BACKGROUND: Interrupted time series (ITS) studies contribute importantly to systematic reviews of population-level interventions. We aimed to develop and validate search filters to retrieve ITS studies in MEDLINE and PubMed.
METHODS: A total of 1017 known ITS studies (published 2013-2017) were analysed using text mining to generate candidate terms. A control set of 1398 time-series studies were used to select differentiating terms. Various combinations of candidate terms were iteratively tested to generate three search filters. An independent set of 700 ITS studies was used to validate the filters\' sensitivities. The filters were test-run in Ovid MEDLINE and the records randomly screened for ITS studies to determine their precision. Finally, all MEDLINE filters were translated to PubMed format and their sensitivities in PubMed were estimated.
RESULTS: Three search filters were created in MEDLINE: a precision-maximising filter with high precision (78%; 95% CI 74%-82%) but moderate sensitivity (63%; 59%-66%), most appropriate when there are limited resources to screen studies; a sensitivity-and-precision-maximising filter with higher sensitivity (81%; 77%-83%) but lower precision (32%; 28%-36%), providing a balance between expediency and comprehensiveness; and a sensitivity-maximising filter with high sensitivity (88%; 85%-90%) but likely very low precision, useful when combined with specific content terms. Similar sensitivity estimates were found for PubMed versions.
CONCLUSIONS: Our filters strike different balances between comprehensiveness and screening workload and suit different research needs. Retrieval of ITS studies would be improved if authors identified the ITS design in the titles.

UNASSIGNED: Few resources exist to support finding journals that accept case reports by specialty. In 2016, Katherine Akers compiled a list of 160 journals that accepted case reports, which many librarians continue to use 7 years later. Because journals\' editorial policies and submission guidelines evolve, finding publication venues for case reports poses a dynamic problem, consisting of reviewing a journal\'s author guidelines to determine if the journal accepts case report manuscripts. This project aimed to create a more up to date and extensive list of journals that currently accept case reports.
UNASSIGNED: 1,874 journal titles were downloaded from PubMed. The team reviewed each journal and identified journal titles that accept case reports. Additional inclusion factors included being indexed in MEDLINE, accessible on the internet, and accepting and publishing English language submissions.
UNASSIGNED: The new journal list includes 1,028 journals covering 129 specialties and is available on the Open Science Framework public page.

暂无摘要。

Two deprescribing search filters for MEDLINE and one deprescribing search filter for Embase have been recently developed, including objectively developed search filters. The objective of this case study was to implement these three deprescribing search filters in systematic review (SR) search strategies and to assess their effect on performances. SR that independently developed original search strategies (OSS) were selected. The deprescribing filters were implemented in each OSS, generating two implemented search strategies (ISS1 and ISS2) in MEDLINE and one ISS (ISS3) in Embase. OSS were re-run on the same date as ISS. The performances of ISS and OSS were calculated and compared. Two SR were included (SR1 and SR2). For MEDLINE, SR1 included 12 articles. The sensitivity was 50% for OSS, 58% for ISS1 and 42% for ISS2. SR2 included four articles. The sensitivity of OSS, ISS 1 and 2 was 25%. For Embase, SR1 included 12 articles. The sensitivity was 33% for OSS and 58% for ISS3. SR2 included four articles. None of the four included articles were retrieved with OSS or ISS3. While sensitivity of OSS was moderate, the objectively developed deprescribing filters maintained or slightly improved this sensitivity when implementing.

