Maxillomandibular advancement has been shown to be an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea; however, the literature focuses mainly on sleep-related parameters such as apnea-hypopnea index, respiratory disturbance index and Epworth sleepiness scale. Other factors that may be important to patients, such as esthetics, patient satisfaction, nasality, swallowing problems and so forth have been reported in the literature but have not been systematically studied. Together with an information specialist, an extensive search in Medline, Embase and Scopus yielded 1592 unique articles. Titles and abstracts were screened by two blinded reviewers. In total, 75 articles were deemed eligible for full-text screening and 38 articles were included for qualitative synthesis. The most common categories of non-sleep related outcomes found were surgical accuracy, facial esthetics, functional outcomes, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and emotional health. All categories were reported using heterogenous methods, such that meta-analysis could not be performed. There was lack of consistent methods to assess these outcomes. This work is the first to systematically review non-sleep related outcomes of maxillomandibular advancement. Despite growing interest in evaluating surgical outcomes through patient subjective experiences, this review points to the need of standardized, validated methods to report these outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of maxillomandibular advancement surgery in the treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea by comparing the pre- and postoperative Apnea and Hypopnea Index, in addition to classifying the degree of evidence and risk of intervention bias.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out in the PUBMED, LILACS, EMBASE, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE and COCHRANE platforms, including cohort studies with polysomnographic follow-up, without other associated pharyngeal or nasal surgical procedures. The risk of study bias was assessed using the Modified Delphi technique. Pre- and postoperative Apnea and Hypopnea Index data were plotted for meta-analysis, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system.
RESULTS: Of 1882 references, 32 articles were selected for full-text reading, of which four studies were included, totaling 83 adults with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent maxillomandibular advancement. The meta-analysis was in favor of the intervention (DM = -33.36, 95% CI -41.43 to -25.29, p < 0.00001), with a mean percentage reduction in the Apnea and Hypopnea Index of 79.5% after surgery, even though the level of evidence was classified as very low quality by the GRADE system.
CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis was in favor of the intervention, characterizing maxillomandibular advancement surgery as an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in adults.

This systematic review provides supporting evidence for the accompanying clinical practice guideline on the referral of adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) for surgical consultation.
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine commissioned a task force of experts in sleep medicine. A systematic review was conducted to identify studies that compared the use of upper airway sleep apnea surgery or bariatric surgery to no treatment as well as studies that reported on patient-important and physiologic outcomes pre- and postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the clinical significance of using surgery to treat obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) process was used to assess the evidence for making recommendations.
The literature search resulted in 274 studies that provided data suitable for statistical analyses. The analyses demonstrated that surgery as a rescue therapy results in a clinically significant reduction in excessive sleepiness, snoring, blood pressure (BP), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), respiratory disturbance index (RDI), and oxygen desaturation index (ODI); an increase in lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT) and sleep quality; and an improvement in quality of life in adults with OSA who are intolerant or unaccepting of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. The analyses demonstrated that surgery as an adjunctive therapy results in a clinically significant reduction in optimal PAP pressure and improvement in PAP adherence in adults with OSA who are intolerant or unaccepting of PAP due to side effects associated with high pressure requirements. The analyses also demonstrated that surgery as an initial treatment results in a clinically significant reduction in AHI/RDI, sleepiness, snoring, BP, and ODI and an increase in LSAT in adults with OSA and major anatomical obstruction. Analysis of bariatric surgery data showed a clinically significant reduction in BP, AHI/RDI, sleepiness, snoring, optimal PAP level, BMI, and ODI and an increase in LSAT in adults with OSA and obesity. Analyses of very limited evidence suggested that upper airway surgery does not result in a clinically significant increase in risk of serious persistent adverse events and suggested that bariatric surgery may result in a clinically significant risk of iron malabsorption that may be managed with iron supplements. The task force provided a detailed summary of the evidence along with the quality of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use considerations.
Kent D, Stanley J, Aurora RN, et al. Referral of adults with obstructive sleep apnea for surgical consultation: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(12):2507-2531.

