Minimally invasive cardiac Surgery

微创心脏手术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    机器人辅助的微创直接冠状动脉搭桥术(RA-MIDCAB)是冠状动脉血运重建的一种有吸引力的策略。越来越多的证据支持在冠状动脉手术中使用全动脉移植。我们使用RA-MIDCAB评估了双侧胸廓内动脉(BITA)的总动脉左侧冠状动脉血运重建,并将其与倾向评分匹配(PSM)非体外循环CAB(OPCAB)手术人群进行了比较。
    我们回顾性纳入了2015年1月1日至2022年10月31日使用BITA进行的所有孤立的OPCAB和RA-MIDCAB手术,而没有进行大隐静脉移植。我们分析了所有RA-MIDCAB患者,并进行了PSM,以将其与我们的OPCAB人群进行比较。主要结局是主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)和死亡率。次要结果是手术参数,住院时间,和学习曲线。
    我们包括601OPCAB和77RA-MIDCAB程序,这导致2个队列的54名患者PSM后。死亡率和MACCE生存分析显示无显著差异。与OPCAB组(38.9%;P=0.02)相比,RA-MIDCAB组的输血减少(16.7%)。我们观察到重症监护病房(ICU)入院人数减少(24.1%vs96.6%),ICU住院时间较短(0.78±1.7vs1.91±1.01天),RA-MIDCAB与OPCAB组的住院时间较短(6.78±2.4vs8.01±2.5天)(P<0.01)。手术时间从400.0±70.8降至325.0±38.0min,RA-MIDCABBITA采集经验更多(P<0.01)。
    这是用于左冠状动脉系统血运重建的77份连续RA-MIDCABBITA采集的第一份出版物。该技术在MACCE和死亡率方面是安全的。其他优点是住院时间短,ICU入院人数减少,减少输血。
    UNASSIGNED: Robot-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (RA-MIDCAB) is an attractive strategy for coronary revascularization. Growing evidence supports the use of total arterial grafting in coronary surgery. We evaluated total arterial left-sided coronary revascularization with bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) using RA-MIDCAB and compared it with a propensity score-matched (PSM) off-pump CAB (OPCAB) surgery population.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively included all isolated OPCAB and RA-MIDCAB surgery using BITA without saphenous vein graft from January 1, 2015, to October 31, 2022. We analyzed all our RA-MIDCAB patients and performed PSM to compare them with our OPCAB population. Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and mortality. Secondary outcomes were surgical parameters, length of hospital stay, and learning curve.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 601 OPCAB and 77 RA-MIDCAB procedures, which resulted in 2 cohorts of 54 patients after PSM. Mortality and MACCE survival analysis showed no significant difference. There was less blood transfusion in the RA-MIDCAB (16.7%) compared with the OPCAB group (38.9%; P = 0.02). We observed fewer intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (24.1% vs 96.6%), shorter ICU stay (0.78 ± 1.7 vs 1.91 ± 1.01 days), and shorter hospital stay (6.78 ± 2.4 vs 8.01 ± 2.5 days) in the RA-MIDCAB versus OPCAB group (P < 0.01). Surgery time decreased from 400.0 ± 70.8 to 325.0 ± 38.0 min with more experience in RA-MIDCAB BITA harvesting (P < 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: This is a first publication of 77 consecutive RA-MIDCAB BITA harvesting for left coronary artery system revascularization. This technique is safe in terms of MACCE and mortality. Additional advantages are shorter length of hospital stay, fewer ICU admissions, and less blood transfusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:微创二尖瓣手术(MIC-MVS)已被确定为二尖瓣返流(MR)的首选治疗方法。但二尖瓣经导管边缘-边缘瓣膜修复术(M-TEER)通常在手术风险高的患者中进行,并且在中危患者中的应用越来越多.方法:从2010年到2021年,我们进行了723个M-TEER和123个分离的MIC-MVS程序。我们通过匹配年龄应用了敏感性分析,左心室射血分数(LVEF),EuroSCOREII和MR的病因。结果:基线特征在总体队列中显示出显着差异(p<0.01):年龄78.3岁与61.5年,EuroSCOREII5.5%与1.3%和LVEF48.4%与60.4%的M-TEER与MIC-MVS患者。M-TEER患者出院时的MR分级为中度/重度,占24.5%(171/697),与MIC-MVS中6.5%(8/123)(p<0.01)。M-TEER的一年生存率为91.5%(552/723)。MIC-MVS为97.6%(95/123)(p=0.04)。与49对(n=98)的匹配显示随访期间具有可比性的生存率,但数值上更高的平均二尖瓣梯度为4.1mmHg(95%CI:3.6-4.6)M-TEER中3.4mmHg(95%CI:3.0-3.8)(p=0.04)。结论:接受M-TEER的患者一年生存率低于MIC-MVS,但匹配后差异消失。M-TEER患者的MR减少效果较差,术后二尖瓣梯度较高。
    Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIC-MVS) has been established as preferred treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR), but mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge valve repair (M-TEER) is routinely performed in patients at high surgical risk and is increasingly performed in intermediate risk patients. Methods: From 2010 to 2021, we performed 723 M-TEER and 123 isolated MIC-MVS procedures. We applied a sensitivity analysis by matching age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), EuroSCORE II and etiology of MR. Results: Baseline characteristics showed significant differences in the overall cohort (p < 0.01): age 78.3 years vs. 61.5 years, EuroSCORE II 5.5% vs. 1.3% and LVEF 48.4% vs. 60.4% in M-TEER vs. MIC-MVS patients. Grade of MR at discharge was moderate/severe in 24.5% (171/697) in M-TEER vs. 6.5% (8/123) in MIC-MVS (p < 0.01). One-year survival was 91.5% (552/723) in M-TEER vs. 97.6% (95/123) in MIC-MVS (p = 0.04). A matching with 49 pairs (n = 98) showed comparable survival during follow-up, but a numerically higher mean mitral valve gradient of 4.1 mmHg (95% CI: 3.6-4.6) vs. 3.4 mmHg (95% CI: 3.0-3.8) in M-TEER (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Patients undergoing M-TEER had lower one-year survival than MIC-MVS, but differences disappeared after matching. Reduction in MR was less effective in M-TEER patients and postprocedural mitral valve gradients were higher.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在微创二尖瓣手术(MIMVS)中,主动脉内球囊闭塞(EABO)和经胸交叉钳夹已被证明具有相当的安全性。然而,很少有研究完全集中在完全内窥镜机器人方法上。我们试图比较接受完全内窥镜机器人二尖瓣手术并通过EABO和经胸钳夹进行主动脉闭塞的患者的结局,因为EABO不可用,需要我们使用经胸钳夹。回顾性审查确定了113例患者在2019年至2021年期间在我们的机构接受了EABO(n=71)或经胸钳夹(n=42)的机器人二尖瓣手术。提取相关数据并进行比较。术前特征相似,但冠状动脉疾病的发生率较高[EABO:69.0%(49/71)vs钳夹:45.2%(19/42),p=.02]和慢性肺病[EABO:38.0%(27/71)与钳夹:9.5%(4/42),在EABO组中p<.01]。经皮体外循环中位时间,手术时间,和交叉钳夹时间具有可比性。术后出血并发症发生率相似,无主动脉并发症。每组中的一名患者接受了开放方法的转换。30天死亡率和再入院率相当。EABO和经胸钳夹术后出血和主动脉结局相似,术后30天的死亡率和再入院率相当.我们的发现支持两种技术的可比安全性,这在包括所有MIMVS技术的研究中得到了很好的证明,在完全内窥镜机器人方法的特定背景下。
    Endoaortic balloon occlusion (EABO) and transthoracic cross-clamping have been shown to have comparable safety profiles for aortic occlusion in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS). However, few studies have focused exclusively on the totally endoscopic robotic approach. We sought to compare outcomes for patients undergoing totally endoscopic robotic mitral valve surgery with aortic occlusion via EABO and transthoracic clamping after a period where EABO was unavailable required us to use the transthoracic clamp. Retrospective review identified 113 patients who underwent robotic mitral valve surgery at our facility between 2019 and 2021 with EABO (n = 71) or transthoracic clamping (n = 42). Relevant data were extracted and compared. Preoperative characteristics were similar other than a higher rate of coronary artery disease [EABO: 69.0% (49/71) vs clamp: 45.2% (19/42), p = .02] and chronic lung disease [EABO: 38.0% (27/71) vs clamp: 9.5% (4/42), p < .01] in the EABO group. Median percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass time, operative time, and cross-clamp time were comparable. Similar rates of postoperative bleeding complications were observed, and no aortic complications were observed. One patient in each group underwent conversion to an open approach. 30-day mortality and readmission rates were comparable. EABO and transthoracic clamp were associated with similar bleeding and aortic outcomes, and mortality and readmission rates were comparable at thirty days postoperatively. Our findings support the comparable safety of the two techniques, which is well documented in studies encompassing all MIMVS techniques, within the specific context of the totally endoscopic robotic approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:微创心脏手术会引起大量疼痛,因此会消耗镇痛药。筋膜平面阻滞对镇痛效果和患者总体满意度的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们测试了主要假设,即筋膜平面阻滞可在机器人辅助二尖瓣修复后的最初3天内改善整体获益镇痛评分(OBAS)。其次,我们检验了阻止减少阿片类药物消耗和改善呼吸力学的假设.