Realist methodologies are increasingly being used to evaluate complex interventions in health and social care. Programme theory (ideas and assumptions of how a particular intervention works) development is the first step in a realist evaluation or a realist synthesis, with literature reviews providing important evidence to support this. Deciding how to search for programme theories is challenging and there is limited guidance available. Using an example of identifying programme theories for a realist evaluation of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Instruments in clinical practice, the authors explore and compare several different approaches to literature searching and highlight important methodological considerations for those embarking on a programme theory review.
We compared the performance of an academic database search with a simple Google search and developed an optimised search strategy for the identification primary references (i.e. documents providing the clearest examples of programme theories) associated with the use of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Instruments (PU-RAIs). We identified the number of primary references and the total number of references retrieved per source. We then calculated the number needed to read (NNR) expressed as the total number of titles and abstracts screened to identify one relevant reference from each source.
The academic database search (comprising CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, HMIC, Medline) identified 2 /10 primary references with a NNR of 1395.The Google search identified 7/10 primary references with a NNR of 10.1. The combined NNR was 286.3. The optimised search combining Google and CINAHL identified 10/10 primary references with a NNR of 40.2.
The striking difference between the efficiency of the review\'s academic database and Google searches in finding relevant references prompted an in-depth comparison of the two types of search. The findings indicate the importance of including grey literature sources such as Google in this particular programme theory search, while acknowledging the need for transparency of methods. Further research is needed to facilitate improved guidance for programme theory searches to enhance practice in the realist field and to save researcher time and therefore resource.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the bibliometric profile of Tunisian \"case report\" publications in general surgery over the last thirty years (1989-2018).
METHODS: This is a descriptive bibliometric study on \"case reports\", general surgery, Tunisian affiliation, indexed in the Medline database, between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 2018. The themes of Search articles were defined by referring to their major keywords used for their indexing.
RESULTS: During 30 years of study, Medline indexed 188 papers in \"General Surgery\" type \"case reports\", signed by 80 authors in first position and 71 authors in last position, belonging to ten academic specialties and 19 professional affiliations. These papers were published by 60 journals, including the Ugandan magazine \"Pan African Medical Journal\", which published 23% of these \"case reports\" alone. The number of major indexing keywords was 299 words, mainly \"Echinococcosis\", \"Pancreatic Cancers\" and \"Echinococcosis of the liver\", together accounting for 18.1% of articles.
CONCLUSIONS: The plethora of \"case reports\" in Tunisian general surgery publications over the last three decades was accompanied by a preferential edition in the journal \"Pan Afr Med J\" and a thematic focus on hydatid cysts and cancers pancreatic. Hence the importance of strengthening the capacity of Tunisian surgeons in research methodology and scientific medical writing.

The objective of this chapter is to examine on the basis of the knowledge currently available the criteria available before labour for selecting women who would be eligible for trial of vaginal delivery.
Bibliographical research in French and English using the Medline and Cochrane databases between 1980 and 2019 and the recommendations of international societies.
It is recommended to offer women who wish to attempt a vaginal delivery at term a pelvimetry to decide with them on their mode of delivery (Grade C). The pelvimetric standards used at the time of the PREMODA study were anteroposterior diameter of inlet≥105mm, a transverse diameter of inlet≥120mm, a transverse interspinous diameter≥100mm. However, since there is no evidence about which pelvic measures to use, nor any evidence to set decision-making thresholds other than those set in published studies, the selected decision-making thresholds can be adjusted according to gestational age at delivery or fetal biometrics (Professional consensus). There is no argument for recommending the practice of pelvimetry in the case of delivery before 37 weeks gestational age (Professional consensus) and in the case of breech presentation discovered at the time of beginning of labour, the absence of pelvimetry alone does not contraindicate the attempt of vaginal delivery (Professional consensus). There is insufficient data to recommend the systematic use of fetal weight estimation and/or biparietal diameter measurement as acceptance criteria for a vaginal delivery attempt. In the event of a known fetal weight estimation before birth greater than 3800g, a cesarean section is to be preferred (Professional consensus). The breech presentation is not in itself a contraindication to an attempt of vaginal delivery for a small fetus for gestational age (Professional consensus). The presentation of the non-frank breech is not in itself a contraindication to an attempt of vaginal delivery (Professional consensus). In the case of premature breech delivery, current data do not allow to recommend one delivery route over another (Professional consensus). It is recommended to check the absence of hyperextension of the fetal head by ultrasound before an attempt of vaginal delivery (Professional consensus) and to prefer a cesarean section if such a position is found (Professional consensus). It is not recommended to propose a caesarean section with the sole reason of nulliparity (Grade C). The history of cesarean section is not in itself a contraindication to an attempt of vaginal delivery in the case of fetal breech presentation (Professional consensus). Premature rupture of the membranes is not in itself a contraindication to an attempt of vaginal delivery (Professional consensus).
A number of the factors analyzed in this chapter are to be incorporated into the decision-making process in order to choose with the woman whose fetus is in breech presentation the delivery route.