Multilevel surgery (MLS) and maxillomandibular advancement surgery (MMA) are two established options in surgical management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which target different levels of airway obstruction. The objective of this review was to comparatively evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of MMA and MLS in the treatment of OSA. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for studies on MMA and/or MLS in OSA patients. Twenty MMA studies and 39 MLS studies were identified. OSA patients who underwent MMA showed significant improvements in AHI, LSAT, ODI, and ESS by -46.2/h, 13.5%, -30.3/h, and -8.5, respectively. The pooled rates of surgical success and cure for MMA were 85.0% and 46.3%, respectively. Patients who underwent MLS showed significant improvements in AHI, LSAT, ODI, and ESS by -24.7/h, 8.7%, -19.1/h, and -5.8, respectively. The pooled surgical success and cure rates for MLS were 65.1% and 28.1%, respectively. The rates of major complication of MMA and MLS were 3.2% and 1.1%, respectively, and the rate of minor complication of MMA was higher than that of MLS. We conclude that both MMA and MLS are effective treatment options for OSA. Compared to MLS, MMA may be more effective in improving OSA. However, the complication rate of MMA is higher.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of eight different surgical treatments based on maxillomandibular advancement (MMA), which has emerged in recent years, for adult obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients.
METHODS: The literature was searched from January 2010 to May 2020 for studies of adult OSA patients with different types of MMA procedures to perform a network meta-analysis. The outcomes were changes in the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), the lowest pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2 min) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Treatment hierarchy was summarized according to the rank charts.
RESULTS: Eight studies were included and encompassed a total of 227 adult patients diagnosed with OSA. Among them, 225 patients underwent combined surgery or simple MMA surgery, including modified maxillomandibular advancement (MMMA),counterclockwise maxillomandibular advancement (CMMA), drug-induced sleep endoscopy and maxillomandibular advancement (MMA + DISE), transoral robotic surgery and maxillomandibular advancement (MMA + TORS), uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), maxillomandibular advancement and uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (MMA + UPPP), uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with uvula preservation and maxillomandibular advancement (MMA + HUPPP); MMA consisting of Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral inverted-L osteotomy (ILOs), genioplasty and iliac bone grafting; and MMA consisting of Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies and genioplasty. The results showed that the most effective surgical treatment is MMA + HUPPP [- 56.79 (WMD); 95% confidence interval (CI): - 113.02 to - 3.33] (P < 0.00001), which was far superior to other approaches.
CONCLUSIONS: MMA combined with HUPPP had the highest efficacy. The MMA consisted of Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies and genioplasty; CMMA and MMA + TORS are likely also great choices.

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is characterized by repeated upper airway collapse leading to oxygen desaturation resulting in cardiovascular and neurocognitive sequelae. Upper airway surgeries such as palatopharyngoplasty, tongue base surgery, and maxillomandibular advancement can improve patient tolerance of continuous positive airway pressure, quality of life, and the severity of OSA. Upper airway stimulation (UAS) of the hypoglossal nerve is a contemporary US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment modality for OSA with a fundamentally different mechanism. We report the case of a 65-year-old male with a high body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, dentofacial deformity, and severe OSA. He presented with a respiratory distress index (RDI) of 89.1 events per hour, apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) of 82.7 events per hour, and minimum oxygen saturation of 75%. He chose to undergo UAS. Initially, complete concentric collapse of the velum was found during drug-induced sedation endoscopy, which was converted by palatopharyngoplasty to meet inclusion criteria for UAS. The patient achieved surgical cure with postoperative RDI and AHI of 2 events per hour with minimum oxygen saturation of 83%, and resolution of daytime somnolence. UAS is an effective surgical option to broaden the surgeon\'s ability to treat OSA, especially if facial skeletal surgery is contraindicated or declined by the patient with dentofacial deformity.