    方法:计划进行机器人辅助二尖瓣修复的成年人被随机分配到胸肌II和锯齿肌前平面联合阻滞或常规镇痛。这些块是超声引导的,并使用了普通和脂质体布比卡因的混合物。在术后第1-3天每天测量OBAS,并用线性混合效应建模进行分析。使用简单的线性回归模型评估阿片类药物的消耗,并使用线性混合模型评估呼吸力学。
    结果:按计划,我们招募了194名患者,其中98个被分配给阻滞,96个被分配给常规镇痛管理。术后第1-3天对总OBAS既没有治疗时间相互作用(P=0.67),也没有治疗效果,中位差异为0.08(95%置信区间[CI]:-0.50至0.67;P=0.69),几何平均值的估计比为0.98(95%CI:0.85-1.13;P=0.75)。没有证据表明对累积阿片类药物消耗或呼吸力学有治疗作用。两组术后每天的平均疼痛评分相似。
    结论:前锯肌和胸肌平面阻滞不能改善术后镇痛效果,累积阿片类药物消费量,或呼吸力学在机器人辅助二尖瓣修复后的最初3天。
    背景:NCT03743194。
    Minimally invasive cardiac surgery provokes substantial pain and therefore analgesic consumption. The effect of fascial plane blocks on analgesic efficacy and overall patient satisfaction remains unclear. We therefore tested the primary hypothesis that fascial plane blocks improve overall benefit analgesia score (OBAS) during the initial 3 days after robotically assisted mitral valve repair. Secondarily, we tested the hypotheses that blocks reduce opioid consumption and improve respiratory mechanics.
    Adults scheduled for robotically assisted mitral valve repairs were randomised to combined pectoralis II and serratus anterior plane blocks or to routine analgesia. The blocks were ultrasound-guided and used a mixture of plain and liposomal bupivacaine. OBAS was measured daily on postoperative Days 1-3 and were analysed with linear mixed effects modelling. Opioid consumption was assessed with a simple linear regression model and respiratory mechanics with a linear mixed model.
    As planned, we enrolled 194 patients, with 98 assigned to blocks and 96 to routine analgesic management. There was neither time-by-treatment interaction (P=0.67) nor treatment effect on total OBAS over postoperative Days 1-3 with a median difference of 0.08 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.50 to 0.67; P=0.69) and an estimated ratio of geometric means of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.85-1.13; P=0.75). There was no evidence of a treatment effect on cumulative opioid consumption or respiratory mechanics. Average pain scores on each postoperative day were similarly low in both groups.
    Serratus anterior and pectoralis plane blocks did not improve postoperative analgesia, cumulative opioid consumption, or respiratory mechanics during the initial 3 days after robotically assisted mitral valve repair.