To evaluate the maternal, perinatal and long-term prognosis in the event of previable premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) and to specify the interventions likely to reduce the risks and improve the prognosis.
The PubMed database, the Cochrane Library and the recommendations from the French and foreign obstetrical societies or colleges have been consulted.
Previable PROM is a rare event whose frequency varies from 0.3 to 1% according to estimates (NP4). When occurring as a complication of amniocentesis, the prognosis is generally better than when spontaneous (NP3). Between 23 and 39% of women will deliver in the week following PROM and nearly 40% of women will not have given birth 2 weeks after (NP3). The frequency of medical termination of pregnancy varies greatly according to the studies (NP4), as does that of fetal death (NP4). Hospital survival and survival rates without major morbidity as a proportion of conservatively treated patients range from 17-55% and 26-63%, respectively (NP4). Neonatal prognosis is largely dominated by prematurity and its complications (NP3). The frequency of maternal sepsis varies from 0.8 to 4.8% in the most recent studies (NP4). Only one case of maternal death is reported, although 3 cases were identified in France between 2007 and 2012 (NP3). Information is a major component of the care to be provided to women and their partners (Professional consensus). An initial period of hospitalization may be proposed after previable PROM (Professional consensus). Thereafter, there is no argument to recommend hospital management rather than extra-hospital management when there is no argument in favour of intrauterine infection (Professional consensus). An evaluation of the amount of amniotic fluid by ultrasound may be proposed at the initial consultation and after a period of 7 to 14 days if pregnancy continues (Professional consensus). Prophylactic antibiotic treatment is recommended as soon as PROM is diagnosed (Professional consensus). The gestational age at which corticosteroid therapy may be proposed will depend on the thresholds selected for neonatal resuscitation care. In particular, it will take into account parental positioning (Professional consensus). From the time of the decision to perform neonatal resuscitation until the gestational age of 32 weeks, it is recommended to administer MgSO4 to the woman whose delivery is imminent (Grade A). Tocolysis is not recommended in this context (Professional consensus). In certain situations, meeting strictly the conditions mentioned by the CSP article L. 2213-1, a maternal request for medical interruption of pregnancy may be discussed.
The levels of evidence of scientific work on the management of previable PROM are low, therefore, most of the recommendations proposed here are based on professional agreement by \"reasonable\" extension of recommendations valid for later gestational ages.

BACKGROUND: Subdural empyema can present as a spinal subdural empyema (SSE) or a cranial subdural empyema (CSE). Although they differ somewhat in epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiology, and symptomatology and occur separately, they rarely manifest together. The aim of this article is to review the literature concerning the clinical presentation, clinical course, and treatment options for managing concurrently occurring SSE and CSE.
METHODS: The literature in the Medline database was reviewed with key words including but not limited to subdural empyema, retroclival empyema, and Streptococcus mitis. No similar reports were found in the database involving infection with this type of microorganism in this anatomical region.
RESULTS: Only 3 cases with concurrent CSE and SSE were found in the literature caused by various etiologic agents. Two of the patients recovered with no neurologic deficit, whereas one fatality was reported. One new illustrative case caused by Streptococcus mitis is also presented.
CONCLUSIONS: CSE and SSE are neurosurgical emergencies, often requiring prompt surgical evacuation. Although very rare, Streptococcus mitis can cause spinal subdural empyema or retroclival abscesses. Natural history of this disease is grave without treatment. Delays in diagnosis and treatment are directly related to mortality and severe morbidity in patients with intracranial and spinal subdural empyema. Prompt recognition and treatment are essential to preclude severe neurologic disabilities or in rare cases a fatal outcome. A treatment paradigm for cranio-spinal empyema is proposed.

BACKGROUND: In naturally occurring numbers the frequencies of digits 1-9 in the leading position are counterintuitively distributed because the frequencies of occurrence are unequal. Benford-Newcomb\'s law describes the expected distribution of these frequencies. It was previously shown that known fraudulent articles consistently violated this law.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the features of 12 known fraudulent articles from a single Japanese author to the features of 13 articles in the same research field from other Japanese authors, published during the same time period and identified with a Medline database search.
RESULTS: All 25 articles were assessed to determine whether the data violated the law. Formulas provided by the law were used to determine the frequencies of occurrence for the first two leading digits in manually extracted numbers. It was found that all the known fraudulent papers violated the law and 6 of the 13 articles used for comparison followed the law. Assuming that the articles in the comparison group were not falsified or fabricated, the sensitivity of assessing articles with Benford-Newcomb\'s law was 100% (95% confidence interval CI: 73.54-100%) but the specificity was only 46.15% (95% CI: 19.22-74.87%) and the positive predictive value was 63.16% (95% CI: 38.36-83.71%).
CONCLUSIONS: All 12 of the known falsified articles violated Benford-Newcomb\'s law, which indicated that this analysis had a high sensitivity. The low specificity of the assessment may be explained by the assumptions made about the articles identified for comparison. Violations of Benford-Newcomb\'s law about the frequencies of the leading digits cannot serve as proof of falsification but they may provide a basis for deeper discussions between the editor and author about a submitted work.