Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a syndrome with a high burden on public health. Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) has proven to be a highly effective treatment option. This retrospective analysis evaluated the safety of maxillomandibular advancement with rotation in patients with OSA. A total of 63 patients with OSA were included in this study. Surgical treatment by maxillomandibular advancement was virtually planned based on preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). A 3D printed guide and a customised implant were used for surgical transfer. The safety of MMA was evaluated based on the necessity of postoperative intermediate care unit (IMCU) stay, duration of stay in hospital, and recording of medical complications. A total of 63.5% of the OSA patients treated by MMA (n = 40/63) were postoperatively transferred from the recovery room directly to the regular ward, while 36.5% of the patients (n = 23/63) stayed on IMCU for at least one night. On average, the length of hospitalisation was four days after surgery. One patient from the ward group and one patient from the IMCU group developed a major complication according to Clavian-Dindo classification grade IV. MMA is a safe surgical procedure. The necessity for postoperative monitoring in an IMCU setting should be based on an individual risk evaluation. However, since major complications can occur, MMA should be performed as an inpatient procedure in a hospital with available intensive medicine care. This study underlines the safety of MMA in OSA patients.

To identify potential predictors of surgical response to maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) from the most common clinically available data (patient-related, polysomnographic, cephalometric, and surgical variables).
This was a retrospective study comprised of consecutive patients who underwent MMA for moderate to severe OSA. Relevant clinical, polysomnographic, cephalometric, and surgical variables were collected as independent variables (predictors). The association of the independent variables with a favorable surgical response to MMA was assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses.
In 100 patients (82% male; mean age 50.5 years), the mean apnea hypopnea index [AHI] was 53.1 events/h. The rate of favorable surgical response was 67%. Based on multivariate analysis, patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) had 0.140 times lower odds of a favorable response to MMA (OR: 0.140 [0.038, 0.513], P = 0.003). For each 1-unit increase in central apnea index (CAI) and superior posterior airway space (SPAS), there were 0.828 and 0.724 times lower odds to respond favorably to MMA (OR: 0.828 [0.687, 0.997], P = 0.047; and 0.724 [0.576, 0.910], P = 0.006), respectively.
The findings of this study suggest that the surgical outcome of MMA may be less favorable when patients with OSA have certain phenotypic characteristics: the presence of CVD, higher CAI and larger SPAS. If confirmed in future studies, these variables may guide patient selection for MMA.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients with a percentage of central and mixed apnea index in the total apnea-hypopnea index (CMAI%) ≧25%. Patients treated with MMA for OSA were retrospectively evaluated for baseline and postoperative patient data and polysomnographic results. The pre- and postoperative obstructive, central and mixed apnea parameters were compared. Of the included 78 patients, 21 patients (27%) presented with CMAI% ≧25% (median CMAI%, 49.1%; 35.9-63.8) prior to MMA. In 67% of these cases, MMA resulted in CMAI% <25 (median CMAI%, 6.1%; 2.1-8.9) and significantly improved the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (p < 0.001), the lowest oxyhemoglobin saturation (p < 0.001), central and mixed apnea index (p < 0.001), percentage of central and mixed apneas of total AHI (p = 0.004), central apnea index (p < 0.001), and mixed apnea index (p < 0.001). CMAI% ≧25% emerged in 25% of patients after MMA (median CMAI%, 49.1%; 35.9-63.8). Within the undeniable limitations of the study, it seems that the presence of CMAI% ≧25% should not be regarded as a contraindication for MMA in OSA patients.

