Migration and health

移民与健康
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    真菌瘤是潜在真菌(真菌瘤)或细菌(放线菌瘤)起源的慢性感染。它的特征是肿瘤样肿胀的临床三联症,积极排水鼻窦和宏观颗粒的特征颜色。我们以一名接受免疫抑制治疗的66岁妇女为例,该妇女表现为足部大肿(Madurafoot)。培养的真菌是Acrophialophorafusispora该病例采用广泛的手术清创术治疗,并用万古霉素和伏立康唑浸渍的硫酸钙(Stimulan)珠包装。据作者所知,这是足部深部真菌感染手术治疗的新辅助手段。通过手术和口服抗真菌药物治疗的Eumycetoma治愈率为25%-35%。这种新颖的治疗方法似乎需要进一步研究提高治愈率的潜力。在8个月的随访中,我们的患者似乎进展良好,目前没有复发迹象.
    Mycetoma is a chronic infection of underlying fungal (eumycetoma) or bacterial (actinomycetoma) origin. It is characterised by a clinical triad of tumour-like swelling, actively draining sinuses and macroscopic grains of characteristic colours.We the case of a 66-year-old woman on immunosuppressive therapy presenting with eumycetoma of the foot (Madura foot). The fungal organism cultured was Acrophialophora fusisporaThis case was managed with a combination of extensive surgical debridement, and packing with calcium sulfate (Stimulan) beads impregnated with vancomycin and voriconazole. As far as the authors are aware, this is a novel adjunct to the surgical treatment of deep fungal infection in the foot.Eumycetoma treated with surgery and oral antifungal therapy leads to cure rates of 25%-35%. This novel treatment seems to bear further investigation for the potential to improve cure rates. At 8 months follow-up, our patient appears to be making good progress with no current signs of recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于经济原因,尼加拉瓜人在国内和国际上迁移了几个世纪,政治和社会文化因素。该国医疗保健系统的缺陷导致人们获得医疗保健和药品的不平等。汇款已成为重要的收入来源,部分投资于健康。
    研究的总体目标是在更广泛的社会经济转型背景下分析当代尼加拉瓜的移民与健康关系。
    这项研究采用了混合方法,结合定性访谈数据和定量调查数据。
    调查结果表明,移民通常是一种谋生策略,与争取更好的生活有关。健康问题间接地嵌入到人们的移动生计中,也直接影响移民动机。此外,移民对健康既有好处,也有坏处。移徙妇女的身体暴力和性暴力可以结束,内部移民可以更容易获得医疗保健和医疗服务,环境灾难造成的脆弱性可以通过移动来避免。此外,汇款可以改善人们的日常生活和健康。然而,移民也可能是一个压力和损害健康的事件。国际移民,特别是无证的,获得医疗保健可能会有问题,在边境口岸也经历了很多危险。跨国家庭可能因分离而在情感上和身体上都遭受痛苦。调查结果显示,移民家庭成员对身体健康的评价不如非移民家庭。
    尼加拉瓜人口的社会公民权得不到保障。这导致流动生计和需要跨地方社会支持(例如汇款)。移徙可能对移徙者及其家庭成员的健康产生积极和消极影响;地理距离和社会差异是结果的关键。
    Nicaraguans have migrated internally and internationally for centuries due to economic, political and sociocultural factors. Deficiencies in the country\'s health care system have produced inequities in people\'s access to health care and medicines. Remittances have become an important source of income, partly invested in health.
    The overall aim of the study was to analyse migration-health relations in contemporary Nicaragua within a broader context of socio-economic transformations.
    The study uses a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative interview data and quantitative survey data.
    The findings show that migration is commonly practised as a strategy for making a living and is related to the struggle for a better life. Health concerns are indirectly embedded in people\'s mobile livelihoods, but also directly influence migration motives. Furthermore, migration involves both advantages and disadvantages for health. Physical and sexual violence can come to an end for migrating women, health care and medicine can become more accessible for internal migrants, and vulnerabilities caused by environmental disasters can be avoided by moving. Moreover, remittances can improve people\'s everyday life and health. Yet migration can also be a stressful and health-damaging event. International migrants, particularly the undocumented, can have problems accessing health care, and also experience much danger at border crossings. Transnational families can suffer emotionally as well as physically due to separation. Findings from the survey show that family members of migrants do not rate their physical health as good as often as non-migrating families.
    The Nicaraguan population is not guaranteed its social rights of citizenship. This results in mobile livelihoods and the need for translocal social support (e.g. remittances). Migration can have both positive and negative effects on health for migrants and their family members; geographical distance and social differences are key to the outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Chinese immigrants in the Netherlands are less likely than other ethnic groups to utilize mainstream mental health care services. This study investigated the experiences of Chinese with mental health problems, to inform measures to make services more responsive to the needs of this group. Qualitative methods of analysis were applied to interview data in order to explore ways of finding help, barriers to accessing mainstream mental health care, experiences in care, factors jeopardizing the quality of care, and views on mental health services among Chinese migrants in the Netherlands. Rather than recruiting individuals with mental health problems, an indirect method was used in which ethnic Chinese participants were invited to tell us about one or more Chinese individuals in their social environment whom they regarded as having (had) mental health problems (Symbol: see text). Although most Chinese regarded mainstream Dutch care as the appropriate resource for dealing with mental health problems, many barriers to access and threats to care quality were reported. In contrast to the widely accepted view that cultural differences in health beliefs underlie the low utilization of mental health services by Chinese in the West, the main obstacles identified in this study concerned practical issues such as communication problems and lack of knowledge of the health system. Respondents also described concerns about entitlement to care and discrimination (actual or anticipated). Measures suggested by respondents for improving care included increased use of interpreters and cultural mediators, encouraging migrants to increase their language proficiency, and better dissemination of information about the health system. The article concludes with a discussion of the policy implications of these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号