NSAIDs

NSAIDs
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    任何对药物过敏的病史应在给药前由医生询问。短时间给药后过敏和ACS症状的重合可能是Kounis综合征的指标。应考虑和治疗过敏和冠状动脉症状。
    缺血性心脏病仍然是全球主要的死亡原因。一些药物,包括NSAIDS和抗生素,由于冠状动脉痉挛,可引起心脏表现的过敏反应。在这种情况下,我们介绍了1例胸痛综合征患者,原因是肌内注射(IM)双氯芬酸注射液引起的超敏反应.病人是一名51岁的男性,他到急诊科就诊,主诉胸骨后胸痛,呼吸困难,和瘙痒,在他注射双氯芬酸后半小时开始,因为腰痛。注射抗组胺药缓解了过敏症状,但胸痛和呼吸困难保持稳定。他因导联二中存在ST段压低而入院,III,和AVF,并接受了经皮冠状动脉造影,这很正常.病人因诊断为库尼斯综合征而出院,一年后,他进行了平稳的随访。Kounis超敏反应相关急性冠脉综合征,尤其是由于内皮功能障碍引起的I型变异型冠状动脉痉挛是一种急性心肌综合征。以下报告描述了与过敏反应相关的KounisI型综合征的罕见病例,该病例在肌内注射双氯芬酸后表现出男性患者的ST段变化。
    UNASSIGNED: The history of any allergy to the medications should be asked by physicians before administration of the medication. The coincidence of allergic and ACS symptoms after a short time of drug administration might be an indicator of Kounis syndrome. Allergic and coronary symptoms should be considered and treated.
    UNASSIGNED: Ischemic heart disease is still the leading cause of death worldwide. Some medications, including NSAIDS and antibiotics, can cause allergic reactions with cardiac manifestations due to spasms of the coronary arteries. In this case, we present a patient with chest pain syndrome due to a hypersensitivity reaction caused by an intramuscular (IM) diclofenac injection. The patient was a 51-year-old male who presented to the emergency department complaining of retrosternal chest pain, breathlessness, and pruritis that started half an hour after an IM diclofenac injection he had because of low back pain. The allergic symptoms subsided with an antihistamine injection, but chest pain and dyspnea remained stable. He was admitted due to the presence of ST-segment depression in leads II, III, and AVF and underwent percutaneous coronary angiography, which was normal. The patient was discharged with the diagnosis of Kounis syndrome, and he had an uneventful follow-up 1 year later. Kounis hypersensitivity-associated acute coronary syndrome, especially type I variant coronary spasm due to endothelial dysfunction is a type of acute myocardial syndrome. The following report describes an uncommon case of anaphylaxis-associated Kounis type I syndrome manifesting ST-segment changes in a male patient following an intramuscular injection of diclofenac.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    消化性溃疡(PUD)是一种影响胃或近端肠粘膜衬里的外科急症。PUD的并发症包括上消化道出血,穿孔,和阻塞。消化性溃疡穿孔的主要治疗方法是手术,但是在某些情况下可以进行保守管理。一名54岁的女性被转诊到外科病房,有严重的上腹痛和反复呕吐的病史。除非甾体抗炎药史外,无其他症状报告,无明显病史或家族史。检查显示该患者有身体状况。在上腹部有压痛,特别是上腹部和右侧软骨病,但没有全身性腹膜炎的迹象.她的白细胞计数升高到24,000x10^3/UL,C反应蛋白为45.5mg/dL。直立的CXR揭示了隔膜下的经典气体。经口胃graffin的腹部CT诊断为十二指肠溃疡穿孔,无溃疡漏。该病例通过从复苏开始的保守治疗,每个操作系统为零,IV流体,IV抗生素,并密切观察,患者病情稳定,无并发症,成功完成非手术治疗,直至住院10天后出院。该案例说明,尽管这种情况在没有手术干预的情况下并不常见,成功的NOM有一些因素和标准。消化性溃疡穿孔是危及生命的外科急症。手术是PPU的标准治疗方法,在高度选择的病例中,NOM可以安全成功地进行。外科医生应保持广泛的安全窗口,同时提供非标准管理,随时准备手术。我们认为,成功进行非手术治疗的主要因素是在穿孔前长时间禁食。
    Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a surgical emergency that affects the mucosal lining of the stomach or proximal intestine. Complications of PUD include upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, perforation, and obstruction. The primary management approach for perforated peptic ulcers is surgery, but conservative management can be conducted in selected cases. A 54-year-old female was referred to the surgical unit with a history of severe upper abdominal pain and repeated vomiting. No other symptoms were reported and there was no significant medical or family history except the history of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Examination revealed that the patient had a medical condition. was vitally stable with tenderness in the upper abdomen, in particular the epigastric and right hypochondrial, but no signs of generalized peritonitis. Her white cell count was elevated at 24,000x10^3/UL, and a C-reactive protein of 45.5 mg/dL. An upright CXR revealed the classic gas under the diaphragm. Abdominal CT with oral gastrograffin identified the diagnosis of perforated duodenal ulcer without ulcer leak. The case was treated by conservative management started with resuscitation, nil per os, IV fluid, IV antibiotics, and close observation and the patient was stable with no complications and completed the nonoperative management successfully till discharge after 10 days of hospital stay. The case illustrates that although this condition is uncommon to be treated without surgical intervention, there are some factors and criteria for successful NOM. Peptic ulcer perforation is a life-threatening surgical emergency. Surgery is the standard treatment for PPU and NOM can be conducted safely and successfully in highly selected cases. the surgeon should keep a wide safety window while providing nonstandard management with readiness to operate at any time. We believe that the main factor in successful nonsurgical management of our case is being fasted for a long time before perforation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:卡波西静脉曲张爆发(KVE),也被称为疱疹湿疹,是一种罕见且可能危及生命的皮肤病,主要归因于单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)感染,柯萨奇A16,牛痘,带状疱疹水痘,和天花病毒。通常与预先存在的皮肤病有关,尤其是特应性皮炎,KVE主要影响儿童,但可以在健康成人中表现出来。以皮肤和粘膜上的囊泡和疮为特征的疼痛簇,它经常伪装成其他皮肤病。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)通常用于缓解疼痛和炎症,尽管它们作为KVE触发器的潜在作用仍然不确定。
    方法:这里,我们介绍了一例18岁女性KVE归因于水痘带状疱疹病毒(VZV),并在一周内成功口服阿昔洛韦治疗,强调早期识别和干预的重要性。KVE可以表现为全身症状,如发烧,疲劳,和淋巴结病,可能涉及多个器官系统,可能需要使用抗生素治疗并发症。
    结论:该病例强调了迅速识别KVE并考虑抗病毒治疗以提高患者预后的重要性。需要进一步的研究来阐明这种罕见疾病的诱发因素。
    BACKGROUND: Kaposi Varicelliform Eruptions (KVE), also known as eczema herpeticum, is a rare and potentially life-threatening dermatological condition primarily attributed to herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection, with less frequent involvement of Coxsackie A16, vaccinia, Varicella Zoster, and smallpox viruses. Typically associated with pre-existing skin diseases, especially atopic dermatitis, KVE predominantly affects children but can manifest in healthy adults. Characterized by painful clusters of vesicles and sores on the skin and mucous membranes, it often masquerades as other dermatological disorders. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain relief and inflammation, though their potential role as KVE triggers remains uncertain.