The primary objective of this review was to establish the effectiveness of maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) as a successful treatment modality in improving airway patency in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). A systematic and detailed search was performed using PubMed Central, covering the period January 2000 to December 2015, with well-defined selection criteria. The authors independently conducted the study selection, data extraction, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. The outcome measures studied were the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), respiratory disturbance index (RDI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT), and body mass index (BMI). The random-effects model was adopted for meta-analysis as moderate heterogeneity was identified. The analysis revealed significant changes in the outcome measures after the intervention. The results showed that the preoperative severity of OSA based on AHI and RDI significantly influences the outcome of MMA intervention, with a strong positive correlation between the pre MMA AHI values and the percentage change post intervention. The surgical success of MMA in patients with OSA was found to be 100% with respect to AHI and RDI scores. It is concluded that MMA is a successful treatment for OSA.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to systematically review polysomnography data and sleepiness in morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥40 kg/m(2)) patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treated with either a maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) or a tracheostomy and to evaluate the outcomes.
METHODS: MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library.
METHODS: A search was performed from inception through April 8, 2014, in each database.
RESULTS: Six maxillomandibular advancement studies (34 patients, age 42.42 ± 9.13 years, mean BMI 44.88 ± 4.28 kg/m(2)) and 6 tracheostomy studies (14 patients, age 52.21 ± 10.40 years, mean BMI 47.93 ± 7.55 kg/m(2)) reported individual patient data. The pre- and post-MMA means ± SDs for apnea-hypopnea indices were 86.18 ± 33.25/h and 9.16 ± 7.89/h (P < .00001), and lowest oxygen saturations were 66.58% ± 16.41% and 87.03% ± 5.90% (P < .00001), respectively. Sleepiness following MMA decreased in all 5 patients for whom it was reported. The pre- and posttracheostomy mean ± SD values for apnea indices were 64.43 ± 41.35/h and 1.73 ± 2.68/h (P = .0086), oxygen desaturation indices were 69.20 ± 26.10/h and 41.38 ± 36.28/h (P = .22), and lowest oxygen saturations were 55.17% ± 16.46% and 79.83% ± 4.36% (P = .011), respectively. Two studies reported outcomes for Epworth Sleepiness Scale for 5 patients, with mean ± SD values of 18.80 ± 4.02 before tracheostomy and 2.80 ± 2.77 after tracheostomy (P = .0034).
CONCLUSIONS: Data for MMA and tracheostomy as treatment for morbidly obese, adult OSA patients are significantly limited. We caution surgeons about drawing definitive conclusions from these limited studies; higher level studies are needed.

Obstructive sleep apnoea is ideally treated by continuous positive airway pressure, but other options are needed because its clinical effectiveness is limited by poor acceptance and tolerance, which results in suboptimal compliance. Patients often prefer operation, with maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) being the most effective approach. In this systematic review we have assessed its effects on the upper airway and surrounding structures in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. After a structured search of electronic databases and hand searching, we retrieved 104 publications. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 studies remained. From these we extracted data on study design, sample size, patients, methods and measurement, and outcomes. The quality of each study was assessed objectively. The heterogeneity of samples and outcome measures prevented a meta-analysis. MMA was shown to be an effective treatment of sleep apnoea. Primary and secondary MMA resulted in mean reductions in the apnoea-hypopnoea index/respiratory disturbance index of 61-92% and 82-92%, respectively. The operation not only enlarges the upper airway in the anteroposterior and lateral dimensions, but also raises the hyoid. Only 7 studies reported the relations between improvement in sleep apnoea and changes in the upper airway and surrounding structures, and only one correlated it with skeletal advancement. The studies were of low or medium quality. There were insufficient data to support a relation between improvement in sleep apnoea and changes in the upper airway and surrounding structures because of the contradictory results and poor quality of most studies.