postoperative care is the use of nasal packing. While some argue it aids healing and hemostasis, others avoid it due to patient discomfort. This review assesses the pros and cons of postoperative nasal packing following rhinoplasty and septoplasty. A thorough literature review spanning 2000-2023 yielded 30 relevant articles from 62. Discussion reveals that nasal packing offers limited benefits in reducing bleeding, edema and ecchymosis. In conclusion, the decision to employ nasal packing in rhinoplasty and septoplasty should be made carefully, considering patient comfort and surgical context. Evidence suggests that nasal packing may not consistently provide significant advantages and could lead to adverse outcomes. Nasal splints offer similar advantages and may be considered viable alternatives. Surgeons should tailor their approach to individual patient needs, with further research needed to refine postoperative management for these procedures.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

OBJECTIVE: To systematically reviews the safety and effectiveness of alloplastic implants (AI) in septoplasty.
METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search in Medline, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases to identify articles on septoplasty using AI. We also manually searched reference lists of included articles. Inclusion criteria involved prospective or retrospective case-series studies of adults with deviated nasal septum (DNS) who underwent septoplasty with AI, with sufficient follow-up data. Two authors independently screened articles, reviewed full manuscripts, and extracted data.
RESULTS: Out of 5370 articles, 16 met inclusion criteria, encompassing 884 patients from 14 eligible studies. Most studies had fair quality. AI materials included Polydioxanone (PDS), Polycaprolactone (PCL), Titanium, Macropore, and PolyMax. AI usage improved nasal obstruction in most patients, with 95.6 % (84.8 %-100 %) based on physical examination and 96.9 % (89.6 %-100 %) based on symptoms. AI-related complications occurred in 4.3 % (0 %-12.8 %) of cases, mostly non-serious.
CONCLUSIONS: AI use can be considered as a useful adjunct in septoplasty, with uncommon complications similar to standard procedures. However, due to limited-quality evidence, further prospective controlled studies are needed.

Corrective septal surgery for children with nasal obstruction has historically been avoided due to concern about the impact on the growing nose, with disruption of midfacial growth. However, there is a paucity of data evaluating complication and revision rates post-nasal septal surgery in the pediatric population. In addition, there is evidence to suggest that failure to treat nasal obstruction in children may itself result in facial deformity and/or developmental delay. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of septal surgery in pediatric patients with nasal obstruction. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Original studies in pediatric patients (<18 years of age) with nasal obstruction were eligible for inclusion. Patients with cleft lip or palate as their primary diagnosis were excluded. Our primary outcomes were patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), postsurgical complications, and revision rates. Secondary outcomes included surgical technique, anatomical considerations, and anthropometric measurements. Eighteen studies were included (1,080 patients). Patients underwent septoplasty, septorhinoplasty, rhinoplasty, or a combination of procedures for nasal obstruction. Obstruction was commonly reported secondary to trauma, nasal septal deviation, or congenital deformity. The mean age of the patients was 13.04 years with an average follow-up of 41.8 months. In all, 5.6% patients required revision surgery and there was an overall complication rate of 7.8%. Septal surgery for nasal obstruction in children has low revision and complication rates. However, a pediatric-specific outcome measure is yet to be determined. Larger prospective studies with long-term follow-up periods are needed to determine the optimal timing of nasal surgery for nasal obstruction in the pediatric population.

BACKGROUND: Septoplasty is used to correct nasal obstruction from nasal septum deviation. However, the long-term efficacy of septoplasty is unclear, and no literature reviews have examined long-term outcomes of septoplasty with or without turbinate modification. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of septoplasty with or without turbinate modification in improving nasal obstruction.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the aforementioned databases. Studies reporting outcomes 12+ months after functional septoplasty with or without turbinate surgery for nasal obstruction were included. Septorhinoplasties, concurrent sinus surgery, pediatric studies, and studies where septoplasty was performed for indications other than nasal obstruction were excluded.
RESULTS: After screening, 35 studies with 4,432 patients were included. Mean weighted post-operative follow-up time was 29.1 months (range 12-120 months). All studies reported significant improvement in subjective and objective outcomes at long-term follow-up compared to baseline. When comparing short-term (<12 months) to long-term (≥12 months) outcomes, four studies noticed that subjective outcomes worsened slightly over time, but no study found a significant change in objective outcomes over time. In addition, 23 studies reported patient satisfaction and/or improvement rates, with 75.4% (2,348/3,113) of patients expressing satisfaction/improvement at an average of 27.0 months after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, septoplasty with or without turbinate modification shows significant improvement in obstructive symptoms at long-term follow-up per both objective and subjective measures. Whether outcomes may worsen slightly over time remains indeterminate based on mixed results in the literature.
METHODS: N/A Laryngoscope, 134:2525-2537, 2024.