    METHODS: Here, we present a case of an 18-year-old female with KVE attributed to Varicella Zoster virus (VZV) and successfully treated with oral acyclovir within a week, underscoring the significance of early recognition and intervention. KVE can manifest with systemic symptoms like fever, fatigue, and lymphadenopathy and may involve multiple organ systems, necessitating possible antibiotic use for complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the importance of prompt KVE identification and consideration of antiviral therapy to enhance patient outcomes. Further research is warranted to elucidate predisposing factors for this rare condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    46岁的男性,没有慢性疾病,抱怨疼痛,撕裂,发红一个月,没有畏光,放电,或视力下降。检查发现了一个小,痛苦,左侧巩膜红肿.使用狭窄的明亮狭缝光束进行的狭缝灯检查显示巩膜层水肿和浅层巩膜血管的注射。其余的眼前节检查和眼底镜检查均正常。实验室检查和系统检查正常。患者最初用醋酸泼尼松龙(PredForte)1%每天三小时治疗一周,然后每天四次,连续一周,并在八周内逐渐变细,使用全身性非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)作为双氯芬酸钠,持续八周,临床症状有轻度改善,但是病变的大小没有任何变化,并且患者在疗程结束时开始出现症状复发。在完全无菌的预防措施下,在药房中制备0.1%浓度的局部他克莫司滴剂,并在接下来的六周持续时间内每天使用四次,而不是初始治疗(类固醇和NSAIDs)。然后,他克莫司滴剂在另外六周的持续时间内逐渐变细。患者表现出炎症的显着抑制和症状的异常缓解,并完全缓解了上巩膜炎。外用他克莫司治疗结节性巩膜炎非常有效,对类固醇治疗有抵抗力.结节性上巩膜炎患者患有长时间的炎症发作,其特征是比弥漫性更痛苦,并且可能与其他全身性疾病有关。该病例为类固醇耐药结节性巩膜炎,对常规治疗无反应,对他克莫司治疗反应良好,它最初是在上巩膜炎中引入的。他克莫司正在用于其他眼部疾病,但它在上巩膜炎中的使用是独一无二的。
    A 46-year-old male, with no chronic medical illness, complained of pain, tearing, and redness for one-month duration, with no photophobia, discharge, or decrease in visual acuity. Examination revealed a small, painful, red swelling in the left sclera. Slit-lamp examination using a narrow bright slit beam revealed edema of the episcleral layer and injection of the superficial episcleral blood vessels. The rest of the anterior segment exam and fundoscopy were normal. The laboratory investigations and systemic workup were normal. The patient was initially treated with prednisolone acetate (Pred Forte) 1% every three hours per day for one week, and then four times per day for another week, and tapered gradually over eight weeks with systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as diclofenac sodium for eight weeks with mild improvement of clinical symptoms, but the size of the lesion remained without any change and the patient started to have a relapse of symptoms at the end of the course. Topical tacrolimus drops of 0.1% concentration were prepared in the pharmacy under complete sterile precautions and were used four times per day for the following six weeks duration instead of the initial therapy (steroids and NSAIDs). Tacrolimus drops were then tapered gradually over another six weeks duration. The patient showed dramatic suppression of inflammation and exceptional remission of symptoms with complete resolution of the episcleritis. Topical tacrolimus is very effective in the treatment of nodular episcleritis, which is resistant to steroid therapy. Patients with nodular episcleritis suffer from prolonged bouts of inflammation that are characteristically more painful than the diffuse type and may be associated with other systemic diseases. The case is steroid-resistant nodular episcleritis, which did not respond to the usual treatment and showed a good response to treatment with tacrolimus, which was first introduced in episcleritis. Tacrolimus is being used in other ocular diseases, but its use in episcleritis is unique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:膈肌疾病,通常与长期使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)有关,表现为隔膜样小肠狭窄,常导致肠梗阻。
    方法:一名75岁男性,表现为复发性亚急性肠梗阻,后来通过CT成像诊断为多发性小肠狭窄。手术干预,包括切除和吻合,是为了缓解梗阻。切除标本的组织病理学检查证实膈肌疾病,挑战其与非甾体抗炎药使用的传统关联。
    结论:膈肌疾病,以粘膜和粘膜下膈肌样狭窄为特征,通常归因于NSAID的使用。然而,该病例强调了在无NSAID暴露的情况下发生膈肌疾病的可能性.病理结果支持隔膜样狭窄的存在,尽管患者拒绝使用NSAID。
    结论:本病例强调了将膈肌疾病作为间歇性肠梗阻患者的鉴别诊断的重要性,即使没有非甾体抗炎药的历史。
    BACKGROUND: Diaphragm disease, typically associated with long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, manifests as diaphragm-like small bowel strictures, often resulting in bowel obstruction.