    NCT03743194.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:本研究的目的是探讨超快通道心脏麻醉(UFTCA)对右胸腔镜微创心脏手术患者术后快速恢复的影响。
    方法:回顾性观察研究。
    方法:一家大型教学医院。
    方法:纳入了在2021年1月至2021年8月期间接受右胸腔镜微创心脏手术的153例患者。入选标准为美国麻醉医师协会I至III级,纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能I至III级,年龄≥18岁。排除标准为NYHAIV级,局部麻醉过敏,重度肺动脉高压(肺动脉收缩压,PASP>70mmHg),年龄≤18岁或≥80岁,急诊手术,以及数据不完整或缺失的患者。
    方法:最后,共纳入122例患者,并按不同麻醉策略分组.60例患者接受了前锯肌平面阻滞辅助超快轨道心脏麻醉(UFTCA组),62例患者接受常规全身麻醉(CGA组)。主要结果是住院时间和术后重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间。次要结果是术后疼痛评分,阿片类药物的使用,术后胸腔引流,和并发症。
    结果:UFTCA组术中舒芬太尼和瑞芬太尼的剂量明显低于CGA组(66.25±1.03µgv283.31±11.36µg,p<0.001;和1.94±0.38mgv2.14±0.99mg,p分别<0.001)。UFTCA组术后抢救镇痛发生率明显低于CGA组(10例[16.67%]v30例[48.38%],p<0.001)。在术后ICU,UFTCA组疼痛评分数字评定量表≥3的患者少于CGA组(10例[16.67%]v29例[46.78%],p<0.001)。UFTCA组术后拔管时间短于CGA组(0.3小时[范围,0.25-0.4小时]v13.84小时[范围,10.25-18.36小时],p<0.001)。UFTCA组的ICU住院时间和住院时间短于CGA组(27.73±16.54小时v61.69±32.48小时,p<0.001;和8天[范围,7-9]v9天[范围,8-12],p分别<0.001)。与CGA组相比,UFTCA组患者术后24小时内胸管引流较少(197.67±13.05mLv318.23±160.10mL,p<0.001)。住院死亡率没有显着差异,术后出血,或二次手术2组之间。术后恶心的发生率,呕吐,或肺不张在两组之间具有可比性。
    结论:锯肌前平面阻滞辅助超快通道心脏麻醉可促进右胸腔镜微创心脏手术患者术后快速恢复。这种麻醉方案在临床上是安全可行的。
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of ultra-fast-track cardiac anesthesia (UFTCA) on rapid postoperative recovery in patients undergoing right-thoracoscopic minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
    A retrospective observational study.
    A single large teaching hospital.
    A total of 153 patients who underwent right-thoracoscopic minimally invasive cardiac surgery between January 2021 and August 2021 were enrolled. The inclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I to III, New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac function class I to III, and age ≥18 years. The exclusion criteria were NYHA class IV, local anesthetic allergy, severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary arterial systolic pressure, PASP >70 mmHg), age ≤18 years or ≥80 years old, emergency surgery, and patients with incomplete or missing data.
    Finally, a total of 122 patients were included and grouped by different anesthesia strategies. Sixty patients received serratus anterior plane block-assisted ultra-fast- track cardiac anesthesia (UFTCA group), and 62 patients received conventional general anesthesia (CGA group). The primary outcomes were lengths of hospital stay and postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay. The secondary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, opioids use, postoperative chest tube drainage, and complications.
    The intraoperative dosages of sufentanil and remifentanil in the UFTCA group were significantly lower than those in the CGA group (66.25 ± 1.03 µg v 283.31 ± 11.36 µg, p < 0.001; and 1.94 ± 0.38 mg v 2.14 ± 0.99 mg, p < 0.001, respectively). The incidence of postoperative rescue analgesia in the UFTCA group was significantly lower than that in the CGA group (10 patients [16.67%] v 30 patients [48.38%], p < 0.001). In the postoperative ICU, there were fewer patients with pain score Numeric Rating Scale ≥3 in the UFTCA group than that in the CGA group (10 patients [16.67%] v 29 patients [46.78%], p < 0.001). The postoperative extubation time in the UFTCA group was shorter than that in the CGA group (0.3 hours [range, 0.25-0.4 hours] v 13.84 hours [range, 10.25-18.36 hours], p < 0.001). Lengths of ICU stay and hospital stay in the UFTCA group were shorter than those in the CGA group (27.73 ± 16.54 hours v 61.69 ± 32.48 hours, p < 0.001; and 8 days [range, 7-9] v 9 days [range, 8-12], p < 0.001, respectively). Compared with the CGA group, the patients in the UFTCA group had less chest tube drainage within 24 hours after surgery (197.67 ± 13.05 mL v 318.23 ± 160.10 mL, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality, postoperative bleeding, or secondary surgery between the 2 groups. The incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting, or atelectasis were comparable between the 2 groups.
