背景:本综述旨在通过团队科学方法系统地识别和分类进行研究的障碍和促进者。
方法:PubMed,EMBASE,PsycINFO,Scopus,WebofScience,翡翠,并在ProQuest数据库中搜索了使用定量,定性,或混合方法。搜索中包括使用团队科学方法研究障碍和促进者的研究。两名独立审稿人筛选了文本,提取并编码数据。对所有35篇纳入的文章进行质量评估。确定的障碍和促进者被归类在人类,组织,和技术模型。
结果:来自9,381篇文章的35项研究符合纳入标准,从中确定了42个障碍和148个促进者。人的障碍是研究人员的特征,团队技能,和时间。我们认为人类促进者跨越九个子主题如下:研究人员的特点,角色,目标,通信,信任,冲突,学科距离,学术排名,合作经验。与组织有关的障碍是体制政策,团队科学整合,和资金。组织促进者如下:团队科学技能培训,体制政策,和评价。技术领域的促进者包括虚拟就绪和数据管理,技术障碍是技术的复杂性和隐私问题。
结论:我们确定了使用团队科学方法进行研究的主要障碍和促进因素。研究结果对该干预策略在研究中的持续和未来实施具有重要意义。这次审查的分析为决策者提供了证据,资金提供者,研究人员,和学生对现有的障碍和促进团队科学研究。
背景:本综述在PROSPERO数据库(PROSPERO2021CRD42021278704)上进行了前瞻性注册。
BACKGROUND: The present
review aimed to systematically identify and classify barriers and facilitators of conducting research with a team science approach.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Emerald, and ProQuest databases were searched for primary research studies conducted using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods. Studies examining barriers and facilitators of research with a team science approach were included in search. Two independent reviewers screened the texts, extracted and coded the data. Quality assessment was performed for all 35 included articles. The identified barriers and facilitators were categorized within Human, Organization, and Technology model.
RESULTS: A total of 35 studies from 9,381 articles met the inclusion criteria, from which 42 barriers and 148 facilitators were identified. Human barriers were characteristics of the researchers, teaming skills, and time. We consider Human facilitators across nine sub-themes as follows: characteristics of the researchers, roles, goals, communication, trust, conflict, disciplinary distances, academic rank, and collaboration experience. The barriers related to organization were institutional policies, team science integration, and funding. Organizational facilitators were as follows: team science skills training, institutional policies, and evaluation. Facilitators in the field of technology included virtual readiness and data management, and the technology barriers were complexity of techniques and privacy issues.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified major barriers and facilitators for conducting research with team science approach. The findings have important connotations for ongoing and future implementation of this intervention strategy in research. The analysis of this
review provides evidence to inform policy-makers, funding providers, researchers, and students on the existing barriers and facilitators of team science research.
BACKGROUND: This
review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO database (PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021278704).