    METHODS: A 75-year-old male presented with features of recurrent subacute intestinal obstruction, later diagnosed with multiple small bowel strictures via CT imaging. Surgical intervention, including resection and anastomosis, was performed to alleviate the obstruction. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen confirmed diaphragm disease, challenging its traditional association with NSAID use.
    CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragm disease, characterized by mucosal and submucosal diaphragm-like strictures, is typically attributed to NSAID usage. However, this case underscores the possibility of diaphragm disease in the absence of NSAID exposure. Pathological findings supported the presence of diaphragm-like strictures, despite the patient\'s denial of NSAID use.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case emphasizes the importance of considering diaphragm disease as a differential diagnosis in patients with intermittent bowel obstruction, even in the absence of NSAID history.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:溃疡性结肠炎是一种复发和缓解的疾病,可能与耀斑有关。在印度环境中耀斑的原因尚未得到很好的认识。
    方法:本前瞻性病例对照研究是在印度北部的一个中心进行的。病例定义为因溃疡性结肠炎发作而入院的患者,而对照组是从门诊部招募的缓解患者。诊断耀斑的基础是简单的临床结肠炎活动指数(SCCAI)≥5和内镜活动,而缓解是基于SCCAI<4和正常的粪便钙卫蛋白。一份评估最近感染的问卷,压力,药物摄入量(抗生素,止痛药),坚持治疗,并使用补充和替代疗法(CAM)。
    结果:我们包括84例患者(51例发作,33例缓解),中位年龄38岁,其中47人(55.9%)为男性。两组基线参数相似,包括年龄(38、23-50和38、25.5-48.5岁),男性(52.9%和60.6%),疾病的程度,肠外表现(21.6%和12.1%),使用5-氨基水杨酸盐(76.5%和90.9%)。在有耀斑的人群中,硫嘌呤的使用量较低(15.7%和36.4%)。在耀斑的预测因素中,最近的感染(39.2%和30.3%),最近的旅行(31.4%和27.3%),吃室外食物(47.1%和39.4%),奶制品消费量(88.2%和75.8%),使用止痛药(43.1%和33.3%)和近期应激(62.7%和60.6%)在病例和对照组之间相似.抗生素使用率(29.4%和6.1%),缺乏依从性(50.9%和15.2%),耀斑患者的CAM摄入量(70.6%和33.3%)较高。患者将缺乏依从性归因于治疗成本,假定治愈(由于缺乏症状),对不利影响的恐惧。
    结论:UC患者缺乏对炎症性肠病治疗的依从性以及近期CAM和抗生素摄入量较高。该研究为促进对IBD治疗的知识和依从性的教育干预奠定了基础。
    BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis is a relapsing and remitting disease that may be associated with flares. The causes of flares in the Indian setting are not well recognized.
    METHODS: The present prospective case-control study was conducted at a single center in North India. Cases were defined as patients admitted for flare of ulcerative colitis, while controls were patients in remission enrolled from the outpatient department. The basis of the diagnosis of flare was a simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI) of ≥ 5 and endoscopic activity, while remission was based on SCCAI < 4 and a normal fecal calprotectin. A questionnaire evaluating recent infections, stress, drug intake (antibiotics, pain medication), adherence to therapy, and use of complementary and alternative therapy (CAM) was administered.