An innovative approach for the primary and definitive treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adult patients is presented: Bilateral Internal Ramus Distraction of the mandible (BIRD), which is a slow, progressive and more stable procedure to advance the mandibular bone. This study investigated whether this surgical approach is useful to cure OSA.
Study design was of an interventional (surgical) one-arm trial of OSA patients assessed before and 12 months after BIRD. All patients were evaluated by pre- and post-operative polysomnography and three-dimensional scans. The amount of skeletal advancement, percentage of upper airway volume increase and postoperative value of mandibular occlusal plane were the predictor variables. Changes in the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and percentage of time with saturation under 90% (TC90) were the main outcome variables.
Thirty-two subjects with a mean ± SD age of 41.9 ± 13.3 years and 87.5% male were included, and they were followed-up 32 ± 14.2 months. AHI was 47.9 ± 23.1 per hour before surgery and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) was 13.4 ± 4.4. Postoperative AHI was 4.8 ± 5.6 per hour 12 months after surgery (P < 0.001), with 81.2% of the patients considered cured (AHI<5) and 18.8% suffering from a mild-to-moderate residual OSA. ESS decreased to 1.9 ± 1.8 at the end of the surgical treatment (P < 0.001). 3D changes revealed an upper airway volume increase of 188.4% ± 73.5% (P < 0.001).
Lengthening the mandibular ramus by distraction osteogenesis to cure OSA appears to be more effective and safer when compared to other surgical protocols, especially in very severe cases with initial AHI>50/h. Titration of the mandibular advancement weekly using respiratory polygraphy allows better healing control and customization of the skeletal advancement, enhancing the aesthetic result.

UNASSIGNED: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder associated with significant morbidities and mortality if untreated. Continuous positive airway pressure is the gold standard treatment for OSA, but poor adherence significantly limits its use. However, there is evidence to support the effectiveness of surgical treatments for OSA.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to assess the experience of sleep physicians in Saudi Arabia in treating OSA using surgical options.
UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study featured an electronic survey that was sent to all sleep physicians across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between January 2018 and March 2018. The questionnaire contained questions on the demographics of the physicians and the types of surgical referral for patients with OSA.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-six physicians completed the questionnaire. More than two-thirds of the physicians preferred to refer their patients to otolaryngologists (69.23%), while the remainder preferred to refer their patients to oral and maxillofacial surgeons (23.07%). More than half of the physicians indicated that maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) was the most effective surgical procedure (53.8%), followed by adenotonsillectomy (19.2%), then uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) (11.5%). Four physicians (15.4%) chose \"none\" as the best answer. More participants indicated that the benefits outweighed the risks for MMA (53.84%) than for UPPP (19.23%).
UNASSIGNED: Based on the opinions of sleep physicians in Saudi Arabia, MMA is the best surgical option for the treatment of moderate to severe OSA. Otolaryngologists are the preferred surgeons because they are more available than oral and maxillofacial surgeons physicians, who are scarce in Saudi Arabia.

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and feasibility of inverted-L osteotomy (ILO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment. According to different surgery procedures, 28 OSA patients who underwent maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) were divided into 2 groups (group A: ILO, n = 9; group B: SSRO, n = 19). Polysomnography (PSG) and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) on T0, T1and T2 were used to evaluate the effectiveness of OSA treatments. Patients\' airway structures and facial appearances were also evaluated. From T0 to T1, the mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI,/per hour) dropped from 69.2 ± 8.4 to11.2 ± 2.4 (P < 0.01) in group A and from 54.6 ± 14.6 to 9.4 ± 5.4 (P < 0.01) in group B; LSpO2 (lowest pulse oxygen saturation, %) increased from 66.5 ± 7.7% to 88.2 ± 4.6 (P < 0.01) and from 76.6 ± 10.7%to 89.4 ± 2.4% (P < 0.01) while the mean ESS score decreased by 51% in group A and 44% in group B. Most patients (group A: 88.9%; group B: 84.3%) were satisfied with their postoperative appearance. Mild relapse was observed in both groups on T2. This study concluded that MMA containing ILO and MMA containing SSRO are both feasible and effective for selected OSA patients.

Cephalometric variables that can be used to identify patients with obstructive sleep apnoea who are suitable for mandibular advancement splints and surgical maxillomandibular advancement are lacking. The aim of this pilot study was to describe the craniofacial characteristics of patients whose symptoms of obstructive sleep apnoea were successfully treated with mandibular advancement splints and who were subsequently considered for maxillomandibular advancement. We retrospectively compared the craniofacial characteristics of our patients with data from 2 previously published studies. There were significant differences between the 2 groups for ANB (p<0.000), overjet (p<0.0001), Go-Me (p<0.0002), and ANS-PNS (p<0.0009). Patients, whose symptoms improve with the use of mandibular advancement splints and are potential candidates for maxillomandibular advancement, may have unique craniofacial features consisting of bimaxillary retrusion characterised by a shorter maxilla and mandible, and a greater class II skeletal tendency. The results of this study should be viewed as a pilot. Further research is required.