BACKGROUND: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a vasculitis that affects respiratory and kidney vessels. It primarily involves the nose and sinuses but can progress systemically. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis causes severe nasal deformities, impacting aesthetics and breathing. Literature focuses on rhinoplasty for saddle nose deformities in non-GPA patients, but its suitability for GPA patients remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of rhinoplasty in GPA patients by analyzing the existing literature.
METHODS: Four databases were searched; 2 reviewers independently screened the retrieved references, then relevant data for our study were extracted. Categorical outcomes were analyzed using pooled proportions and 95% CI. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistics χ 2 test with a P -value lower than 0.1 indicating heterogeneity.
RESULTS: In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we incorporated 16 studies encompassing 136 patients who underwent nasal reconstruction as part of their treatment for GPA. The collective findings indicate a favorable success rate for rhinoplasty, with a pooled ratio of 89% (95% CI: 84%, 95%). The rate of revision surgeries was relatively low, with a pooled rate of 19% (95% CI: 12%, 26%). Furthermore, rhinoplasty demonstrated comparatively lower rates of recurrence (pooled rate: 22%, 95% CI: 3%, 42%) and complications (pooled rate: 12%, 95% CI: 7%, 18%).
CONCLUSIONS: Rhinoplasty benefits GPA patients with saddle nose deformity and septal perforation with high success rates and low recurrence, revision, and complication outcomes. However, more research is needed for validation and refinement.

Impiego dei lembi nasali peduncolati nella chirurgia endoscopica transnasale: revisione della letteratura su indicazioni e tecniche chirurgiche.
Ad oggi la maggior parte delle patologie che coinvolgano il compartimento nasosinusale e i distretti anatomici circostanti (es. orbita, basicranio, spazio parafaringeo superiore, ecc.) possono essere trattate efficacemente mediante un approccio endoscopico endonasale esclusivo nella maggior parte dei casi, minimizzando l’invasività della procedura chirurgica. In questo contesto i lembi nasali vascolarizzati sono ampiamente utilizzati, poiché costituiscono una metodica di ricostruzione o di protezione delle strutture nobili/vitali più efficace rispetto all’utilizzo degli innesti, pur essendo associati a una riduzione dell’estensione e della morbidità chirurgica rispetto all’uso di lembi regionali o liberi. Differenti tipologie di lembi locali nasali sono state descritte in letteratura: scopo della presente review è quello di esaminare le applicazioni, caratteristiche, indicazioni, tassi di successo e complicanze di ciascuno di essi. Differenti lembi nasali basati su peduncoli singoli o multipli sono stati descritti; la scelta tra di essi è basata su differenti fattori: forma e dimensione del lembo, sede d’origine del peduncolo, ampiezza e angolo di rotazione, eventuali chirurgie precedenti, esperienza chirurgica oltre alla posizione e dimensione dell’area da rivestire.
At present an exclusive endoscopic endonasal approach is sufficient in the majority of cases to treat pathologies involving the sinonasal compartment and the surrounding anatomical subsites (e.g. orbit, ventral skull base, upper parapharyngeal space, etc.) with the advantage of minimising surgical invasiveness. In this context, nasal vascularised local flaps are widely employed because they represent a more effective option for reconstruction or preservation of noble/vital structures compared to grafts. On the other hand, the surgical extension and morbidity are minimised compared to regional or free flaps. Several nasal local flaps have been described in the literature: the aim of this review is to examine their applications, characteristics, indications, success rates and morbidities. Different nasal flaps based on single or multiple pedicles have been described; the choice between them is based on different factors such as the flap’s shape and dimension, localisation of the pedicle’s origin, width of rotation angle, previous surgeries which could compromise vascularisation, and surgical experience, in addition to the position and dimension of the area which must be resurfaced.