    RESULTS: We included 84 patients (51 with flare and 33 in remission) with a median age of 38 years, of whom 47 (55.9%) were males. The two groups were similar for baseline parameters, including age (38, 23-50 and 38, 25.5-48.5 years), male gender (52.9% and 60.6%), extent of disease, extraintestinal manifestations (21.6% and 12.1%), use of 5-aminosalicylates (76.5% and 90.9%). The thiopurine use was lower in those having a flare (15.7% and 36.4%). Amongst the predictors of flare, the recent infections (39.2% and 30.3%), recent travel (31.4 and 27.3%), eating outside food (47.1% and 39.4%), consumption of milk products (88.2% and 75.8%), use of pain medication (43.1% and 33.3%) and recent stress (62.7% and 60.6%) were similar between cases and controls. The rates of antibiotic use (29.4% and 6.1%), lack of adherence (50.9% and 15.2%), and intake of CAM (70.6% and 33.3%) were higher in those with flare. Patients attributed a lack of adherence to the cost of therapy, presumed cure (due to lack of symptoms), and fear of adverse effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: Lack of adherence to inflammatory bowel disease therapies and recent CAM and antibiotic intake was higher in patients with flares of UC. The study makes ground for educational intervention(s) promoting knowledge and adherence to IBD therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    囊性纤维化关节病(CFA)是一种短暂性,间歇性形式的关节炎,不能与CF以外的任何其他疾病相关,因此CFA被排除在外。NSAIDs,短期间歇性夹板,糖皮质激素,和改善疾病的抗风湿药物是CFA的治疗选择。目前,关于如何最好地治疗CFA尚无共识。CFA的诊断和治疗仍然是医生和CF患者的挑战。最新的CFTR调节剂疗法,elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor(ETI),FDA最近批准用于在CFTR基因中具有至少一个Phe508del等位基因的6岁以上儿童。自批准以来,已经报道了ETI在肺功能和总体疾病负担方面的多种临床益处。然而,关于ETI的肌肉骨骼治疗益处的数据有限.在这份报告中,我们介绍了一名7岁女性CF患者,其CFA症状在开始ETI治疗后缓解.
    Cystic fibrosis arthropathy (CFA) is a transient, intermittent form of arthritis that cannot be associated with any other disease other than CF thus making CFA a diagnosis of exclusion. NSAIDs, short-term intermittent splinting, glucocorticoids, and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs are treatment options for CFA. Currently, there is no consensus on how to best treat CFA. Diagnosis and treatment of CFA remain a challenge for physicians and people with CF. The newest CFTR modulator therapy, elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), was approved by the FDA recently for children over the age of 6 with at least one Phe508del allele in the CFTR gene. Multiple clinical benefits of ETI in pulmonary functions and overall disease burden have been reported since its approval, however, the data on the musculoskeletal therapeutic benefits of ETI has been limited. In this report, we present a 7-year-old female with CF whose CFA symptoms resolved after starting ETI therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)是最常用的药物之一,并且是药物超敏反应的主要原因之一。NSAIDs超敏反应根据症状参与和NSAIDs亚类交叉反应性来分类。从皮肤受累到呼吸道症状的反应可以由多个NSAIDs亚类触发。过敏反应,虽然罕见,可以由单一的NSAID诱导,具有其他结构无关的亚类的耐受性。超出这些传统类别的反应被认为是“混合反应”。我们报告了一个独特的病例,可能对乙酰水杨酸(ASA)和布洛芬的过敏反应,两种结构上不同的非甾体抗炎药,表明典型的NSAIDs超敏反应类别之外的严重混合反应。
    方法:一名健康的45岁女性在急性发作呼吸困难后转诊到过敏和免疫学诊所,嘴唇肿胀,和布洛芬使用的全身性荨麻疹需要在急诊科肌内肾上腺素治疗。她以前耐受布洛芬,萘普生,和对乙酰氨基酚,没有荨麻疹病史,血管性水肿,哮喘,或者鼻息肉.她接受了ASA的口服挑战,从而出现荨麻疹和喉咙刺激,并出现反弹症状,需要2剂肌内肾上腺素。在随后的访问中,她通过了对乙酰氨基酚和塞来昔布的治疗剂量挑战。建议她避免所有其他NSAIDs,如果将来临床上需要这种药物,则提供ASA脱敏。
    结论:NSAIDs超敏反应可由对其他亚类具有耐受性的单个NSAIDs或由COX-1抑制导致的多种结构无关的NSAIDs引发。确定反应类型(NERD,NECD,NIUA,SNIUAA,或SNIDHR)允许适当的口服挑战和安全的替代疗法建议。然而,并非所有的临床反应都完全符合这些类别。患者也可能出现混合反应。我们的案例突出了对多种无关的非甾体抗炎药的严重混合反应,包括ASA可能的过敏反应。我们注意到药物激发试验(DPT)的实用性,以确定安全的替代药物选择,以及在配备适当的环境中进行DPT的重要性,以评估和管理包括过敏反应在内的严重超敏反应。
    BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most commonly used classes of medications, and are among the leading causes of drug hypersensitivity. NSAIDs hypersensitivity reactions are classified by symptom involvement and NSAIDs subclass cross-reactivity. Reactions varying from cutaneous involvement to respiratory symptoms can be triggered by multiple NSAIDs subclasses. Anaphylaxis, while rare, can be induced by a single NSAID, with tolerability of other structurally unrelated subclasses. Reactions that fall outside of these traditional categories are deemed \"blended reactions\". We report a unique case of possible anaphylaxis to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and ibuprofen, two structurally dissimilar NSAIDs, indicating a severe blended reaction outside of the typical NSAIDs hypersensitivity reaction categories.
    METHODS: An otherwise healthy 45 year old woman was referred to the Allergy and Immunology clinic after developing acute onset dyspnea, lip swelling, and generalized urticaria with ibuprofen use requiring treatment with intramuscular epinephrine in the emergency department. She previously tolerated ibuprofen, naproxen, and acetaminophen and had no history of urticaria, angioedema, asthma, or nasal polyps. She underwent an oral challenge to ASA whereby she developed urticaria and throat irritation with rebound symptoms requiring 2 doses of intramuscular epinephrine. On subsequent visits she passed treatment dose acetaminophen and celecoxib challenges. She was counseled to avoid all other NSAIDs and ASA desensitization was offered should this medication be clinically indicated in the future.
    CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs hypersensitivity reactions can be triggered by individual NSAIDs with tolerance of other subclasses or by multiple structurally unrelated NSAIDs due to COX-1 inhibition. Determining the type of reaction (NERD, NECD, NIUA, SNIUAA, or SNIDHR) allows for appropriate oral challenges and safe alternative therapy recommendations. However, not all clinical reactions fit perfectly into these categories. Patients may also develop blended reactions. Our case highlights a severe blended reaction to multiple unrelated NSAIDs, including likely anaphylaxis to ASA. We note the utility of drug provocation tests (DPTs) to identify safe alternative medication options, as well as the importance of performing DPTs in settings properly equipped to assess and manage severe hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是根据文献中的建议,评估复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)患者的镇痛药物处方趋势的差异。
    方法:我们进行了回顾性病例对照研究。
    方法:共有2510名CRPS患者和2510名人口统计学匹配的对照者参与了这项研究。
    方法:使用Epic中的SlicerDicer特征查找在2010年1月至2022年11月期间诊断为CRPSI或II的患者。同等数量的年龄-,性别-,没有CRPS诊断的种族匹配对照从Epic撤回。在病例和对照中检索了以下类别的一般和CRPS相关处方频率:苯二氮卓类药物,双膦酸盐,降钙素,辣椒素,神经性疼痛药物,NSAIDs,阿片类药物,和类固醇。
    结果:总共740名(29%)CRPS患者和425名(17%)对照者服用了苯二氮卓类药物(95%CI0.1-0.15),154例(6.1%)CRPS患者和52例(2.1%)对照者服用辣椒素(95%CI0.03-0.05),1837例(73%)CRPS患者和927例(37%)对照者服用了神经性疼痛药物(95%CI0.05-0.34),1769名(70%)CRPS患者和1217名(48%)对照者服用阿片类药物(95%CI0.19-0.25),1095例(44%)CRPS患者和1217例(48%)对照者服用类固醇(95%CI0.08-0.14),1638例(65%)CRPS患者和1765例(70%)对照者服用NSAIDs(95%CI-0.08-0.02),所有类别的p<0.001。与CRPS相关的处方,(95%CI0.05-0.16,p<0.001)比对照组(N=327,49%)更多的CRPS患者服用阿片类药物(N=398,59%)。
    结论:CRPS难以治疗,建议的治疗方式存在显著差异。根据我们的研究结果,一些公布的建议和实际做法之间存在分歧。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate discrepancies in prescription trends for analgesic medications in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) patients based on recommendations in the literature.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study.