    Serratus anterior plane block-assisted ultra-fast-track cardiac anesthesia can promote rapid postoperative recovery in patients with right-thoracoscopic minimally invasive cardiac surgery. This anesthesia regimen is clinically safe and feasible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    关于在微创心脏手术(MICS)中由股动脉插管引起的远端肢体缺血的监测和后果的文献仍然有限。主要目标是确定其发病率,定义为插管和非插管肢体之间持续≥连续4分钟的局部氧饱和度(rSO2)差异≥15%。次要目标包括:确定远端肢体缺血,定义为插管肢体的组织氧合指数(TOI)<50%,远端肢体缺血预测因子的鉴定,确定NIRS诊断的缺血与急性肾损伤的可能关联,以及心脏手术后六个月内需要进行血管手术。一个潜在的,采用盲法rSO2测量防止术中临床决策的观察性队列研究。单中心,社区医院,临床研究。所有连续患者≥18岁,和预定义的MICS。通过近红外光谱(NIRS)进行双侧小腿肌肉rSO2测量,对患者进行了MICS。根据主要目标,总共有75/280患者(26.79%)经历了远端肢体缺血,而18/280患者(6.42%)根据次要目标经历了远端肢体缺血。多因素logistic回归分析显示年龄较小是远端肢体缺血的独立预测因素(p=0.003)。术中缺血的患者均未在随访期内需要进行血管手术。根据所使用的标准,NIRS诊断的缺血的发生率从6.4%到26.8%不等。短期和长期的血管后遗症,然而,是有限的,与术中缺血无关。由于血管原因,术中远端肢体NIRS监测的附加值似乎有限。未来MICS中股动脉插管的研究应将重点转移到其他结果参数,如急性肾损伤,术后疼痛或感觉异常。
    Literature regarding monitoring and consequences of distal limb ischemia due to femoral artery cannulation for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS) remains limited. The primary objective was to determine its incidence, defined as a ≥ 15% difference in regional Oxygen Saturation (rSO2) lasting ≥ four consecutive minutes between the cannulated and non-cannulated limb. The secondary objectives included: determination of distal limb ischemia, defined as a Tissue Oxygenation Index (TOI) < 50% in the cannulated limb, identification of predictors for distal limb ischemia, determination of a possible association of NIRS-diagnosed ischemia with acute kidney injury, and the need for vascular surgery up to six months after cardiac surgery. A prospective, observational cohort study with blinded rSO2-measurements to prevent intraoperative clinical decision-making. A single-center, community-hospital, clinical study. All consecutive patients ≥ 18 years old, and scheduled for predefined MICS. Patients underwent MICS with bilateral calf muscle rSO2-measurements conducted by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS). In total 75/280 patients (26.79%) experienced distal limb ischemia according to the primary objective, while 18/280 patients (6.42%) experienced distal limb ischemia according to the secondary objective. Multivariate logistic regression showed younger age to be an independent predictor for distal limb ischemia (p = 0.003). None of the patients who suffered intraoperative ischemia required vascular surgery within the follow-up period. The incidence of NIRS-diagnosed ischemia varied from 6.4% to 26.8% depending on the used criteria. Short and long-term vascular sequelae, however, are limited and not intraoperative ischemia related. The added value of intraoperative distal limb NIRS monitoring for vascular reasons seems limited. Future research on femoral artery cannulation in MICS should shift focus to other outcome parameters such as acute kidney injury, postoperative pain or paresthesias.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the association between cardiac surgical approach (thoracotomy vs. sternotomy) and incidence of persistent postoperative pain at 3 months. Secondary objectives were the incidence and intensity of persistent pain at 6 and 12 months, acute postoperative pain, analgesic requirement and its side effects.
    METHODS: Single-center, prospective, observational study. Recruitment between December 2017 and August 2018.
    METHODS: Perioperative care at university-affiliated tertiary care centre.
    METHODS: 202 adults scheduled for cardiac surgery. Patients with chronic pain or behavioural disorder were excluded.
    METHODS: Thoracotomy (n = 106) and sternotomy (n = 96).
    METHODS: Pain scores and pain medication requirements from extubation until hospital discharge. Persistent postoperative pain was assessed using a telephone questionnaire.