    METHODS: A total of 2510 CRPS patients and 2510 demographic-matched controls participated in this study.
    METHODS: The SlicerDicer feature in Epic was used to find patients diagnosed with CRPS I or II between January 2010 and November 2022. An equal number of age-, gender-, and race-matched controls without a CRPS diagnosis were retracted from Epic. General and CRPS-associated prescription frequencies for the following classes were retrieved for both cases and controls: benzodiazepines, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, capsaicin, neuropathic pain medications, NSAIDs, opioids, and steroids.
    RESULTS: A total of 740 (29%) CRPS patients and 425 (17%) controls were prescribed benzodiazepines (95% CI 0.1-0.15), 154 (6.1%) CRPS patients and 52 (2.1%) controls were prescribed capsaicin (95% CI 0.03-0.05), 1837 (73%) CRPS patients and 927 (37%) controls were prescribed neuropathic pain medications (95% CI 0.05-0.34), 1769 (70%) CRPS patients and 1217 (48%) controls were prescribed opioids (95% CI 0.19-0.25), 1095 (44%) CRPS patients and 1217 (48%) controls were prescribed steroids (95% CI 0.08-0.14), and 1638 (65%) CRPS patients and 1765 (70%) controls were prescribed NSAIDs (95% CI -0.08-0.02), p < 0.001 for all classes. With CRPS-associated prescriptions, (95% CI 0.05-0.16, p < 0.001) more CRPS patients were prescribed opioids (N = 398, 59%) than controls (N = 327, 49%).
    CONCLUSIONS: CRPS is difficult to treat with significant variance in suggested treatment modalities. Based on the results of our study, there is a divergence between some published recommendations and actual practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    胆汁性腹膜炎是代表具有高死亡风险的医疗紧急情况的病理状况。这种情况在胆道破裂后的人类和兽医学中都有报道,肝外胆道梗阻,胆囊破裂,创伤,或者十二指肠穿孔.在这份报告中,描述了首例Bobtail纯种犬因胃穿孔引起的胆汁性腹膜炎,这可能是由非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)引起的。选择性脾切除和去势后,这只狗因食欲不振被转诊到我们医院接受医疗管理,精神抑郁,和多次胃部呕吐并有血迹.临床诊断测试显示存在胆汁性腹膜炎。由于临床状况恶化,病人接受了安乐死。宏观检查显示游离的褐色腹腔积液和胃幽门区穿孔性溃疡。
    Biliary peritonitis is a pathological condition representing a medical emergency with a high risk of mortality. This condition is reported in both human and veterinary medicine following biliary tract rupture, extrahepatic biliary obstructions, gallbladder rupture, trauma, or duodenal perforation. In this report, the first-ever case of biliary peritonitis due to gastric perforation in a Bobtail purebred dog is described, which was probably induced by the administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). After an elective splenectomy and castration, the dog was referred to our hospital for medical management for inappetence, mental depression, and multiple episodes of gastric vomits with traces of blood. Clinical diagnostic tests showed the presence of biliary peritonitis. Due to worsening clinical conditions, the patient was subjected to euthanasia. Macroscopic examination showed a free brownish abdominal effusion and the presence of perforating ulcer of the stomach pylorus region.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号