    RESULTS: Incidence and intensity of pain was not significantly different between thoracotomy or sternotomy either in the short- or in the long-term follow-up. Incidence of persistent postoperative pain showed no differences between groups (30.2 vs 22.9% at 3 months (p = 0.297), 10.4 vs 7.3% at 6 months (p = 0.364) and 7.5 vs 7.3% at 12 months (p = 0.518) in thoracotomy and sternotomy group). A significant decrease of pain incidence was observed between 3 and 6 months (p < 0.001) but not between 6 and 12 months (p = 0.259) in both groups. ANOVA of repeated measures adjusted for confounding variable showed a decrease of acute pain intensity over time (p = 0.001) with no difference between groups (p = 0.145). Acute pain medication requirements were not different between the groups (p = 0.237 for piritramide and p = 0.743 for oxycodone) with no difference in their side effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed no difference in short- or long-term pain in patients undergoing anterolateral thoracotomy or median sternotomy. Both groups showed a decrease in persistent postoperative pain incidence between 3 and 6 months without any significant changes at 12 months.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较安全性和可行性,包括住院,重症监护病房(ICU)入住,转换为全身麻醉(GA)的频率,pH值,在清醒镇静(CS)下通过右小开胸手术进行微创二尖瓣手术(MIMVS)以避免GA的部分患者的PaCO2和PaO2。作者还旨在评估自主呼吸的围手术期管理。
    方法:回顾性研究,观察性研究。
    方法:单中心。
    方法:本研究纳入101例CS或GA下接受MIMVS的患者。
    方法:接受MIMVS的患者根据适应症标准在CS或GA下进行管理。
    结果:ICU住院(p=0.010),术后时间直到第一次液体摄入(p<0.0001),CS组的机械通气时间(p=0.004)短于GA组。没有患者从CS转换为GA。CS组体外循环(CPB)期间PaCO2明显低于GA组。然而,CPB终止时CS组PaCO2明显高于GA组。
    结论:在CS组中,有合并症的高龄患者接受二尖瓣手术,无术后并发症.作者的研究结果表明,CS下的MIMVS可能是一种潜在的微创方法,提供比GA下的MIMVS更快的恢复。
    OBJECTIVE: The aims of the present study were to evaluate and compare the safety and feasibility, including hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, frequency of conversion to general anesthesia (GA), pH, PaCO2, and PaO2, of selected patients who underwent minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) via a right minithoracotomy under conscious sedation (CS) to avoid GA. The authors also aimed to evaluate the perioperative management of spontaneous breathing.
    METHODS: A retrospective, observational study.
    METHODS: Single-center.
    METHODS: This study enrolled 101 patients who underwent MIMVS under CS or GA.
    METHODS: The patients who underwent MIMVS were managed under CS or GA according to indication criteria.
    RESULTS: ICU stay (p = 0.010), postoperative time until first fluid intake (p < 0.0001), and duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.004) were shorter in the CS group than in the GA group. No patients converted to GA from CS. PaCO2 during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in the CS group was significantly lower than that in the GA group. However, PaCO2 at the termination of CPB in the CS group was significantly higher than that in the GA group.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the CS group, advanced-age patients with comorbidities underwent mitral surgery without postoperative complications. The authors\' findings suggested that MIMVS under CS could be a potentially less-invasive method, providing a quicker recovery than MIMVS under GA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Investigate differences in the prevalence and severity of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after cardiac surgery via thoracotomy versus sternotomy are not well-understood.
    An observational cohort study.
    A tertiary care hospital.
    Four hundred twenty-eight patients (sternotomy: 192 patients, thoracotomy: 236 patients) who underwent mitral valve repair.
    A questionnaire about the severity of surgical wound pain evaluated with a numerical rating scale (NRS) was sent. NRS responses for current pain, peak pain in the last four weeks, and average pain in the last four weeks were evaluated.
    The main outcomes were the severity of CPSP evaluated using NRS and the prevalence of CPSP. CPSP was defined as pain >0 that developed after a surgical procedure. During the median follow-up of 29 months, 79 patients complained of CPSP. (sternotomy: 15 patients, thoracotomy: 64 patients). Multivariate ordinal logistic regression showed that NRS responses for current pain (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-6.12; p = 0.001), peak pain in the last four weeks (aOR, 2.00; 95% CI 1.11-3.61; p = 0.021), and average pain in the last four weeks (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI 1.31-3.72; p = 0.003) were significantly higher in patients who underwent thoracotomy. Multivariate logistic regression showed that thoracotomy was an independent predictor of CPSP (aOR, 3.63; 95% CI 1.67-7.88; p = 0.001).
    The prevalence and severity of CPSP were higher among patients who underwent mitral valve repair via thoracotomy than sternotomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号